2015 Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class

Change year or car

Change year or car


starting MSRP

2015 Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class
2015 Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class

Key specs

Base trim shown


Body style


Combined MPG


Seating capacity

178.3” x 66.9”


Rear-wheel drive



The good:

  • Diesel fuel efficiency
  • Nimble in tight spaces
  • Great visibility
  • V-6's responsiveness
  • Easily accessible Latch anchors

The bad:

  • Small cargo area
  • Cramped backseat
  • Highway wind noise
  • Aged interior technology

3 trims

Starting msrp listed lowest to highest price

Wondering which trim is right for you?

Our 2015 Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class trim comparison will help you decide.

See also: Find the best SUVs for 2023

Notable features

  • Standard V-6 (GLK350)
  • Rear- or all-wheel drive
  • Seats five
  • Diesel-powered GLK250 (AWD only)
  • 19-inch wheels
  • Stop/start technology

2015 Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class review: Our expert's take

By Joe Bruzek

The 2015 Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class’ small footprint and nimble, refined driving experience stand out, despite its otherwise dated luxury experience.

The 2015 Mercedes-Benz GLK350 4Matic could very well be the last GLK — in name, anyway. Mercedes is revamping its model nomenclature, so the successor to the GLK-Class crossover will be the GLC, which is rumored to be released as a 2016 model. Even after a mild 2013 refresh, the GLK is showing its age compared with Mercedes’ latest and greatest cars, like the 2015 C-Class sedan.

Introduced for 2010, the GLK received a minor refresh for 2013 with a new engine, an interior update and a slightly tweaked exterior. Compare the 2015 with the 2013 and 2010 here. I tested a simply optioned GLK350 with 4Matic all-wheel drive; its cost was $45,025 with a destination fee. The Mercedes-Benz GLK350 starts at $38,825 with rear-wheel drive, while an all-wheel-drive, diesel-powered GLK250 is available starting at $40,325.

Exterior & Styling
The Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class’ chiseled appearance and square roofline stand out in a crowded segment of mostly soft-styled luxury SUVs. The GLK’s traditional SUV styling makes it appear larger than it really is: Bumper to bumper, the GLK is 4.3 inches shorter than the Audi Q5, 5.2 inches shorter than the Acura RDX and a sizable 9.5 inches shorter than the Lexus RX 350. It’s even shorter — by 0.9 inches — than a segment newcomer, the 2015 Lincoln MKC. Compare the GLK to its longtime competitors here and to the MKC here.

The GLK’s upright shape provides fantastic visibility from the driver’s seat thanks to tall windows, thin body pillars and a squared roofline. Small side mirrors are the only weak spot in the GLK’s otherwise commanding view of the road.

How It Drives
A well-sorted suspension and tight steering connect the GLK to the road with supreme levels of sure-footedness. The available full-time all-wheel-drive system does the same in snowy and slippery conditions; it’s well worth the $2,000 premium it commands. A tight 37.6-foot turning circle and extremely nimble nature make the GLK a master of city driving; U-turns and tight corners are easily conquered by the sprightly SUV. Benz calls the GLK-Class midsize, but it drives like a much smaller compact SUV.

Small turbocharged engines are gaining popularity in other Mercedes-Benz cars and SUVs for their increased fuel economy, and it’s possible you’ll see a turbocharged offering in the GLK’s successor. If that’s the case, I’ll miss the current GLK’s standard powertrain: a naturally aspirated 302-horsepower, 3.5-liter V-6. Sure, fuel economy could be improved from the all-wheel-drive’s 18/25/21 mpg city/highway/combined figures, but it’s hard to replicate in a turbocharged one the punchiness of a good naturally aspirated engine. The GLK’s V-6 offers a potent punch of acceleration, with instantaneous accelerator response and a healthy V-6 growl under the hood. A BlueTEC diesel-powered GLK250 is rated 24/33/28 mpg with standard all-wheel drive and is one of a few diesel-powered SUVs in the segment.

Other noises inside the GLK aren’t as pleasant, like the intrusive wind you’ll hear whistling past the exterior at high speeds. The excessive noise is almost like a light switch that turns on at 50 mph and above, marring an otherwise refined highway driving experience, as the GLK tracks true on the highway with minimal fuss.

The GLK’s cabin isn’t claustrophobic despite having a decidedly more compact exterior than competing SUVs. The rear seat, however, is tight. It’s not an uncomfortable experience, like you’ll find in Mercedes’ smaller GLA-Class SUV, but it’s snug and the backrest is raked at an awkward angle without any adjustable reclining function. Much larger SUVs like the RX 350 have hugely roomy backseats; I even found the Q5’s slightly larger backseat more comfortable than that of the Mercedes-Benz GLK.

The interior is put together with decent materials, providing a satisfactory luxury experience. Not one particular finish stands out, however, and the design as a whole is somewhat uninspiring. Our test car was equipped with the standard MB-Tex imitation leather upholstery, which I find convincing enough. Leather upholstery, which is standard on the base Acura and Audi, is an $1,850 option here. Our GLK test car featured no-cost burl walnut wood trim, heated front seats ($750) and the Premium Package ($3,450), which included a panoramic moonroof, power liftgate, 115-volt AC household outlet and more.

There isn’t much new blood in this aging class of SUVs except for the Lincoln MKC, which provides a surprisingly luxurious experience for the money and a much more interesting, high-tech interior than the GLK. You’d think the GLK hadn’t been redesigned for some time, and from the ground up it hasn’t been, but it was touched up for 2013 with a new dashboard and interior materials. The update, though, merely brought the GLK up to an average level of quality. Given what we’ve seen Mercedes accomplish with the all-new 2015 C-Class compared with its previous generation, there’s promise for a GLK successor to make a big leap in the interior finish and design department.

