Skip to main content

2001 Mitsubishi Eclipse

Change year or car
$17,987

starting MSRP

Key specs

Base trim shown

Coupe

Body style

4

Seating capacity

175.4” x 52.8”

Dimensions

Front-wheel drive

Drivetrain

Overview

(37 reviews)

5 trims

Starting msrp listed lowest to highest price

Wondering which trim is right for you?

Our 2001 Mitsubishi Eclipse trim comparison will help you decide.

See also: Find the best Coupes for 2024

2001 Mitsubishi Eclipse review: Our expert's take

By Cars.com Editors

This thing has such a bad case of stylistic testosterone poisoning, you’d expect it to have acne, but there were no blemishes on the lustrous silver exterior of the tester. The Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder enters its second generation as a 2001 model, following its sibling, the coupe, which was redone for the 2000 model-year run. The Eclipse Spyder is positioned as an “affordable” alternative to $40,000-and-up class open-air machines, such as the Mercedes SLK-Class reviewed here recently. While it may fall short of THAT kind of delicious hedonism, it certainly does not feel like a poor man’s concession, at least in its more competent GT form.

More mature drivers may be put off by the adolescent lack of subtlety, but it may be just the ticket for the uninitiated, and it DOES have the goods to fairly well back up the visual boasting. The Eclipse convertible comes in two series, show and go, or, as the company styles them, GS and GT. Both the exciting turbo engine and the road-hugging all-wheel-drive mechanisms available in the last generation have been retired, more’s the pity.

The GS, which starts at $23,347, has the same 2.4-liter four-banger engine as the base coupe. It makes 147 hp and 158 foot-pounds of torque. While that’s certainly enough for cruising and the general sort of exhibitionism to which the breed is prone, it’s far from being up to the task of making good on the body’s bold claims. For that there’s the GT. The engine alone makes the $25,237 base price compelling vis–vis the GS, although there are many sweeteners in the deal. The GT has a 3-liter, 24-valve (single-overhead-cam) V-6, which churns out 200 horses and 205 foot-pounds. Now THAT is what it takes to get the job done in a car that weighs a bit over 3,200 pounds.

It showed little interest in plodding along at less than 1,500 rpm, came alive in a big way at 4,000, and ran to the 6,800 redline with such brio that I soon discovered ignition cutoff comes on hard at 7,000.

The standard transmission is a slick-shifting five-speed manual, though a four-speed Sportronic automatic is available. The test car had the manual, and after running through the gears a few times, I was glad of it – it’s nice enough to enhance rather than detract from the driving experience, and this peaky engine needs the extra cog. The clutch would be a good one for a learner – it’s a model of fluid grace.

Traction control, an option with the automatic transmission, is not available with the five-speed, nor did I find any pressing need for it, thanks to the car’s forward weight bias. Even with the convertible top motors at the rear, 63 percent of the car’s weight rests on its front, driving wheels.

Power is sent to the ground through massive 215/50 tires on 17-inch alloy wheels. (Even the GS has commendably meaty 205/55/16s). They’re V-rated, which means they’re good for speeds that will cost a lot of points (up to 149 mph) without bei ng quite so harsh as stiffer skins would be.

Goosing the engine up to a few grand and then dropping the clutch guarantees repairs down the road and, as I found, a good deal of squeal, smoke and torque-steer squirming. Easing out the clutch with modest throttle inputs allows brisk and not nearly so costly departures.

Though slightly larger than its predecessor, the Eclipse is still a subcompact, with but 75 cubic feet for passengers and a half-sized 7.2-c.f. trunk. It’s provided with four sets of seatbelts for those poor souls who are at that awkward age of having small children and the desire for a sports car. Those who need to haul grown-ups had best look elsewhere. The front compartment affords a nominal 13 inches more legroom than the rear and thus was able to accommodate my 6-1 frame. Headroom was surprisingly good, thanks to the low seating position, and ducking under the roof not nearly so painful as I had feared, given the low-slung 3-inch height of the .

Unfortunately, I was a few inches too tall to enjoy actually driving this machine topless. No matter how I scrunched down, I got an unwelcome scalp massage. With the top up, the Eclipse was noisier than some of the competition. Even though the roof is three-ply, considerable wind and road noise penetrated. Side sealing was excellent, however, neither rushing air nor torrential rain able to intrude. Raising and lowering the top was simple – two latches, one switch. Mitsubishi farms out the top work to the renowned American Sunroof Corp., just a few miles from the Normal, Ill., plant where Eclipses are assembled. Eclipse fails of being called domestic, however, because 32 percent of its components are from overseas, including the Japanese-made engine and transmission.

Ride quality was very good, albeit firm. The new platform has 65 percent more bending rigidity than before, and 9 percent more twisting resistance. This pays off in a tight, well-controlled feel, even over highly irregular surfaces. There was a minor rattle or two, and a leetle bit of cowl shake, but well within the tolerance for convertibles.

