Skip to main content

2002
Chevrolet Cavalier

Starts at:
$13,960
Shop options
New 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier
See ratings
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Shop Cars.com
Browse cars & save your favorites
Dealers near you
Find & contact a dealership near you
no listings

We're not finding any listings in your area.
Change your location or search Cars.com to see more!

Change location

Available trims

See the differences side-by-side to compare trims.
  • 2dr Cpe
    Starts at
    $13,960
    24 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas L4
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 4dr Sdn
    Starts at
    $14,110
    20 City / 28 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas L4
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 2dr Cpe LS
    Starts at
    $15,110
    24 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas L4
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 4dr Sdn LS
    Starts at
    $15,235
    24 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas L4
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 2dr Cpe LS Sport
    Starts at
    $16,555
    24 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas L4
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 4dr Sdn LS Sport
    Starts at
    $16,685
    24 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas L4
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs

Photo & video gallery

2002 Chevrolet Cavalier 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier

The good & the bad

This vehicle doesn't have any good or bad insights yet.

Use our comparison tool to look at this model side-by-side with other vehicles or view the full specifications list .

Start your comparison

Expert 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier review

our expert's take
Our expert's take
By
Full article
our expert's take

The season’s Sackcloth of Shame is hereby awarded to General Motors, for continuing to foist the Chevrolet Cavalier and its clone, Pontiac Sunfire, on an unsuspecting public.

It’s Chevy’s bad luck that I got the Cavalier LS Sport Coupe right on the heels of a Toyota Corolla – a comparison between a vehicle first penned a decade ago and one so fresh it carries a 2003 label is bound to be invidious.

And that’s the whole point – GM must have colossal contempt for the low-end segment if it thinks it can keep a mediocre car around that far beyond its useful lifetime.

There’s one glimmer of good news – the marketplace in its infinite wisdom is sharply discounting the outcast from Lordstown, Ohio, although I’d probably tell someone I cared about to buy a previously-owned, last-generation Corolla in its stead, if price is paramount. (A total reworking of the Cavalier/Sunfire platform, having much in common with Saturn’s recently-revealed Ion line, is expected in 2004.)

Let’s get to the bill of particulars.

Don’t be fooled by the admittedly snazzy job the exterior stylists have done on the version called sport coupe and sport sedan. They’re curvaceous, and bear a respectable paint job. Their big tires and handsome wheels, along with bold “aero” treatments front, rear and side, promise far more than the cars can deliver, however.

The Z24 package used to be the hot tip, Cavalier-wise. It is being phased out in favor of the fresher-sounding sports sibs, while a more purely cosmetic “sport” treatment can be grafted on the base series.

A new engine debuts for the 2002 run. Called the EcoTec 2.2, it’s a more modern piece than those which propelled Cavaliers all those years. All-aluminum, it’s lighter, thriftier with gas and lower in emissions than the clunky pushrod base engine or the hot, well, lukewarm, Z24 powerplant. With twin balance shafts to damp the inherent tendency of an inline four to rock and roll, it is smooth at idle, and climbs to its 5,600-rpm power peak quite willingly.

Rated output is 140 horses and 150 foot-pounds of torque (@4,000). That’s a tad less than what the Z24 2.4-liter twincam offers (150/155), but it garners appreciably better EPA estimates – 24 mpg city, 32 highway. I managed 26.2, giving the optional automatic transmission a workout on mostly rural roads.

Despite having a 10:1 compression ratio, the EcoTec seemed content with the recommended 87-octane fuel, a point of some interest at this end of the automotive gene pool.

A five-speed manual transmission is the standard fitment; the four-speed automatic adds $780 to the asking price.

The automatic did its job quite well. Both upshifts and downshifts were handled smoothly and quickly, and the box seldom got flustered by sudden changes in power demands. The console-mounted shifter must be pulled back into third to negate the long-legged overdrive (fourth forward ratio), with nothing among the instruments to tip t he driver off that she’s now tooling around in third – save the noise level.

The exhaust note of the Sport Coupe was unremarkable, but the intake was buzzy and poorly isolated from the cabin. When the tachometer climbed above 2,000 rpm, the drone became tiresome. In overdrive, each thousand engine turns translates to nearly 30 mph of road speed; in the around-town, 35-45-mph domain, that leads to slight sense of running away, solved by notching down to third. When the speed climbs above 40, the engine drone returns, serving as an audible reminder to upshift.

