2002 Gmc Yukon Xl
1-2 of 2 reviews
Test drive review

From a 1998 to a 2002

by from Austin, Texas on November 10, 2010

Vehicle rides smoother & quicker off the line. More "SUV" than truck-like, pre-2000 model. MPG lower city & hwy on the 5.3l versus 5.7l. Wife likes the "plushness" of the ride & handling - clearly not...
Vehicle rides smoother & quicker off the line. More "SUV" than truck-like, pre-2000 model. MPG lower city & hwy on the 5.3l versus 5.7l. Wife likes the "plushness" of the ride & handling - clearly not as stiff as pre-2000 models. Jury is still out on the sturdiness. Nothing compares to Suburban - nothing!
Comfort
Exterior Styling
Interior Design
Value for the Money
Performance
Reliability

Purchased a used car

Uses car for Transporting family

Does recommend this car!!

6 out of 7 people found this review helpful. Did you?
Test drive review

Workhorse

by from Sacramento, CA on August 1, 2017

it was with great sadness that they towed away our "Beast" yesterday. This car saw more field trips, swim meets, soccer tournaments, camping trips, etc. than most cars/trucks see. It ended up with o...
it was with great sadness that they towed away our "Beast" yesterday. This car saw more field trips, swim meets, soccer tournaments, camping trips, etc. than most cars/trucks see. It ended up with over 250k miles on it, one new transmission and new shocks (of course, put on less than 6 months before some jerk hit us and totaled it!) The only downside of this vehicle is the gas mileage. I think we averaged 13 mpg around town, but I would do it all again for the memories that this car gave us. Yes, it's huge and you'll get the stink eye from little cars, but if you need a big car for big loads, this car did it all!
Comfort
Exterior Styling
Interior Design
Value for the Money
Performance
Reliability

Purchased a new car

Uses car for Transportingfamily

Does recommend this car!!

0 out of 0 people found this review helpful. Did you?
See Model Details