Skip to main content
4.8

2017 Kia Niro

Starts at:
$22,890
Choose Trim
Compare trims
FE FWD LX FWD Touring Launch Edition FWD EX FWD Touring FWD Shop options
New 2017 Kia Niro
Choose trim
Compare trims
FE FWD LX FWD Touring Launch Edition FWD EX FWD Touring FWD Shop options
Shop Cars.com
Browse cars & save your favorites
Dealers near you
Find & contact a dealership near you
Listings near 20149
Change location See all listings

Your message was sent. You'll receive a response shortly.

Key specifications

Highlights
Gas/Electric I-4
Engine Type
52 City / 49 Hwy
MPG
139 hp
Horsepower
5
Seating Capacity
Engine
195 @ 2400
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
139 @ 5700
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
1.6 L/96
Displacement
Gas/Electric I-4
Engine Type
Suspension
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Strut
Suspension Type - Front
Strut
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear
Weight & Capacity
N/A
Curb Weight - Rear
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Maximum Trailering Capacity
Safety
Standard
Stability Control
Standard
Backup Camera
Entertainment
Standard
Bluetooth®
Electrical
N/A
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
N/A
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
Brakes
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel Disc
Brake Type
11 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness

Notable features

All-new hybrid hatchback
146 total horsepower, gas/electric
Six-speed automatic transmission
Front-wheel drive
Apple CarPlay and Android Auto available
High-mileage FE trim level

Engine

195 @ 2400 SAE Net Torque @ RPM
139 @ 5700 SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
1.6 L/96 Displacement
Gas/Electric I-4 Engine Type

Suspension

Multi-Link Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Strut Suspension Type - Front
Strut Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Multi-Link Suspension Type - Rear

Weight & Capacity

N/A Curb Weight - Rear
N/A Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A Maximum Trailering Capacity
0 lbs Total Option Weight
N/A Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A Maximum Payload Capacity
N/A Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
3,106 lbs Base Curb Weight
12 gal Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A Curb Weight
N/A Curb Weight - Front

Safety

Standard Stability Control
Standard Backup Camera

Entertainment

Standard Bluetooth®

Electrical

N/A Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
N/A Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)

Brakes

Yes Disc - Front (Yes or )
4-Wheel Brake ABS System
4-Wheel Disc Brake Type
11 in Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
Yes Disc - Rear (Yes or )
10 in Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
N/A Brake ABS System (Second Line)
N/A Drum - Rear (Yes or )

Photo & video gallery

2017 Kia Niro 2017 Kia Niro 2017 Kia Niro 2017 Kia Niro 2017 Kia Niro 2017 Kia Niro 2017 Kia Niro 2017 Kia Niro 2017 Kia Niro 2017 Kia Niro 2017 Kia Niro 2017 Kia Niro 2017 Kia Niro 2017 Kia Niro 2017 Kia Niro 2017 Kia Niro 2017 Kia Niro 2017 Kia Niro 2017 Kia Niro 2017 Kia Niro

The good & the bad

The good

Accelerates like a non-hybrid
Spirited Sport mode
UVO touchscreen system standard
Outward visibility
Excellent rear headroom and legroom

The bad

All-wheel drive not offered
Lots of interior plastic
Lower mpg, less cargo room than Prius
Automatic braking only on top trims
No power-flow graphical display

Expert 2017 Kia Niro review

our expert's take
Our expert's take
By Bill Jackson
Full article
our expert's take

The Kia Niro is a hybrid, but at many points during its driving introduction in San Antonio, Kia referred to it as the “un-hybrid.” The idea is that you can have a car that’s a useful hatchback that also happens to be a hybrid with good fuel economy.

Or, as one executive put it more bluntly: “You don’t have to drive ugly” to get great mileage.

If that’s the goal of the Niro, Kia has succeeded.

The Niro competes with hybrid hatchbacks like the Toyota Prius and Ford C-Max.

