Skip to main content

2003
Acura CL

Starts at:
$28,200
Shop options
New 2003 Acura CL
See ratings
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Shop Cars.com
Browse cars & save your favorites
Dealers near you
Find & contact a dealership near you
no listings

We're not finding any listings in your area.
Change your location or search Cars.com to see more!

Change location

Available trims

See the differences side-by-side to compare trims.
  • 2dr Cpe 3.2L
    Starts at
    $28,200
    20 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 2dr Cpe 3.2L w/Navigation
    Starts at
    $30,350
    20 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 2dr Cpe 3.2L Type S
    Starts at
    $30,550
    20 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 2dr Cpe 3.2L Type S 6-Speed
    Starts at
    $30,550
    19 City / 28 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 2dr Cpe 3.2L Type S w/Navigation
    Starts at
    $32,700
    20 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 2dr Cpe 3.2L Type S 6-Speed w/Nav
    Starts at
    $32,700
    19 City / 28 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs

Photo & video gallery

2003 Acura CL 2003 Acura CL 2003 Acura CL 2003 Acura CL 2003 Acura CL 2003 Acura CL 2003 Acura CL 2003 Acura CL 2003 Acura CL 2003 Acura CL 2003 Acura CL 2003 Acura CL 2003 Acura CL 2003 Acura CL 2003 Acura CL 2003 Acura CL

The good & the bad

This vehicle doesn't have any good or bad insights yet.

Use our comparison tool to look at this model side-by-side with other vehicles or view the full specifications list .

Start your comparison

Expert 2003 Acura CL review

our expert's take
Our expert's take
By
Full article
our expert's take

Not having a beautiful mind, I don’t usually talk to myself – really, Doc – but after a few miles in this week’s examinand, I whistled and muttered, “Wow, this is the real deal.”

A week later, after playing with the Acura 3.2 CL Type S in three states, I took it up to top off the tank for the repo man. Somehow the car, as if with a will of its own, shot right past the gas station and put another 75 miles on its odometer. That’s a pretty good indication, considering that I was (somewhat reluctantly) wrangling two other vehicles in the same time frame.

I had sampled this coupe last year, and found it worthy. This year, in addition to a couple of appearance mods (bigger exhaust tips, new taillamps, revised front fascia), buyers of the Type S can opt for a six-speed manual transmission for the same price as with the five-speed automatic.

If you’ve plowed through my dissertations for a while, you’ll recall that I’ve pretty much been won over by modern, “adaptive” (i.e. semi-intelligent) transmissions, at least in luxury cars. When well executed they can shift faster and more smoothly than I can, and the best of breed can choose a ratio with something approaching uncanny intuition. Failing that, most have a semi-automatic mechanism which lets the driver take over gear-change chores without the need for a clutch pedal. And five forward ratios should provide a match for even highly tuned, peaky engines. Thus I approached this six-speed manual proposition with equal measures of curiosity and skepticism. My belief system was altered after a couple of runs through the gears.

The Honda 6-speed is a paradigm of precision. Never was there any doubt about where the next gear lay, whether changing up or down, moderately or in a rush. The clutch was a good match for the gearbox, light enough to live with in traffic jams, and requiring just a bit of throttle before engaging quickly. The geartrain itself seemed unusually taut, without the sloppiness that generally lets one visualize the interconnected parts.

To me, the choice of a Type S over the base model 3.2 CL is practically a no-brainer. The “base” car is $28,200, plus $480 freight. The Type S is $30,550. Either way, you have but one option decision to make: whether to plunk down $2,150 more for the navigation system.

In stock form, the cars are truly luxury-level in their appointments. They come with leather seating surfaces, power moonroof, power-adjustable heated seats, a Bose AM-FM-cassette-6-CD sound system, alloy wheels, xenon high-intensity-discharge headlamps, HomeLink and OnStar, front and side air bags, and all the usual power and convenience features.

At the price, the 3.2 CL Type S would be quite a bargain even if it were only an adequate performer. As it is, it’s a steal.

