Skip to main content

Aston Martin DB9 vs. Mazda CX-7

Add new car
$198,250
$22,190
Add new car
 
Hide similarities

Highlights

$198,250
Starting MSRP
$22,190
Starting MSRP
-
Starting MSRP
-
Towing Capacity
N/A
Towing Capacity
-
Towing Capacity
-
Cargo Capacity
N/A
Cargo Capacity
-
Cargo Capacity
Premium Unleaded V-12
Engine Type
Gas I4
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
13 City / 19 Hwy
MPG
20 City / 27 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
540 hp
Horsepower
161 hp
Horsepower
-
Horsepower
Rear Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front Wheel Drive
Drive Type
-
Drive Type
2
Seating Capacity
5
Seating Capacity
-
Seating Capacity
3 yr / -1 mi
Basic Warranty
3 yr / 36,000 mi
Basic Warranty
-
Basic Warranty

Engine

Premium Unleaded V-12
Engine Type
Gas I4
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
457 @ 5500
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
161 @ 3500
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
-
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
6.0 L/362
Displacement
2.5L/151
Displacement
-
Displacement
540 @ 6750
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
161 @ 6000
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
-
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
6-Speed A/T
A/T
Transmission w/Dual Shift Mode
Transmission Options
A/T
5-Speed A/T
Transmission Options
-
Transmission Options
13 City / 19 Hwy
MPG
20 City / 27 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
N/A
Total Cooling System Capacity
9.5 qts
Total Cooling System Capacity
-
Total Cooling System Capacity

Tires & Wheels

20 X 8.5 in
Front Wheel Size
17 x 7.0 in
Front Wheel Size
-
Front Wheel Size
20 X 11 in
Rear Wheel Size
17 x 7.0 in
Rear Wheel Size
-
Rear Wheel Size
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
-
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum
Spare Wheel Material
N/A
Spare Wheel Material
-
Spare Wheel Material
P295/30YR20
Rear Tire Size
P215/70HR17
Rear Tire Size
-
Rear Tire Size
P245/35YR20
Front Tire Size
P215/70HR17
Front Tire Size
-
Front Tire Size
Compact
Spare Tire Size
T155/90D18
Spare Tire Size
-
Spare Tire Size
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
-
Rear Wheel Material
Compact in
Spare Wheel Size
18 x -TBD- in
Spare Wheel Size
-
Spare Wheel Size

Suspension

Double Wishbone
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
w/Coil Springs
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Double Wishbone
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
w/Coil Springs
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Double Wishbone
Suspension Type - Front
MacPherson Strut
Suspension Type - Front
-
Suspension Type - Front
Double Wishbone
Suspension Type - Rear
Multi-link
Suspension Type - Rear
-
Suspension Type - Rear

Steering

Rack-Pinion
Steering Type
Pwr Rack & Pinion
Steering Type
-
Steering Type
N/A
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
3
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
-
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
41 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
37 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
-
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
N/A
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
16
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
-
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
-
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall

