Cars.com Reviews the 2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
&&&&&EMBEDDED_ELEMENT_START&&&&& {“id”:1420668702132,”originalName”:”2015_03_04_17_06_55_034_http___blogs_cars_com__a_6a00d83451b3c669e2017d42a0e0aa970c_800wi”,”name”:”MMS ID 56038 (created by CM Utility)”,”URI”:”/62/-2047059931-1425510416062.”,”createDate”:”2015-03-04 05:06:56″,”metadata”:{“AUTHOR”:”automatic-content-migration”,”KEYWORDS”:””},”href”:”https://www.cstatic-images.com/stock/1170×1170/62/-2047059931-1425510416062.”,”description”:”Came from http://blogs.cars.com/.a/6a00d83451b3c669e2017d42a0e0aa970c-800wi”,”externalid”:”56038″,”updatedby”:”cmuadmin”,”updateddate”:1425511628362,”associations”:{}} &&&&&EMBEDDED_ELEMENT_END&&&&&
The 2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class’ ride is comfortable. Very comfortable. And quiet too — don’t forget quiet. But if Cars.com reviewer Kelsey Mays were to stop there out of respect for the virtue of “If you don’t have anything nice to say … ,” he wouldn’t be saying much at all about the C-Class, which curiously remains a top seller despite superior sport-sedan competitors. In nearly every other category — interior space, styling, acceleration, fuel economy, brakes and handling — this last-place finisher in Cars.com’s $46,000 Sport-Sedan Challenge is strictly riding on its rep, Mays says.