The Type S’s main distinction lies in the engine compartment. The 6-cylinder engines in base and Type S are essentially the same, but dressed differently. That is, they have iden tical 3.2-liter displacement, are made mostly of aluminum alloys, have a single overhead camshaft in each bank of the V and breathe via 24 valves. Both use Honda’s variable timing and lift technology and achieve environmentally-friendly “low emissions vehicle” status.

In stock trim, the engine puts out 225 hp and 216 foot-pounds of torque, respectable specific output and enough to provide quite adequate performance.

The S, however, thanks to some tuner tricks, such as a dual-path intake, freer-breathing exhaust, higher compression ratio and slightly different valve timing, pumps out 260 hp and 232 foot-pounds of torque. Redline, 6,300 on the base engine, is 6,900 on the S.

Power peaks at 6,100 rpm on the S, while torque plateaus between 3,500 and 5,500, Rev-happy? Yes. A slug below 3,500? No. I found the CL would potter around quite contentedly at 2,000 or so, albeit unenthusiastically.

The thrills start coming as the tachometer needle rushes past 4,000 and the high-speed intake path and valve maps are selected. Acura’s engineers have managed to give the Type S a sound that is more viscerally appealing than some V-8s’, and the power surge feels like going on afterburner. The engine feels as if it wants to keep going past 7,000, but the engine management computer reins in such foolishness by becoming miserly with fuel, gently reminding the driver to keep an eye on the tach.

Speaking of fuel . . . both engine types are designed for premium, but will run acceptably, Honda says, on lesser grades, albeit producing less power. Nobody said this was an economy car. And yet, the EPA figures are surprisingly good for a 3,500-pound machine: 19 mpg city, 28 highway. I logged 24.4, and I spent much time in the upper rev ranges.

The CLs ordered with automatic transmissions get either simple traction control (base) or the whiz-bang “vehicle stability assist” system, which includes traction and yaw control. If you opt for the 6-speed manual, you’re considered hard-core enough to prefer the (new this year) limited-slip differential. I much preferred that arrangement to the electronic oversight. Even with full-throttle blastoffs, torque steer was well managed as the differential gearset parceled out power to the front wheels.

Standard tires are 205/60 Michelins on 16-inch wheels. Type S gets 215/50s on 17-inch wheels. Either way, they’re V-rated for sustained running at up to 149 mph. The grip was impressive on both wet and dry surfaces. With a pronounced forward weight bias, the CL ultimately ran wide in turns when pressed too hard, but did so with plenty of warning, and grace.

Ride quality was sporty – i.e., a trifle rough at times, but was generally pleasant in view of the car’s athleticism, and felt unconquerable when pressed really hard.

The brakes are the same on both series, ventilated discs front, solid rear. I’d have to rate them overqualified on the lower-level car, because they were impressive on the S. The antilock was highly effective and utterly unobtrusive, even when called upon in simulated panic stops at elevated velocities.

When it wasn’t under the gun, the CL was commendably quiet, even at freeway speeds and with the moonroof open.

The Bose stereo was, as usual, above-average in tuner sensitivity and outstanding in clarity and overall tonality.

The tilt wheel would be more lovable with more range of motion, and telescoping would be nice.

I gave the navigation system some tests and it worked as promised, although, with all that it has going on, it can’t help but be visually distracting. In voice mode, an annoying feminine voice gives instructions. I deliberately took some wrong turns after dialing in a destination, and the GPS/DVD system calmly recalculated and suggested alternative routes. Worth $2,150? Perhaps, if you’re a delivery person.

Neither the feds nor insurance testers have had their way with a 2003 CL yet, but Honda has a pretty good handle on such worst-case scenarios.

Consumers Union surveys of owners report well-above-average satisfaction and reliability for the CL series.

Fit and finish overall were excellent. Final assembly point for the CL is the Honda complex at Marysville, Ohio. Only the transmission was sourced from Japan.

