Skip to main content

2018 Ford Expedition Vs. 2017 Chevrolet Tahoe

CARS.COM — From “Freddy vs. Jason” to “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice,” it’s fun to pit a pair of prominent members of a given field (be it superheroing or serial killing) against one another. With the recent debut of the 2018 Ford Expedition, the comparison that came to mind is body-on-frame, full-size SUVs; how does the new Expedition measure up to its rival, the Chevrolet Tahoe?

Related: 2018 Ford Expedition Review: First Impressions and Photo Gallery

In terms of exterior styling, some of our editors who saw the Ford Expedition at the Chicago Auto Show perceived an increased similarity between it and the Tahoe. While not everyone agreed, the pair do bear a resemblance in their greenhouses’ long, flat, narrow look — both seeming to rise gradually as the eye moves front to back — and likewise in their trapezoidal second and third row windows and rear-roof overhangs.

img1411585552 1487095255612 jpg 2017 Chevrolet Tahoe | Cars.com photo by Angela Conners

In front, the new Ford Expedition seems more like a tour of styling cues from other Ford trucks and large SUVs. The hood borrows heavily from its platform-mate, the F-150, while the grater-like grille and lower front bumper have more in common with the Explorer SUV, as do the wheel arches.

We don’t have specs yet for the new Expedition beyond it being 1 inch longer and 1 inch wider than the outgoing model year, which would put it at about 207.5 inches long and 79.8 inches wide. That’s compared to the Chevy Tahoe’s 204-inch length and 80.5-inch width.

Under the hood, the new Ford Expedition gets a new twin-turbo 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6 mated to a 10-speed automatic transmission. Ford hasn’t released full specs yet, but the old twin-turbo 3.5-liter V-6 EcoBoost made 365 horsepower and 420 pounds-feet of torque and was mated to a six-speed automatic. Chevrolet powers the 2017 Tahoe with a 5.3-liter V-8 that makes 355 horsepower and 383 pounds-feet of torque, and is also mated to a six-speed automatic. EPA-estimated fuel-economy estimates likewise were not yet available, but the 2017 Expedition loses that battle with 15/21/18 mpg city/highway/combined compared with the Tahoe’s 16/23/19 mpg.

Do you notice a resemblance between the two truck-based SUVs? Or are some of us here at Cars.com seeing things?

Check out the photo galleries below and decide for yourself.

2018 Ford Expedition

img118693381 1487095282246 jpg img119616902 1487095284396 jpg img120540423 1487095285221 jpg img121463944 1487095286142 jpg img122387465 1487095286814 jpg img123310986 1487095287653 jpg img124234507 1487095288576 jpg img125158028 1487095289339 jpg img126081549 1487095290085 jpg img146399011 1487095291124 jpg img147322532 1487095292517 jpg img148246053 1487095293500 jpg img149169574 1487095294518 jpg img150093095 1487095295447 jpg img151016616 1487095296569 jpg img151940137 1487095297706 jpg img152863658 1487095299341 jpg img153787179 1487095300277 jpg img154710700 1487095301109 jpg img175028162 1487095302127 jpg img175951683 1487095302829 jpg img118693381 1487095282246 jpg img119616902 1487095284396 jpg img120540423 1487095285221 jpg img121463944 1487095286142 jpg img122387465 1487095286814 jpg img123310986 1487095287653 jpg img124234507 1487095288576 jpg img125158028 1487095289339 jpg img126081549 1487095290085 jpg img146399011 1487095291124 jpg img147322532 1487095292517 jpg img148246053 1487095293500 jpg img149169574 1487095294518 jpg img150093095 1487095295447 jpg img151016616 1487095296569 jpg img151940137 1487095297706 jpg img152863658 1487095299341 jpg img153787179 1487095300277 jpg img154710700 1487095301109 jpg img175028162 1487095302127 jpg img175951683 1487095302829 jpg

2017 Chevrolet Tahoe

img1410662031 1487095254606 jpg img1411585552 1487095255612 jpg img1412509073 1487095256462 jpg img1413432594 1487095257472 jpg img1414356115 1487095258412 jpg img1415279636 1487095259294 jpg img1416203157 1487095260182 jpg img1417126678 1487095260919 jpg img1418050199 1487095261770 jpg img1438367661 1487095263079 jpg img1439291182 1487095263921 jpg img1440214703 1487095264734 jpg img1441138224 1487095265628 jpg img1442061745 1487095266312 jpg img1442985266 1487095267554 jpg img1443908787 1487095268370 jpg img1410662031 1487095254606 jpg img1411585552 1487095255612 jpg img1412509073 1487095256462 jpg img1413432594 1487095257472 jpg img1414356115 1487095258412 jpg img1415279636 1487095259294 jpg img1416203157 1487095260182 jpg img1417126678 1487095260919 jpg img1418050199 1487095261770 jpg img1438367661 1487095263079 jpg img1439291182 1487095263921 jpg img1440214703 1487095264734 jpg img1441138224 1487095265628 jpg img1442061745 1487095266312 jpg img1442985266 1487095267554 jpg img1443908787 1487095268370 jpg

Cars.com’s Editorial department is your source for automotive news and reviews. In line with Cars.com’s long-standing ethics policy, editors and reviewers don’t accept gifts or free trips from automakers. The Editorial department is independent of Cars.com’s advertising, sales and sponsored content departments.

Assistant Managing Editor-News
Matt Schmitz

Former Assistant Managing Editor-News Matt Schmitz is a veteran Chicago journalist indulging his curiosity for all things auto while helping to inform car shoppers.

Featured stories

hyundai sonata n line 2025 01 exterior front angle jpg
toyota 4runner hybrid trd off road premium 2025 03 exterior front angle jpg
bmw m5 touring 2025 03 exterior dynamic front angle jpg