2003 Subaru Forester Consumer Reviews

2003 Subaru Forester

Change

2003 Subaru Forester

Kelley Blue Book Retail $7,175–$8,075  

Average Rating

3.9 out of 5
Review This Car
Comfort:4.1 out of 5
Performance:4.2 out of 5
Exterior Styling:4.2 out of 5
Interior Design:4.3 out of 5
Value for the Money:4.0 out of 5
Reliability:3.7 out of 5

11 out of 17 people would recommended this car to a friend

Consumer Reviews

Page 1 of 2 Next Page

A good, sturdy dog car

by Dawg Mom
from Annapolis, MD | January 18, 2013

Rating from

(4)
Comfort: 4 out of 5
Performance: 4 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 4 out of 5
Interior Design: 4 out of 5
Value for the Money: 4 out of 5
Reliability: 4 out of 5

"We purchased a used 2003 Subaru Forester with 164k miles from a private buyer through cars.com. It is a sturdy vehicle and, so far, dependable. Nice room for 2 70-lb. dogs, with the back seats folded down. And maybe even one more dog. Drives mostly like a car, versus a full-blown SUV. And, it's 4WD, which will make it my work car during bad weather. I'll bet it was really "stylin'" when it was new! (This particular car has all the bells and whistles.)"

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: Used

Primary use for this car: Transporting family


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

0 out of 0 found this review helpful

blue forester

by car byuer
from LONG BEACH CA | December 22, 2012

Rating from

(1)
Comfort: 5 out of 5
Performance: 5 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 5 out of 5
Interior Design: 5 out of 5
Value for the Money: 2 out of 5
Reliability: 1 out of 5

"Nice car leaks oil from the drivers side head. Also had a vibration from the brakes and paul took care of it. But we had to pay him for that. We did not buy the car he was not willing to repair it. But it comes with a 50 50 warranty. So you will be paying 50% of the repair that he is aware of. We did not buy it . He cried he broke his first rule of selling cars. Then cried he lost money on turning the rotors. What he lost is us as customers. So we paid him to fix the brakes on a car we did not buy. If you let it run and warm up ... You will smell the oil burning. Just want you to be aware need to spend a little money on it."

I would recommend this car to a friend: No

Primary use for this car: Commuting


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

0 out of 1 found this review helpful

some good, some bad

by car enthusiast
from Chicago, IL | November 3, 2012

Rating from

(3)
Comfort: 3 out of 5
Performance: 4 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 5 out of 5
Interior Design: 4 out of 5
Value for the Money: 3 out of 5
Reliability: 3 out of 5

"I bought my 2003 Subaru Forester new almost ten years ago. It now has 103,000 miles and I have always had preventative maintenance performed. Some things about the car I like very much, others not. With it's all wheel drive it's a great car in slippery/snowy conditions. However, the AWD really seems to affect the gas mileage. The Boxer 4 cylinder engine and automatic transmission get about 22 mpg combined city/highway and about 26 mpg on the highway. I would hope for better gas mileage with a 4 cylinder engine but I guess that's at the expense of the safer AWD performance. The flat 2.5 liter 4 cylinder engine is peppy for a 4 cyl. engine but is barely adequate for the size of this vehicle. The flat 6 cyl. engine was not an option for this car. I have had more mechanical problems with this car than I would expect based on Subaru's reputation. I had to have both head gaskets replaced around 70,000 miles. That was expensive. I understand this is a common expensive problem with Subarus of this era. A rear wheel bearing went bad around 40,000 miles. The heated driver seat no longer heats up. Rear seat room is poor, especially for feet. I understand they improved the rear seat room on the latest model Forester. The car handles and brakes very well with all wheel disc brakes. Visibility is great from the inside. Heating and air conditioning work well. There have been no rust issues even though driven in the salty winters of the Midwest. These Foresters seem to hold good value money-wise. I would not hesitate to purchase a used one if I had it thoroughly checked out by an independent mechanic especially having the head gaskets inspected."

I would recommend this car to a friend: No

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: Transporting family


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

2 out of 2 found this review helpful

2003 Forester

by stefko
from Budd Lake,NJ | August 30, 2011

Rating from

(4)
Comfort: 4 out of 5
Performance: 5 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 4 out of 5
Interior Design: 4 out of 5
Value for the Money: 5 out of 5
Reliability: 5 out of 5

"151K and still going strong. Just put $1000 in needed repairs. Will go past 200k with no problem. Great car for a new driver, safe and gives 24 mpg avg,"

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: Commuting


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

0 out of 0 found this review helpful

I wanted to like it

by Tweetweet
from Birmingham, AL | February 10, 2011

Rating from

(2)
Comfort: 4 out of 5
Performance: 3 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 4 out of 5
Interior Design: 4 out of 5
Value for the Money: 2 out of 5
Reliability: 1 out of 5

"I've owned Subarus since 1982 and really want to stick with them still. But my 2003 Forester has been a dud. Transmission and head gaskets went kaput way too early, and a terrible gas smell has been plaguing me for years. It's one thing after another, which I've heard from every other Subaru owner I know. I'm eager to switch to another car company, and very sad that such a reputable brand has let me down."