Exterior & Styling

For a car more conservatively styled than the Prius, Kia has still done its due diligence in trying to eke out a few more miles per gallon with the exterior design. There are active grille shutters that close at higher speeds to reduce drag, plus a flat belly pan to further help with aerodynamics and a spoiler in front of the muffler to reduce drag.

Overall, the Kia Niro looks like any other small SUV or hatchback. It’s got the same grille as the rest of Kia’s lineup, as well as nicely sculpted sides and rear. Overall, I think it’s one of Kia’s better-looking cars — less funky than the Soul and more cohesive than the Sportage, whose grille is too small.

How It Drives

Early hybrids — and some still on sale today — were criticized for their “unnatural” feel both stopping and going, especially with continuously variable automatic transmissions. That’s because CVTs, by design, don’t have a shift point like conventional transmissions do — or at least they shouldn’t if their goal is efficiency. Instead, there’s a more “elastic” response. And hybrid brakes, because they’re using braking drag to regenerate power for the battery, can have a grabby or inconsistent feeling.

When the Niro is in its default Eco driving mode, however, it’s hard to tell you’re driving a hybrid. In Sport mode, it’s all but impossible to tell.

That’s mostly because Kia ditched the CVT and put in a six-speed, dual-clutch automatic transmission instead. That means the engine revs up and shifts like a normal car. Also, unlike some other hybrids, there’s not a big change in the car’s sound when the gas engine comes on. Overall, you just pull away from lights. It’s a bit slow in Eco mode, where it feels like a slightly slow normal car. The only clue to its hybrid nature is that the Niro is very quiet when it gets going with only the electric motor working, as it can under some conditions.

In Sport mode, the engine and transmission respond more aggressively and the steering takes on a sportier feel. In this mode, the Niro feels like it can hold its own against — or beat — conventional cars in the subcompact SUV class, such as the Honda HR-V, Chevrolet Trax and Jeep Renegade. It’s the mode I suspect a lot of owners will consistently use thanks to the performance improvement.

Finally, the brakes are very good for a hybrid. They’re a bit mushy and vague, but there’s none of the weird, grabby action you can get from other hybrids, like the Chevrolet Volt.

The Kia Niro’s most fuel-efficient trim, the FE, gets an EPA-estimated 50 mpg combined. The versions Kia expects to sell the most of are the LX and EX, which get 49 mpg combined. I tested a loaded Touring model, the highest trim, that’s rated 43 mpg combined.

City estimates are as follows: 52 mpg for the FE, 51 mpg for the LX and EX, 46 mpg for the Touring. On the highway, where hybrids generally return lower mpg, the Niro FE is still rated a decent 49 mpg. The LX and EX are rated 46 mpg on the highway and the Touring is rated 40 mpg. Conventional competitors can’t come close to the hybrid Niro: Front-wheel-drive versions are rated 25/33/28 mpg city/highway/combined (the Trax); 28/34/31 mpg (the HR-V); and 24/31/26 mpg (the Renegade, which requires premium gas and has a manual transmission). Compare the competition here.

What’s noteworthy is that, unlike the Niro, the HR-V, Trax and Renegade can also be had with all-wheel drive. For some buyers, that may be a significant enough factor to opt for one of those little SUVs over the hybrid.

When it comes to just gas mileage, though, Kia admits the ubiquitous Toyota Prius is still the 800-pound gorilla of the hybrid market. Against that car’s EPA-rated 54/50/52 mpg, the Niro falls short — but only by an estimated 2 or 3 mpg if you discount the option-heavy, and thus actually heavier, Niro Touring.

It should be noted, however, that those ratings are for the car’s default Eco mode. Lower mileage can be expected in the more aggressive Sport mode, though Kia said it hasn’t had the car tested to see how much lower.

Kia said there will be a plug-in-hybrid version of the Niro coming around October or November 2017 that’s intended to have up to 26 miles of electric-only range. Stay tuned for further details.

Interior

Kia does a lot of things right with the interior, though I drove a top-of-the-line Touring model. The seats were comfortable, with good support and a leather-trimmed seat that looked and felt good. Lesser trims get either plain cloth or cloth and leather seats.

