Skip to main content

2002
Volvo S60

Starts at:
$27,125
Shop options
New 2002 Volvo S60
See ratings
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Shop Cars.com
Browse cars & save your favorites
Dealers near you
Find & contact a dealership near you
no listings

We're not finding any listings in your area.
Change your location or search Cars.com to see more!

Change location

Available trims

See the differences side-by-side to compare trims.
  • 2.4 A SR 4dr Sdn Auto w/Sunroof
    Starts at
    $27,125
    21 City / 28 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas I5
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 2.4 A 4dr Sdn Auto
    Starts at
    $27,125
    21 City / 28 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas I5
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 2.4 M 4dr Sdn Manual
    Starts at
    $27,125
    21 City / 28 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas I5
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 2.4T A SR 4dr Sdn Auto w/Sunroof
    Starts at
    $31,625
    21 City / 28 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Turbo Gas I5
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 2.4T AWD A SR 4dr Sdn Auto w/SR
    Starts at
    $33,375
    19 City / 26 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Turbo Gas I5
    Engine
    All Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • T5 M SR 4dr Sdn Manual w/Sunroof
    Starts at
    $34,025
    20 City / 27 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Turbo Gas I5
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • T5 A SR 4dr Sdn Auto w/Sunroof
    Starts at
    $34,025
    21 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Turbo Gas I5
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs

The good & the bad

This vehicle doesn't have any good or bad insights yet.

Use our comparison tool to look at this model side-by-side with other vehicles or view the full specifications list .

Start your comparison

Expert 2002 Volvo S60 review

our expert's take
Our expert's take
By
Full article
our expert's take

Here in what we call the Midwest, Left Coasters call Back East, and Easterners call Indian Country, we spent all summer hoping and praying for rain, but neither our optimism nor our pleas for intercession were heeded.

It was a near-disaster for farmers, as I frequently reminded myself when I lamented the lack of precipitation’s impact on my requirements as an auto tester. If I managed the weather, there would be at least one day a week with steady, sometimes torrential rain, the better to judge vehicles’ tap-dancing prowess. Ah, well, absent the cloud droppings, one does the best one can, substituting more vigorous driving for the loss of friction nature sometimes provides.

The week I tested today’s car was typically hot and dry. Pity, since the victim in question was a newly all-wheel-drive sedan from Volvo. The S60 was introduced as a front-driver a year earlier, and picked up 150 pounds’ worth of extra drive gear for the 2002 model-year run.

Scandinavians don’t endure winter, they embrace it, with rallies across ice and snow conditions that would have most of us curled by the fireplace. Still, most of the cars they turn into missiles are front-wheel-drive, albeit with special winter tires sometimes carrying spikes. So they’ve been a little late arriving at the AWD party, but the mechanism used in the S60, very similar to the one we’ve seen in their Cross Country crossover vehicle, is as sophisticated as they come.

Not many folks in the U.S. bother with getting special snow tires, because the standard run of all-seasons are pretty good. But having the edge of AWD is quite appealing in freezing zones. Volvo calls its system Active-on-Demand.

Under normal conditions, the S60 AWD acts and feels like a front-drive car. But if the front wheels start to slip, power can be allocated to the rear axle in an infinitely-variable ratio via a wet-plate clutch (on the rear axle). All this overseen, of course, by a team of sensors and microcomputers. Driver merely reaps the benefits, most of the time not even knowing it

Volvo says the clutch can start locking up within 15 degrees’ driveshaft rotation – that’s close enough to instantaneous for me. At the same time, the system is smart enough to recognize that the difference in rotational speed of the front and rear wheels caused by backing into a parallel parking spot doesn’t mean it has to kick in.

I’ve seen this approach before, along with the rival viscous-coupling approach, such as Subaru and Audi use. There, a fluid in a center differential heats up and becomes thicker when front and rear are out of sync. That’s probably not quite so fast as Volvo’s system, but in practical terms, for the kind of winter driving most of us do, the difference wouldn’t be perceptible. The viscous approach seems more elegant and perhaps more durable.

To test Volvo’s system, I found some fields that in the drought had turned rock hard, with a coating of dust that simulated we t pavement. On full-throttle burnouts, the front wheels appeared to kick up a little dust as they spun before the rears started shouldering part of the load, but on the whole, blasting off under such conditions was hardly different from doing the same on dry concrete.

