Skip to main content

1997
Pontiac Grand Am

Starts at:
$14,800
Shop options
New 1997 Pontiac Grand Am
See ratings
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Shop Cars.com
Browse cars & save your favorites
Dealers near you
Find & contact a dealership near you
no listings

We're not finding any listings in your area.
Change your location or search Cars.com to see more!

Change location

Available trims

See the differences side-by-side to compare trims.
  • 4dr Sdn SE (CMI)
    Starts at
    $14,800
    22 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas L4
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 2dr Cpe SE (CMI)
    Starts at
    $14,800
    22 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas L4
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 4dr Sdn SE
    Starts at
    $14,809
    22 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas L4
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 2dr Cpe SE
    Starts at
    $14,809
    22 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas L4
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 2dr Cpe GT
    Starts at
    $16,124
    22 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas L4
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 4dr Sdn GT
    Starts at
    $16,124
    22 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas L4
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 2dr Cpe GT (CMI)
    Starts at
    $16,300
    22 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas L4
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 4dr Sdn GT (CMI)
    Starts at
    $16,300
    22 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas L4
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs

The good & the bad

This vehicle doesn't have any good or bad insights yet.

Use our comparison tool to look at this model side-by-side with other vehicles or view the full specifications list .

Start your comparison

Expert 1997 Pontiac Grand Am review

our expert's take
Our expert's take
By
Full article
our expert's take

There’s a simple reason the Grand Am is Pontiac’s best-selling vehicle: You get a lot of car for not a lot of money.

Our test car, a 1997 Grand Am SE sedan, had a 150-horsepower twin-cam engine that beats a lot of the competition, plus a base price of $14,734. Add goodies like a rear spoiler, alloy wheels and a (yuk) smoker’s package and you’ll still be well below $20,000. Our test model barely nudged the $18,000 mark.

While the ’97 edition hasn’t changed much from the previous year, Pontiac has thrown another bone to the budget-pinched – standard air conditioning on all models. There’s an added benefit, too, that you won’t see advertised. The interior is so cramped it finally may force you to go on that diet.

She: The Grand Am would be an easy target to pick on. A lot of the competition, like the Toyota Camry and the Nissan Altima, clearly are better engineered and more sophisticated cars. But they’re handicapped by price. That’s where the Grand Am shines. Our test car was loaded up with all kinds of options and it still squeaked in with a total price of just $18,015. That will barely buy you an entry-level Camry these days. While the Grand Am’s chubby steroid “sporty” style may not suit everyone’s taste, at least you’re not getting some bland insurance-company car. Price and personality. How can you beat that?

He: Let me count the ways. Just look at some of the Grand Am’s siblings at General Motors, like the new Chevrolet Malibu and the Oldsmobile Cutlass. Both are better-built, better-looking, better-handling and better-equipped cars for around the same price. Plus, a new Grand Am is coming next year. I would say buy the 1997 model only if you can get a heavy discount on the sticker. I imagine you’ll have a pretty good chance of wheeling and dealing on the Grand Am.

She: That’s half the fun for some people. Where the Grand Am disappoints is in the cabin, which is short on space and has just about the worst-looking plastic I’ve ever seen. Our test-vehicle had a teal-colored interior, which just seemed to intensify the cheapness of the plastic. It seemed too grainy and garish. The rear seats feel quite cramped.

He: The whole interior is cramped for a six-footer, and the front seats are so thinly padded, you’ll feel every pothole in the seat of your pants. Other than that, the Grand Am is not much better than a middle-of-the-road car.

She: I’m surprised to hear that from a former Saturday-night hot-rodder. I thought you’d love the engine power in the Grand Am.

He: Whaddya mean, “hot rodder”? In my beat-up ’65 Fairlane with the 289 V-8, “three on the tree” transmission and bald, retread tires, you gotta be kidding. I know 150 horses in the Grand Am’s size and price class is nothing to sneeze at.

But let’s not kid ourselves, this is no sports car. The steering is not as crisp and precise as it could be, nor does the car feel all that agile, despite the fact that it has struts and coi ls in front and a semi-independent trailing-arm setup in the rear. As I said, it seems like just a step behind some of the newer products in the segment.

