3.0
2 Reviews|
|
Comfort |
|
|
Value for the Money |
|
|
Interior Design |
|
|
Reliability |
|
|
Performance |
|
|
Exterior Styling |
Have you driven the 1996 Buick Skylark?
Write Your Review1 - 2 of 2 reviews
by FORMER OWNER from on Wed Dec 31 2008
I THINK YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR, THE IS NOT THAT STYLISH BUT IT IS RELIABLE, AND THE MAINTENCE AND UP KEEP IS NOT EXPENSIVE
Purchased a Used car
Does recommend this car!!
4 out of 4 people found this review helpful. Did you?
Runs more poorly than expected
by Amber from Cincinnati, Ohio on Sun Nov 12 2006
Although this is a good car in terms of price and size I have had problems with it running rough despite a tune up which has been a disappointment.
Purchased a Used car
Does not recommend this car!!
4 out of 5 people found this review helpful. Did you?
What is it about the Buick Skylark that gets it no respect?
It's never in the front of Buick's catalog, nor first in the hearts of its buyers. It fills the entry-level niche at luxury-oriented Buick, sharing its underpinnings with the Pontiac Grand Am and Oldsmobile Achieva. It sells the fewest copies of the three.
But there's plenty to change that for '96.
To start with, stylists tamed the Skylark's bodacious beak, giving it a more conservative look (the swoopy side trim is retained). It's certainly a more acceptable look for Buick's mature buyers. The back end is much the same, but the result is an improved set of feathers for Buick's bird.
Trim levels are the same as last year: entry-level... Read More