On the stretch of road I normally use for hot-rod tests – good concrete – the S60 easily broke the 8-second barrier, though, like all AWD machines, it didn’t FEEL that fast. The S60 AWD also comes with stability and traction control. With all that going for you, you should make it through anything that’s less than axle height, though there’s no pretense of being an off-roader.

All the motivation comes from a five-cylinder alloy engine that displaces 2.4 liters. It is urged on via a high-pressure turbo. With 20 valves, variably timed, and dual overhead camshafts, it has been biased toward the low rpm range, which is the way to do it for the speed-constrained U.S. market. The engine delivers 197 hp at 6,000 rpm. Torque (210 foot-pounds) peaks at 1,800 rpm and stays there out to 5,000.

Of course recommended petrol is of the 91-octane sort. EPA ratings are 26 mpg highway, 19 city. With quite a bit of cruising as well as some fuel-sucking stunts, I managed 23.3 overall. The result is quick response and a readiness to go at most any speed.

The five-speed “Geartronic” automatic transmission can be shifted manually, or you can just let the little computer demons adapt to your needs and style. It shifted well, but was not among the “smartest” I’ve encountered. Forced downshifts, as from third to second, were often hesitant and rough.

If you need to stop, you can rely on the car’s four-wheel disc brakes with antilock. The pedal feel was excellent, a joy to modulate during tests, and stopping distances were impressively short.

On the passive safety front, the S60 has dual-stage front air bags, of course, plus side and head curtain bags for the front-seat occupants.

The S60 is a distinctive, handsome machine — a sedan that almost tricks the eye into thinking it’s a sportier coupe, and it has just enough curviness to elicit second glances. Inside, it’s more stark than luxurious, but in a purposeful way. Controls are properly sized and well-situated. The optional leather seating was pleasing to the senses both tactile and olfactory. The gauges were dazzling — in the good sense. Electroluminescent, they could be easily seen regardless of ambient conditions. The stereo was excellent, with impressive clarity and good tuner sensitivity. It’s an AM-FM-CD-cassette unit with six speakers. Basic controls, illuminated, are placed on the steering wheel hub. The rear compartment is about what one would expect in a midsize car – not the place for excursions, but fine for urban jaunts.

With anti-roll bars front and rear, the S60 cornered quite flat. Ride quality overall was quite good, just right for a low-luxury sport sedan, with a feel for what’s important and filtration of annoyances like expansion joints. Given the S60’s rather tidy wheelbase, I was surprised that its turning circle is nearly 39 feet, a number that’s important when trying to slip into narrow slots at the mall. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration crash testers gave the S60 a four-star rating for occupant protection in frontal impacts, five stars for side impacts. Five is the top mark on their scale.

In the tougher 40-mph frontal offset crash engineered by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), the S60 garnered a rating of Good, their top designation. They had reservations about the leg-protection component, rating it Acceptable. On IIHS’s tests of bumper fragility, the S60 sustained an average of $909 damage when hitting things at 5 mph. That’s about mid-pack for their class of medium luxury sedans.

Going the extra mile for environme ntal protection, Volvo has coated the S60’s radiator with a catalytic agent that turns ozone (O3) into oxygen (O2). The S60 is assembled in Ghent, Belgium, with careful attention to details of fit and finish.

The tester had a few extras: metallic paint, $400; leather seating, $1,300; an air-quality sensor (this turns off outside air when it detects excessive levels of pollution), $125. Total suggested price thus became, with freight, $35,825. Edmund.com suggests the average buyer is getting about $1,400 off – maybe more, now that 2003s are arriving. At full retail, payments would be $726, assuming 20 percent down, 10 percent interest and 48 payments.

2002 Volvo S60 review: Our expert's take
By

Here in what we call the Midwest, Left Coasters call Back East, and Easterners call Indian Country, we spent all summer hoping and praying for rain, but neither our optimism nor our pleas for intercession were heeded.

It was a near-disaster for farmers, as I frequently reminded myself when I lamented the lack of precipitation’s impact on my requirements as an auto tester. If I managed the weather, there would be at least one day a week with steady, sometimes torrential rain, the better to judge vehicles’ tap-dancing prowess. Ah, well, absent the cloud droppings, one does the best one can, substituting more vigorous driving for the loss of friction nature sometimes provides.

The week I tested today’s car was typically hot and dry. Pity, since the victim in question was a newly all-wheel-drive sedan from Volvo. The S60 was introduced as a front-driver a year earlier, and picked up 150 pounds’ worth of extra drive gear for the 2002 model-year run.