The tester came with the navigation system, and thus bore a final price of $33,180 with freight. Payments at that price would come to $673, assuming 20 percent down, 10 percent interest and 48 installments. Edmunds.com, which monitors transaction prices nationally, says that on average CLs are going for $700-$800 under sticker – better snap one up before the marketplace wises up.

“The Gannett News Service”

2003 Acura CL review: Our expert's take
By

Not having a beautiful mind, I don’t usually talk to myself – really, Doc – but after a few miles in this week’s examinand, I whistled and muttered, “Wow, this is the real deal.”

A week later, after playing with the Acura 3.2 CL Type S in three states, I took it up to top off the tank for the repo man. Somehow the car, as if with a will of its own, shot right past the gas station and put another 75 miles on its odometer. That’s a pretty good indication, considering that I was (somewhat reluctantly) wrangling two other vehicles in the same time frame.

I had sampled this coupe last year, and found it worthy. This year, in addition to a couple of appearance mods (bigger exhaust tips, new taillamps, revised front fascia), buyers of the Type S can opt for a six-speed manual transmission for the same price as with the five-speed automatic.

If you’ve plowed through my dissertations for a while, you’ll recall that I’ve pretty much been won over by modern, “adaptive” (i.e. semi-intelligent) transmissions, at least in luxury cars. When well executed they can shift faster and more smoothly than I can, and the best of breed can choose a ratio with something approaching uncanny intuition. Failing that, most have a semi-automatic mechanism which lets the driver take over gear-change chores without the need for a clutch pedal. And five forward ratios should provide a match for even highly tuned, peaky engines. Thus I approached this six-speed manual proposition with equal measures of curiosity and skepticism. My belief system was altered after a couple of runs through the gears.

The Honda 6-speed is a paradigm of precision. Never was there any doubt about where the next gear lay, whether changing up or down, moderately or in a rush. The clutch was a good match for the gearbox, light enough to live with in traffic jams, and requiring just a bit of throttle before engaging quickly. The geartrain itself seemed unusually taut, without the sloppiness that generally lets one visualize the interconnected parts.

To me, the choice of a Type S over the base model 3.2 CL is practically a no-brainer. The “base” car is $28,200, plus $480 freight. The Type S is $30,550. Either way, you have but one option decision to make: whether to plunk down $2,150 more for the navigation system.

In stock form, the cars are truly luxury-level in their appointments. They come with leather seating surfaces, power moonroof, power-adjustable heated seats, a Bose AM-FM-cassette-6-CD sound system, alloy wheels, xenon high-intensity-discharge headlamps, HomeLink and OnStar, front and side air bags, and all the usual power and convenience features.

At the price, the 3.2 CL Type S would be quite a bargain even if it were only an adequate performer. As it is, it’s a steal.

The Type S’s main distinction lies in the engine compartment. The 6-cylinder engines in base and Type S are essentially the same, but dressed differently. That is, they have iden tical 3.2-liter displacement, are made mostly of aluminum alloys, have a single overhead camshaft in each bank of the V and breathe via 24 valves. Both use Honda’s variable timing and lift technology and achieve environmentally-friendly “low emissions vehicle” status.

In stock trim, the engine puts out 225 hp and 216 foot-pounds of torque, respectable specific output and enough to provide quite adequate performance.

The S, however, thanks to some tuner tricks, such as a dual-path intake, freer-breathing exhaust, higher compression ratio and slightly different valve timing, pumps out 260 hp and 232 foot-pounds of torque. Redline, 6,300 on the base engine, is 6,900 on the S.

Power peaks at 6,100 rpm on the S, while torque plateaus between 3,500 and 5,500, Rev-happy? Yes. A slug below 3,500? No. I found the CL would potter around quite contentedly at 2,000 or so, albeit unenthusiastically.

The thrills start coming as the tachometer needle rushes past 4,000 and the high-speed intake path and valve maps are selected. Acura’s engineers have managed to give the Type S a sound that is more viscerally appealing than some V-8s’, and the power surge feels like going on afterburner. The engine feels as if it wants to keep going past 7,000, but the engine management computer reins in such foolishness by becoming miserly with fuel, gently reminding the driver to keep an eye on the tach.