After that, the surfaces you touch — the center armrest, door handles and doorsills — are soft and feel good in quality. While there is a lot of hard plastic in the dash area, it looks good and isn’t the sort of thing one normally touches while driving or riding anyway.

What’s interesting, though, is that unlike hybrids like the Prius, the Kia Niro has no large center screen to display the car’s efficiency and/or whether it’s getting most of its power from the electric motor or the gasoline engine. It further drives home Kia’s intention to make a hybrid that doesn’t scream “Hybrid!” at every opportunity. Outward visibility is very good. The windshield pillars are thin enough, and they’re set at a good angle to allow you to see out. (Often I find that when a car is designed to be aerodynamic, the windshield pillars tilt back and make it hard to see.) Also, you sit higher in the Niro than in other hatchbacks, such as the Mazda3 or Ford Focus, which further helps visibility.

Finally, for such a small car, the Niro hybrid is roomy. I had plenty of headroom in the rear seat, and my legs weren’t cramped. I’m about 6 feet 2 inches tall, so that’s a nice thing. My legs were angled a bit, leaving my knees higher than my hips, but it wasn’t bad enough to be a problem on a longer commute if I were riding in back.

Ergonomics & Electronics

The Niro features both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto as standard equipment. Touring models have an 8-inch touchscreen, while every other trim gets a 7-inch screen.

The key for me, though, is that the Niro — in all trims — uses Kia’s UVO system to move between the car’s various multimedia and navigation systems. It’s been my experience that UVO is quick and easy to use, and my time in the Niro proved no different.

Cargo & Storage

The Kia Niro’s cargo area isn’t bad. I generally find hatchbacks easiest to load a wider variety of items into, and the Niro is no exception. If you’re cross-shopping the Niro with the Prius, though, the Prius is bigger; I find it to be among the easiest cars to load things into. The Niro’s one advantage, though, is that it doesn’t have a lip on the cargo area to snag things, as does the Prius.

As much as Kia wants to define the Niro as a crossover, it’s probably best to think of it as a small hatchback when it comes to storage. I think it could take four people and their roll-aboard luggage to the airport, but I’m not sure how it’d do if those same four people had bigger bags.

Safety

As of this writing, the Kia Niro has not been crash-tested by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. If it is, results will appear here.

As far as advanced safety systems go, Kia says the Niro has a blind spot warning system standard on EX and Touring trims, but one is unavailable on the FE and LX. Also, a lane departure warning system, adaptive cruise control and automatic emergency braking are optional on EX and Touring models only.

Value in Its Class

Kia is probably wise to play up the car’s un-hybrid attributes, as today’s cheap gas usually leads buyers to consider less-efficient cars and SUVs. As a small car, the Niro is pleasant — if not exhilarating — to drive. Its hatchback styling offers a little more utility than a sedan, and it will save you some money at the gas pump. Even if gas is cheap, that’s still money you can spend elsewhere.

Shoppers who want a car that, through its styling and attributes, loudly exclaims, “I’m trying to save the planet by getting great gas mileage,” will be disappointed with the Niro. I’m not sure the rest of car buyers will feel the same way.

We’ll find out this month, when the first Kia Niros are expected to go on sale. Pricing hasn’t been set, but it’s expected to range from around $23,000 for an FE up to around $32,000 for a loaded Touring model.

2017 Kia Niro review: Our expert's take
By Bill Jackson

The Kia Niro is a hybrid, but at many points during its driving introduction in San Antonio, Kia referred to it as the “un-hybrid.” The idea is that you can have a car that’s a useful hatchback that also happens to be a hybrid with good fuel economy.

Or, as one executive put it more bluntly: “You don’t have to drive ugly” to get great mileage.

If that’s the goal of the Niro, Kia has succeeded.

The Niro competes with hybrid hatchbacks like the Toyota Prius and Ford C-Max.

Exterior & Styling

For a car more conservatively styled than the Prius, Kia has still done its due diligence in trying to eke out a few more miles per gallon with the exterior design. There are active grille shutters that close at higher speeds to reduce drag, plus a flat belly pan to further help with aerodynamics and a spoiler in front of the muffler to reduce drag.