Scandinavians don’t endure winter, they embrace it, with rallies across ice and snow conditions that would have most of us curled by the fireplace. Still, most of the cars they turn into missiles are front-wheel-drive, albeit with special winter tires sometimes carrying spikes. So they’ve been a little late arriving at the AWD party, but the mechanism used in the S60, very similar to the one we’ve seen in their Cross Country crossover vehicle, is as sophisticated as they come.

Not many folks in the U.S. bother with getting special snow tires, because the standard run of all-seasons are pretty good. But having the edge of AWD is quite appealing in freezing zones. Volvo calls its system Active-on-Demand.

Under normal conditions, the S60 AWD acts and feels like a front-drive car. But if the front wheels start to slip, power can be allocated to the rear axle in an infinitely-variable ratio via a wet-plate clutch (on the rear axle). All this overseen, of course, by a team of sensors and microcomputers. Driver merely reaps the benefits, most of the time not even knowing it

Volvo says the clutch can start locking up within 15 degrees’ driveshaft rotation – that’s close enough to instantaneous for me. At the same time, the system is smart enough to recognize that the difference in rotational speed of the front and rear wheels caused by backing into a parallel parking spot doesn’t mean it has to kick in.

I’ve seen this approach before, along with the rival viscous-coupling approach, such as Subaru and Audi use. There, a fluid in a center differential heats up and becomes thicker when front and rear are out of sync. That’s probably not quite so fast as Volvo’s system, but in practical terms, for the kind of winter driving most of us do, the difference wouldn’t be perceptible. The viscous approach seems more elegant and perhaps more durable.

To test Volvo’s system, I found some fields that in the drought had turned rock hard, with a coating of dust that simulated we t pavement. On full-throttle burnouts, the front wheels appeared to kick up a little dust as they spun before the rears started shouldering part of the load, but on the whole, blasting off under such conditions was hardly different from doing the same on dry concrete.

On the stretch of road I normally use for hot-rod tests – good concrete – the S60 easily broke the 8-second barrier, though, like all AWD machines, it didn’t FEEL that fast. The S60 AWD also comes with stability and traction control. With all that going for you, you should make it through anything that’s less than axle height, though there’s no pretense of being an off-roader.

All the motivation comes from a five-cylinder alloy engine that displaces 2.4 liters. It is urged on via a high-pressure turbo. With 20 valves, variably timed, and dual overhead camshafts, it has been biased toward the low rpm range, which is the way to do it for the speed-constrained U.S. market. The engine delivers 197 hp at 6,000 rpm. Torque (210 foot-pounds) peaks at 1,800 rpm and stays there out to 5,000.

Of course recommended petrol is of the 91-octane sort. EPA ratings are 26 mpg highway, 19 city. With quite a bit of cruising as well as some fuel-sucking stunts, I managed 23.3 overall. The result is quick response and a readiness to go at most any speed.

The five-speed “Geartronic” automatic transmission can be shifted manually, or you can just let the little computer demons adapt to your needs and style. It shifted well, but was not among the “smartest” I’ve encountered. Forced downshifts, as from third to second, were often hesitant and rough.

If you need to stop, you can rely on the car’s four-wheel disc brakes with antilock. The pedal feel was excellent, a joy to modulate during tests, and stopping distances were impressively short.

On the passive safety front, the S60 has dual-stage front air bags, of course, plus side and head curtain bags for the front-seat occupants.

The S60 is a distinctive, handsome machine — a sedan that almost tricks the eye into thinking it’s a sportier coupe, and it has just enough curviness to elicit second glances. Inside, it’s more stark than luxurious, but in a purposeful way. Controls are properly sized and well-situated. The optional leather seating was pleasing to the senses both tactile and olfactory. The gauges were dazzling — in the good sense. Electroluminescent, they could be easily seen regardless of ambient conditions. The stereo was excellent, with impressive clarity and good tuner sensitivity. It’s an AM-FM-CD-cassette unit with six speakers. Basic controls, illuminated, are placed on the steering wheel hub. The rear compartment is about what one would expect in a midsize car – not the place for excursions, but fine for urban jaunts.

With anti-roll bars front and rear, the S60 cornered quite flat. Ride quality overall was quite good, just right for a low-luxury sport sedan, with a feel for what’s important and filtration of annoyances like expansion joints. Given the S60’s rather tidy wheelbase, I was surprised that its turning circle is nearly 39 feet, a number that’s important when trying to slip into narrow slots at the mall. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration crash testers gave the S60 a four-star rating for occupant protection in frontal impacts, five stars for side impacts. Five is the top mark on their scale.

