Skip to main content

1993
Suzuki Sidekick

Starts at:
$10,999
Shop options
New 1993 Suzuki Sidekick
See ratings
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Shop Cars.com
Browse cars & save your favorites
Dealers near you
Find & contact a dealership near you
no listings

We're not finding any listings in your area.
Change your location or search Cars.com to see more!

Change location

Available trims

See the differences side-by-side to compare trims.
  • 2dr JS Soft Top 2WD 5-Spd
    Starts at
    $10,999
    See all specs
  • 4dr JS Hard Top 5-Spd 2WD
    Starts at
    $12,069
    See all specs
  • 2dr JX Soft Top 5-Spd 4WD
    Starts at
    $12,399
    See all specs
  • 4dr JX Hard Top 5-Spd 4WD
    Starts at
    $13,229
    See all specs
  • 4dr JLX Hard Top 5-Spd 4WD
    Starts at
    $14,489
    See all specs

The good & the bad

This vehicle doesn't have any good or bad insights yet.

Use our comparison tool to look at this model side-by-side with other vehicles or view the full specifications list .

Start your comparison

Expert 1993 Suzuki Sidekick review

our expert's take
Our expert's take
By
Full article
our expert's take

If you have about $16,000 and want to buy a well-equipped four-doorsport-utility vehicle, the choices are rather slim.

You can forget about Ford’s Explorer or Jeep’s Grand Cherokee, the twohottest sport utilities. They start at about $18,000.

You’ll have to look at the second tier of vehicles, which include the IsuzuRodeo, the best-selling import sport-utility; the original Jeep Cherokee;Chevy’s S-10 Blazer; and this week’s test vehicle, the Suzuki Sidekick.

For 16 grand, you would expect better than you get in the Suzuki SidekickJLX.

The vehicle I tested was not assembled particularly well; it seemedexceptionally tinny, almost flimsy. Also, it didn’t really have enough power.

The Sidekick would best be suited as an urban commuter. If driven inenvironments that don’t require quick turns, panic-braking orpedal-to-the-metal acceleration, the Sidekick can be acceptabletransportation.

PERFORMANCE

The Sidekick is powered by a 95-horsepower, four-cylinder engine that has16 valves and electronic fuel injection.

Though the engine runs smoothly, it has to struggle to provide reasonableacceleration onto interstates and while passing. The engine also gets somewhatraucous (read: loud and buzzy) as it approaches 5,000 rpm.

The test vehicle came with a four-speed automatic. Shifts were notparticularly smooth. The driver can select between ”normal” and ”power”shift modes. The only real difference seems to be in the roughness of theshifts, because performance does not improve much.

Gas mileage was excellent for a sport-utility vehicle. Using the airconditioner, the test vehicle logged 25 mpg in city driving and 29 on thehighway.

HANDLING

The Sidekick offers a fairly soft and stable ride for a small vehicle.Unlike the two-door Sidekick, the heavier four-door isn’t affected much bywind gusts. But on sharp turns, the body leans considerably.

The steering is power-assisted, making the vehicle easyto maneuver. It canturn a circle in 35.4 feet.

Brakes, discs up front and drums with anti-lock in the rear, are adequate,but nothing more.

FIT AND FINISH

For years, the words ”cheap” and ”Japanese” were synonymous. Thatperception began to change in the 1970s after the invasion of well-builtJapanese cars and electronic products. These days, when one mentions Japan,quality is the word that often comes to mind.

Suzuki’s Sidekick, however, must be viewed as a setback, albeit a minorone, for the Japanese.

The Sidekick exhibits little of the exceptional quality we have come toexpect from Japanese vehicles.

For instance, a window-switch housing on the driver’s door panel was loose.So was the housing on the dash-mounted air conditioner switches. And when Islammed a rear door, I heard a symphony of noises and rattles. Even suchthings as the steering wheel looked cheap.

I also didn’t like the AM/FM cassette radio. With the volume turned up, thespeak ers distorted the sound so much that music was almost unintelligible.

I was infuriated and embarrassed at a gas pump when the fuel-filler doorrefused to open. Out of desperation, I finally inserted the ignition keybetween the body and the fuel door and pried it open.

On the plus side, the interior offers decent head and leg room.

Both front and rear seats were comfortable and the instruments were clearand easy to read, if a bit utilitarian.

Rear vision was partially blocked by the spare tire, which is mounted onthe swing-out rear door.

The Suzuki Sidekick JLX is a vehicle I’ll remember. Unfortunately, I’llremember it for all the wrong reasons.

Truett’s tip: In a world filled with outstanding sport-utility vehicles, Suzuki’s sidekick JXL is no better than average in terms of performance, quality, features and value.

1993 Suzuki Sidekick review: Our expert's take
By

If you have about $16,000 and want to buy a well-equipped four-doorsport-utility vehicle, the choices are rather slim.

You can forget about Ford’s Explorer or Jeep’s Grand Cherokee, the twohottest sport utilities. They start at about $18,000.