Traction control is standard with the automatic transmission, though there hardly seems to be enough torque to make the front, driving wheels break away except on wet surfaces. The traction assist is turned off when one manually downshifts to second or first, a situation heralded by a light near the tachometer.

Overall handling was adequate, although it seemed rubbery and vague, despite an unusual amount of feedback through the front tires. The car maintained a heading on the freeway without excessive correction, though it had some tendency, fostered perhaps by the wide, “sporty” tires, to follow road creases.

The LS Sport coupe sits on 205/55/R16 tires mounted on expensive-looking chromed aluminum wheels. It’s a good thing GM didn’t find it necessary to mount high-speed, i.e., stiffer tires, for with the 55 profile, the standard skins were rough enough. Overall, they felt as if they were many pounds overinflated, though they weren’t – it was not very long before the ride became unpleasant.

The tires do afford good grip, though, and that showed also in braking tests, where the Cavalier did reasonably well, despite having somewhat smallish discs at the rear. Antilock is standard, to GM’s credit, and performed correctly without any alarming feedback.

Noise level at freeway speeds was a bit above touring comfort levels, but the noises that got me the most were the unseemly clunks and groans emanating from the chassis. When I exercised the machine over less than optimal roads, it sounded as if the suspension members weren’t firmly bolted together. This kept me from any overenthusiastic exercises, which would have been difficult anyway, given the lack of support from the seats. Though the coupe stands only 53 inches high, it was fairly easy to get into. Once aboard, however, I felt somewhat cramped behind the wheel, even with the driver’s seat full back.

There were two map lights mounted overhead, a good thing per se, but their switches resided in the headliner, which seemed to be lightweight cardboard covered with fuzz – a very cheap feel.

The seatbelt wasn’t as hard to reach as on some GM mistakes, but the guide for it – mounted atop the seatback, was next to useless thanks to an inept design which allowed the belt to break free.

The basic four instruments were well-placed and highly legible, white on black. The tachometer and speedometer seemed rather small, while the other two were disproportionately large.

All in all, Cavalier would get a mediocre rating, were it not for the crash-test results.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which uses a five-star scale, gives it three stars for driver protection in a frontal impact, while the co-pilot has a more respectable four-star aura. In a side impact, however, front-seat occupants have only 1-star protection, while those in the rear are a little better off, with two stars. Either way spells a high likelihood of injury. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety uses a 40-mph frontal-offset crash into a barrier to gauge occupant protection. It gave the Cavalier its worst rating – poor, a shameful distinction it shares only with the Daewoo Leganza and its cousins, the Pontiac Grand Am/Oldsmobile Alero.

The institute considers the Cavalier an inexpensive mid-sized car, and thus compares it with such as the Honda Accord (acceptable overall), Subaru Legacy (best pick), Dodge Stratus and Mazda 626 (good). Chevrolet defines the competition as the Dodge Neon, Honda Civic and Ford Focus. IIHS gave the Civic and Focus its top rating – good – while the Neon was graded marginal. The 2002 Corolla, to return to a point I made above, was rated acceptable. I think these tests deserve heavy weight, particularly in the case of cars aimed at a youthful, accident-prone audience.

The Cavalier I tested bears a base sticker price of $16,280. The automatic transmission was the only option, at $780. With freight, then, total asking price was $17,600.

Edmunds.com estimates you can get one for about $1,000 less – still no bargain, in my opinion.

Payments on a $17,600 car would be $357, assuming 20 percent down, 48 installments and 10 percent interest.

2002 Chevrolet Cavalier review: Our expert's take
By

The season’s Sackcloth of Shame is hereby awarded to General Motors, for continuing to foist the Chevrolet Cavalier and its clone, Pontiac Sunfire, on an unsuspecting public.

It’s Chevy’s bad luck that I got the Cavalier LS Sport Coupe right on the heels of a Toyota Corolla – a comparison between a vehicle first penned a decade ago and one so fresh it carries a 2003 label is bound to be invidious.

And that’s the whole point – GM must have colossal contempt for the low-end segment if it thinks it can keep a mediocre car around that far beyond its useful lifetime.

There’s one glimmer of good news – the marketplace in its infinite wisdom is sharply discounting the outcast from Lordstown, Ohio, although I’d probably tell someone I cared about to buy a previously-owned, last-generation Corolla in its stead, if price is paramount. (A total reworking of the Cavalier/Sunfire platform, having much in common with Saturn’s recently-revealed Ion line, is expected in 2004.)

