1998 Chevrolet Blazer Consumer Reviews

1998 Chevrolet Blazer

Change

1998 Chevrolet Blazer

Kelley Blue Book Retail $2,600–$3,300  

Average Rating

3.5 out of 5
Review This Car
Comfort:3.4 out of 5
Performance:3.5 out of 5
Exterior Styling:3.8 out of 5
Interior Design:3.7 out of 5
Value for the Money:3.5 out of 5
Reliability:3.2 out of 5

8 out of 13 people would recommended this car to a friend

Consumer Reviews

Page 1 of 2 Next Page

kg

by kg
from nh | December 1, 2011

Rating from

(4)
Comfort: 5 out of 5
Performance: 4 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 4 out of 5
Interior Design: 4 out of 5
Value for the Money: 5 out of 5
Reliability: 4 out of 5

"We have had about 6 blazers in the family. All have been a good vec. great tow and work truck, good ride."

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: Used

Primary use for this car: Transporting family


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

1 out of 1 found this review helpful

Garbage

by Brian
from Placerville, CA | April 26, 2011

Rating from

(1)
Comfort: 1 out of 5
Performance: 2 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 2 out of 5
Interior Design: 1 out of 5
Value for the Money: 1 out of 5
Reliability: 1 out of 5

"This is not a well made vehicle. Problems with fuel pumps are common ($900 repair), as are clogged spider injectors (also $900). I spoke with 3 mechanics who all said they saw these Blazers for these issues all the time, especially years 97-98. (My tow truck driver said his brother had to replace the fuel pump 3 times during the life of his earlier model Blazer.) When the vehicle is working, ride comfort is not good, noise levels are extremely high, handling is atrocious, and the vehicle just feels plain clunky. Avoid!"

I would recommend this car to a friend: No

This vehicle was purchased: Used

Primary use for this car: Towing


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

1 out of 1 found this review helpful

Best first car

by Brett
from Kansas City, MO | March 6, 2011

Rating from

(5)
Comfort: 4 out of 5
Performance: 4 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 5 out of 5
Interior Design: 3 out of 5
Value for the Money: 4 out of 5
Reliability: 5 out of 5

"Parents bought it new, i drove it after it was already 12 years old and besides for the stains on the floors its as good as new. 86,000 miles on it and it runs like a beauty."

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: Transporting family


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

1 out of 1 found this review helpful

Good starter

by General Motors Expert
from mansfield, Ohio | September 20, 2009

Rating from

(5)
Comfort: 5 out of 5
Performance: 5 out of 5
Handling: 5 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 5 out of 5
Interior Design: 5 out of 5
Features: 5 out of 5
Value for the Money: 5 out of 5
Reliability: 5 out of 5

"This is a great starter car, very reliable, never had any problems with it, and is great off roads."

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: Used

Primary use for this car: Having fun


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

2 out of 2 found this review helpful

You won't be disappointed

by SUV Man
from Frederick, MD | September 19, 2009

Rating from

(5)
Comfort: 5 out of 5
Performance: 5 out of 5
Handling: 5 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 5 out of 5
Interior Design: 5 out of 5
Features: 4 out of 5
Value for the Money: 5 out of 5
Reliability: 5 out of 5

"Bought New in '98. If you have had water pump problems its because of Dex-cool. Any other recurring problems are so easily fixed - Do it yourself and buy GOOD replacement brands! I have only ever had to do major maintenance once - Intake manifold gasket. The AC dies under warranty which is on par for GM vehicles (Expect this) I ABSOLUTELY LOVE THIS VEHICLE AND WANT TO MAKE IT LAST FOREVER!!! This vehicle has a nice interior, it is very comfortable and the AC (With the cheap Delphi compressor replaced with an AC Delco) is very cold, sometimes even too cold. The electric mirrors don't work any more, they died after about 8 years, but the defrosters still work. Engine still has plenty of power after 145K miles, EASY TO REPAIR!! EASIER TO TUNE-UP THAN MY '95 S10! My maintenance: (Routine stuff not listed. i.e. brakes, oil, filters, consumable parts) -AC Compressor -Parking brake pedal assy -Front Wiper Motor (once, then never again) -4-wheel drive switch (got rear-ended & my coffee went into it and made it stick) -Intake manifold gasket -3 waterpumps (Before I changed from Dex-cool to the old school coolant, since then: never) -Repaired 1 rust spot Pretty good for 145K in my opinion. None of them were too hard. More time consuming than hard. Longest was 5 days and that was intake manifold gasket + all the upper gaskets just because I was in the neighborhood."

