2007 Land Rover Range Rover Consumer Reviews

2007 Land Rover Range Rover

Change

2007 Land Rover Range Rover

Kelley Blue Book Retail $27,700–$33,400  

Best Bet

Average Rating

3.4 out of 5
Review This Car
Comfort:4.3 out of 5
Performance:3.9 out of 5
Exterior Styling:4.6 out of 5
Interior Design:4.0 out of 5
Value for the Money:2.8 out of 5
Reliability:2.6 out of 5

5 out of 9 people would recommended this car to a friend

Consumer Reviews

Page 1 of 1

Breaks Down Way Too Much and Dangereous 2007 HSE

by bigbangbar
from Los angeles, CA | February 3, 2013

Rating from

(1)
Comfort: 2 out of 5
Performance: 2 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 3 out of 5
Interior Design: 4 out of 5
Value for the Money: 1 out of 5
Reliability: 1 out of 5

"This SUV is a nightmare, expensive upkeep, the seat is very uncomfortable on long trips leaving your bottom sore. I bought mine used with about 62K miles on it but by the time i got to 78K miles the vehicle has cost about 9K in repairs, First the engine wasn't in line with the belts on the water pump so it had to be shimmed as it was a recall from the factory because it kept chewing up the belt. You would figure for a nearly 90K new vehicle the factory could line up the engine correctly to the attached equipment. The suspension keeps failing and it won't go back up on the airbags. One time I was driving it about 35 miles an hour coming down a steep hill and the complete brake system locked right up on me. I bought my 2007 for 35K in late 2011 and now in early 2013 its only worth about 18K on a trade in and 24K at retail. Adding the repairs and the depreciation this vehicle has cost me about 26K in 15 months. Thats nearly 2K a month for this terrible vehicle. I would even hesitate owning one if I was given one for free. Do yourself a favor and buy a dependable chevy tahoe like I just did and save yourself lots of headache and towing expenses."

I would recommend this car to a friend: No

This vehicle was purchased: Used

Primary use for this car: Transporting family


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

5 out of 5 found this review helpful

Range Rovers

by Range Rovers are heavenly
from Denver, CO | April 1, 2011

Rating from

(5)
Comfort: 5 out of 5
Performance: 5 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 5 out of 5
Interior Design: 5 out of 5
Value for the Money: 5 out of 5
Reliability: 5 out of 5

"These is the most elegant beautiful SUV on the road. It is powerful and has all of the feature you could ask for and it does everything, the seats are so comfortable that you can sit in them for ever, they are climate controlled and are completely adjustable in every way. The technology is amazing and there is lots of it, from the rear view camera to parking sensors. Beauty beyond you can imagine, but I have never had to take it to the shop, even though I take it on intense of roading trips that it does perfectly on and drive it in snow, in which it does great in."

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: Used

Primary use for this car: Just getting around


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

2 out of 3 found this review helpful

Great car if you take care of it.

by Land Rover Lover
from Denver, CO | January 7, 2011

Rating from

(4)
Comfort: 5 out of 5
Performance: 4 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 5 out of 5
Interior Design: 5 out of 5
Value for the Money: 4 out of 5
Reliability: 3 out of 5

"The Range Rover is unsurpassed when it comes to both luxury and performance in all (especially unfavorable) weather conditions. It's a smooth ride and virtually unparalleled in luxury and interior comfort. There are some people who complain about problems and/or reliability. But this is one of those cars that can be reliable and do an easy 100k+ miles if you take care of it. Some cars you can drive for 10k miles before needing an oil change or service. But a Range Rover is one that you need to stay on top of with routine oil changes and services. Doing so every 3k miles helps ensure that the car will take care of you too in miles to come. Replacing parts is expensive. But any car in its class is. If you buy used, check the history report to make sure that the previous owner took care of it and you won't have any unpleasant surprises. Just take care of it, and enjoy!"

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: Used

Primary use for this car: Just getting around


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

8 out of 8 found this review helpful

Roger the Range Rover

by BRIT 1
from manchester, MA | August 6, 2010

Rating from

(5)
Comfort: 5 out of 5
Performance: 4 out of 5
Handling: 4 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 5 out of 5
Interior Design: 4 out of 5
Features: 4 out of 5
Value for the Money: 3 out of 5
Reliability: 3 out of 5

"Smooth, comfortable and classic just the ticket! This vechicle glides along the road and will tackle hillsides without any problems. The Range Rover is perfect for work, sporting and social events."