She: Of course this is a sports car. Just look at some of the competition. You get an anemic 98-horsepower engine in the Suzuki Esteem and a 100-horsepower engine in the base Saturn SL1 sedan. I don’t want to get into a philosophical argument with you about what’s sporty and what’s not, but the Grand Am is sporty, believe me. If the engine isn’t zippy enough for you, just look at the two new paint colors – both metallic and one’s even purple.

He: Oh, come on. I’m just trying to say that the Grand Am seems to have lost a little of its spunk and personality. It’s even more apparent when you consider what a great job Pontiac did in redesigning its big brother, the Grand Prix, this year. I just hope some of that excellence and enthusiasm filters down to the Grand Am when they redo it next summer for the 1999 model year.

She: I think it’s more spunky than ever. Especially if spunky means able to handle whatever is thrown at it in terms of weather and road conditions. You get standard antilock brakes, and with the optional four-speed automatic transmission you also get a form of traction control. So you get sporty and sensible. Tote up all the safety features, including daytime running lights and child-proof rear door locks, and the Grand Am seems fun and practical. I admire that.

He: Wait a minute. I’m fun and practical. You never said you admire me.

She: I wonder how your specs would hold up next to the Grand Am’s.

He: How about more rear-end room and a louder exhaust?

1997 Pontiac Grand Am SE

Type: Front-engine, front-wheel drive, five-passenger sedan.

Price: Base, $14,734; as tested, $18,015 (inc. $525 destination charge).

What’s new for ’97: Standard air conditioning, two new colors (medium blue metallic and medium purple metallic).

Standard equipment: Power rack-and-pinion steering, power door locks, custom bolt-on wheel covers, fog lamps, tinted glass, air conditioning, illuminated entry, tachometer, console with cup holders, dual visor vanity mirrors, AM/FM stereo with four speakers, remote fuel and trunk releases.

Safety features: Dual air bags, four-wheel antilock brakes, daytime running lamps, child-proof rear door locks, traction control (optional).

Options on test vehicle: Option Group 1SB ($825) including tilt steering wheel, intermittent windshield wipers, cruise control, rear window defogger, AM/FM stereo radio with clock and cassette player; 4-speed automatic transmission with enhanced traction system ($810); power windows ($355); 15-inch crosslace aluminum wheels ($300); rear deck spoiler ($170); remote keyless entry ($150); P195/65R15 touring tires ($131); smoker’s package ($15).

EPA fuel economy: 22 mpg city/ 32 mpg highway.

Engine: 2.4-liter four-cylinder; 150-hp at 6000 rpm; 155 lb-ft torque at 4400 rpm.

Transmission: Four-speed automatic.

Competitors: Buick Skylark, Chevrolet Cavalier, Chevrolet Malibu, Dodge Neon, Dodge Stratus, Ford Contour, Ford Taurus, Geo Prizm, Honda Accord, Honda Civic, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Sonata, Kia Sephia, Mazda Protege, Mazda 626, Mercury Mystique, Mercury Sable, Mitsubishi Galant, Nissan Altima, Nissan Sentra, Oldsmobile Achieva, Oldsmobile Cutlass, Plymouth Breeze, Saturn SL, Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy, Suzuki Esteem, Toyota Camry, Toyota Corolla, Volkswagen Jetta.

Specifications: Wheelbase, 103.4 inches; overall length, 186.9 inches; curb weight, 2,877 pounds; legroom, 43.1 inches front/34.9 inches rear; headroom, 37.8 inches front/37.0 inches rear; shoulder room, 52.2 inches front/ 52.6 inches rear.

12-month insurance cost: According to AAA Michigan: $949, Rates based on an average family of four from the Livonia area whose primary driver is aged 40 with no tickets who drives three to 10 miles each way to work. Rates reflect multicar discount and, where appropriate, discounts for air bags and seat belts.

Where built: Lansing

1997 Pontiac Grand Am review: Our expert's take
By

There’s a simple reason the Grand Am is Pontiac’s best-selling vehicle: You get a lot of car for not a lot of money.

Our test car, a 1997 Grand Am SE sedan, had a 150-horsepower twin-cam engine that beats a lot of the competition, plus a base price of $14,734. Add goodies like a rear spoiler, alloy wheels and a (yuk) smoker’s package and you’ll still be well below $20,000. Our test model barely nudged the $18,000 mark.

While the ’97 edition hasn’t changed much from the previous year, Pontiac has thrown another bone to the budget-pinched – standard air conditioning on all models. There’s an added benefit, too, that you won’t see advertised. The interior is so cramped it finally may force you to go on that diet.

