1997 Range Rover

Consumer Reviews
1997 Land Rover Range Rover

Change Vehicle

Reviews Summary

2.6 out of 5 stars

2.6

5 Reviews
1997 Land Rover Range Rover
4 out of 5 starsComfort
2.2 out of 5 starsPerformance
2.6 out of 5 starsExterior Styling
3.2 out of 5 starsInterior Design
2.2 out of 5 starsValue for the Money
2 out of 5 starsReliability
Write a Review
Write a Review

All Reviews

1 - 5 of 5 reviews

4 out of 5 stars

Value for money vehicle

by John James Rambo from KL, Malaysia on February 1, 2010

Most of the Range Rover owners are people who have passion with their cars & in so, generally the cars are least abused & very well taken care of. I just bought a 1997 4.6 HSE from a single owner with genuine mileage of only 25 K km. I even paid USD2K as special tip to the seller. The car runs as good as new....got a good buy.

5 out of 5 starsComfort
3 out of 5 starsPerformance
3 out of 5 starsExterior Styling
4 out of 5 starsInterior Design
3 out of 5 starsValue for the Money
3 out of 5 starsReliability

Purchased a Used car

Uses car for Commuting

Does recommend this car!!

3 out of 3 people found this review helpful. Did you?

Your feedback has been sent to Cars.com

3 out of 5 stars

GOOD LUCK

by KERRIE from PUYALLUP WA on September 16, 2008

QUITE THE MONEY PIT, EXTREMELY COMFORTABLE, HAS EVERY OPTION YOU CAN THINK OF EVEN ON OLDER MODELS. THE SEATS ARE WONDERFUL. HOWEVER UNLESS YOU CAN FIND A CHEAP MECHANIC WHO IS FAMILIAR WITH THESE VEHICLES UR IN TROUBLE. ALOT OF WEIRD LITTLE EXPENSIVE THINGS HAPPEN WITH THESE.

5 out of 5 starsComfort
3 out of 5 starsPerformance
3 out of 5 starsExterior Styling
4 out of 5 starsInterior Design
4 out of 5 starsValue for the Money
1 out of 5 starsReliability

Purchased a Used car

Does not recommend this car!!

2 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Did you?

Your feedback has been sent to Cars.com

4 out of 5 stars

Good allrounder.

by Rozz. from Auckland. on October 8, 2008

A good allround vehicle for offroad / highway driving. It does use a heap of fuel though. I may have been lucky, but I have not had many of the minor problems that people talk about. I just keep it regularly seviced. (Every 10,000km).

5 out of 5 starsComfort
3 out of 5 starsPerformance
4 out of 5 starsExterior Styling
5 out of 5 starsInterior Design
2 out of 5 starsValue for the Money
4 out of 5 starsReliability

Purchased a Used car

Does recommend this car!!

2 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Did you?

Your feedback has been sent to Cars.com

1 out of 5 stars

NOT WORTH IT

by stevo from on September 7, 2011

this car is a money pit. if you have 20,000 dollars to spend for a car only worth 5,000 then go for it. my car had only 80,000 miles on it, head-gasget broke, 12 mpg, bad brakes, no abs,and leaked inside.... please dont do it. not worth it

4 out of 5 starsComfort
1 out of 5 starsPerformance
2 out of 5 starsExterior Styling
2 out of 5 starsInterior Design
1 out of 5 starsValue for the Money
1 out of 5 starsReliability

Purchased a Used car

Uses car for Just getting around

Does not recommend this car!!

1 out of 4 people found this review helpful. Did you?

Your feedback has been sent to Cars.com

1 out of 5 stars

Review for Land Rover

by Express from Santa Maria on April 7, 2010

car has normal miles price is to expencive compare with other dealers, please reasanable pricing, we know people offer less. but you are tring to get more that more.

1 out of 5 starsComfort
1 out of 5 starsPerformance
1 out of 5 starsExterior Styling
1 out of 5 starsInterior Design
1 out of 5 starsValue for the Money
1 out of 5 starsReliability

Purchased a Used car

Uses car for Transporting family

Does not recommend this car!!

1 out of 9 people found this review helpful. Did you?

Your feedback has been sent to Cars.com

1
Our Expert Review: 1997 Land Rover Range Rover