Skip to main content

Aston Martin DB9 vs. Mazda CX-7

Add new car
$198,250
2dr Cpe Auto GT 2dr Volante Auto 2dr Cpe Auto GT Bond Edition
$22,190
FWD 4dr i SV FWD 4dr i Sport FWD 4dr s Touring FWD 4dr i Touring AWD 4dr s Touring FWD 4dr s Grand Touring AWD 4dr s Grand Touring
Add new car
 

Highlights

Highlights comparison
2016 Aston Martin DB92012 Mazda CX-7
Starting MSRP
$198,250
$22,190
Towing Capacity
Not available
N/A
Cargo Capacity
Not available
N/A
Engine Type
Premium Gasoline V-12
Gas I4
MPG
13 City / 19 Hwy
20 City / 27 Hwy
Horsepower
540 hp
161 hp
Drive Type
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Seating Capacity
2
5
Basic Warranty
3 yr / -1 mi
3 yr / 36,000 mi

Engine

Engine comparison
2016 Aston Martin DB92012 Mazda CX-7
Displacement
6.0 L/362
2.5L/151
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
540 @ 6750
161 @ 6000
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
457 @ 5500
161 @ 3500
Engine Type
Premium Gasoline V-12
Gas I4
Transmission Options
  • 6-Speed A/T
  • A/T
  • Transmission w/Dual Shift Mode
  • A/T
  • 5-Speed A/T
MPG
13 City / 19 Hwy
20 City / 27 Hwy
Total Cooling System Capacity
N/A
9.5 qts

Tires & Wheels

Tires & Wheels comparison
2016 Aston Martin DB92012 Mazda CX-7
Rear Wheel Material
Aluminum
Aluminum
Spare Wheel Material
Aluminum
N/A
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Size
20 X 11 in
17 x 7.0 in
Front Wheel Size
20 X 8.5 in
17 x 7.0 in
Rear Tire Size
P295/30YR20
P215/70HR17
Front Tire Size
P245/35YR20
P215/70HR17
Spare Wheel Size
Compact in
18 x -TBD- in
Spare Tire Size
Compact
T155/90D18

Suspension

Suspension comparison
2016 Aston Martin DB92012 Mazda CX-7
Suspension Type - Rear
Double Wishbone
Multi-link
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Double Wishbone
w/Coil Springs
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Double Wishbone
w/Coil Springs
Suspension Type - Front
Double Wishbone
MacPherson Strut

Steering

Steering comparison
2016 Aston Martin DB92012 Mazda CX-7
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
N/A
16
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
N/A
N/A
Steering Type
Rack-Pinion
Pwr Rack & Pinion
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
41 ft
37 ft
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
N/A
3

Measurements

Measurements comparison
2016 Aston Martin DB92012 Mazda CX-7
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1
Not available
N/A
Second Head Room
N/A
39 in
Track Width, Front
62 in
64 in
Length, Overall
186 in
184 in
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 3
Not available
N/A
Front Hip Room
N/A
55 in
Passenger Capacity
4
5
Cargo Box (Area) Height
Not available
N/A
Liftover Height
N/A
N/A
Second Leg Room
N/A
36 in
Front Leg Room
43 in
42 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
74 in
74 in
Cargo Volume to Seat 1
Not available
59 ft³
Wheelbase
108 in
108 in
Height, Overall
51 in
65 in
Cargo Volume to Seat 2
Not available
30 ft³
Front Head Room
36 in
40 in
Second Hip Room
N/A
53 in
Cargo Area Width @ Beltline
Not available
N/A
Min Ground Clearance
N/A
8 in
Front Shoulder Room
55 in
58 in
Passenger Volume
N/A
102 ft³
Cargo Volume to Seat 3
Not available
Not Available ft³
Second Shoulder Room
N/A
56 in
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2
Not available
N/A
Rear Door Opening Height
Not available
N/A
Track Width, Rear
62 in
64 in
Rear Door Opening Width
Not available
N/A
Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings
Not available
N/A
Trunk Volume
7 ft³
Not available

Weight & Capacity

Weight & Capacity comparison
2016 Aston Martin DB92012 Mazda CX-7
Curb Weight - Front
Not available
N/A
Curb Weight - Rear
Not available
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Not Available lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Not Available lbs
Base Curb Weight
3,935 lbs
3,496 lbs
Total Option Weight
Not available
0 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
150 lbs
Curb Weight
Not available
N/A
Maximum Trailering Capacity
Not available
N/A
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
21 gal
16 gal
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
1,500 lbs
Maximum Payload Capacity
Not available
N/A

Safety

Safety comparison
2016 Aston Martin DB92012 Mazda CX-7
Brake Assist
Not available
Standard
Stability Control
Standard
Standard
Backup Camera
Standard
Not available

Entertainment

Entertainment comparison
2016 Aston Martin DB92012 Mazda CX-7
Bluetooth®
Standard
Not available

Electrical

Electrical comparison
2016 Aston Martin DB92012 Mazda CX-7
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
N/A
110
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
N/A
N/A

Brakes

Brakes comparison
2016 Aston Martin DB92012 Mazda CX-7
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Yes
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes
Yes
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
16 in
11.7 X 1.1 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
14 in
11.9 X 0.7 in
Brake Type
4-Wheel Disc
Pwr
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
N/A
Not Available
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
N/A
N/A
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel
4-Wheel

FAQ

Which is more reliable, the 2016 Aston Martin DB9 or the 2012 Mazda CX-7?

The 2016 Aston Martin DB9 is more reliable than the 2012 Mazda CX-7 according to Cars.com consumers, with a reliability rating of 5.0 for the 2016 DB9 versus a reliability rating of 4.7 for the 2012 CX-7.

Which is more fuel efficient, the 2016 Aston Martin DB9 or the 2012 Mazda CX-7?

The 2012 Mazda CX-7 is more fuel efficient than the 2016 Aston Martin DB9 with 22 MPG combined versus 15 MPG combined.

Which car is cheaper, the 2016 Aston Martin DB9 or the 2012 Mazda CX-7?

The 2012 Mazda CX-7 is cheaper than the 2016 Aston Martin DB9 with a $22,190 starting MSRP versus a $198,250 starting MSRP.

Similar cars for sale

Compare the Aston Martin DB9

Compare the Mazda CX-7

Add car to comparison