Let’s get to the bill of particulars.

Don’t be fooled by the admittedly snazzy job the exterior stylists have done on the version called sport coupe and sport sedan. They’re curvaceous, and bear a respectable paint job. Their big tires and handsome wheels, along with bold “aero” treatments front, rear and side, promise far more than the cars can deliver, however.

The Z24 package used to be the hot tip, Cavalier-wise. It is being phased out in favor of the fresher-sounding sports sibs, while a more purely cosmetic “sport” treatment can be grafted on the base series.

A new engine debuts for the 2002 run. Called the EcoTec 2.2, it’s a more modern piece than those which propelled Cavaliers all those years. All-aluminum, it’s lighter, thriftier with gas and lower in emissions than the clunky pushrod base engine or the hot, well, lukewarm, Z24 powerplant. With twin balance shafts to damp the inherent tendency of an inline four to rock and roll, it is smooth at idle, and climbs to its 5,600-rpm power peak quite willingly.

Rated output is 140 horses and 150 foot-pounds of torque (@4,000). That’s a tad less than what the Z24 2.4-liter twincam offers (150/155), but it garners appreciably better EPA estimates – 24 mpg city, 32 highway. I managed 26.2, giving the optional automatic transmission a workout on mostly rural roads.

Despite having a 10:1 compression ratio, the EcoTec seemed content with the recommended 87-octane fuel, a point of some interest at this end of the automotive gene pool.

A five-speed manual transmission is the standard fitment; the four-speed automatic adds $780 to the asking price.

The automatic did its job quite well. Both upshifts and downshifts were handled smoothly and quickly, and the box seldom got flustered by sudden changes in power demands. The console-mounted shifter must be pulled back into third to negate the long-legged overdrive (fourth forward ratio), with nothing among the instruments to tip t he driver off that she’s now tooling around in third – save the noise level.

The exhaust note of the Sport Coupe was unremarkable, but the intake was buzzy and poorly isolated from the cabin. When the tachometer climbed above 2,000 rpm, the drone became tiresome. In overdrive, each thousand engine turns translates to nearly 30 mph of road speed; in the around-town, 35-45-mph domain, that leads to slight sense of running away, solved by notching down to third. When the speed climbs above 40, the engine drone returns, serving as an audible reminder to upshift.

Traction control is standard with the automatic transmission, though there hardly seems to be enough torque to make the front, driving wheels break away except on wet surfaces. The traction assist is turned off when one manually downshifts to second or first, a situation heralded by a light near the tachometer.

Overall handling was adequate, although it seemed rubbery and vague, despite an unusual amount of feedback through the front tires. The car maintained a heading on the freeway without excessive correction, though it had some tendency, fostered perhaps by the wide, “sporty” tires, to follow road creases.

The LS Sport coupe sits on 205/55/R16 tires mounted on expensive-looking chromed aluminum wheels. It’s a good thing GM didn’t find it necessary to mount high-speed, i.e., stiffer tires, for with the 55 profile, the standard skins were rough enough. Overall, they felt as if they were many pounds overinflated, though they weren’t – it was not very long before the ride became unpleasant.

The tires do afford good grip, though, and that showed also in braking tests, where the Cavalier did reasonably well, despite having somewhat smallish discs at the rear. Antilock is standard, to GM’s credit, and performed correctly without any alarming feedback.

Noise level at freeway speeds was a bit above touring comfort levels, but the noises that got me the most were the unseemly clunks and groans emanating from the chassis. When I exercised the machine over less than optimal roads, it sounded as if the suspension members weren’t firmly bolted together. This kept me from any overenthusiastic exercises, which would have been difficult anyway, given the lack of support from the seats. Though the coupe stands only 53 inches high, it was fairly easy to get into. Once aboard, however, I felt somewhat cramped behind the wheel, even with the driver’s seat full back.

There were two map lights mounted overhead, a good thing per se, but their switches resided in the headliner, which seemed to be lightweight cardboard covered with fuzz – a very cheap feel.

The seatbelt wasn’t as hard to reach as on some GM mistakes, but the guide for it – mounted atop the seatback, was next to useless thanks to an inept design which allowed the belt to break free.

The basic four instruments were well-placed and highly legible, white on black. The tachometer and speedometer seemed rather small, while the other two were disproportionately large.