A GT has to have a spoiler, according to the Woodward Avenue Convention. Pity this one is so large, especially since the rear window is so small. Visibility overall is pathetic, and rather claustrophobic with the top in place. At least that aft window is glass, and has defroster wires implanted.

The stylists chose a gray outline font on a medium gray background for the instruments, which makes for terrible legibility in daylight. Well-placed, they’re fine at night.

The tester had the upgraded Infiniti stereo, which was average in FM sensitivity, above-average in tonality and powerful enough to produce tympanic effects on the cloth top.

The GT’s brakes are larger than the less-serious GS’s (10.9 inches front, 10.3 rear), and feature discs at the rear instead of the more plebeian ride’s drums. Pedal feel was good, progressive and easily tuned, and stopping distances were comforting.

Overall build quality was quite good, the top exemplary.

Neither the feds nor the insurance folks have run one into a wall yet, so no crash data are available. Neither is reliability information.

EPA mileage ratings on the GT with manual trans are 20 mpg city, 27 highway, and it does want premium fuel, despite the modest 9:1 compression ratio. I measured its thirst at 22.6 mpg, working the gears quite a bit on country roads.

Both GS and GT come with the expected array of goodies. The tester had a $2,370 “premium package.” This brings antilock brakes, the stereo upgrade, leather seating, power driver’s seat and side front air bags. Pity the safety features are inextricably intertwined with items I could pass on.

“The Gannett News Service”

Consumer reviews

(37 reviews)
Rating breakdown (out of 5):
  • Comfort 4.0
  • Interior 4.2
  • Performance 4.0
  • Value 4.2
  • Exterior 4.5
  • Reliability 3.9
Write a review

Most recent consumer reviews

The automotive love of my life.

I kinda feel in love with the GT 3.0 model when I seen how cool vin Diesel looked zooming around if the fast and the furious I love almost everything about this cat,starting with how it fits like a glove, and envelopes my body when I opening the door and getting in . There could be a slight headroom issue if you're 6' or taller That's easily overlooked because once seated adjusted and buckled it feels almost perfect.The satisfaction continues when I start the 3.0 liter naturally aspirated v6 engine and heat it's throaty growl. It accelerates nicely ,but leaves you wanting just a bit more .handled superbly on the freeway and in traffic.I can handled some hairpin turns at 50+ mph where lots of other comparable cars have to slow down to 25-30 mph . ( however I don't recommend that you do that .I tend to push performance cars to their absolute limits .the car is moderately easy mechanically speaking to work on .The engines oxygen sensors are a pain in the neck and can really throw a lot of other stuff crucial to high performance for a loop if I don't stay after it. Seems like it's quite a bit more difficult to satisfy the service engine soon light after the odometer goes pass 130,000 or so .the one big bright red flag with these cars would be the timing belt and how the motor is pretty much toast if I breaks while driving .Any driver buying this model should immediately replace the timing belt upon purchasing if the odometer has 80 thousand or more.

Rating breakdown (out of 5):
  • Comfort 5.0
  • Interior 5.0
  • Performance 4.0
  • Value 4.0
  • Exterior 5.0
  • Reliability 5.0
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Used for Having fun
  • Does recommend this car
2 people out of 2 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Great car Minor issues

Got my car used for 6k not even less than an hour started dying on me it was wiring issues but other than that the car is good if I could name any other cons it would be the fwd and car ignition not working sometimes due to the fact that it needs to be fully in park.

Rating breakdown (out of 5):
  • Comfort 5.0
  • Interior 5.0
  • Performance 4.0
  • Value 5.0
  • Exterior 5.0
  • Reliability 3.0
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Used for Commuting
  • Does recommend this car
3 people out of 3 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Love to drive, hate to fix

I have always wanted this body style since the day I first saw one in high school. Finally got one, 17 years later. Love the way it drives, love how comfortable I felt driving it ... But hate how it has many issues. Engine issues.

Rating breakdown (out of 5):
  • Comfort 5.0
  • Interior 5.0
  • Performance 4.0
  • Value 4.0
  • Exterior 5.0
  • Reliability 2.0
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Used for Commuting
  • Does recommend this car
12 people out of 13 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No
See all 37 consumer reviews

Safety

Based on the 2001 Mitsubishi Eclipse base trim.
Side driver
5

Warranty

New car and Certified Pre-Owned programs by Mitsubishi
New car program benefits
Bumper-to-bumper
36 months/36,000 miles
Corrosion
84 months/100,000 miles
Powertrain
60 months/60,000 miles
Certified Pre-Owned program benefits
Maximum age/mileage
Less than 5 years/less than 60,000 miles
Basic warranty terms
Remainder of original 5 years/60,000 miles
Powertrain
Remainder of original 10-year/100,000 miles
Dealer certification required
123-point inspection
Roadside assistance
Yes
View all cpo program details

Have questions about warranties or CPO programs?

Compare the competitors

Latest 2001 Eclipse stories

News

33033

News

34459

See all 2001 Mitsubishi Eclipse articles