The CX-7 is a smallish crossover that shares its turbo four-cylinder with the hot-rodded Mazdaspeed3. Changes for the 2009 model, which you can compare to the '08 CX-7 here, include a handful of minor cabin and styling tweaks. In ascending order, trim levels comprise the Sport, Touring and Grand Touring, with all-wheel drive optional on all three. I tested an all-wheel-drive CX-7 Grand Touring.
Still Looking Good
Perhaps a bit over the top when it first hit the streets back in 2006, the CX-7's lines have matured well — especially considering that the compact-SUV field, with the possible exception of the Ford Escape, is looking more windswept by the year. The CX-7's oversized elements, from its flared fenders to its mustachioed air dam, create the illusion of an RX-8-turned-SUV. The 18-inch alloy wheels, which are standard across all trims, help maintain the image as well. I'm not so crazy about the frosted taillight effects, but they're minimally offensive.
At 184 inches long and nearly 74 inches wide, the CX-7 has a slightly larger footprint than most of its immediate competitors, and its 37.4-foot turning circle isn't particularly U-turn friendly — only the Volkswagen Tiguan (39.4 feet) and Saturn Vue (40.0) rate worse; the Subaru Forester (34.4), Toyota RAV4 (34.8) and Mitsubishi Outlander (34.8) require a lot less room.
Going & Stopping
Mazda reportedly may offer a more fuel-efficient, normally aspirated four-cylinder engine in the CX-7 down the line, but until then, the only available drivetrain is a 244-horsepower, turbocharged 2.3-liter four-cylinder hitched to a six-speed automatic transmission. The combo yields potent but uneven power, so shoppers who put driving refinement above all else ought to look elsewhere. There's slight but noticeable turbo lag starting out, and under hard acceleration the engine blats out a flat, unappealing drone. The automatic takes its time doling out downshifts, and when they finally arrive, the resulting power can feel peaky and sudden. Six-cylinder competitors like the 3.6-liter Vue and 3.5-liter RAV4 accelerate more smoothly, and the RAV4 feels quicker overall.
Don't take that to mean the CX-7 is slow. There's plenty of power at low revs and good highway passing power, too. The drivetrain feels best on inclines, where it easily maintains speed without needing to downshift. On several occasions it was able to pass others on steep uphill stretches with the tach below 3,000 rpm. No doubt a front-wheel-drive CX-7 would feel even lighter on its feet, as it sheds 219 pounds versus the all-wheel-drive version. Our friends at MotorWeek clocked a front-wheel-drive CX-7 hitting 60 mph in a swift 7.7 seconds. That's in the same league as the quickest Vue that MotorWeek tested, and it's significantly quicker than the V-6 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Four-wheel-disc antilock brakes are standard. The pedal feels linear and elicits strong deceleration without much forward suspension dive. Don't consider towing much, though, as the CX-7 maxes out at just 2,000 pounds. When properly equipped, the Vue, RAV4, Outlander and Ford Escape can each tow 3,500 pounds.
You'll pay for all this fun, of course. Once gas prices go back up — which many experts fully expect them to do — gas mileage will be the CX-7's single greatest drawback. The EPA pegs mileage for front-wheel-drive models at 17/23 mpg city/highway, and in all-wheel-drive models it's estimated at 16/22 mpg. Those may not seem like huge deficits versus a V-6 RAV4 or Escape, but considered as a percentage they translate into significant differences in your weekly gas receipts. Non-turbo four-cylinder SUVs offer the best mileage in this segment, but even among the go-fast crowd the CX-7 ranks near the bottom. Worse yet, Mazda recommends premium fuel. Regular fuel will suffice, but it'll likely mean slightly slower starts and weaker passing.
|Gas Mileage Compared (EPA Combined City/Highway Ratings, mpg)|
|Toyota RAV4 3.5L||21||22||Regular|
|Subaru Forester 2.5L turbo||21||n/a||Premium (required)|
|Ford Escape 3.0L||20||21||Regular|
|Volkswagen Tiguan 2.0L turbo||20||21||Premium (recommended)|
|Hyundai Santa Fe 3.3L||19||20||Regular|
|Mitsubishi Outlander 3.0L||19||20||Regular|
|Mazda CX-7 2.3L turbo||18||20||Premium (recommended)|
|Saturn Vue 3.6L||18||19||Regular|
|*AWD Vue also offered with 3.5L engine; combined mileage is 18 mpg.|
Source: EPA and automaker data for 2009 models.