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: Transporting family


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

2 out of 2 found this review helpful

Will drive it till it dies

by Karsailz
from Cinton Twp. MI. | June 15, 2009

Rating from

(4)
Comfort: 4 out of 5
Performance: 5 out of 5
Handling: 4 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 5 out of 5
Interior Design: 5 out of 5
Features: 5 out of 5
Value for the Money: 5 out of 5
Reliability: 4 out of 5

"I recently bought a 98 LS 4X4 4DR. with 200K on it. It is in very nice condition, never painted( all original paint) or smashed, mint interior etc. Things I know have been replaced: Transmission,ball joints, fuel pump , wiper motor, alternator, EGR valve, rear differential,shocks, drivers door pins. Things I fixed- wheel bearings, rear wiper motor, universal joints,a/c compressor,tensioner, brake pads, front rotors and new tires. Im in it for about $3,000 including repairs. Drives and looks new. Very happy."

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: Used

Primary use for this car: Just getting around


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

1 out of 2 found this review helpful

Test Drive

by SUV Trouble
from Dublin, OH | May 14, 2009

Rating from

(1)
Comfort: 1 out of 5
Performance: 1 out of 5
Handling: 1 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 4 out of 5
Interior Design: 3 out of 5
Features: 2 out of 5
Value for the Money: 1 out of 5
Reliability: 2 out of 5

"Drive the vehicle before reviewing it. which, mean I drive test before I decided to buy this nice truck. I personally find some few problems: ? Outside mirriors control doesn't works ? Weak Breaks ? Tires/Wheels is to big ? Poor acceleration ? Tail Light lose ? Right rear seat wonldn"t fold down ? Few rusty spots."

I would recommend this car to a friend: No

This vehicle was purchased: Used

Primary use for this car: Outdoor sports (hiking, cycling, etc.)


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

0 out of 2 found this review helpful

Least Reliable Car I've ever owned

by BlazerMoneyTrap
from New Jersey | June 27, 2008

Rating from

(2)
Comfort: 3 out of 5
Performance: 3 out of 5
Handling: 1 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 3 out of 5
Interior Design: 3 out of 5
Features: 3 out of 5
Value for the Money: 1 out of 5
Reliability: 1 out of 5

"Look on any blazer forum and you can see the same things failing early: water pump, door pins, wiper motor, tranfer case seals, loose steering, ball joints, coil pack, .... Worst design I've ever seen."

I would recommend this car to a friend: No

This vehicle was purchased: Used

Primary use for this car: N/A


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

1 out of 2 found this review helpful

Solid Vehicle - B Student All the Way

by Vegas Wms
from N Utah | May 5, 2007

Rating from

(4)
Comfort: 4 out of 5
Performance: 5 out of 5
Handling: 3 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 4 out of 5
Interior Design: 5 out of 5
Features: 5 out of 5
Value for the Money: 4 out of 5
Reliability: 4 out of 5

"Plenty of power for towing, hauling, and passing. Relatively comfortable. Only two mechanical issues: alternator went out @ 60k miles (no reoccurrence after that) and weird suspension noises when full opposite lock / vibration @ 65-75 mph (hasn't effected driveability and I've seen this on other GM trucks). Very reliable other than those hick-ups. Was $8k less expensive than the similarly equipped 4-Runner I cross-shopped. Relatively comfortable and love the adjustable lumbar support. Cat-con hump on the passenger side is VERY uncomfortable during a long drive. Decent cargo capacity and chock full of comfort / convenience features (dual sun-visors, cargo cover that extends sideways vs. front-to-back making it easier for short folks, grab handles, overhead console, many others) and storage cubbies. Overall pleased w/ my purchase; 10 model years old and plan to keep at least 3-4 more years."

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: Used

Primary use for this car: N/A


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

0 out of 0 found this review helpful

best car i have owned

by chevy guy
from oklahoma | April 18, 2007

Rating from

(5)
Comfort: 4 out of 5
Performance: 4 out of 5
Handling: 4 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 3 out of 5
Interior Design: 4 out of 5
Features: 5 out of 5
Value for the Money: 5 out of 5
Reliability: 4 out of 5

"mine has all the options including leather seats , heated mirrors, heated seats, power windows, power locks, radio stays on till door is open, ccd player, cassette theft lock radio, bucket seats in front, center console, rear hatch open button, full size spare, tinted windows also luggae rack , driving lights, fog lamps, auto on head lights , over head consloe with compass, miles per gallon fuel used , miles till on empty, instant fuel economy, outside temp, love the way it handles would ride better with new shocks good gas mileage 17 in town and on highway still getting 21 bought it used 1998 170 000 miles no leaks no mess, i"

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: Used

Primary use for this car: N/A


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

1 out of 1 found this review helpful

Page 1 of 2 Next Page
*Invoice prices are made available by Cars.com and are not dealer advertising. All prices are subject to regional variations. Prices last updated 9/23/10. Click here for more information.