Skip to main content

Head to Head: Ford Sport Trac vs. Chevy Avalanche Part 3

668069862 1425510825206 jpeg automatic-content-migration

In the final installment of the series Mike and Kelsey take on looks and substance.

Utility & Styling

Mike: If maximum utility is your thing, the Avalanche has you covered. Folding the second-row seats and the midgate is a snap, and doing so significantly extends the cargo bed. The Sport Trac’s short cargo box can’t be extended, though it can have a bed extender, and its optional hard tonneau cover is easier to deal with than the Avalanche’s collapsible tonneau cover.

Avalanche Extended Bed

369660044 1425510808260 jpeg

Explorer Sport Trac Extended Bed

1363411139 1425510820291 jpeg automatic-content-migration

Kelsey: I’ll concede the tonneau cover. The Avalanche’s three-piece set weighs a ton and requires a callisthenic workout to stow — nothing near the simplicity of Ford’s folding unit. The Sport Trac has three in-bed storage bins that are self-draining, but they’re not lockable. The Avalanche has larger, lockable storage over the rear fenders. I’m not smitten with either truck’s arrangement, but I give the edge to Ford.

Mike: Glad to see you’re starting to see things my way. I’ll let our readers be the final style judges, but I was impressed with the Avalanche’s bold front end; it manages to look both rugged and elegant. The front of the Sport Trac, meanwhile, doesn’t scream Ford to me. Instead, its V-shaped chrome grille reminds me of a Volkswagen Passat, which could very well be the last thing the stylists in Dearborn want to hear.

Head to Head: Ford Sport Trac vs. Chevy Avalanche Part 1
Head to Head: Ford Sport Trac vs. Chevy Avalanche Part 2

Managing Editor
David Thomas

Former managing editor David Thomas has a thing for wagons and owns a 2010 Subaru Outback and a 2005 Volkswagen Passat wagon.

Featured stories