In the tougher 40-mph frontal offset crash engineered by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), the S60 garnered a rating of Good, their top designation. They had reservations about the leg-protection component, rating it Acceptable. On IIHS’s tests of bumper fragility, the S60 sustained an average of $909 damage when hitting things at 5 mph. That’s about mid-pack for their class of medium luxury sedans.

Going the extra mile for environme ntal protection, Volvo has coated the S60’s radiator with a catalytic agent that turns ozone (O3) into oxygen (O2). The S60 is assembled in Ghent, Belgium, with careful attention to details of fit and finish.

The tester had a few extras: metallic paint, $400; leather seating, $1,300; an air-quality sensor (this turns off outside air when it detects excessive levels of pollution), $125. Total suggested price thus became, with freight, $35,825. Edmund.com suggests the average buyer is getting about $1,400 off – maybe more, now that 2003s are arriving. At full retail, payments would be $726, assuming 20 percent down, 10 percent interest and 48 payments.

Safety review

Based on the 2002 Volvo S60 base trim
NHTSA crash test and rollover ratings, scored out of 5.
Side driver
5/5
Side rear passenger
5/5

Factory warranties

New car program benefits

Basic
4 years / 50,000 miles
Corrosion
8 years
Powertrain
4 years / 50,000 miles
Roadside Assistance
4 years

Certified Pre-Owned program benefits

Age / mileage
Less than 5 years / less than 80,000 miles
Basic
5 years / unlimited miles , upgradeable up to 10 years
Dealer certification
170- plus point inspection

Compare similar vehicles

Select cars to compare for more detailed info.
  • 2002
    4.4
    Volvo S60
    Starts at
    $27,125
    21 City / 28 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas I5
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2005
    4.6
    Acura TL
    Starts at
    $33,100
    20 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 1999
    4.9
    BMW M3
    Starts at
    $39,700
    19 City / 26 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas 6-Cyl
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2011
    4.7
    Saab 9-5
    Starts at
    $38,525
    17 City / 27 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Turbocharged Gas I4
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2016
    4.3
    Volvo S60 Inscription
    Starts at
    $38,900
    25 City / 37 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Intercooled Turbo Regular Unleaded I-4
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2011
    4.7
    Volvo S60
    Starts at
    $37,700
    18 City / 26 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Twin-Scroll Turbocharged Gas I6
    Engine
    All-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2012
    4.9
    Volvo S80
    Starts at
    $37,950
    20 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    -
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2006
    4.8
    Mercury Grand Marquis
    Starts at
    $24,780
    17 City / 25 Hwy
    MPG
    6
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • Compare more options
    Use our comparison tool to add any vehicle of your choice and see a full list of specifications and features side-by-side.
    Try it now

Consumer reviews

4.4 / 5
Based on 18 reviews
Write a review
Comfort 4.8
Interior 4.7
Performance 4.6
Value 4.5
Exterior 4.7
Reliability 4.0

Most recent

  • Overall a great car

    I bought the 2.4T Automatic and even with HIGH mileage this car has been reliable and never once let me down. It has a few little quirks but its a 20 year old car. Its nice to look at, the seats have many adjustable settings and its comfortable inside, it drives smooth and if taken care of will last a long time.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Transporting family
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    8 people out of 8 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Horrible Car To Own

    Comfortable car, horribly expensive to maintain. The electronics in this car are way to complex, have issues frequently, and for the most part can only be repaired by dealer.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does not recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 1.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 1.0
    12 people out of 15 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Tank for a Car

    THis car has never let me down with proper maintenance. Great for winter, never got stuck on the snow while SUV I saw passing by were stuck. Great engines that last forever.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    9 people out of 9 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Great Cat!

    I owned and drive this car for 15 years. It was such a reliable car and never left me stranded. The interior stays nice, except for the center console scratches easily. The paint did well until I moved to the California sun then faded a bit on the trunk lid. The turning radius stinks, otherwise I would've given it 5 Stars.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    6 people out of 6 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • A New experience for me

    This is a good looking, nice driving, and economical vehicle. I had driven a older Buick Regal and thought driving this smaller car would not be as comfortable. But to my surprise it is. Good gas milage as I average about 29 mpg. My only con would be the cost and inconvenience of getting a spare key. It is laser cut and programmed to match the chip in the car.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 5.0
    1 person out of 1 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Best looking car I have owned

