1997 Land Rover Range Rover

Change year or car

Change year or car


starting MSRP

Get notified when this car becomes available.

Key specs

Base trim shown


Body style


Seating capacity

185.5” x 71.6”


Four-wheel drive



2 trims

Starting msrp listed lowest to highest price

Wondering which trim is right for you?

Our 1997 Land Rover Range Rover trim comparison will help you decide.

See also: Find the best SUVs for 2024

1997 Land Rover Range Rover review: Our expert's take


The dearth of lions and tigers not withstanding, driving a Range Rover 4.6 HSE or a Range Rover 4.0 SE throughout the wilds of Indiana can be a trip.

As sport-utility vehicles of the British Rover Group, these upstream 1997 sport utes put extra emphasis on the sport and utility aspects of the SUV market, combining life on the trail with life in the luxury lane.

Represented locally by Tom Wood Range Rover, the 4.6 HSE and 4.0 SE models are designated by the displacement of their V-8 engines.

In keeping with the luxury theme, the vehicles have a car-like ride to go with their utility capabilities. In Indiana, their use falls more to a daily commute rather than tracking the wild beasts. Occupants are coddled amidst the trapping of leather, burled walnut trim and a plethora of comfort and convenience accessories.

Both the 4.0 and the performance-oriented 4.6 have no trouble qualifying for a luxury category. The MSRP (manufacturer’s suggested retail price) for the 4.0 is $55,500. For the 4.6, it’s $63,000. Add to those figures $625 for freight.

In return, you get a lot of vehicle.

It’s about as strong as a bridge and features a fully boxed and welded frame with an internal “Z” reinforcement that provides a rigid base. A Class III tow-hitch receiver is integrated with the frame. Ten tuned body mounts isolate noise and vibration from the passenger compartment.

Front and rear axles for the four-wheel drive system are full-floating live (solid housing) axles for maximum strength. This is the basic axle structure of a truck, but the car-like ride is achieved via an electronic air suspension system with air springs, tuned shock absorbers and height sensors at each wheel.

The air suspension provides 5.2 inches of travel over five height modes. There is an access mode for ease of entrance and exit, a low profile for highway cruising, standard ride height, high profile for the trail and an extended profile when the vehicle automatically senses the need for high centering.

Obviously, if you drive the sport utes across a gully, it’s not going to ride as if it’s going down North Meridian Street – on second thought, there isn’t be too much difference – but the air system is designed to smooth out the bumps and vibrations of normal travel.

Power is by state-of-the-art aluminum alloy V-8s that utilize a push rod/rocker arm valve train. Horsepower and torque figures follow known parameters, with the larger 4.6-liter engine putting out more power than the 4.0-liter motor.

The 4.6 possesses 278-cubic inches of displacement and produces a healthy 235-horsepower and 280 foot-pounds of torque. The 241-cubic inch 4.0 comes in at 190-horsepower and 236 foot-pounds of torque.

Both engines are real stump pullers, being rated at 7,700 pounds of towing capacity in the low range, 6,500 pounds in the high range.

The only transmission offered is a ZF four-speed automatic, with its electronically controlled high/low gear ratio range selected by a single tr ansmission lever.

An interesting design feature is a transfer case for the four-wheel drive system has an emergency/parking brake drum mounted on its side. In this location, the drum will not fill with mud and debris as wheel mounted drums do.

Despite the differences in engine size, there is a miniscule difference in fuel consumption. The bigger engine takes more, of course, but only by 1 mile per gallon.

The 4.0 is rated at 13 mpg city/17 highway. For the 4.6, its 12/16.

Admittedly, the 4.6 is a high buck proposition, but in addition to a bigger engine, it rides on bigger wheels that sharpen the off-road response.

The wheels are 18-inch “Mondial” design alloys that have a rim width of 8 inches, compared to a 16-inch wheel for the 4.0 SE. These 18-inchers can churn up a monstrous amount mud whether goings through bottom lands or up the side of the mountain.

I guess you could say the Range Rover 4.6 HSE and Range Rover SE are quintessential sport-utilityvehicles that o ffer image as well as utilitarian practicality. They also provide a new philosophy to the sport ute market.

Consumer reviews

Rating breakdown (out of 5):
  • Comfort 4.0
  • Interior 3.2
  • Performance 2.2
  • Value 2.2
  • Exterior 2.6
  • Reliability 2.0

Most recent consumer reviews



this car is a money pit. if you have 20,000 dollars to spend for a car only worth 5,000 then go for it. my car had only 80,000 miles on it, head-gasget broke, 12 mpg, bad brakes, no abs,and leaked inside.... please dont do it. not worth it


Review for Land Rover

car has normal miles price is to expencive compare with other dealers, please reasanable pricing, we know people offer less. but you are tring to get more that more.


Value for money vehicle

Most of the Range Rover owners are people who have passion with their cars & in so, generally the cars are least abused & very well taken care of. I just bought a 1997 4.6 HSE from a single owner with genuine mileage of only 25 K km. I even paid USD2K as special tip to the seller. The car runs as good as new....got a good buy.

See all 5 consumer reviews


New car program benefits
36 months/42,000 miles
72 months/unlimited distance

Compare the competitors