Overall, the Kia Niro looks like any other small SUV or hatchback. It’s got the same grille as the rest of Kia’s lineup, as well as nicely sculpted sides and rear. Overall, I think it’s one of Kia’s better-looking cars — less funky than the Soul and more cohesive than the Sportage, whose grille is too small.

How It Drives

Early hybrids — and some still on sale today — were criticized for their “unnatural” feel both stopping and going, especially with continuously variable automatic transmissions. That’s because CVTs, by design, don’t have a shift point like conventional transmissions do — or at least they shouldn’t if their goal is efficiency. Instead, there’s a more “elastic” response. And hybrid brakes, because they’re using braking drag to regenerate power for the battery, can have a grabby or inconsistent feeling.

When the Niro is in its default Eco driving mode, however, it’s hard to tell you’re driving a hybrid. In Sport mode, it’s all but impossible to tell.

That’s mostly because Kia ditched the CVT and put in a six-speed, dual-clutch automatic transmission instead. That means the engine revs up and shifts like a normal car. Also, unlike some other hybrids, there’s not a big change in the car’s sound when the gas engine comes on. Overall, you just pull away from lights. It’s a bit slow in Eco mode, where it feels like a slightly slow normal car. The only clue to its hybrid nature is that the Niro is very quiet when it gets going with only the electric motor working, as it can under some conditions.

In Sport mode, the engine and transmission respond more aggressively and the steering takes on a sportier feel. In this mode, the Niro feels like it can hold its own against — or beat — conventional cars in the subcompact SUV class, such as the Honda HR-V, Chevrolet Trax and Jeep Renegade. It’s the mode I suspect a lot of owners will consistently use thanks to the performance improvement.

Finally, the brakes are very good for a hybrid. They’re a bit mushy and vague, but there’s none of the weird, grabby action you can get from other hybrids, like the Chevrolet Volt.

The Kia Niro’s most fuel-efficient trim, the FE, gets an EPA-estimated 50 mpg combined. The versions Kia expects to sell the most of are the LX and EX, which get 49 mpg combined. I tested a loaded Touring model, the highest trim, that’s rated 43 mpg combined.

City estimates are as follows: 52 mpg for the FE, 51 mpg for the LX and EX, 46 mpg for the Touring. On the highway, where hybrids generally return lower mpg, the Niro FE is still rated a decent 49 mpg. The LX and EX are rated 46 mpg on the highway and the Touring is rated 40 mpg. Conventional competitors can’t come close to the hybrid Niro: Front-wheel-drive versions are rated 25/33/28 mpg city/highway/combined (the Trax); 28/34/31 mpg (the HR-V); and 24/31/26 mpg (the Renegade, which requires premium gas and has a manual transmission). Compare the competition here.

What’s noteworthy is that, unlike the Niro, the HR-V, Trax and Renegade can also be had with all-wheel drive. For some buyers, that may be a significant enough factor to opt for one of those little SUVs over the hybrid.

When it comes to just gas mileage, though, Kia admits the ubiquitous Toyota Prius is still the 800-pound gorilla of the hybrid market. Against that car’s EPA-rated 54/50/52 mpg, the Niro falls short — but only by an estimated 2 or 3 mpg if you discount the option-heavy, and thus actually heavier, Niro Touring.

It should be noted, however, that those ratings are for the car’s default Eco mode. Lower mileage can be expected in the more aggressive Sport mode, though Kia said it hasn’t had the car tested to see how much lower.

Kia said there will be a plug-in-hybrid version of the Niro coming around October or November 2017 that’s intended to have up to 26 miles of electric-only range. Stay tuned for further details.

Interior

Kia does a lot of things right with the interior, though I drove a top-of-the-line Touring model. The seats were comfortable, with good support and a leather-trimmed seat that looked and felt good. Lesser trims get either plain cloth or cloth and leather seats.