Speaking of fuel . . . both engine types are designed for premium, but will run acceptably, Honda says, on lesser grades, albeit producing less power. Nobody said this was an economy car. And yet, the EPA figures are surprisingly good for a 3,500-pound machine: 19 mpg city, 28 highway. I logged 24.4, and I spent much time in the upper rev ranges.

The CLs ordered with automatic transmissions get either simple traction control (base) or the whiz-bang “vehicle stability assist” system, which includes traction and yaw control. If you opt for the 6-speed manual, you’re considered hard-core enough to prefer the (new this year) limited-slip differential. I much preferred that arrangement to the electronic oversight. Even with full-throttle blastoffs, torque steer was well managed as the differential gearset parceled out power to the front wheels.

Standard tires are 205/60 Michelins on 16-inch wheels. Type S gets 215/50s on 17-inch wheels. Either way, they’re V-rated for sustained running at up to 149 mph. The grip was impressive on both wet and dry surfaces. With a pronounced forward weight bias, the CL ultimately ran wide in turns when pressed too hard, but did so with plenty of warning, and grace.

Ride quality was sporty – i.e., a trifle rough at times, but was generally pleasant in view of the car’s athleticism, and felt unconquerable when pressed really hard.

The brakes are the same on both series, ventilated discs front, solid rear. I’d have to rate them overqualified on the lower-level car, because they were impressive on the S. The antilock was highly effective and utterly unobtrusive, even when called upon in simulated panic stops at elevated velocities.

When it wasn’t under the gun, the CL was commendably quiet, even at freeway speeds and with the moonroof open.

The Bose stereo was, as usual, above-average in tuner sensitivity and outstanding in clarity and overall tonality.

The tilt wheel would be more lovable with more range of motion, and telescoping would be nice.

I gave the navigation system some tests and it worked as promised, although, with all that it has going on, it can’t help but be visually distracting. In voice mode, an annoying feminine voice gives instructions. I deliberately took some wrong turns after dialing in a destination, and the GPS/DVD system calmly recalculated and suggested alternative routes. Worth $2,150? Perhaps, if you’re a delivery person.

Neither the feds nor insurance testers have had their way with a 2003 CL yet, but Honda has a pretty good handle on such worst-case scenarios.

Consumers Union surveys of owners report well-above-average satisfaction and reliability for the CL series.

Fit and finish overall were excellent. Final assembly point for the CL is the Honda complex at Marysville, Ohio. Only the transmission was sourced from Japan.

The tester came with the navigation system, and thus bore a final price of $33,180 with freight. Payments at that price would come to $673, assuming 20 percent down, 10 percent interest and 48 installments. Edmunds.com, which monitors transaction prices nationally, says that on average CLs are going for $700-$800 under sticker – better snap one up before the marketplace wises up.

“The Gannett News Service”

Factory warranties

New car program benefits

Basic
4 years / 50,000 miles
Corrosion
5 years
Powertrain
4 years / 50,000 miles
Roadside Assistance
4 years / 50,000 miles

Certified Pre-Owned program benefits

Age / mileage
6 years old and newer from their original in-service date, with 80,000 miles or fewer at time of vehicle delivery.
Basic
2 years / 100,000 miles
Dealer certification
182-point inspection

Consumer reviews

4.6 / 5
Based on 46 reviews
Write a review
Comfort 4.5
Interior 4.6
Performance 4.6
Value 4.6
Exterior 4.3
Reliability 4.6

Most recent

  • Will never do business with aaa ever again

    The buying counseling Greg pence was the worst person I’ve delt with in the history of automotive sales currently. Very unprofessional unresponsive absolutely the worst person ever
    • Purchased a New car
    • Used for Having fun
    • Does not recommend this car
    Comfort 1.0
    Interior 1.0
    Performance 1.0
    Value 1.0
    Exterior 1.0
    Reliability 1.0
    5 people out of 10 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Awesome

