Can You Go Farther in a VW Atlas or a Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT Trackhawk?


If you were driving entirely on the highway, which would run out of gas first: a 2018 Volkswagen Atlas or a 2018 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT Trackhawk? This seems like a really, really stupid question with a really, really obvious answer.
Related: Hate Stopping for Gas? The 2018 Volkswagen Atlas Isn’t for You
And yet! Here we are, wondering if it really is that obvious (spoiler alert: it’s not) even though we (well, I) just argued that the Trackhawk is a gas-guzzling behemoth and should be taxed appropriately despite the boatloads of fun it provides when driven in its proper environment: a track.
That’s because our time with the Atlas has been a bit frustrating when it comes to refueling. We’ve driven more than 300 miles only three times before filling it up since we bought it in December. Our average fuel economy of 18.7 mpg equates to 347 miles of driving before emptying the Atlas’s tank — not terrible, but not outstanding.
- ${price_badge()}
- ${battery_badge()}${ev_report_link()}
- ${hot_car_badge()}
- ${award_badge()}
- ${cpo_badge()}
${price_badge_description}
The EV Battery Rating is based on this vehicle's current expected range relative to the vehicles expected range when new. ${battery_badge_text}
Certified cars are manufacturer warrantied and typically go through a rigorous multi-point inspection.
This car is likely to sell soon based on the price, features, and condition.
${award_blurb}
${award_two_blurb}
Shop the 2018 Volkswagen Atlas near you


That means it’s time for some math. If we assume we meet the EPA’s highway fuel economy for both vehicles while driving, then multiplying that figure by the vehicle’s fuel tank capacity should give a rough idea of each SUV’s theoretical maximum range.
- 2018 Volkswagen Atlas 4Motion: 18.6-gallon fuel tank; 23 mpg highway; 427.8 miles of range
- 2018 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT Trackhawk: 24.6-gallon fuel tank; 17 mpg highway; 418.2 miles of range
In this hypothetical world where we aren’t flooring the accelerator of the Trackhawk at every (safe) opportunity, we’d run out of gas only 9.6 miles before the Atlas. One measly highway mpg more from the Trackhawk and it would best the Atlas by 15 miles.
Which would I choose for a long trip? Right now, the Trackhawk. The fun of it combined with its nicer interior and much better Uconnect multimedia system outweigh the lesser theoretical range and added cost of premium fuel. I’d only choose the Atlas if I needed a three-row vehicle — and I don’t have five friends. If that’s the cost of never needing to switch to the Atlas, well … I’m good with that.
Cars.com’s Editorial department is your source for automotive news and reviews. In line with Cars.com’s long-standing ethics policy, editors and reviewers don’t accept gifts or free trips from automakers. The Editorial department is independent of Cars.com’s advertising, sales and sponsored content departments.

Road Test Editor Brian Normile joined the automotive industry and Cars.com in 2013, and he became part of the Editorial staff in 2014. Brian spent his childhood devouring every car magazine he got his hands on — not literally, eventually — and now reviews and tests vehicles to help consumers make informed choices. Someday, Brian hopes to learn what to do with his hands when he’s reviewing a car on camera. He would daily-drive an Alfa Romeo 4C if he could.
Featured stories



2025 Lincoln Navigator Review: Elephantine Elegance
