Chevrolet Caprice vs. Oldsmobile Cutlass

Add new car

1992 Chevrolet Caprice

$17,300

See all results

1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass

$18,145

See all results

Add new car

Hide similarities

Highlights

$17,300 Starting MSRP	$18,145 Starting MSRP	- Starting MSRP
- Engine Type	Gas V6 Engine Type	- Engine Type
- MPG	20 City / 29 Hwy MPG	- MPG
- Horsepower	150 hp Horsepower	- Horsepower
Drive Type	Front Wheel Drive Drive Type	- Drive Type
- Seating Capacity	5 Seating Capacity	- Seating Capacity
- Basic Warranty	3 yr / 36,000 mi Basic Warranty	- Basic Warranty

Engine

- Engine Type	Gas V6 Engine Type	- Engine Type
- SAE Net Torque @ RPM	185 @ 3200 SAE Net Torque @ RPM	- SAE Net Torque @ RPM
- SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM	150 @ 4800 SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM	- SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
- Displacement	3.1L/191 Displacement	- Displacement
A/T 4-Speed A/T Transmission Options	A/T 4-Speed A/T Transmission Options	- Transmission Options
- MPG	20 City / 29 Hwy MPG	- MPG
- Total Cooling System Capacity	13.2 qts Total Cooling System Capacity	- Total Cooling System Capacity

Tires & Wheels

- Front Wheel Material	Steel Front Wheel Material	- Front Wheel Material
- Rear Wheel Material	Steel Rear Wheel Material	- Rear Wheel Material
- Front Tire Size	P215/60R15 Front Tire Size	- Front Tire Size
- Spare Wheel Material	Steel Spare Wheel Material	- Spare Wheel Material
- Rear Wheel Size	15 x 6 in Rear Wheel Size	- Rear Wheel Size
- Rear Tire Size	P215/60R15 Rear Tire Size	- Rear Tire Size
- Spare Tire Size	T125/70D15 Spare Tire Size	- Spare Tire Size
- Spare Wheel Size	15 x 4 in Spare Wheel Size	- Spare Wheel Size
- Front Wheel Size	15 x 6 in Front Wheel Size	- Front Wheel Size

Suspension

- Suspension Type - Front	MacPherson Strut Suspension Type - Front	- Suspension Type - Front
- Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)	w/Coil Springs Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)	- Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
- Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)	w/Coil Springs Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)	- Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
- Suspension Type - Rear	Tri-Link Suspension Type - Rear	- Suspension Type - Rear

Steering

- Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)	3 Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)	- Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
- Steering Ratio (:1), Overall	16 Steering Ratio (:1), Overall	- Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
- Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb	36 ft Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb	- Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
- Steering Type	Power Rack & Pinion Steering Type	- Steering Type
- Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall	N/A Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall	- Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall

Measurements

- Front Head Room	39 in Front Head Room	- Front Head Room
- Track Width, Rear	59 in Track Width, Rear	- Track Width, Rear
- Second Head Room	38 in Second Head Room	- Second Head Room
- Passenger Volume	99 ft³ Passenger Volume	- Passenger Volume
- Liftover Height	29 in Liftover Height	- Liftover Height
- Second Leg Room	38 in Second Leg Room	- Second Leg Room
- Track Width, Front	59 in Track Width, Front	- Track Width, Front
- Min Ground Clearance	6 in Min Ground Clearance	- Min Ground Clearance
- Front Leg Room	42 in Front Leg Room	- Front Leg Room
- Second Hip Room	52 in Second Hip Room	- Second Hip Room
- Passenger Capacity	5 Passenger Capacity	- Passenger Capacity
- Wheelbase	107 in Wheelbase	- Wheelbase
- Length, Overall	192 in Length, Overall	- Length, Overall
- Trunk Volume	17 ft³ Trunk Volume	- Trunk Volume
- Height, Overall	56 in Height, Overall	- Height, Overall
- Front Hip Room	52 in Front Hip Room	- Front Hip Room
- Front Shoulder Room	55 in Front Shoulder Room	- Front Shoulder Room
- Second Shoulder Room	55 in Second Shoulder Room	- Second Shoulder Room
- Width, Max w/o mirrors	69 in Width, Max w/o mirrors	- Width, Max w/o mirrors

Weight & Capacity

- Base Curb Weight	3,074 lbs Base Curb Weight	- Base Curb Weight
- Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.	Not Available lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.	- Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
- Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.	1,000 lbs Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.	- Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
- Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx	15 gal Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx	- Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
- Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx	N/A Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx	- Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
- Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.	Not Available lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.	- Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
- Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.	100 lbs Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.	- Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.

Electrical

- Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)	105 Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)		- Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
- Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)	600 Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)		- Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)

Brakes

- Brake ABS System (Second Line)	N/A Brake ABS System (Second Line)	- Brake ABS System (Second Line)
- Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness	10.78 x 1.02 in Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness	- Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
- Disc - Front (Yes or )	Yes Disc - Front (Yes or )	- Disc - Front (Yes or )
- Brake ABS System	4-Wheel Brake ABS System	- Brake ABS System
- Drum - Rear (Yes or )	Yes Drum - Rear (Yes or )	- Drum - Rear (Yes or )
- Disc - Rear (Yes or )	Not Available Disc - Rear (Yes or )	- Disc - Rear (Yes or )
- Brake Type	Power Brake Type	- Brake Type
- Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness	Not Available in Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness	- Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness

FAQ

Which is more reliable, the 1992 Chevrolet Caprice or the 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass?

The 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass is more reliable than the 1992 Chevrolet Caprice according to Cars.com consumers, with a reliability rating of 5.0 for the 1999 Cutlass versus a reliability rating of 4.5 for the 1992 Caprice.

Which is more fuel efficient, the 1992 Chevrolet Caprice or the 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass?

The 1992 Chevrolet Caprice and the 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass both get 0 MPG combined.

Which car is cheaper, the 1992 Chevrolet Caprice or the 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass?

The 1992 Chevrolet Caprice is cheaper than the 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass with a $17,300 starting MSRP versus a $18,145 starting MSRP.