Ride & Handling
Impressively, Mazda continues to make good on its zoom-zoom marketing tagline. Just about every one of its models, with the possible exception of the Escape clone Tribute, is among the most engaging to drive in its respective segment. The CX-7 is no different: The heavy steering wheel takes a bit more effort to turn, but it isn't overly stiff in parking lots. It transmits precise inputs on curvy roads, and on the highway it's evenly weighted when pointed straight ahead. Body roll is minimal, and the chassis sticks to the road over bumpy corners more than I'd expect in an SUV. I found myself throwing the CX-7 around with carlike abandon at times, and though understeer is prevalent at the limits, it sticks to its course pretty well.
Like nearly all crossovers, the CX-7 uses a four-wheel-independent suspension. The wheels hit bumps with little noise or reverberation, and road and wind noise on the highway remains relatively low. Ambient noise, however, seems high; on the highway, trucks passing in the next lane can drown out your music — unless you're listening to U2's "Achtung Baby," in which case it'll probably all blend together. (Cue the hate mail.)
Some may find the CX-7's interior styling a bit too heavy-handed, but overall quality is good, and there's more utility than you might imagine on first glance. The dashboard plastic is hard to the touch — typical for this class, though the Tiguan and Vue laudably buck the trend — but the surfaces look high-rent. Where some competitors throw grainier, cheaper-looking plastics below dash-level, Mazda sheathes areas from the gearshift to the cupholders with a slick black finish. Nice.
Higher up, the silver plastic trim and optional piano-black accents are attractive, and the cabin is generally free of unsightly panel gaps. The Grand Touring's auto-A/C dials operate with a luxury car's well-oiled authenticity. Unfortunately, I can't lavish such praise on the headliner, which employs the sort of mouse-fur most competitors have banished by now.
The features are a mixed bag. The base Sport trim comes standard with premium niceties like express down-and-up front windows and a leather-wrapped steering wheel with audio controls, but higher up the ladder some options feel half-baked. The automatic climate control offers only a single zone; the Escape, RAV4, Santa Fe and Tiguan offer two. The uplevel nine-speaker Bose stereo system sounds merely OK. The heated seats on upper trim levels have only one setting, and it's not especially toasty. Competitors have as many as five levels of heat.
Then there's the optional navigation system. Allow me a rant: The shortcut keys flanking the touch-screen are too small, and the blocky map graphics look a few years behind the times. There aren't nearly enough street labels, and in my week with the car, the point-of-interest finder went one for three — it found a favorite pizza joint but couldn't find a major bowling alley or the local gym. The intersection finder won't let you input a city or state first, and it annoyingly demands full details for one road before allowing you to input the cross street. Want Third and Main? Hope you remember if it's West Third Boulevard or South Third Avenue, because if you don't you'll need to choose from dozens of variants in umpteen surrounding states. It doesn't hint at where those mystery roads might be, mind you — because then you could dismiss the one in Nowhere, Idaho. While you're pulling your hair out trying to figure out which one is yours, pop in U2's "Where the Streets Have No Name." I dare you.
Seating & Cargo
Touring and Grand Touring trims have leather seats, which offer good lateral support but could use a bit more cushioning. Both trims also get a power driver's seat with an impressive range of travel in all directions. Alas, the steering wheel only tilts; the RAV4, Tiguan and uplevel Foresters offer tilt and telescoping adjustments.
One passenger noted that the short rear doors make the backseat a chore to enter, but headroom and legroom are excellent once you're there. The seat cushions angle upward, offering good thigh support, but the seatbacks don't recline, which is possible in many competitors.
