Skip to main content

BMW 640 vs. Jaguar XK

Add new car
$86,700
$84,500
Add new car
 
Hide similarities

Highlights

$86,700
Starting MSRP
$84,500
Starting MSRP
-
Starting MSRP
Intercooled Turbo Premium Unleaded I-6
Engine Type
Premium Unleaded V-8
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
20 City / 29 Hwy
MPG
16 City / 24 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
315 hp
Horsepower
385 hp
Horsepower
-
Horsepower
Rear Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear Wheel Drive
Drive Type
-
Drive Type
4
Seating Capacity
4
Seating Capacity
-
Seating Capacity
4 yr / 50,000 mi
Basic Warranty
4 yr / 50,000 mi
Basic Warranty
-
Basic Warranty

Engine

315 @ 5800
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
385 @ 6500
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
-
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
3.0 L/182
Displacement
5.0 L/305
Displacement
-
Displacement
Intercooled Turbo Premium Unleaded I-6
Engine Type
Premium Unleaded V-8
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
330 @ 1400
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
380 @ 3500
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
-
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
8-Speed A/T
A/T
Transmission w/Dual Shift Mode
Transmission Options
6-Speed A/T
A/T
Transmission w/Dual Shift Mode
Transmission Options
-
Transmission Options
20 City / 29 Hwy
MPG
16 City / 24 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
N/A
Total Cooling System Capacity
N/A
Total Cooling System Capacity
-
Total Cooling System Capacity

Tires & Wheels

Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
-
Front Wheel Material
N/A
Spare Tire Size
Compact
Spare Tire Size
-
Spare Tire Size
N/A
Spare Wheel Size
Compact in
Spare Wheel Size
-
Spare Wheel Size
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
-
Rear Wheel Material
18 X 8 in
Rear Wheel Size
20 X 10 in
Rear Wheel Size
-
Rear Wheel Size
18 X 8 in
Front Wheel Size
20 X 9 in
Front Wheel Size
-
Front Wheel Size
P245/45VR18
Rear Tire Size
P285/30YR20
Rear Tire Size
-
Rear Tire Size
P245/45VR18
Front Tire Size
P255/35YR20
Front Tire Size
-
Front Tire Size
N/A
Spare Wheel Material
Aluminum
Spare Wheel Material
-
Spare Wheel Material

Suspension

Double Wishbone
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Double Wishbone
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Short And Long Arm
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Double Wishbone
Suspension Type - Front
Double Wishbone
Suspension Type - Front
-
Suspension Type - Front
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear
Short And Long Arm
Suspension Type - Rear
-
Suspension Type - Rear

Steering

N/A
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
N/A
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
-
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
Rack-Pinion
Steering Type
Rack-Pinion
Steering Type
-
Steering Type
38 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
36 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
-
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
N/A
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
N/A
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
-
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
-
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall

Measurements

N/A
Second Hip Room
N/A
Second Hip Room
-
Second Hip Room
193 in
Length, Overall
189 in
Length, Overall
-
Length, Overall
65 in
Track Width, Rear
59 in
Track Width, Rear
-
Track Width, Rear
75 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
75 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
-
Width, Max w/o mirrors
37 in
Second Head Room
30 in
Second Head Room
-
Second Head Room
57 in
Front Shoulder Room
57 in
Front Shoulder Room
-
Front Shoulder Room
42 in
Front Leg Room
43 in
Front Leg Room
-
Front Leg Room
63 in
Track Width, Front
59 in
Track Width, Front
-
Track Width, Front
89 ft³
Passenger Volume
N/A
Passenger Volume
-
Passenger Volume
112 in
Wheelbase
108 in
Wheelbase
-
Wheelbase
N/A
Liftover Height
N/A
Liftover Height
-
Liftover Height
N/A
Front Hip Room
N/A
Front Hip Room
-
Front Hip Room
50 in
Second Shoulder Room
42 in
Second Shoulder Room
-
Second Shoulder Room
54 in
Height, Overall
52 in
Height, Overall
-
Height, Overall
4
Passenger Capacity
4
Passenger Capacity
-
Passenger Capacity
31 in
Second Leg Room
28 in
Second Leg Room
-
Second Leg Room
11 ft³
Trunk Volume
N/A
Trunk Volume
-
Trunk Volume
5 in
Min Ground Clearance
5 in
Min Ground Clearance
-
Min Ground Clearance
40 in
Front Head Room
37 in
Front Head Room
-
Front Head Room

Weight & Capacity

N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
19 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
16 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
4,255 lbs
Base Curb Weight
3,770 lbs
Base Curb Weight
-
Base Curb Weight

Safety

Standard
Backup Camera
Standard
Backup Camera
-
Backup Camera
Standard
Stability Control
Standard
Stability Control
-
Stability Control

Entertainment

Standard
Bluetooth®
Standard
Bluetooth®
-
Bluetooth®

Electrical

210
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
N/A
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
-
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
N/A
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
N/A
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
-
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)

Brakes

14 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
13 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
-
Disc - Front (Yes or )
4-Wheel Disc
Brake Type
4-Wheel Disc
Brake Type
-
Brake Type
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
-
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
N/A
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
Not Available
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
-
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
-
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
-
Brake ABS System
14 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
14 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness

FAQ

Which is more reliable, the 2018 BMW 640 or the 2015 Jaguar XK?

The 2015 Jaguar XK is more reliable than the 2018 BMW 640 according to Cars.com consumers, with a reliability rating of 4.5 for the 2015 XK versus a reliability rating of 4.0 for the 2018 640.

Which is more fuel efficient, the 2018 BMW 640 or the 2015 Jaguar XK?

The 2018 BMW 640 is more fuel efficient than the 2015 Jaguar XK with 23 MPG combined versus 19 MPG combined.

Which car is cheaper, the 2018 BMW 640 or the 2015 Jaguar XK?

The 2015 Jaguar XK is cheaper than the 2018 BMW 640 with a $84,500 starting MSRP versus a $86,700 starting MSRP.

Compare the BMW 640

Compare the Jaguar XK

Add car