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: Used

Primary use for this car: Commuting


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

3 out of 5 found this review helpful

Best vehicle I ever owned

by Love My Rover
from Scottsdale, AZ | October 24, 2009

Rating from

(5)
Comfort: 5 out of 5
Performance: 4 out of 5
Handling: 4 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 5 out of 5
Interior Design: 5 out of 5
Features: 5 out of 5
Value for the Money: 4 out of 5
Reliability: 5 out of 5

"This has been the best vehicle I have ever owned. In 30,000 miles the only thing I've had to do is, replace the brakes and oil changes. Mine has been reliable, head turning and a joy to drive. I would recommend this vehicle to anyone. Although pricey, I have not regret my decision to purchase my Rover. I do find it a little top heavy and getting out into traffic with the a/c on I shift into "sport mode" to get more torque out of the engine. I am also very happy with the gas milage, I'm getting an average of 17.8 mpg, which I consider very good for a vehicle of this size and weight."

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: Just getting around


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

8 out of 10 found this review helpful

Needs Based

by Altitude
from Snowmass, CO | December 20, 2008

Rating from

(4)
Comfort: 5 out of 5
Performance: 5 out of 5
Handling: 3 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 5 out of 5
Interior Design: 5 out of 5
Features: 5 out of 5
Value for the Money: 3 out of 5
Reliability: 3 out of 5

"Amazing features and design. The interior finishing and comfort is second to none and the off-road capability is phenomenal. The supercharged engine is a requirement as the vehicle weighs so very much and thankfully the brakes are up to the challenge. The vehicle?s weight and height hinder any quick handling maneuvers, but make the off-roading experience very smooth. Reliability is obviously an issue, so make sure you have a good dealership nearby and have extended warranty coverage. If your needs are governed by the environment- winter driving, rough roads, mountains- this vehicle is hard to surpass. Buying used certainly helps the dollar value."

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: Used

Primary use for this car: Just getting around


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

8 out of 11 found this review helpful

Great to look at, but a nuisance to own

by James, fine car enthusiast
from Bergen County, NJ | December 1, 2007

Rating from

(2)
Comfort: 4 out of 5
Performance: 3 out of 5
Handling: 3 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 4 out of 5
Interior Design: 3 out of 5
Features: 3 out of 5
Value for the Money: 2 out of 5
Reliability: 1 out of 5

"Ran well first 2500 miles, then electrical problems (window didnt open), back to dealer 4 times, then something else broke. Some rattles. Lovely leather. Don't buy this car unless you live close to a dealer!"

I would recommend this car to a friend: No

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: N/A


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

15 out of 17 found this review helpful

The least Reliable car I've ever owned.

by Car Owner
from Atlanta, GA | October 15, 2007

Rating from

(3)
Comfort: 4 out of 5
Performance: 5 out of 5
Handling: 5 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 5 out of 5
Interior Design: 3 out of 5
Features: 2 out of 5
Value for the Money: 1 out of 5
Reliability: 1 out of 5

"These cars are great until about 30,000 - 50,000 miles. Everything in the cars begins to break. In my car, the nav. system, suspension, alternator, battery, electric seats, and many other items failed. They were all replaced for free at the dealership, however, when you pay the high price for these cars, they should atleast run for a little while."

I would recommend this car to a friend: No

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: N/A


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

12 out of 13 found this review helpful

1959 Cadi.

by Open Speed Zone
from Reno Nv. | September 15, 2007

Rating from

(2)
Comfort: 4 out of 5
Performance: 3 out of 5
Handling: 3 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 4 out of 5
Interior Design: 2 out of 5
Features: 2 out of 5
Value for the Money: 2 out of 5
Reliability: 1 out of 5

"Truely one of the Querkies Vehicle on the market.A wirering nightmare. Dont loose your key! the cost is 200.00.. the worst part it takes 2 weeks to get a replacement..."

I would recommend this car to a friend: No

This vehicle was purchased: Used

Primary use for this car: N/A


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

5 out of 9 found this review helpful

Page 1 of 1

People Who Viewed This Car Also Viewed

Choose up to three models to compare to the 2007 Land Rover Range Rover.

Compare Side-by-Side
2007 Chevrolet Silverado 1500

2007 Chevrolet Silverado 1500

Kelley Blue Book Retail
$5,875 - $24,200

2007 Chevrolet Tahoe

2007 Chevrolet Tahoe

Kelley Blue Book Retail
$20,100 - $25,700

2007 GMC Sierra 1500

2007 GMC Sierra 1500

Kelley Blue Book Retail
Price Coming Soon

*Invoice prices are made available by Cars.com and are not dealer advertising. All prices are subject to regional variations. Prices last updated 9/23/10. Click here for more information.