All in all, Cavalier would get a mediocre rating, were it not for the crash-test results.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which uses a five-star scale, gives it three stars for driver protection in a frontal impact, while the co-pilot has a more respectable four-star aura. In a side impact, however, front-seat occupants have only 1-star protection, while those in the rear are a little better off, with two stars. Either way spells a high likelihood of injury. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety uses a 40-mph frontal-offset crash into a barrier to gauge occupant protection. It gave the Cavalier its worst rating – poor, a shameful distinction it shares only with the Daewoo Leganza and its cousins, the Pontiac Grand Am/Oldsmobile Alero.

The institute considers the Cavalier an inexpensive mid-sized car, and thus compares it with such as the Honda Accord (acceptable overall), Subaru Legacy (best pick), Dodge Stratus and Mazda 626 (good). Chevrolet defines the competition as the Dodge Neon, Honda Civic and Ford Focus. IIHS gave the Civic and Focus its top rating – good – while the Neon was graded marginal. The 2002 Corolla, to return to a point I made above, was rated acceptable. I think these tests deserve heavy weight, particularly in the case of cars aimed at a youthful, accident-prone audience.

The Cavalier I tested bears a base sticker price of $16,280. The automatic transmission was the only option, at $780. With freight, then, total asking price was $17,600.

Edmunds.com estimates you can get one for about $1,000 less – still no bargain, in my opinion.

Payments on a $17,600 car would be $357, assuming 20 percent down, 48 installments and 10 percent interest.

Safety review

Based on the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier base trim
NHTSA crash test and rollover ratings, scored out of 5.
Frontal driver
3/5
Frontal passenger
4/5
Side driver
1/5
Side rear passenger
2/5

Factory warranties

New car program benefits

Basic
3 years / 36,000 miles
Corrosion
6 years / 100,000 miles
Powertrain
3 years / 36,000 miles
Roadside Assistance
3 years / 36,000 miles

Certified Pre-Owned program benefits

Age / mileage
5 model years or newer / up to 75,000 miles
Basic
12 months / 12,000 miles bumper-to-bumper original warranty, then may continue to 6 years / 100,000 miles limited (depending on variables)
Dealer certification
172-point inspection

Consumer reviews

4.6 / 5
Based on 34 reviews
Write a review
Comfort 4.1
Interior 3.9
Performance 4.3
Value 4.7
Exterior 4.4
Reliability 4.8

Most recent

  • I have had this car for 22 years.

    I have had this car for 22 years. I wish it was garaged as it is rusting out and the paint has peeled. It has 235,000 miles on it and still running as of 2024.
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 5.0
    1 person out of 1 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • The perfect little car

    I can’t say enough great things about the 02’ cavalier. Mine unfortunately became too unsafe for the road due to the MN winters taking their toll on its body. Salty roads. The perfect all around car for many years of reliability and great mpg. The handling is pretty good for a econo box and the seats were great. Can’t forget about the cup holders in the top of the center console either. I miss it everyday as I learned stick in that car and many milestones happened because of it. The first chance I get, I’m buying another one.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    2 people out of 2 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • She sure is reliable

    My grandma bought a 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier brand new in 2002, which she had it up until she passed away, and gave it to my dad. With the story aside, it's been pretty reliable these past 20 years, in fact, I find it impressively reliable. Normally a car would be useless at 5 - 10 years old, but this car was certainly built tougher than modern cars. Design wise, it's ok, but the materials used for the interior and exterior were certainly cheap, considered the fact that the dash cracks within a decade or so and the weather stripping begins to peel off after around 15 years. Exterior styling is pretty ok, especially with the ls sport coupe, with the spoiler in the back. As far as the value for the money, it's pretty ok as well, however, I dislike the lack of effort with the paint job, considering that the clear coat fails fairly quickly and the materials used are, again, cheap. Overall, I give this car a 4.5 rating, It's cheaply made, but it's been put through xxxx with the California heat and the intense UV rays penitrating on the paint job. I truly hope that Chevrolet learned their lesson with this one, because I don't want to one day buy a used car from chevy and soon look at the roof and see the clear coat chipping off or the dash having numerous cracks.
    • Purchased a New car
    • Used for Transporting family
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 3.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 3.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 5.0
    0 people out of 1 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • 2002 the end era of NON-GPS

    Got my first four door in 1998. Awesome vehicle. Got second one because wife wrecked our first Cavilier. Bought a used 2092 with 82,000+ miles. Still starts on first turn of key. Now has 207,000, and smoke a bit, but is in storage. Hope to rebuild soon. Reliable vehicle.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 3.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    4 people out of 5 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • I own a 2002 and 2004

    These cars have been basically bullet proof. Continue to run with very little issues. The 2004 has had a fan switch replaced but is otherwise original. The 2002 has had the air conditioner replaced and several other issues but nothing that keeps it from getting from here to there.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Having fun
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 5.0
    4 people out of 4 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • theyre ok

    i had this car for around 7 years. it was a decent car in terms of reliability. nothing major besides the ac compressor blew around 3 times. it was a decent car. it got me where i wanted it to go. but i prefer my 07 yaris over this
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 4.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 3.0
    2 people out of 2 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Great little car.

