Skip to main content

BMW 650 vs. Jaguar XK

Add new car
$98,300
$84,500
Add new car
 
Hide similarities

Highlights

$98,300
Starting MSRP
$84,500
Starting MSRP
-
Starting MSRP
Twin Turbo Premium Unleaded V-8
Engine Type
Premium Unleaded V-8
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
17 City / 25 Hwy
MPG
16 City / 24 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
445 hp
Horsepower
385 hp
Horsepower
-
Horsepower
Rear Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear Wheel Drive
Drive Type
-
Drive Type
4
Seating Capacity
4
Seating Capacity
-
Seating Capacity
4 yr / 50,000 mi
Basic Warranty
4 yr / 50,000 mi
Basic Warranty
-
Basic Warranty

Engine

4.4 L/268
Displacement
5.0 L/305
Displacement
-
Displacement
480 @ 1750
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
380 @ 3500
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
-
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
Twin Turbo Premium Unleaded V-8
Engine Type
Premium Unleaded V-8
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
445 @ 5500
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
385 @ 6500
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
-
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
8-Speed A/T
A/T
Transmission w/Dual Shift Mode
Transmission Options
6-Speed A/T
A/T
Transmission w/Dual Shift Mode
Transmission Options
-
Transmission Options
17 City / 25 Hwy
MPG
16 City / 24 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
N/A
Total Cooling System Capacity
N/A
Total Cooling System Capacity
-
Total Cooling System Capacity

Tires & Wheels

N/A
Spare Wheel Material
Aluminum
Spare Wheel Material
-
Spare Wheel Material
N/A
Spare Tire Size
Compact
Spare Tire Size
-
Spare Tire Size
P245/40VR19
Rear Tire Size
P285/30YR20
Rear Tire Size
-
Rear Tire Size
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
-
Front Wheel Material
P245/40VR19
Front Tire Size
P255/35YR20
Front Tire Size
-
Front Tire Size
19 X 8.5 in
Front Wheel Size
20 X 9 in
Front Wheel Size
-
Front Wheel Size
N/A
Spare Wheel Size
Compact in
Spare Wheel Size
-
Spare Wheel Size
19 X 8.5 in
Rear Wheel Size
20 X 10 in
Rear Wheel Size
-
Rear Wheel Size
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
-
Rear Wheel Material

Suspension

Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Short And Long Arm
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Double Wishbone
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Double Wishbone
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Double Wishbone
Suspension Type - Front
Double Wishbone
Suspension Type - Front
-
Suspension Type - Front
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear
Short And Long Arm
Suspension Type - Rear
-
Suspension Type - Rear

Steering

38 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
36 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
-
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
Rack-Pinion
Steering Type
Rack-Pinion
Steering Type
-
Steering Type
N/A
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
N/A
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
-
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
N/A
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
N/A
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
-
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
-
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall

Measurements

63 in
Track Width, Front
59 in
Track Width, Front
-
Track Width, Front
65 in
Track Width, Rear
59 in
Track Width, Rear
-
Track Width, Rear
75 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
75 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
-
Width, Max w/o mirrors
5 in
Min Ground Clearance
5 in
Min Ground Clearance
-
Min Ground Clearance
89 ft³
Passenger Volume
N/A
Passenger Volume
-
Passenger Volume
57 in
Front Shoulder Room
57 in
Front Shoulder Room
-
Front Shoulder Room
50 in
Second Shoulder Room
42 in
Second Shoulder Room
-
Second Shoulder Room
42 in
Front Leg Room
43 in
Front Leg Room
-
Front Leg Room
31 in
Second Leg Room
28 in
Second Leg Room
-
Second Leg Room
N/A
Second Hip Room
N/A
Second Hip Room
-
Second Hip Room
4
Passenger Capacity
4
Passenger Capacity
-
Passenger Capacity
54 in
Height, Overall
52 in
Height, Overall
-
Height, Overall
40 in
Front Head Room
37 in
Front Head Room
-
Front Head Room
112 in
Wheelbase
108 in
Wheelbase
-
Wheelbase
37 in
Second Head Room
30 in
Second Head Room
-
Second Head Room
N/A
Liftover Height
N/A
Liftover Height
-
Liftover Height
11 ft³
Trunk Volume
N/A
Trunk Volume
-
Trunk Volume
N/A
Front Hip Room
N/A
Front Hip Room
-
Front Hip Room
193 in
Length, Overall
189 in
Length, Overall
-
Length, Overall

Weight & Capacity

N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
19 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
16 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
4,520 lbs
Base Curb Weight
3,770 lbs
Base Curb Weight
-
Base Curb Weight
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.

Safety

Standard
Backup Camera
Standard
Backup Camera
-
Backup Camera
Standard
Stability Control
Standard
Stability Control
-
Stability Control

Entertainment

Standard
Bluetooth®
Standard
Bluetooth®
-
Bluetooth®

Electrical

N/A
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
N/A
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
-
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
210
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
N/A
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
-
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)

Brakes

N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
-
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
-
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
-
Brake ABS System
N/A
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
Not Available
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
-
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
14 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
13 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
15 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
14 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
-
Disc - Front (Yes or )
4-Wheel Disc
Brake Type
4-Wheel Disc
Brake Type
-
Brake Type

FAQ

Which is more reliable, the 2018 BMW 650 or the 2015 Jaguar XK?

The 2018 BMW 650 is more reliable than the 2015 Jaguar XK according to Cars.com consumers, with a reliability rating of 5.0 for the 2018 650 versus a reliability rating of 4.5 for the 2015 XK.

Which is more fuel efficient, the 2018 BMW 650 or the 2015 Jaguar XK?

The 2018 BMW 650 is more fuel efficient than the 2015 Jaguar XK with 20 MPG combined versus 19 MPG combined.

Which car is cheaper, the 2018 BMW 650 or the 2015 Jaguar XK?

The 2015 Jaguar XK is cheaper than the 2018 BMW 650 with a $84,500 starting MSRP versus a $98,300 starting MSRP.

Compare the BMW 650

Compare the Jaguar XK

Add car