    Awesome working with Victor, he is a very nice salesman. i must say that best dealership hands down.. just love it & truly impressed highly
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 4.0
    Exterior 4.0
    4 people out of 4 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Amazing

    It is a grand vehicle and I’m so glad I purchased it from this dealership. You will not be disappointed with any car you buy there
    • Purchased a New car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    2 people out of 4 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • They are so helpful

    I love them so much they try to help u as much as possible. Clean cars. Good service. Nice crew. Pleased to deal with them
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    0 people out of 1 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • omg this car saved my life

    I would give my left nut for this carI'm a big guy, 6'3" and big-boned, with two younger children that require car seats. There is still some room behind me with the seat backed up all of the way. The features and smart key are a nice touch. I am used to a V-6 AWD vehicle, so it has taken some time getting used to the slower acceleration in normal or ECO mode. In Sport mode, the acceleration is good. I really like the looks of this car. It just stinks you have to go to the Sport or Limited model to get dark interiors, but I'll deal with it.
    • Purchased a New car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Excellent car

    I am very happy with my car. It is really great experience to drive this car. It was like my dream and no it came true.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Having fun
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Great luxury coupe ahead of its time. Very reliabl

    This Car is very reliable and handles amazing. I drove it in the mountains and in low snow and it handled it gracefully. the heated seats work very well, a awesome find in a 2003 car. The car just needs a little work and I’m looking to purchase something bigger for off roading
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Most realiable

    This car did not meet my needs nor would I recommend it to anyone I know. Hope you find a better car that works for you
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 1.0
    Interior 1.0
    Performance 1.0
    Value 1.0
    Exterior 1.0
    0 people out of 1 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Great car lot

    Met marty he hooked us up with a bomb car they are the best i would recommend auto mart to anyone who needs a car they are very friendly and understanding i appreciate auto mart thanks so much
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Transporting family
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Bought the car at 25k still running string at 192k

    The car pretty much has been bullet proof but then again its' made by Honda. The only thing of consequence that failed was a head light ballast at about 185K, kind of a pricey repair but all projector lamps are.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 5.0
    1 person out of 1 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • It’s alright

    Car is alright, no longer using it.....great car if you do not want to spend more money on an expensive machine which will eventually break down
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Having fun
    • Does not recommend this car
    Comfort 3.0
    Interior 3.0
    Performance 3.0
    Value 2.0
    Exterior 2.0
    Reliability 2.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Reliable

    Great car I would highly recommendable to anyone looking for a car . Paul was awesome and kind and the car I bought is so nice at a great price
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 4.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No

Latest news from cars.com

See all news

Acura dealers near you

FAQ

What trim levels are available for the 2003 Acura CL?

The 2003 Acura CL is available in 4 trim levels:

  • (1 style)
  • Type S (2 styles)
  • Type S w/Navigation System (2 styles)
  • w/Navigation System (1 style)

What is the MPG of the 2003 Acura CL?

The 2003 Acura CL offers up to 20 MPG in city driving and 29 MPG on the highway. These figures are based on EPA mileage ratings and are for comparison purposes only. The actual mileage will vary depending on vehicle options, trim level, driving conditions, driving habits, vehicle maintenance, and other factors.

Is the 2003 Acura CL reliable?

The 2003 Acura CL has an average reliability rating of 4.6 out of 5 according to cars.com consumers. Find real-world reliability insights within consumer reviews from 2003 Acura CL owners.

Is the 2003 Acura CL a good Coupe?

Below are the cars.com consumers ratings for the 2003 Acura CL. 95.7% of drivers recommend this vehicle.

4.6 / 5
Based on 46 reviews
  • Comfort: 4.5
  • Interior: 4.6
  • Performance: 4.6
  • Value: 4.6
  • Exterior: 4.3
  • Reliability: 4.6
Your list was successfully saved.
 
 
 
 
Save list Compare
[{"cat":"luxurypassenger_standard","stock_type":"used","bodystyle":"Coupe","page_type":"research/make-model-year","oem_page":false,"search_fuel_types":["Gasoline Fuel"]}]