    Great starter car. We purchased this little used car for our grandson. No big bells or whistles, easy keeper and low mileage!! Sold it!! Along with the great salesman Mr. Hawk.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Transporting family
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • I've had mine for 18 years!!

    I love my car. It's got 133k miles on it. Only just recently have I had to replace the starter. I went 16 years without any issue. Only taking it to garage for upkeep and oil change. Although I have a new car, I still kept this one and still drive it occasionally. I'm waiting for it to become a classic car. I want to be one of those people
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Transporting family
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 5.0
    2 people out of 2 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • First car i ever owned And best deal

    the Chevy Cavalier as a whole is an amazing car there cheap but reliable for the time you take care of them! I bought my 2002 cavalier with 132,000mi already on it in 2015-2016 from my sister for $400 I am still driving it today however unless you stay on top of potential problems this car isn't for you. I've had to pay for frame restoration, Exhaust repair, and now my engine has begun to smoke from potential wiring issues turnsignals work on and off, headlamps are leaking water, and the base primer and paint for original cavaliers will show major peeling and rust out. bottom side panels are shot and reap bumper is probably rotting out, next on the list is breaking its an old heavy car not with a lot of stopping power and sometimes due to the disk/drum break combo will get break wobble when having to stop hard. but its lasted through 2002-2020 and that makes this car a 100% go to car for anyone who can find one in good-great condition proves they will last your kids or spouse long enough to save for a better newer car so get them while you can.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Off-roading
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 2.0
    Interior 2.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 4.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 4.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Most reliable car I owned

    Great on milage, minimal repairs, owned a cavalierm sports model from 2003 to Nov 2019, when I was t boned and car was totalled. Broke my heart to give her up. 140000 miles on her and still running until then. No issues except normal wear and tear. Wish they were still on the market.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Built like an absolute tank

    Got this car from my father for $100 after it sat for 5 years. It got beaten on very badly during its life (ex going 30k without an oil change once) and was all smashed up and wrecked. After those 5 years of sitting, I changed all the fluids, put a new battery and spark plugs in and the car cranked right up. I put the body back together with parts from the scrapyard and it's running great with 237,000 miles. The only complaint I really have is that it isn't great with going up hills because I guess the transmission is more geared to fuel economy.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 3.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    1 person out of 1 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Great car for first time driver

    The Cavalier is a great car for the price. The only option I miss is cruise control. The AC cools there car quickly in 90° heat. The trans shifts smoothly.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No

Latest news from cars.com

See all news

Chevrolet dealers near you

FAQ

What trim levels are available for the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier?

The 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier is available in 3 trim levels:

  • (2 styles)
  • LS (2 styles)
  • LS Sport (2 styles)

What is the MPG of the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier?

The 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier offers up to 24 MPG in city driving and 32 MPG on the highway. These figures are based on EPA mileage ratings and are for comparison purposes only. The actual mileage will vary depending on vehicle options, trim level, driving conditions, driving habits, vehicle maintenance, and other factors.

Is the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier reliable?

The 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier has an average reliability rating of 4.8 out of 5 according to cars.com consumers. Find real-world reliability insights within consumer reviews from 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier owners.

Is the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier a good Coupe?

Below are the cars.com consumers ratings for the 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier. 100.0% of drivers recommend this vehicle.

4.6 / 5
Based on 34 reviews
  • Comfort: 4.1
  • Interior: 3.9
  • Performance: 4.3
  • Value: 4.7
  • Exterior: 4.4
  • Reliability: 4.8
Your list was successfully saved.
 
 
 
 
Save list Compare
[{"cat":"sedan_compact","stock_type":"used","bodystyle":"Coupe","page_type":"research/make-model-year","oem_page":false,"search_fuel_types":["Gasoline Fuel"]}]