Ford Thunderbird vs. Plymouth Prowler

Add new car
2005 Ford Thunderbird
$38,355
See all results
Photo not available
2001 Plymouth Prowler
$44,225
See all results
Add new car
 
Hide similarities

Highlights

$38,355
Starting MSRP
$44,225
Starting MSRP
-
Starting MSRP
Gas V8
Engine Type
Gas V6
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
17 City / 24 Hwy
MPG
17 City / 23 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
280 hp
Horsepower
253 hp
Horsepower
-
Horsepower
Rear Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear Wheel Drive
Drive Type
-
Drive Type
2
Seating Capacity
2
Seating Capacity
-
Seating Capacity
3 yr / 36,000 mi
Basic Warranty
3 yr / 36,000 mi
Basic Warranty
-
Basic Warranty

Engine

286 @ 4000
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
255 @ 3950
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
-
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
280 @ 6000
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
253 @ 6400
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
-
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
Gas V8
Engine Type
Gas V6
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
3.9L/240
Displacement
3.5L/215
Displacement
-
Displacement
A/T
Transmission w/Dual Shift Mode
5-Speed A/T
Transmission Options
A/T
Transmission w/Dual Shift Mode
4-Speed A/T
Transmission Options
-
Transmission Options
17 City / 24 Hwy
MPG
17 City / 23 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
N/A
Total Cooling System Capacity
11.0 qts
Total Cooling System Capacity
-
Total Cooling System Capacity

Tires & Wheels

17 x -TBD- in
Rear Wheel Size
20 x 10.0 in
Rear Wheel Size
-
Rear Wheel Size
P235/50VR17
Rear Tire Size
P295/40VR20
Rear Tire Size
-
Rear Tire Size
N/A
Spare Wheel Size
Not Available in
Spare Wheel Size
-
Spare Wheel Size
N/A
Spare Wheel Material
Not Available
Spare Wheel Material
-
Spare Wheel Material
17 x -TBD- in
Front Wheel Size
17 X 7.5 in
Front Wheel Size
-
Front Wheel Size
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
Chrome
Front Wheel Material
-
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
Chrome
Rear Wheel Material
-
Rear Wheel Material
P235/50VR17
Front Tire Size
P225/45HR17
Front Tire Size
-
Front Tire Size
N/A
Spare Tire Size
Not Available
Spare Tire Size
-
Spare Tire Size

Suspension

SLA Independent
Suspension Type - Rear
4-link
Suspension Type - Rear
-
Suspension Type - Rear
Not Available
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Coil-over-shock
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Not Available
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Coil-over-shock
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
SLA Independent
Suspension Type - Front
Independent
Suspension Type - Front
-
Suspension Type - Front

Steering

35 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
39 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
-
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
N/A
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
3
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
-
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
-
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
18
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
18
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
-
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
Pwr Rack & Pinion
Steering Type
Pwr Rack & Pinion
Steering Type
-
Steering Type

Measurements

9 ft³
Trunk Volume
N/A
Trunk Volume
-
Trunk Volume
107 in
Wheelbase
113 in
Wheelbase
-
Wheelbase
37 in
Front Head Room
37 in
Front Head Room
-
Front Head Room
43 in
Front Leg Room
43 in
Front Leg Room
-
Front Leg Room
N/A
Second Shoulder Room
N/A
Second Shoulder Room
-
Second Shoulder Room
30 in
Liftover Height
N/A
Liftover Height
-
Liftover Height
53 in
Height, Overall
51 in
Height, Overall
-
Height, Overall
N/A
Second Head Room
N/A
Second Head Room
-
Second Head Room
8 in
Min Ground Clearance
5 in
Min Ground Clearance
-
Min Ground Clearance
186 in
Length, Overall
165 in
Length, Overall
-
Length, Overall
N/A
Second Hip Room
N/A
Second Hip Room
-
Second Hip Room
61 in
Track Width, Front
62 in
Track Width, Front
-
Track Width, Front
53 ft³
Passenger Volume
48 ft³
Passenger Volume
-
Passenger Volume
57 in
Front Shoulder Room
52 in
Front Shoulder Room
-
Front Shoulder Room
54 in
Front Hip Room
N/A
Front Hip Room
-
Front Hip Room
60 in
Track Width, Rear
64 in
Track Width, Rear
-
Track Width, Rear
N/A
Second Leg Room
N/A
Second Leg Room
-
Second Leg Room
72 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
77 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
-
Width, Max w/o mirrors
2
Passenger Capacity
2
Passenger Capacity
-
Passenger Capacity

Weight & Capacity

Not Available lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
100 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
3,775 lbs
Base Curb Weight
2,838 lbs
Base Curb Weight
-
Base Curb Weight
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
1,000 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
18 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
12 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
Not Available lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.

Electrical

N/A
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
500
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
-
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
110
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
90
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
-
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)

Brakes

Pwr
Brake Type
Power
Brake Type
-
Brake Type
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
Not Available
Brake ABS System
-
Brake ABS System
N/A
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
13.0 x 0.8 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
Not Available
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
Not Available
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
-
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
-
Disc - Front (Yes or )
N/A
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
11.1 x 1.0 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
-
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
-
Disc - Rear (Yes or )

FAQ

Which is more reliable, the 2005 Ford Thunderbird or the 2001 Plymouth Prowler?

The 2001 Plymouth Prowler is more reliable than the 2005 Ford Thunderbird according to Cars.com consumers, with a reliability rating of 5.0 for the 2001 Prowler versus a reliability rating of 4.6 for the 2005 Thunderbird.

Which is more fuel efficient, the 2005 Ford Thunderbird or the 2001 Plymouth Prowler?

The 2005 Ford Thunderbird and the 2001 Plymouth Prowler both get 0 MPG combined.

Which car is cheaper, the 2005 Ford Thunderbird or the 2001 Plymouth Prowler?

The 2005 Ford Thunderbird is cheaper than the 2001 Plymouth Prowler with a $38,355 starting MSRP versus a $44,225 starting MSRP.

Similar cars for sale

Compare the Ford Thunderbird

Compare the Plymouth Prowler

Add car