Skip to main content

Cadillac Eldorado vs. Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme

Add new car
$42,130
$18,950
Add new car
 
Hide similarities

Highlights

$42,130
Starting MSRP
$18,950
Starting MSRP
-
Starting MSRP
Gas V8
Engine Type
Gas V6
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
18 City / 27 Hwy
MPG
20 City / 29 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
275 hp
Horsepower
160 hp
Horsepower
-
Horsepower
Front Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front Wheel Drive
Drive Type
-
Drive Type
5
Seating Capacity
5
Seating Capacity
-
Seating Capacity
4 yr / 50,000 mi
Basic Warranty
3 yr / 36,000 mi
Basic Warranty
-
Basic Warranty

Engine

Gas V8
Engine Type
Gas V6
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
4.6L/279
Displacement
3.1L/191
Displacement
-
Displacement
275 @ 5600
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
160 @ 5200
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
-
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
300 @ 4000
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
185 @ 4000
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
-
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
A/T
4-Speed A/T
Transmission Options
A/T
4-Speed A/T
Transmission Options
-
Transmission Options
18 City / 27 Hwy
MPG
20 City / 29 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
12.5 qts
Total Cooling System Capacity
9.14 qts
Total Cooling System Capacity
-
Total Cooling System Capacity

Tires & Wheels

Steel
Spare Wheel Material
N/A
Spare Wheel Material
-
Spare Wheel Material
P225/60SR16
Front Tire Size
P215/60R16
Front Tire Size
-
Front Tire Size
P225/60SR16
Rear Tire Size
P215/60R16
Rear Tire Size
-
Rear Tire Size
T125/70R15
Spare Tire Size
T125/70R16
Spare Tire Size
-
Spare Tire Size
16 x 7.0 in
Front Wheel Size
16 x 6.5 in
Front Wheel Size
-
Front Wheel Size
16 x 7.0 in
Rear Wheel Size
16 x 6.5 in
Rear Wheel Size
-
Rear Wheel Size
15 x 4.0 in
Spare Wheel Size
16 x 4 in
Spare Wheel Size
-
Spare Wheel Size
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
-
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
-
Rear Wheel Material

Suspension

Independent
Suspension Type - Front
MacPherson Strut
Suspension Type - Front
-
Suspension Type - Front
Independent
Suspension Type - Rear
Tri-Link
Suspension Type - Rear
-
Suspension Type - Rear
Elec level control
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
w/Coil Springs
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Elec level control
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
w/Leaf Springs
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)

Steering

Pwr
Steering Type
Power Rack & Pinion
Steering Type
-
Steering Type
17
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
16
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
-
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
3
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
3
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
-
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
40 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
37 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
-
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
42 ft
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
42 ft
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
-
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall

Measurements

38 in
Front Head Room
38 in
Front Head Room
-
Front Head Room
43 in
Front Leg Room
42 in
Front Leg Room
-
Front Leg Room
58 in
Front Shoulder Room
57 in
Front Shoulder Room
-
Front Shoulder Room
58 in
Front Hip Room
54 in
Front Hip Room
-
Front Hip Room
38 in
Second Head Room
37 in
Second Head Room
-
Second Head Room
36 in
Second Leg Room
35 in
Second Leg Room
-
Second Leg Room
58 in
Second Shoulder Room
57 in
Second Shoulder Room
-
Second Shoulder Room
56 in
Second Hip Room
53 in
Second Hip Room
-
Second Hip Room
108 in
Wheelbase
108 in
Wheelbase
-
Wheelbase
201 in
Length, Overall
194 in
Length, Overall
-
Length, Overall
76 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
72 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
-
Width, Max w/o mirrors
54 in
Height, Overall
53 in
Height, Overall
-
Height, Overall
61 in
Track Width, Front
60 in
Track Width, Front
-
Track Width, Front
61 in
Track Width, Rear
58 in
Track Width, Rear
-
Track Width, Rear
6 in
Min Ground Clearance
6 in
Min Ground Clearance
-
Min Ground Clearance
29 in
Liftover Height
30 in
Liftover Height
-
Liftover Height
15 ft³
Trunk Volume
16 ft³
Trunk Volume
-
Trunk Volume
5
Passenger Capacity
5
Passenger Capacity
-
Passenger Capacity
100 ft³
Passenger Volume
95 ft³
Passenger Volume
-
Passenger Volume

Weight & Capacity

19 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
17 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
3,814 lbs
Base Curb Weight
3,305 lbs
Base Curb Weight
-
Base Curb Weight
1,000 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
1,000 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
100 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
100 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
Not Available lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
Not Available lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
Not Available lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
Not Available lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.

Electrical

770
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
600
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
-
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
140
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
100
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
-
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)

Brakes

Power
Brake Type
Power
Brake Type
-
Brake Type
Yes
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
-
Brake ABS System
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
-
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
-
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
-
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
11.9 x 1.3 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
11.3 x 1.04 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
11.1 x 0.4 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
10.9 x 0.43 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
Not Available
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
Not Available
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
-
Drum - Rear (Yes or )

FAQ

Which is more reliable, the 2002 Cadillac Eldorado or the 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme?

The 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme is more reliable than the 2002 Cadillac Eldorado according to Cars.com consumers, with a reliability rating of 5.0 for the 1997 Cutlass Supreme versus a reliability rating of 4.4 for the 2002 Eldorado.

Which is more fuel efficient, the 2002 Cadillac Eldorado or the 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme?

The 2002 Cadillac Eldorado and the 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme both get 0 MPG combined.

Which car is cheaper, the 2002 Cadillac Eldorado or the 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme?

The 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme is cheaper than the 2002 Cadillac Eldorado with a $18,950 starting MSRP versus a $42,130 starting MSRP.

Similar cars for sale

Compare the Cadillac Eldorado

Compare the Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme

Add car