Measurements

-
Cargo Volume to Seat 3
Not Available ft³
Cargo Volume to Seat 3
-
Cargo Volume to Seat 3
-
Rear Door Opening Height
N/A
Rear Door Opening Height
-
Rear Door Opening Height
N/A
Front Hip Room
55 in
Front Hip Room
-
Front Hip Room
-
Cargo Area Width @ Beltline
N/A
Cargo Area Width @ Beltline
-
Cargo Area Width @ Beltline
51 in
Height, Overall
65 in
Height, Overall
-
Height, Overall
36 in
Front Head Room
40 in
Front Head Room
-
Front Head Room
-
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2
N/A
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2
-
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2
N/A
Passenger Volume
102 ft³
Passenger Volume
-
Passenger Volume
62 in
Track Width, Front
64 in
Track Width, Front
-
Track Width, Front
55 in
Front Shoulder Room
58 in
Front Shoulder Room
-
Front Shoulder Room
N/A
Second Hip Room
53 in
Second Hip Room
-
Second Hip Room
-
Cargo Volume to Seat 2
30 ft³
Cargo Volume to Seat 2
-
Cargo Volume to Seat 2
-
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 3
N/A
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 3
-
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 3
108 in
Wheelbase
108 in
Wheelbase
-
Wheelbase
74 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
74 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
-
Width, Max w/o mirrors
-
Rear Door Opening Width
N/A
Rear Door Opening Width
-
Rear Door Opening Width
43 in
Front Leg Room
42 in
Front Leg Room
-
Front Leg Room
-
Cargo Box (Area) Height
N/A
Cargo Box (Area) Height
-
Cargo Box (Area) Height
186 in
Length, Overall
184 in
Length, Overall
-
Length, Overall
N/A
Min Ground Clearance
8 in
Min Ground Clearance
-
Min Ground Clearance
4
Passenger Capacity
5
Passenger Capacity
-
Passenger Capacity
N/A
Liftover Height
N/A
Liftover Height
-
Liftover Height
N/A
Second Shoulder Room
56 in
Second Shoulder Room
-
Second Shoulder Room
N/A
Second Leg Room
36 in
Second Leg Room
-
Second Leg Room
-
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1
N/A
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1
-
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1
-
Cargo Volume to Seat 1
59 ft³
Cargo Volume to Seat 1
-
Cargo Volume to Seat 1
-
Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings
N/A
Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings
-
Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings
N/A
Second Head Room
39 in
Second Head Room
-
Second Head Room
62 in
Track Width, Rear
64 in
Track Width, Rear
-
Track Width, Rear
7 ft³
Trunk Volume
-
Trunk Volume
-
Trunk Volume

Weight & Capacity

N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
Not Available lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
1,500 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Maximum Trailering Capacity
N/A
Maximum Trailering Capacity
-
Maximum Trailering Capacity
-
Maximum Payload Capacity
N/A
Maximum Payload Capacity
-
Maximum Payload Capacity
21 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
16 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Total Option Weight
0 lbs
Total Option Weight
-
Total Option Weight
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
150 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Curb Weight
N/A
Curb Weight
-
Curb Weight
-
Curb Weight - Front
N/A
Curb Weight - Front
-
Curb Weight - Front
-
Curb Weight - Rear
N/A
Curb Weight - Rear
-
Curb Weight - Rear
3,935 lbs
Base Curb Weight
3,496 lbs
Base Curb Weight
-
Base Curb Weight
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
Not Available lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.

Safety

Standard
Stability Control
Standard
Stability Control
-
Stability Control
-
Brake Assist
Standard
Brake Assist
-
Brake Assist
Standard
Backup Camera
-
Backup Camera
-
Backup Camera

Entertainment

Standard
Bluetooth®
-
Bluetooth®
-
Bluetooth®

Electrical

N/A
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
N/A
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
-
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
N/A
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
110
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
-
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)

Brakes

Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
-
Disc - Front (Yes or )
16 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
11.7 X 1.1 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
-
Brake ABS System
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
-
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
-
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
14 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
11.9 X 0.7 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
N/A
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
Not Available
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
-
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
4-Wheel Disc
Brake Type
Pwr
Brake Type
-
Brake Type

FAQ

Which is more reliable, the 2016 Aston Martin DB9 or the 2012 Mazda CX-7?

The 2016 Aston Martin DB9 is more reliable than the 2012 Mazda CX-7 according to Cars.com consumers, with a reliability rating of 5.0 for the 2016 DB9 versus a reliability rating of 4.7 for the 2012 CX-7.

Which is more fuel efficient, the 2016 Aston Martin DB9 or the 2012 Mazda CX-7?

The 2012 Mazda CX-7 is more fuel efficient than the 2016 Aston Martin DB9 with 22 MPG combined versus 15 MPG combined.

Which car is cheaper, the 2016 Aston Martin DB9 or the 2012 Mazda CX-7?

The 2012 Mazda CX-7 is cheaper than the 2016 Aston Martin DB9 with a $22,190 starting MSRP versus a $198,250 starting MSRP.

Compare the Aston Martin DB9

Compare the Mazda CX-7

Add car