She: The Grand Am would be an easy target to pick on. A lot of the competition, like the Toyota Camry and the Nissan Altima, clearly are better engineered and more sophisticated cars. But they’re handicapped by price. That’s where the Grand Am shines. Our test car was loaded up with all kinds of options and it still squeaked in with a total price of just $18,015. That will barely buy you an entry-level Camry these days. While the Grand Am’s chubby steroid “sporty” style may not suit everyone’s taste, at least you’re not getting some bland insurance-company car. Price and personality. How can you beat that?

He: Let me count the ways. Just look at some of the Grand Am’s siblings at General Motors, like the new Chevrolet Malibu and the Oldsmobile Cutlass. Both are better-built, better-looking, better-handling and better-equipped cars for around the same price. Plus, a new Grand Am is coming next year. I would say buy the 1997 model only if you can get a heavy discount on the sticker. I imagine you’ll have a pretty good chance of wheeling and dealing on the Grand Am.

She: That’s half the fun for some people. Where the Grand Am disappoints is in the cabin, which is short on space and has just about the worst-looking plastic I’ve ever seen. Our test-vehicle had a teal-colored interior, which just seemed to intensify the cheapness of the plastic. It seemed too grainy and garish. The rear seats feel quite cramped.

He: The whole interior is cramped for a six-footer, and the front seats are so thinly padded, you’ll feel every pothole in the seat of your pants. Other than that, the Grand Am is not much better than a middle-of-the-road car.

She: I’m surprised to hear that from a former Saturday-night hot-rodder. I thought you’d love the engine power in the Grand Am.

He: Whaddya mean, “hot rodder”? In my beat-up ’65 Fairlane with the 289 V-8, “three on the tree” transmission and bald, retread tires, you gotta be kidding. I know 150 horses in the Grand Am’s size and price class is nothing to sneeze at.

But let’s not kid ourselves, this is no sports car. The steering is not as crisp and precise as it could be, nor does the car feel all that agile, despite the fact that it has struts and coi ls in front and a semi-independent trailing-arm setup in the rear. As I said, it seems like just a step behind some of the newer products in the segment.

She: Of course this is a sports car. Just look at some of the competition. You get an anemic 98-horsepower engine in the Suzuki Esteem and a 100-horsepower engine in the base Saturn SL1 sedan. I don’t want to get into a philosophical argument with you about what’s sporty and what’s not, but the Grand Am is sporty, believe me. If the engine isn’t zippy enough for you, just look at the two new paint colors – both metallic and one’s even purple.

He: Oh, come on. I’m just trying to say that the Grand Am seems to have lost a little of its spunk and personality. It’s even more apparent when you consider what a great job Pontiac did in redesigning its big brother, the Grand Prix, this year. I just hope some of that excellence and enthusiasm filters down to the Grand Am when they redo it next summer for the 1999 model year.

She: I think it’s more spunky than ever. Especially if spunky means able to handle whatever is thrown at it in terms of weather and road conditions. You get standard antilock brakes, and with the optional four-speed automatic transmission you also get a form of traction control. So you get sporty and sensible. Tote up all the safety features, including daytime running lights and child-proof rear door locks, and the Grand Am seems fun and practical. I admire that.

He: Wait a minute. I’m fun and practical. You never said you admire me.

She: I wonder how your specs would hold up next to the Grand Am’s.

He: How about more rear-end room and a louder exhaust?

1997 Pontiac Grand Am SE

Type: Front-engine, front-wheel drive, five-passenger sedan.

Price: Base, $14,734; as tested, $18,015 (inc. $525 destination charge).

What’s new for ’97: Standard air conditioning, two new colors (medium blue metallic and medium purple metallic).

Standard equipment: Power rack-and-pinion steering, power door locks, custom bolt-on wheel covers, fog lamps, tinted glass, air conditioning, illuminated entry, tachometer, console with cup holders, dual visor vanity mirrors, AM/FM stereo with four speakers, remote fuel and trunk releases.

Safety features: Dual air bags, four-wheel antilock brakes, daytime running lamps, child-proof rear door locks, traction control (optional).