After that, the surfaces you touch — the center armrest, door handles and doorsills — are soft and feel good in quality. While there is a lot of hard plastic in the dash area, it looks good and isn’t the sort of thing one normally touches while driving or riding anyway.

What’s interesting, though, is that unlike hybrids like the Prius, the Kia Niro has no large center screen to display the car’s efficiency and/or whether it’s getting most of its power from the electric motor or the gasoline engine. It further drives home Kia’s intention to make a hybrid that doesn’t scream “Hybrid!” at every opportunity. Outward visibility is very good. The windshield pillars are thin enough, and they’re set at a good angle to allow you to see out. (Often I find that when a car is designed to be aerodynamic, the windshield pillars tilt back and make it hard to see.) Also, you sit higher in the Niro than in other hatchbacks, such as the Mazda3 or Ford Focus, which further helps visibility.

Finally, for such a small car, the Niro hybrid is roomy. I had plenty of headroom in the rear seat, and my legs weren’t cramped. I’m about 6 feet 2 inches tall, so that’s a nice thing. My legs were angled a bit, leaving my knees higher than my hips, but it wasn’t bad enough to be a problem on a longer commute if I were riding in back.

Ergonomics & Electronics

The Niro features both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto as standard equipment. Touring models have an 8-inch touchscreen, while every other trim gets a 7-inch screen.

The key for me, though, is that the Niro — in all trims — uses Kia’s UVO system to move between the car’s various multimedia and navigation systems. It’s been my experience that UVO is quick and easy to use, and my time in the Niro proved no different.

Cargo & Storage

The Kia Niro’s cargo area isn’t bad. I generally find hatchbacks easiest to load a wider variety of items into, and the Niro is no exception. If you’re cross-shopping the Niro with the Prius, though, the Prius is bigger; I find it to be among the easiest cars to load things into. The Niro’s one advantage, though, is that it doesn’t have a lip on the cargo area to snag things, as does the Prius.

As much as Kia wants to define the Niro as a crossover, it’s probably best to think of it as a small hatchback when it comes to storage. I think it could take four people and their roll-aboard luggage to the airport, but I’m not sure how it’d do if those same four people had bigger bags.

Safety

As of this writing, the Kia Niro has not been crash-tested by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. If it is, results will appear here.

As far as advanced safety systems go, Kia says the Niro has a blind spot warning system standard on EX and Touring trims, but one is unavailable on the FE and LX. Also, a lane departure warning system, adaptive cruise control and automatic emergency braking are optional on EX and Touring models only.

Value in Its Class

Kia is probably wise to play up the car’s un-hybrid attributes, as today’s cheap gas usually leads buyers to consider less-efficient cars and SUVs. As a small car, the Niro is pleasant — if not exhilarating — to drive. Its hatchback styling offers a little more utility than a sedan, and it will save you some money at the gas pump. Even if gas is cheap, that’s still money you can spend elsewhere.

Shoppers who want a car that, through its styling and attributes, loudly exclaims, “I’m trying to save the planet by getting great gas mileage,” will be disappointed with the Niro. I’m not sure the rest of car buyers will feel the same way.

We’ll find out this month, when the first Kia Niros are expected to go on sale. Pricing hasn’t been set, but it’s expected to range from around $23,000 for an FE up to around $32,000 for a loaded Touring model.

Available cars near you

Factory warranties

New car program benefits

Basic
5 years / 60,000 miles
Corrosion
5 years / 100,000 miles
Powertrain
10 years / 100,000 miles
Battery
10 years / 100,000 miles
Roadside Assistance
5 years / 60,000 miles

Certified Pre-Owned program benefits

Age / mileage
6 years or newer / less than 80,000 miles
Basic
12 months / 12,000 miles
Dealer certification
165-point inspection