The backseat folds in a 60/40-split, and save a ceiling-anchored middle seat belt, the setup is perfect. (The belt obscures visibility and interferes with luggage space in a way that belts anchored into the seatback don't.) Both sides are spring-loaded to fall on their own via release handles in the cargo area, and the resulting load floor is gap-free. Best of all, the outboard seat belts are mounted in the seats rather than the C-pillars, so they don't get caught behind the seatbacks as you return the seats upright. Very clever. All told, Mazda gets points for doing what it could with the limited space: The CX-7 has less cargo space than most of the pack, and it doesn't offer a fold-flat front passenger seat to accommodate long cargo, as some competitors with smaller cargo areas do.
|Cargo Dimensions (cu. ft.) Compared|
|Behind 2nd row||2nd row folded||Fold-flat front passenger seat?|
|Hyundai Santa Fe||34.2*||78.2||No|
|*Without optional third row.|
Source: automaker data for 2009 models.
Safety & Reliability
In Insurance Institute for Highway Safety crash tests, the CX-7 earned top scores in both front and side-impact tests. Standard safety features include antilock brakes, traction control and an electronic stability system, as well as six airbags.
Child-seat provisions include standard Latch child-seat anchors in the outboard rear seats. Top-tether anchors for the outboard positions sit midway down the seatbacks — a more accessible location than up in the ceiling or down at the base of the seats, which is where they're found on many SUVs. Though the outboard rear seats have head restraints, there isn't one for the middle position; that's something the Escape, RAV4 and others include.
Reliability has been middle-of-the-road, with average overall scores from Consumer Reports. The publication rates the RAV4 significantly higher and the Vue significantly lower. Mazda's three-year/36,000-mile comprehensive and five-year/60,000-mile bumper-to-bumper warranty match most competitors', though the Vue, Outlander and Santa Fe offer even longer policies.
Features & Pricing
Standard features on the CX-7 Sport include 18-inch wheels, power windows and locks, A/C, cruise control, steering-wheel audio controls and keyless entry. Its $23,900 starting price eclipses most basic four-cylinder SUVs, but if you want an apples-to-apples comparison you'd need to compare the CX-7 and its turbocharged engine to competitors' uplevel engines. (The Volkswagen Tiguan, which also has a standard turbo four-cylinder, is in the same boat.) At that point the CX-7 starts to look like a performance bargain. Consider:
|Comparably Powered Compact SUVs|
|Volkswagen Tiguan||$23,200 (2.0L turbo)*|
|Toyota RAV4||$23,535 (3.5L)|
|Mazda CX-7||$23,900 (2.3L turbo)|
|Ford Escape||$24,125 (3.0L)|
|Mitsubishi Outlander||$24,380 (3.0L)|
|Hyundai Santa Fe||$24,495 (3.3L)**|
|Saturn Vue||$25,725 (3.5L)***|
|Subaru Forester||$26,195 (2.5L turbo)***|
|*Comes standard with manual transmission; all others have automatics.|
**Pricing for 2008 model; no pricing info available yet for 2009 Santa Fe. All other prices reflect 2009 models.
**Drivetrains only available with AWD; others are priced with FWD.
Stepping up to the Touring ($25,800) adds heated leather upholstery and a power driver's seat, while the Grand Touring ($26,700) adds automatic climate control, upgraded gauges and interior trim, xenon headlights and a few styling tweaks. All-wheel drive on any trim adds $1,700. Other options include the navigation system, a backup camera, Bose audio and a moonroof. Load a Grand Touring to the gunwales, and the price tops out around $33,000.
CX-7 in the Market
Rants aside, the CX-7 represents a lot of performance for the money, and thanks to some clever features and a workable starting price, it's not a pragmatic embarrassment, either. Does that make it the right car for these times? Probably not — Subaru clinched that with the sub-$20,000 base-model Forester. But I'm not convinced every car buyer out there is sidelining whatever he or she wants and choosing the smartest plain-vanilla car for the money. If you are leaning toward something a bit more fun, the CX-7 is worth a look, and it might not break your (shrinking) bank account, either.
|Send Kelsey an email|
People Who Viewed this Car Also Viewed
Select up to three models to compare with the 2009 Mazda CX-7.