Skip to main content

Chrysler 300C vs. Lincoln MKS

Add new car
$38,635
$39,010
Add new car
 
Hide similarities

Highlights

$38,635
Starting MSRP
$39,010
Starting MSRP
-
Starting MSRP
Regular Unleaded V-6
Engine Type
Regular Unleaded V-6
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
19 City / 30 Hwy
MPG
17 City / 26 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
292 hp
363 hp
292 hp
Horsepower
305 hp
Horsepower
-
Horsepower
Rear Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front Wheel Drive
Drive Type
-
Drive Type
5
Seating Capacity
5
Seating Capacity
-
Seating Capacity
3 yr / 36,000 mi
Basic Warranty
4 yr / 50,000 mi
Basic Warranty
-
Basic Warranty

Engine

292 @ 6350
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
305 @ 6500
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
-
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
Regular Unleaded V-6
Engine Type
Regular Unleaded V-6
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
3.6 L/220
Displacement
3.7 L/227
Displacement
-
Displacement
260 @ 4800
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
280 @ 4000
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
-
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
8-Speed A/T
A/T
Transmission w/Dual Shift Mode
Transmission Options
6-Speed A/T
A/T
Transmission w/Dual Shift Mode
Transmission Options
-
Transmission Options
19 City / 30 Hwy
MPG
17 City / 26 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
N/A
Total Cooling System Capacity
N/A
Total Cooling System Capacity
-
Total Cooling System Capacity

Tires & Wheels

Compact in
Spare Wheel Size
Compact in
Spare Wheel Size
-
Spare Wheel Size
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
-
Rear Wheel Material
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
-
Front Wheel Material
P225/60TR18
Front Tire Size
P255/45VR19
Front Tire Size
-
Front Tire Size
P225/60TR18
Rear Tire Size
P255/45VR19
Rear Tire Size
-
Rear Tire Size
Compact
Spare Tire Size
Compact
Spare Tire Size
-
Spare Tire Size
Steel
Spare Wheel Material
Steel
Spare Wheel Material
-
Spare Wheel Material
18 X 7.5 in
Rear Wheel Size
19 X 8 in
Rear Wheel Size
-
Rear Wheel Size
18 X 7.5 in
Front Wheel Size
19 X 8 in
Front Wheel Size
-
Front Wheel Size

Suspension

Short And Long Arm
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Strut
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear
-
Suspension Type - Rear
Short And Long Arm
Suspension Type - Front
Strut
Suspension Type - Front
-
Suspension Type - Front
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)

Steering

N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
-
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
Rack-Pinion
Steering Type
Rack-Pinion
Steering Type
-
Steering Type
N/A
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
N/A
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
-
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
39 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
39 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
-
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
N/A
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
N/A
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
-
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall

Measurements

106 ft³
Passenger Volume
106 ft³
Passenger Volume
-
Passenger Volume
199 in
Length, Overall
206 in
Length, Overall
-
Length, Overall
56 in
Front Hip Room
55 in
Front Hip Room
-
Front Hip Room
56 in
Second Hip Room
55 in
Second Hip Room
-
Second Hip Room
40 in
Second Leg Room
39 in
Second Leg Room
-
Second Leg Room
64 in
Track Width, Rear
65 in
Track Width, Rear
-
Track Width, Rear
5
Passenger Capacity
5
Passenger Capacity
-
Passenger Capacity
120 in
Wheelbase
113 in
Wheelbase
-
Wheelbase
63 in
Track Width, Front
65 in
Track Width, Front
-
Track Width, Front
58 in
Second Shoulder Room
57 in
Second Shoulder Room
-
Second Shoulder Room
60 in
Front Shoulder Room
59 in
Front Shoulder Room
-
Front Shoulder Room
N/A
Liftover Height
N/A
Liftover Height
-
Liftover Height
42 in
Front Leg Room
42 in
Front Leg Room
-
Front Leg Room
59 in
Height, Overall
62 in
Height, Overall
-
Height, Overall
N/A
Min Ground Clearance
N/A
Min Ground Clearance
-
Min Ground Clearance
37 in
Second Head Room
39 in
Second Head Room
-
Second Head Room
37 in
Front Head Room
40 in
Front Head Room
-
Front Head Room
16 ft³
Trunk Volume
19 ft³
Trunk Volume
-
Trunk Volume
75 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
76 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
-
Width, Max w/o mirrors

Weight & Capacity

19 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
19 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
1,000 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
1,000 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
100 lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
100 lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
4,029 lbs
Base Curb Weight
4,204 lbs
Base Curb Weight
-
Base Curb Weight
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
1,000 lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
1,000 lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
100 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
100 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.

Safety

Optional
Backup Camera
Standard
Backup Camera
-
Backup Camera
Standard
Stability Control
Standard
Stability Control
-
Stability Control

Entertainment

Standard
Bluetooth®
Standard
Bluetooth®
-
Bluetooth®

Electrical

730
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
650
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
-
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
180
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
175
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
-
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)

Brakes

13 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
14 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
-
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
-
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
13 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
14 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
N/A
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
N/A
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
-
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
-
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel Disc
Brake Type
4-Wheel Disc
Brake Type
-
Brake Type
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
-
Brake ABS System (Second Line)

FAQ

Which is more reliable, the 2017 Chrysler 300C or the 2016 Lincoln MKS?

The 2016 Lincoln MKS is more reliable than the 2017 Chrysler 300C according to Cars.com consumers, with a reliability rating of 5.0 for the 2016 MKS versus a reliability rating of 4.8 for the 2017 300C.

Which is more fuel efficient, the 2017 Chrysler 300C or the 2016 Lincoln MKS?

The 2017 Chrysler 300C is more fuel efficient than the 2016 Lincoln MKS with 23 MPG combined versus 20 MPG combined.

Which car is cheaper, the 2017 Chrysler 300C or the 2016 Lincoln MKS?

The 2017 Chrysler 300C is cheaper than the 2016 Lincoln MKS with a $38,635 starting MSRP versus a $39,010 starting MSRP.

Compare the Chrysler 300C

Compare the Lincoln MKS

Add car