Compare similiar vehicles

Select cars to compare for more detailed info.
  • 2017
    4.8
    Kia Niro
    Starts at
    $22,890
    52 City / 49 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    -
    Warranty
    Gas/Electric I-4
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2021
    Hyundai NEXO
    Starts at
    $58,935
    -
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    -
    Warranty
    Electric
    Engine
    Front-wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2016
    4.8
    Ford C-Max Hybrid
    Starts at
    $24,170
    42 City / 36 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    60 month/60,000 miles
    Warranty
    Gas/Electric I-4
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2020
    4.8
    Kia Niro Plug-In Hybrid
    Starts at
    $29,490
    26 mi.
    Range
    5
    Seat capacity
    120 month/100,000 miles
    Warranty
    Gas/Electric I-4
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2022
    4.7
    Hyundai IONIQ Hybrid
    Starts at
    $23,600
    58 City / 60 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    120 month/100,000 miles
    Warranty
    Gas/Electric I-4
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2019
    4.5
    Kia Niro
    Starts at
    $23,490
    52 City / 49 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    -
    Warranty
    Gas/Electric I-4
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • Compare more options
    Use our comparison tool to add any vehicle of your choice and see a full list of specifications and features side-by-side.
    Try it now

Consumer reviews

4.8 / 5
Based on 290 reviews
Write a review
Comfort 4.7
Interior 4.7
Performance 4.6
Value 4.7
Exterior 4.7
Reliability 4.8

Most recent

Warranty Warranty Warranty matters

I'm neutral on this car. I bought used at 41k miles, and it's spent 3 of 9 months at the dealership in two visits, both while the original warranty was still valid. In the first instance, what should have been a one or two day repair took a month because of a lack of qualified hybrid mechanics, compounded by a service representative who refused to have the tech look at the item I suggested as the cause of hybrid failure until I called National HQ to complain. The second instance was due to the exhaust problem noted elsewhere, and it took forever for one of the parts to arrive. All that aside, this is a fun car to drive! It's a smooth ride, it's great on curves, and plenty comfortable. I'm hopeful the "issues" are out of the way now.
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Used for Commuting
  • Does recommend this car
Comfort 3.0
Interior 3.0
Performance 3.0
Value 3.0
Exterior 3.0
Reliability 3.0
7 people out of 7 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

They need to recall the exhaust system for 2017

Bought one from a dealership and drove it for two weeks. It overheated and after inspection they said the exhaust system is malfunctioning and they can't get parts to replace it. I now own a 30000 dollar lawn ornament I am paying a loan on while bicycling to work.
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Used for Commuting
  • Does not recommend this car
Comfort 3.0
Interior 4.0
Performance 1.0
Value 1.0
Exterior 4.0
Reliability 1.0
6 people out of 6 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Latest news from cars.com

See all news

Kia dealers near you

FAQ

What trim levels are available for the 2017 Kia Niro?

The 2017 Kia Niro is available in 5 trim levels:

  • EX (1 style)
  • FE (1 style)
  • LX (1 style)
  • Touring (1 style)
  • Touring Launch Edition (1 style)

What is the MPG of the 2017 Kia Niro?

The 2017 Kia Niro offers up to 52 MPG in city driving and 49 MPG on the highway. These figures are based on EPA mileage ratings and are for comparison purposes only. The actual mileage will vary depending on vehicle options, trim level, driving conditions, driving habits, vehicle maintenance, and other factors.

What are some similar vehicles and competitors of the 2017 Kia Niro?

The 2017 Kia Niro compares to and/or competes against the following vehicles:

Is the 2017 Kia Niro reliable?

The 2017 Kia Niro has an average reliability rating of 4.8 out of 5 according to cars.com consumers. Find real-world reliability insights within consumer reviews from 2017 Kia Niro owners.

Is the 2017 Kia Niro a good SUV?

Below are the cars.com consumers ratings for the 2017 Kia Niro. 96.2% of drivers recommend this vehicle.

4.8 / 5
Based on 290 reviews
  • Comfort: 4.7
  • Interior: 4.7
  • Performance: 4.6
  • Value: 4.7
  • Exterior: 4.7
  • Reliability: 4.8

Kia Niro history

Your list was successfully saved.
Your comparisons
 
 
 
 
Save list Compare