Options on test vehicle: Option Group 1SB ($825) including tilt steering wheel, intermittent windshield wipers, cruise control, rear window defogger, AM/FM stereo radio with clock and cassette player; 4-speed automatic transmission with enhanced traction system ($810); power windows ($355); 15-inch crosslace aluminum wheels ($300); rear deck spoiler ($170); remote keyless entry ($150); P195/65R15 touring tires ($131); smoker’s package ($15).

EPA fuel economy: 22 mpg city/ 32 mpg highway.

Engine: 2.4-liter four-cylinder; 150-hp at 6000 rpm; 155 lb-ft torque at 4400 rpm.

Transmission: Four-speed automatic.

Competitors: Buick Skylark, Chevrolet Cavalier, Chevrolet Malibu, Dodge Neon, Dodge Stratus, Ford Contour, Ford Taurus, Geo Prizm, Honda Accord, Honda Civic, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Sonata, Kia Sephia, Mazda Protege, Mazda 626, Mercury Mystique, Mercury Sable, Mitsubishi Galant, Nissan Altima, Nissan Sentra, Oldsmobile Achieva, Oldsmobile Cutlass, Plymouth Breeze, Saturn SL, Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy, Suzuki Esteem, Toyota Camry, Toyota Corolla, Volkswagen Jetta.

Specifications: Wheelbase, 103.4 inches; overall length, 186.9 inches; curb weight, 2,877 pounds; legroom, 43.1 inches front/34.9 inches rear; headroom, 37.8 inches front/37.0 inches rear; shoulder room, 52.2 inches front/ 52.6 inches rear.

12-month insurance cost: According to AAA Michigan: $949, Rates based on an average family of four from the Livonia area whose primary driver is aged 40 with no tickets who drives three to 10 miles each way to work. Rates reflect multicar discount and, where appropriate, discounts for air bags and seat belts.

Where built: Lansing

Safety review

Based on the 1997 Pontiac Grand Am base trim
NHTSA crash test and rollover ratings, scored out of 5.
Frontal driver
4/5
Frontal passenger
5/5

Factory warranties

Basic
3 years / 36,000 miles
Corrosion
3 years / 36,000 miles
Powertrain
8 years / 80,000 miles

Consumer reviews

4.0 / 5
Based on 14 reviews
Write a review
Comfort 3.8
Interior 3.9
Performance 4.1
Value 4.6
Exterior 3.8
Reliability 3.5

Most recent

  • Replacing motor at 133k miles

    I bought this car because it looks immaculate!! The interior looks like it's never been set in,the exterior looks as if it has fresh paint on it. Unfortunately the car was ran without oil in it so I'm waiting for the replacement. Cant wait to drive it again
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 2.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 2.0
    Reliability 1.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Used 2.4 gran am do not buy , buy a v6,

    I have owed my 1998 gran am 2.4 8 year. Car is fun to drive, gets 17 mpg in town and 27 straight highway(interstate). Car had a manual door that had vice grips for a handle . Gas tank had a hole in it. Key door locks were frozen shut from no use. I like the car as a 2nd car to keep my Mark 8 out of winter salt. Car had 140,000 mi used , paid 1000 with all it needed .The car lost coolant 6 months later. The water pump from xxxx leaked. Its a 6 and 1/2 hour job at the Pontiac dealer back then@ 95 per hour=617.00+ tax @ 6.75 come to 659.18 plus part and shop supplies. . I torn it down myself and installed the pump. In 32,000 later, the NAPA pump failed. I liked the car so much I removed the motor mount again, exhaust manifold, timing cover . This is my last used 2.4 be it pont, chev, olds, or any other 2.4 gm with the xxxxxxx behind the rear mounted water pump. Do not buy a 2.4 used as they will need a water pump. Be prepaired to spend up tp 1000.00 unless you can do like me. Buy the v6 gran am and no more worries about the pump being needed to replace The 2.4 is a good motor except the extreeme difficulity and cost of the w.ump.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Transporting family
    • Does not recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 3.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 4.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 2.0
    1 person out of 1 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Can't go wrong

    Picked up a '97 SE V6 4 door to get back and forth from school while my Jeep was being repaired and it never let me down. Drives great, handles great, only problems I've had are the the radio not lighting up anymore and an exhaust leak which makes it sound pretty good to be honest.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 3.0
    Reliability 5.0
    1 person out of 1 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • AMAZING CAR!!!

