Skip to main content

A Luxury Wagon Is Better Than an SUV; Here’s Why

mercedes amg e53 wagon 2026 exterior front angle 01 scaled jpg

Before the burst in popularity of SUVs, Americans were in love with the station wagon. It was the quintessential family vehicle, and most automakers offered at least one in each class; from compact and mid-size models to full-size land barges, there was something for everyone. Sadly, the wagon is nearly an extinct species in the U.S. There are just four wagon models offered by three automakers: the BMW M5 Touring, Mercedes-Benz E-Class All-Terrain and Mercedes-AMG E53 Hybrid Wagon, and Volvo V60 Cross Country. You could once add Subaru into this mix, but its popular Outback and Forester are now SUVs. A Toyota Crown Signia might qualify, but Toyota avoids calling it a wagon.

All the traditional wagons left are sadly expensive, premium vehicles. But even with the small number of wagons available for U.S. buyers, wagons are still a superior vehicle. Here are a few reasons why, using the AMG E53 Hybrid Wagon as an example versus other Mercedes-Benz SUVs.

Related: The 2026 Mercedes-AMG E53 Hybrid Wagon Is (Almost) Everything I Want in a Car: Review

mercedes amg e53 wagon 2026 interior cargo 09 scaled jpg

Superior Cargo Space

A wagon can nearly match or beat the cargo capacity of some SUVs. The E53 wagon is one of them. With 33.1 cubic feet of cargo space behind its second row, the E53 wagon has more cargo space than the Mercedes GLA, GLB, GLC/GLC Coupe and GLE Coupe. The regular GLE beats it, but with 33.3 cubic feet of cargo space, it’s basically tied with the E53 wagon.

Fold the E53 wagon’s second row and cargo volume grows to 64.6 cubic feet, beating all the aforementioned SUVs except for the GLE with its 74.9 cubic feet of maximum cargo space.

mercedes amg e53 wagon 2026 exterior profile 02 scaled jpg

It’s Just an Elongated Car

Unlike SUVs, a wagon isn’t trying too hard to be something it isn’t. Many SUVs use car-based platforms, but a wagon is literally just a long-roof sedan. Viewed from the front, the E53 wagon is identical to any other E-Class sedan, specifically the E53 sedan. Their dimensions are nearly identical: The E53 wagon and E53 sedan have the same wheelbase and are similar in overall length and width. That also means the wagon is easy to drive since it’s basically a sedan; there’s no learning curve for things like maneuverability or parking. This also pays off in the driving experience overall. Larger SUVs can experience body roll when cornering and may dive under hard braking due to their higher centers of gravity; a lower wagon like the E53 has nearly none of those problems.

Downsides

Wagons do have their drawbacks — like availability and cost. As mentioned, wagons are nearly nonexistent in the U.S. market, and while the V60 Cross Country is the least expensive, its starting price is over $53,000 (all prices include destination).

The E-Class wagons are pricey, as well. The “cheapest” is the E-Class All-Terrain at $81,450. If you want the performance of the E53 wagon, it’ll cost you $96,650 to start, though options can push that much higher. The E53 wagon test vehicle seen here was optioned to over $120,000. The M5 Touring is the priciest wagon available and is the sole wagon BMW offers in the U.S.; it starts at $129,350, including a gas-guzzler tax.

Like the M5 Touring, the E53 is a performance vehicle and is not as fuel-efficient as you’d think, with an EPA rating of 22 mpg combined. Blame the powerful AMG tune of the E53 wagon’s six-cylinder engine, which makes 577 horsepower.

So if you’re in the market for a premium SUV, take a look at a premium wagon, too. While the models on sale like the E53 Hybrid Wagon may hit your wallet harder initially and on fuel costs, you’ll be behind the wheel of a vehicle that is superior in nearly every other aspect — and you’ll quickly see why Americans used to be in love with them.

Read More on Wagons From Cars.com:

Related Video:

Cars.com’s Editorial department is your source for automotive news and reviews. In line with Cars.com’s long-standing ethics policy, editors and reviewers don’t accept gifts or free trips from automakers. The Editorial department is independent of Cars.com’s advertising, sales and sponsored content departments.

Add Cars.com as a preferred source on Google
News Editor

I tried to get into this business early on by writing blog posts during my free time in the 2010s. During this period, I briefly wrote for Right Foot Down (briefly as in a couple of articles,  and I was never paid for my efforts). I officially got into the automotive journalism game in 2020 when I started as a staff writer at Jalopnik. Aside from the site, my work was featured or cited in places like Yahoo! Autos, Vice, InsideEVs and Autoblog.  Over 2,000 articles, five years and hundreds of car reviews later, I parted ways with Jalopnik in 2025, where I went on to start my own site called Daily Revs before starting at Cars.com in late 2025. Working in this industry has been a dream, and my work here at Cars has continued that. Here, I’m going in depth using our extensive databases to highlight industry trends and insights for consumers. When I’m not working, I’m usually spending time with my family and teenage son (when he actually wants to spend time with me) or zipping around in my 2018 Hyundai Sonata, which I desperately need to get rid of.

Featured stories