Cadillac Eldorado vs. Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme
Hide similarities
Highlights
|
$42,130
Starting MSRP
|
$18,950
Starting MSRP
|
-
Starting MSRP
|
|
|
Gas V8
Engine Type
|
Gas V6
Engine Type
|
-
Engine Type
|
|
|
18 City / 27 Hwy
MPG
|
20 City / 29 Hwy
MPG
|
-
MPG
|
|
|
275 hp
Horsepower
|
160 hp
Horsepower
|
-
Horsepower
|
|
|
Front Wheel Drive
Drive Type
|
Front Wheel Drive
Drive Type
|
-
Drive Type
|
|
|
5
Seating Capacity
|
5
Seating Capacity
|
-
Seating Capacity
|
|
|
4 yr / 50,000 mi
Basic Warranty
|
3 yr / 36,000 mi
Basic Warranty
|
-
Basic Warranty
|
Engine
|
300 @ 4000
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
|
185 @ 4000
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
|
-
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
|
|
|
275 @ 5600
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
|
160 @ 5200
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
|
-
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
|
|
|
4.6L/279
Displacement
|
3.1L/191
Displacement
|
-
Displacement
|
|
|
Gas V8
Engine Type
|
Gas V6
Engine Type
|
-
Engine Type
|
|
|
A/T
4-Speed A/T Transmission Options
|
A/T
4-Speed A/T Transmission Options
|
-
Transmission Options
|
|
|
18 City / 27 Hwy
MPG
|
20 City / 29 Hwy
MPG
|
-
MPG
|
|
|
12.5 qts
Total Cooling System Capacity
|
9.14 qts
Total Cooling System Capacity
|
-
Total Cooling System Capacity
|
Tires & Wheels
|
Steel
Spare Wheel Material
|
N/A
Spare Wheel Material
|
-
Spare Wheel Material
|
|
|
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
|
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
|
-
Rear Wheel Material
|
|
|
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
|
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
|
-
Front Wheel Material
|
|
|
15 x 4.0 in
Spare Wheel Size
|
16 x 4 in
Spare Wheel Size
|
-
Spare Wheel Size
|
|
|
16 x 7.0 in
Rear Wheel Size
|
16 x 6.5 in
Rear Wheel Size
|
-
Rear Wheel Size
|
|
|
16 x 7.0 in
Front Wheel Size
|
16 x 6.5 in
Front Wheel Size
|
-
Front Wheel Size
|
|
|
T125/70R15
Spare Tire Size
|
T125/70R16
Spare Tire Size
|
-
Spare Tire Size
|
|
|
P225/60SR16
Rear Tire Size
|
P215/60R16
Rear Tire Size
|
-
Rear Tire Size
|
|
|
P225/60SR16
Front Tire Size
|
P215/60R16
Front Tire Size
|
-
Front Tire Size
|
Suspension
|
Elec level control
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
|
w/Leaf Springs
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
|
-
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
|
|
|
Elec level control
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
|
w/Coil Springs
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
|
-
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
|
|
|
Independent
Suspension Type - Rear
|
Tri-Link
Suspension Type - Rear
|
-
Suspension Type - Rear
|
|
|
Independent
Suspension Type - Front
|
MacPherson Strut
Suspension Type - Front
|
-
Suspension Type - Front
|
Steering
|
42 ft
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
|
42 ft
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
|
-
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
|
|
|
40 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
|
37 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
|
-
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
|
|
|
3
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
|
3
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
|
-
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
|
|
|
17
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
|
16
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
|
-
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
|
|
|
Pwr
Steering Type
|
Power Rack & Pinion
Steering Type
|
-
Steering Type
|
Measurements
|
15 ft³
Trunk Volume
|
16 ft³
Trunk Volume
|
-
Trunk Volume
|
|
|
29 in
Liftover Height
|
30 in
Liftover Height
|
-
Liftover Height
|
|
|
6 in
Min Ground Clearance
|
6 in
Min Ground Clearance
|
-
Min Ground Clearance
|
|
|
61 in
Track Width, Rear
|
58 in
Track Width, Rear
|
-
Track Width, Rear
|
|
|
61 in
Track Width, Front
|
60 in
Track Width, Front
|
-
Track Width, Front
|
|
|
54 in
Height, Overall
|
53 in
Height, Overall
|
-
Height, Overall
|
|
|
76 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
|
72 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
|
-
Width, Max w/o mirrors
|
|
|
201 in
Length, Overall
|
194 in
Length, Overall
|
-
Length, Overall
|
|
|
108 in
Wheelbase
|
108 in
Wheelbase
|
-
Wheelbase
|
|
|
56 in
Second Hip Room
|
53 in
Second Hip Room
|
-
Second Hip Room
|
|
|
58 in
Second Shoulder Room
|
57 in
Second Shoulder Room
|
-
Second Shoulder Room
|
|
|
36 in
Second Leg Room
|
35 in
Second Leg Room
|
-
Second Leg Room
|
|
|
38 in
Second Head Room
|
37 in
Second Head Room
|
-
Second Head Room
|
|
|
58 in
Front Hip Room
|
54 in
Front Hip Room
|
-
Front Hip Room
|
|
|
58 in
Front Shoulder Room
|
57 in
Front Shoulder Room
|
-
Front Shoulder Room
|
|
|
43 in
Front Leg Room
|
42 in
Front Leg Room
|
-
Front Leg Room
|
|
|
38 in
Front Head Room
|
38 in
Front Head Room
|
-
Front Head Room
|
|
|
100 ft³
Passenger Volume
|
95 ft³
Passenger Volume
|
-
Passenger Volume
|
|
|
5
Passenger Capacity
|
5
Passenger Capacity
|
-
Passenger Capacity
|
Weight & Capacity
|
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
-
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
|
|
19 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
17 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
-
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
|
|
Not Available lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
Not Available lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
|
|
Not Available lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
Not Available lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
|
|
100 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
100 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
|
|
1,000 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
1,000 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
|
|
3,814 lbs
Base Curb Weight
|
3,305 lbs
Base Curb Weight
|
-
Base Curb Weight
|
Electrical
|
140
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
|
100
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
|
-
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
|
|
|
770
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
|
600
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
|
-
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
|
Brakes
|
Not Available
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
|
Not Available
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
|
-
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
|
|
|
11.1 x 0.4 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
10.9 x 0.43 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
-
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
|
|
11.9 x 1.3 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
11.3 x 1.04 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
-
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
|
|
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
|
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
|
-
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
|
|
|
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
|
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
|
-
Disc - Front (Yes or )
|
|
|
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
|
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
|
-
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
|
|
|
Yes
Brake ABS System
|
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
|
-
Brake ABS System
|
|
|
Power
Brake Type
|
Power
Brake Type
|
-
Brake Type
|
FAQ
Which is more reliable, the 2002 Cadillac Eldorado or the 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme?
The 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme is more reliable than the 2002 Cadillac Eldorado according to Cars.com consumers, with a reliability rating of 5.0 for the 1997 Cutlass Supreme versus a reliability rating of 4.4 for the 2002 Eldorado.
Which is more fuel efficient, the 2002 Cadillac Eldorado or the 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme?
The 2002 Cadillac Eldorado and the 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme both get 0 MPG combined.
Which car is cheaper, the 2002 Cadillac Eldorado or the 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme?
The 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme is cheaper than the 2002 Cadillac Eldorado with a $18,950 starting MSRP versus a $42,130 starting MSRP.
Compare the Cadillac Eldorado
Compare the Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme
Add car