    This was the car I was looking for and when I saw it I did not consider any other. In have owned other Volvos and I know what to expect from them. They are reliable with very little problems and will keep on running with proper care. This car is easy to handle rides smooth and has lots of power for interstate travel. This is a car that I would recommend to anyone who wants a midsize car, and it looks so good on the highway.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Super happy

    Just purchased a 2002 Volvo s60 with 27,404 original miles. Car drives like it is new. This is the second 2002 Volvo s60 we have owned. This first one was great and I do not expect anything else from this one.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 4.0
    1 person out of 1 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • must have been a lemon

    Bought this car with high miles (150,000+) what a mistake!!!! Issues with a/c, transmission (although I believe this to be related to sensors & such, not necessarily a rebuild issue) other than that we love this car, rides nice gets excellent gas mileage (30+) but nearest dealer is over 2hrs away. Hard to find a decent mechanic that u can trust. If I had a mulligan I would definitely use it so I could buy a different car!!!!!!!
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Transporting family
    • Does not recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 3.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 1.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Thank you Volvo

    I've had this car for 5 years, I bought it used at 80k miles. I am currently at 130k and its still running great. I have been in a few accidents... one where I watched my bumper fly over the front of my car into the car I was being slammed into. In the end my daughter was safe and although we couldn't drive away it was still not totaled. This car is amazing, drives wonderfully, keeps my family super safe, looks great and keeps my bum super warm... Oh and the trunk space is AWESOME!! I'm thinking about trading it in for the XC90 but still not sure... it's just such a great car.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Transporting family
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    1 person out of 1 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • GREAT CAR - EVEN WITH HIGH MILES!

    I bought this car with 123,000 miles from a used dealer. It was not well taken care of by previous owners so I had to put about $2000 worth of work into it. The Volvo dealership did NOTHING for me so I had to outsource to a certified German car mechanic. My car came back running PERFECTLY! At 143,000 miles it is still going strong!! The electrical system such as door locks, windows, and headlights seem to have issues but it is an easy fix with my mechanic. VERY reliable for the price!!
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 5.0
    2 people out of 2 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Have had to repair to many times

    I purchased my Volvo from my mother who sold it to me at a fair price, since then I could have just made a new car purchase without having to leave it in a shop for repairs. Not only does it cost alot to repair, the dealership just thinks you should expect that kind of cost when owning this vehicle. At the moment at 122000 miles the transmission is out and I have had to wait forever to get one. Volvo has recieced an email from me about this and will not assist in the repair. I will not purchase another one.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Does not recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 3.0
    Performance 2.0
    Value 3.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 1.0
    2 people out of 2 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • enjoyable all around

    My Volvo s60 has been great. It?s very comfortable to drive, has a great ride and every accesory I'd need and then some. When I want to enjoy driving (a little faster than normally) the turbo provides a great boost of speed that reminds me my car is about more than comfort. I have been an Acura fan in the past and like this car just as much, maybe even a bit more.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 5.0
    1 person out of 1 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No

Latest news from cars.com

See all news

Volvo dealers near you

FAQ

What trim levels are available for the 2002 Volvo S60?

The 2002 Volvo S60 is available in 1 trim level:

  • (7 styles)

What is the MPG of the 2002 Volvo S60?

The 2002 Volvo S60 offers up to 21 MPG in city driving and 28 MPG on the highway. These figures are based on EPA mileage ratings and are for comparison purposes only. The actual mileage will vary depending on vehicle options, trim level, driving conditions, driving habits, vehicle maintenance, and other factors.

What are some similar vehicles and competitors of the 2002 Volvo S60?

The 2002 Volvo S60 compares to and/or competes against the following vehicles:

Is the 2002 Volvo S60 reliable?

The 2002 Volvo S60 has an average reliability rating of 4.0 out of 5 according to cars.com consumers. Find real-world reliability insights within consumer reviews from 2002 Volvo S60 owners.

Is the 2002 Volvo S60 a good Sedan?

Below are the cars.com consumers ratings for the 2002 Volvo S60. 77.8% of drivers recommend this vehicle.

4.4 / 5
Based on 18 reviews
  • Comfort: 4.8
  • Interior: 4.7
  • Performance: 4.6
  • Value: 4.5
  • Exterior: 4.7
  • Reliability: 4.0

Volvo S60 history

Your list was successfully saved.
 
 
 
 
Save list Compare
[{"cat":"luxurypassenger_standard","stock_type":"used","bodystyle":"Sedan","page_type":"research/make-model-year","oem_page":false,"search_fuel_types":["Gasoline Fuel"]}]