Ergonomics & Electronics
Multimedia technology is moving at lightning speed, and the GLK’s standard multimedia system is stuck in the Stone Age. The system might not have been as big a disappointment if we hadn’t already grown enamored with Mercedes’ latest high-resolution-plus-touchpad technology in the C-Class.

The GLK-Class’ standard 5-inch screen is simply not enough real estate to legibly display the many functions of the GLK’s central controller system, which is used to control radio, media and car functions. The graphics are also dated. A 7-inch screen is available with navigation and a backup camera as part of a $2,970 Multimedia Package. Lincoln’s MKC includes a standard 8-inch touch-screen with much higher-quality graphics, plus two USB ports.

Bluetooth hands-free phone connectivity, Bluetooth streaming audio and a USB port for thumb drives are standard, and a Media Interface option allows the use of an iPod or iPhone through the GLK’s audio controls (it’s a $310 stand-alone option and is also part of the aforementioned $3,450 Premium Package). Our test car came with an Apple 30-pin connector for older iPhones. Mercedes’ website says an Apple adapter is required for use with the eight-pin Lightning connector used on later-model devices.

Cargo & Storage
The GLK’s small stature doesn’t show on the inside until you need to use the cargo area, which measures just 16.5 cubic feet behind the backseat. The RDX has 26.1 cubic feet, the MKC 25.2 cubic feet, the Q5 has 29.1 cubic feet and the RX — as its significant size suggests — has the most, at 40 cubic feet. Using the cargo area was at least easy thanks to our test car’s power liftgate, which is included in the Premium Package.

With the 60/40-split folding backseat down, the GLK has a maximum cargo capacity of 54.7 cubic feet. That’s smaller than its competitors; the closest in size is the Q5’s 57.3 cubic feet of cargo space.

The 2015 Mercedes-Benz GLK earned the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s highest score of good in all crash tests to which it’s been subjected, which currently excludes the small overlap front crash test. A score of good or acceptable would earn the agency’s Top Safety Pick Plus designation for the GLK. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration had not crash-tested the GLK as of this writing.

See here for a full list of standard safety features; a backup camera isn’t one of them. Instead, the camera is packaged into an expensive $2,970 Multimedia Package. Luxury automakers haven’t adopted the standard backup camera as readily as some non-luxury automakers, such as Honda.

Mercedes includes six months of its mbrace telematics system standard, which includes emergency response and 24-hour support. Active-safety options include a Lane Tracking Package with blind spot monitoring and lane keeping assist for $875. Available Pre-Safe Brake — as part of a $2,950 Driver Assistance Package — can help prevent an impending collision by sounding an alert and braking the vehicle when an imminent collision is detected. That package also includes blind spot monitoring, lane keeping assist and adaptive cruise control.

Value in Its Class
The compact-to-midsize luxury SUV segment isn’t the freshest lineup at the moment. The GLK, Audi Q5 and RX 350 all have a few years under their belts, and the GLK-Class feels the most dated of the three. An all-wheel-drive GLK350 like our test car starts at $40,825, and with $750 heated front seats and a $3,450 Premium Package, it added up quickly to our $45,025 as-tested price.

At $45,025, the Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class didn’t include a backup camera, smart keyless access with push-button start, or navigation — features you can add to the Q5 and MKC easily for the same price. Those cars also bring much more contemporary interiors and additional cargo space. The GLK is one of the best-driving luxury SUVs in its segment, but it’s less well-rounded — in usefulness and design — than its competitors.



Consumer reviews

Rating breakdown (out of 5):
  • Comfort 4.7
  • Interior design 4.7
  • Performance 4.8
  • Value for the money 4.6
  • Exterior styling 4.7
  • Reliability 4.7

Most recent consumer reviews


Would buy again

Owning 2012 GLK 350. Fast enough power , smooth drive. You can take on off-road and will do fine in sand or mud. 2x4 but still will crawl out of trouble. Looking for 2nd one for my wife.


Money Pit!!

Bought this car second hand..Big mistake! I have poured in about 7K into this car. It seems that every other week there is something wrong with it! Not even sure if it is worth selling since I probably wont get my money’s worth! :( :(


Stay away from MB 2015 GLK250!

Problems/Repairs total is costing us more than $10K. Tires would not seal, replace tires 2016-18, "Check engine": Replace Catalytic Converter Filter 2019, Replace Coolant pump 2022, Replace Crossovervalues(all three)Vacuum Reservoir 2022, Replace Lower Charge Cooler Pipe 2022, and possibly Turbo system. Car is still in the shop at MB of Escondido. Not to mention that All German Auto charged us 2022, for Maint A 50K Oil/Brake/ Transmission Fluid changout for $1500! This car is NOT reliable. No more MB. selling this worthless junk the next chance I get.

See all 76 consumer reviews


New car and Certified Pre-Owned programs by Mercedes-Benz
New car program benefits
48 months/50,000 miles
48 months/50,000 miles
48 months/50,000 miles
Roadside assistance
48 months/50,000 miles
Certified Pre-Owned program benefits
Maximum age/mileage
6 years old or less/less than 75,000 miles
Basic warranty terms
1 year/unlimited miles
1 year/unlimited miles
Dealer certification required
164-point inspection
Roadside assistance
View all cpo program details

Have questions about warranties or CPO programs?

Compare the competitors