    This is hands down the best car I've ever drove. I traded my Ferrari for this car and I will never go back to that. I could basically live in this car with all of the features included in this car. The world would be a better place if everyone owned this car.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Having fun
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Nice car

    This is my first car. It had 97,500 when i got it last June. It's now April, and there's 105.200 on it. I love this car. It's little, good on gas, the heater is very powerful, and I like the exterior design. I've had to put a lot of money in to it because the previous owner was the type of person who drives cars, but was oblivious to anything else, but I'll surely be sad when I need to get a new car/ Northeastern rust sucksss.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 3.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Good car for little money

    I bought my 97 Pontaic in 07 When I turned 16.. I drove it hard to be a little four cylinder.. Had a few performance upgrades. The only problem I had was at 220000 miles the transmission begin to give me a few problems, but all in all I loved it
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 3.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 4.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • ehh

    Bought it used with 30K and now has near 125K, lots of minor repairs but for the most part a decent and affordable car
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Does not recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 3.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 4.0
    Exterior 3.0
    Reliability 2.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • goog car for the price

    Have 2.4 engine great acceleration nice handling car some minor issues when bought but easily fixed. panel nicely laid out. fun car to drive.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 3.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 4.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • So good, I bought another one

    My first car was a 97 se model that I bought for $600 (listed Below). It had 212000 miles on it when I bought it. i drove it until the transmission died at 273000 miles. That is a long time for any car to be on the road these days. I was so impressed with this car I bought another 97 Grand Am. This one is a 2-door GT model that is fully loaded with every available option. I love this car and I will drive it until it dies. it has 140000 miles. since I bought it ive only had to replace a starter, alternator, and serpentine belt which should be expected to go out on any older car. the only thing I dont like about it is the exaust pipe hangers are junk. they brake and leave your muffler dragging on the road. Other than that it has served me well. if you buy any 90s model grand am get the v6 because the 4 cylinder engine is a cursed engine. a friend of mine bought a 4 cylinder grand am and it has been in the shop more than it has been on the road. Other than that these are good cars and i still see many of them still on the road.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Great first cat

    This is the first car I have owned. I bought it in June of 2008. I have had to make a few minor repairs, being that the car is older, but otherwise it has been good to me. It gets fairly good gas mileage for a V6; from 25 to 30 mpg. I like that it is small and somewhat sporty. I think it is an excellent first car for anybody.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 3.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 3.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 3.0
    Reliability 4.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • the worst car i have ever owned stay away

    overheats all the time expensive to fix, one guy said it was the water pump another said the engine. sears told me the head gasket, and the last person said drive it till it finally dies dont spend money on it.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does not recommend this car
    Comfort 1.0
    Interior 1.0
    Performance 1.0
    Value 1.0
    Exterior 1.0
    Reliability 1.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Very reliable with V6

    I purchased a 97 Grand am back in April 2007 and it had 212000 miles on it. It runs perfect! No problems. It has a 3.1 V6 and gets reasonable gas mileage.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 3.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 5.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No

Latest news from cars.com

See all news

FAQ

What trim levels are available for the 1997 Pontiac Grand Am?

The 1997 Pontiac Grand Am is available in 2 trim levels:

  • GT (4 styles)
  • SE (4 styles)

What is the MPG of the 1997 Pontiac Grand Am?

The 1997 Pontiac Grand Am offers up to 22 MPG in city driving and 32 MPG on the highway. These figures are based on EPA mileage ratings and are for comparison purposes only. The actual mileage will vary depending on vehicle options, trim level, driving conditions, driving habits, vehicle maintenance, and other factors.

Is the 1997 Pontiac Grand Am reliable?

The 1997 Pontiac Grand Am has an average reliability rating of 3.5 out of 5 according to cars.com consumers. Find real-world reliability insights within consumer reviews from 1997 Pontiac Grand Am owners.

Is the 1997 Pontiac Grand Am a good Sedan?

Below are the cars.com consumers ratings for the 1997 Pontiac Grand Am. 78.6% of drivers recommend this vehicle.

4.0 / 5
Based on 14 reviews
  • Comfort: 3.8
  • Interior: 3.9
  • Performance: 4.1
  • Value: 4.6
  • Exterior: 3.8
  • Reliability: 3.5
Your list was successfully saved.
 
 
 
 
Save list Compare
[{"cat":"sedan_midsize","stock_type":"used","bodystyle":"Sedan","page_type":"research/make-model-year","oem_page":false,"search_fuel_types":["Gasoline Fuel"]}]