I would recommend this car to a friend: No

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: Just getting around


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

5 out of 7 found this review helpful

Satisfied Subaru owner

by Rally race fan
from Fort Worth, Texas | December 14, 2010

Rating from

(5)
Comfort: 5 out of 5
Performance: 5 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 5 out of 5
Interior Design: 5 out of 5
Value for the Money: 5 out of 5
Reliability: 5 out of 5

"I've had my Forester 4 years, awesome SUV. All wheel drive is great, always have traction and can go off road. Never had any issue with mine, driven about 26000 miles with 46000 total. It will pull a trailer, excellent for moving stuff inside as well. The Forester is the newer designed SUV by Subaru, Outbacks are slightly bigger and weight more. I got into watching off road rally racing, Subaru rules this area by far."

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: Used

Primary use for this car: Just getting around


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

2 out of 2 found this review helpful

Dealership shoos me away

by Fed up
from Walnut Creek, CA | January 4, 2010

Rating from

(3)
Comfort: 3 out of 5
Performance: 4 out of 5
Handling: 3 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 3 out of 5
Interior Design: 3 out of 5
Features: 3 out of 5
Value for the Money: 2 out of 5
Reliability: 1 out of 5

"At about 62K, the troubles began. Needed new head gasket, probably from overheating. Took it in and the dealer mechanic tells me I have no reverse gear and need a new transmission. (Funny, I used reverse to get out of the driveway to get there...) Multi-thousands of dollars later ("It should run like a tank now!" Uh. It should've run like a tank when I bought it from you brand new!) it still overheats. Plugged radiator, so I need a new one of those. Looking back, the radiator likely caused the other two problems, right? They didn't know that. My letter to the local dealer went unacknowledged. For the past two winters, we noticed a strong gas smell. Took it in and they replaced some fuel pump part - and it did nothing for the strong gas smell! So I researched it on the net and found that it's a common problem - cold weather makes the clamp on the fuel line too loose; just needs a simple tightening. I did it, and the problem was fixed. Called the dealer to arrange a refund for their ineffective and expensive non-repair and they accused us of causing the problem, refusing again to have a reasonable discussion. Never again."

I would recommend this car to a friend: No

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: Transporting family


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

13 out of 13 found this review helpful

frustrating car

by easydriver
from new hampshire | June 21, 2009

Rating from

(3)
Comfort: 4 out of 5
Performance: 3 out of 5
Handling: 4 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 4 out of 5
Interior Design: 4 out of 5
Features: 4 out of 5
Value for the Money: 3 out of 5
Reliability: 2 out of 5

"Piston slap, failed catalytic converter, failed radio, original brakes problem, starting problems, all very frustrating. All this and only 65K miles with regular servicing."

I would recommend this car to a friend: No

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: Just getting around


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

9 out of 9 found this review helpful

great car

by captjim
from New Smyrna Bch. Fl. | December 19, 2008

Rating from

(5)
Comfort: 4 out of 5
Performance: 5 out of 5
Handling: 4 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 4 out of 5
Interior Design: 4 out of 5
Features: 5 out of 5
Value for the Money: 5 out of 5
Reliability: 5 out of 5

"The best thing you can say abuot any purchase is that you would buy it again.And I will sure buy a Subaru again."

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: Used

Primary use for this car: Just getting around


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

0 out of 1 found this review helpful

"Still" InExpensive and Built to Stay That Way

by Healthcare traveller
from Columbia, South Carolina | September 14, 2008

Rating from

(5)
Comfort: 4 out of 5
Performance: 4 out of 5
Handling: 5 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 5 out of 5
Interior Design: 4 out of 5
Features: 5 out of 5
Value for the Money: 5 out of 5
Reliability: 5 out of 5

"I purchased my vehicle new in August of 2002 when the new styling was released. I have driven it daily since then and have never had a vehicle as trouble free as this one, ever. I am preparing to take it in for its 105,000 scheduled timing belt change out and recognized that I had not had but two repairs, one I feel I may have contributed to. In over 100,000 miles, I have never had to charnge out a starter, change out an alternator, etc. Things you generally anticipate you will have to at some point, however, not yet for me. If you have the need and the opportunity, you would be well served to at least consider one. Being able to ignore my repairman is worth its weight in gold."

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: N/A


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

3 out of 3 found this review helpful

Page 1 of 2 Next Page

People Who Viewed This Car Also Viewed

Choose up to three models to compare to the 2003 Subaru Forester.

Compare Side-by-Side
2006 Subaru Baja

2006 Subaru Baja

Kelley Blue Book Retail
$15,950 - $15,950

2003 Honda CR-V

2003 Honda CR-V

Kelley Blue Book Retail
$7,825 - $10,100

2006 Subaru Outback

2006 Subaru Outback

Kelley Blue Book Retail
Price Coming Soon

*Invoice prices are made available by Cars.com and are not dealer advertising. All prices are subject to regional variations. Prices last updated 9/23/10. Click here for more information.