You’ll have to look at the second tier of vehicles, which include the IsuzuRodeo, the best-selling import sport-utility; the original Jeep Cherokee;Chevy’s S-10 Blazer; and this week’s test vehicle, the Suzuki Sidekick.

For 16 grand, you would expect better than you get in the Suzuki SidekickJLX.

The vehicle I tested was not assembled particularly well; it seemedexceptionally tinny, almost flimsy. Also, it didn’t really have enough power.

The Sidekick would best be suited as an urban commuter. If driven inenvironments that don’t require quick turns, panic-braking orpedal-to-the-metal acceleration, the Sidekick can be acceptabletransportation.

PERFORMANCE

The Sidekick is powered by a 95-horsepower, four-cylinder engine that has16 valves and electronic fuel injection.

Though the engine runs smoothly, it has to struggle to provide reasonableacceleration onto interstates and while passing. The engine also gets somewhatraucous (read: loud and buzzy) as it approaches 5,000 rpm.

The test vehicle came with a four-speed automatic. Shifts were notparticularly smooth. The driver can select between ”normal” and ”power”shift modes. The only real difference seems to be in the roughness of theshifts, because performance does not improve much.

Gas mileage was excellent for a sport-utility vehicle. Using the airconditioner, the test vehicle logged 25 mpg in city driving and 29 on thehighway.

HANDLING

The Sidekick offers a fairly soft and stable ride for a small vehicle.Unlike the two-door Sidekick, the heavier four-door isn’t affected much bywind gusts. But on sharp turns, the body leans considerably.

The steering is power-assisted, making the vehicle easyto maneuver. It canturn a circle in 35.4 feet.

Brakes, discs up front and drums with anti-lock in the rear, are adequate,but nothing more.

FIT AND FINISH

For years, the words ”cheap” and ”Japanese” were synonymous. Thatperception began to change in the 1970s after the invasion of well-builtJapanese cars and electronic products. These days, when one mentions Japan,quality is the word that often comes to mind.

Suzuki’s Sidekick, however, must be viewed as a setback, albeit a minorone, for the Japanese.

The Sidekick exhibits little of the exceptional quality we have come toexpect from Japanese vehicles.

For instance, a window-switch housing on the driver’s door panel was loose.So was the housing on the dash-mounted air conditioner switches. And when Islammed a rear door, I heard a symphony of noises and rattles. Even suchthings as the steering wheel looked cheap.

I also didn’t like the AM/FM cassette radio. With the volume turned up, thespeak ers distorted the sound so much that music was almost unintelligible.

I was infuriated and embarrassed at a gas pump when the fuel-filler doorrefused to open. Out of desperation, I finally inserted the ignition keybetween the body and the fuel door and pried it open.

On the plus side, the interior offers decent head and leg room.

Both front and rear seats were comfortable and the instruments were clearand easy to read, if a bit utilitarian.

Rear vision was partially blocked by the spare tire, which is mounted onthe swing-out rear door.

The Suzuki Sidekick JLX is a vehicle I’ll remember. Unfortunately, I’llremember it for all the wrong reasons.

Truett’s tip: In a world filled with outstanding sport-utility vehicles, Suzuki’s sidekick JXL is no better than average in terms of performance, quality, features and value.

Factory warranties

Currently no warranties for this model year
This vehicle doesn’t currently have warranty details.
You can still learn about car warranties, review what’s best, and identify coverage that may be right for you.
Cars.com warranty hub

Consumer reviews

5.0 / 5
Based on 1 review
Write a review
Comfort 5.0
Interior 5.0
Performance 4.0
Value 5.0
Exterior 4.0
Reliability 5.0
  • Best 4 x 4 bang for the buck

    These cars are excellent in every aspect. They maintain their value well and have seen 250,000 miles without any drivetrain problems. Highly recommended !!
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 5.0
    4 people out of 4 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No

Latest news from cars.com

See all news

FAQ

What trim levels are available for the 1993 Suzuki Sidekick?

The 1993 Suzuki Sidekick is available in 3 trim levels:

  • JLX (1 style)
  • JS (2 styles)
  • JX (2 styles)

Is the 1993 Suzuki Sidekick reliable?

The 1993 Suzuki Sidekick has an average reliability rating of 5.0 out of 5 according to cars.com consumers. Find real-world reliability insights within consumer reviews from 1993 Suzuki Sidekick owners.

Is the 1993 Suzuki Sidekick a good SUV?

Below are the cars.com consumers ratings for the 1993 Suzuki Sidekick. 100.0% of drivers recommend this vehicle.

5.0 / 5
Based on 1 reviews
  • Comfort: 5.0
  • Interior: 5.0
  • Performance: 4.0
  • Value: 5.0
  • Exterior: 4.0
  • Reliability: 5.0
Your list was successfully saved.
 
 
 
 
Save list Compare
[{"cat":null,"stock_type":"used","bodystyle":"SUV","page_type":"research/make-model-year","oem_page":false,"search_fuel_types":[null]}]