Cars.com Reviews the 2013 Jaguar XF
&&&&&EMBEDDED_ELEMENT_START&&&&& {“id”:1420668706148,”originalName”:”2015_03_04_17_08_16_995_http___blogs_cars_com__a_6a00d83451b3c669e2019aff2af103970c_800wi”,”name”:”MMS ID 58204 (created by CM Utility)”,”URI”:”/49/601229868-1425510497649.”,”createDate”:”2015-03-04 05:08:17″,”metadata”:{“AUTHOR”:”automatic-content-migration”,”KEYWORDS”:””},”href”:”https://www.cstatic-images.com/stock/1170×1170/49/601229868-1425510497649.”,”description”:”Came from http://blogs.cars.com/.a/6a00d83451b3c669e2019aff2af103970c-800wi”,”externalid”:”58204″,”updatedby”:”cmuadmin”,”updateddate”:1425511650232,”associations”:{}} &&&&&EMBEDDED_ELEMENT_END&&&&&
The recent trend of stylish, high-amenity cars swapping power for fuel efficiency isn’t something that Jaguar’s XF can handle, says Cars.com reviewer Aaron Bragman. The 2013 model’s new turbocharged four-cylinder engine is only modestly powerful, and its eight-speed automatic transmission is poorly tuned — together the pair returns unimpressive fuel economy. Bragman says the XF is still sexy, but this big cat has lost its roar.
