Jaguar XJS vs. Pontiac GTO
Hide similarities
Highlights
|
$61,570
Starting MSRP
|
$31,290
Starting MSRP
|
-
Starting MSRP
|
|
|
-
Engine Type
|
Gas V8
Engine Type
|
-
Engine Type
|
|
|
-
MPG
|
17 City / 25 Hwy
MPG
|
-
MPG
|
|
|
-
Horsepower
|
400 hp
Horsepower
|
-
Horsepower
|
|
|
Rear Wheel Drive
Drive Type
|
Rear Wheel Drive
Drive Type
|
-
Drive Type
|
|
|
-
Seating Capacity
|
4
Seating Capacity
|
-
Seating Capacity
|
|
|
-
Basic Warranty
|
3 yr / 36,000 mi
Basic Warranty
|
-
Basic Warranty
|
Engine
|
-
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
|
400 @ 4000
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
|
-
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
|
|
|
-
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
|
400 @ 5200
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
|
-
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
|
|
|
-
Displacement
|
6.0L/364
Displacement
|
-
Displacement
|
|
|
-
Engine Type
|
Gas V8
Engine Type
|
-
Engine Type
|
|
|
A/T
Transmission w/Dual Shift Mode 4-Speed A/T Transmission Options
|
M/T
4-Speed A/T A/T 6-Speed M/T Transmission Options
|
-
Transmission Options
|
|
|
-
MPG
|
17 City / 25 Hwy
MPG
|
-
MPG
|
|
|
-
Total Cooling System Capacity
|
11.5 qts
Total Cooling System Capacity
|
-
Total Cooling System Capacity
|
Tires & Wheels
|
-
Front Wheel Size
|
17 x 8 in
Front Wheel Size
|
-
Front Wheel Size
|
|
|
-
Spare Wheel Size
|
N/A
Spare Wheel Size
|
-
Spare Wheel Size
|
|
|
-
Rear Wheel Size
|
17 x 8 in
Rear Wheel Size
|
-
Rear Wheel Size
|
|
|
-
Spare Wheel Material
|
Aluminum
Spare Wheel Material
|
-
Spare Wheel Material
|
|
|
-
Front Wheel Material
|
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
|
-
Front Wheel Material
|
|
|
-
Rear Tire Size
|
P245/45ZR17
Rear Tire Size
|
-
Rear Tire Size
|
|
|
-
Front Tire Size
|
P245/45ZR17
Front Tire Size
|
-
Front Tire Size
|
|
|
-
Spare Tire Size
|
P245/45ZR17
Spare Tire Size
|
-
Spare Tire Size
|
|
|
-
Rear Wheel Material
|
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
|
-
Rear Wheel Material
|
Suspension
|
-
Suspension Type - Rear
|
Independent
Suspension Type - Rear
|
-
Suspension Type - Rear
|
|
|
-
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
|
Not Available
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
|
-
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
|
|
|
-
Suspension Type - Front
|
Independent
Suspension Type - Front
|
-
Suspension Type - Front
|
|
|
-
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
|
MacPherson strut
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
|
-
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
|
Steering
|
-
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
|
36 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
|
-
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
|
|
|
-
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
|
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
|
-
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
|
|
|
-
Steering Type
|
Pwr Rack & Pinion
Steering Type
|
-
Steering Type
|
|
|
-
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
|
N/A
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
|
-
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
|
|
|
-
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
|
3
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
|
-
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
|
Measurements
|
-
Passenger Volume
|
91 ft³
Passenger Volume
|
-
Passenger Volume
|
|
|
-
Front Head Room
|
37 in
Front Head Room
|
-
Front Head Room
|
|
|
-
Second Leg Room
|
37 in
Second Leg Room
|
-
Second Leg Room
|
|
|
-
Front Hip Room
|
58 in
Front Hip Room
|
-
Front Hip Room
|
|
|
-
Length, Overall
|
190 in
Length, Overall
|
-
Length, Overall
|
|
|
-
Front Shoulder Room
|
60 in
Front Shoulder Room
|
-
Front Shoulder Room
|
|
|
-
Track Width, Front
|
62 in
Track Width, Front
|
-
Track Width, Front
|
|
|
-
Height, Overall
|
55 in
Height, Overall
|
-
Height, Overall
|
|
|
-
Track Width, Rear
|
62 in
Track Width, Rear
|
-
Track Width, Rear
|
|
|
-
Trunk Volume
|
7 ft³
Trunk Volume
|
-
Trunk Volume
|
|
|
-
Width, Max w/o mirrors
|
73 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
|
-
Width, Max w/o mirrors
|
|
|
-
Wheelbase
|
110 in
Wheelbase
|
-
Wheelbase
|
|
|
-
Min Ground Clearance
|
N/A
Min Ground Clearance
|
-
Min Ground Clearance
|
|
|
-
Front Leg Room
|
42 in
Front Leg Room
|
-
Front Leg Room
|
|
|
-
Second Head Room
|
37 in
Second Head Room
|
-
Second Head Room
|
|
|
-
Liftover Height
|
N/A
Liftover Height
|
-
Liftover Height
|
|
|
-
Second Hip Room
|
50 in
Second Hip Room
|
-
Second Hip Room
|
|
|
-
Second Shoulder Room
|
52 in
Second Shoulder Room
|
-
Second Shoulder Room
|
|
|
-
Passenger Capacity
|
4
Passenger Capacity
|
-
Passenger Capacity
|
Weight & Capacity
|
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
1,000 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
|
|
-
Base Curb Weight
|
3,725 lbs
Base Curb Weight
|
-
Base Curb Weight
|
|
|
-
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
-
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
|
|
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
|
|
-
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
18 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
-
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
|
|
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
100 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
|
|
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
Electrical
|
-
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
|
N/A
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
|
-
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
|
|
|
-
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
|
N/A
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
|
-
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
|
Brakes
|
-
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
|
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
|
-
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
|
|
|
-
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
11.3 x -TBD- in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
-
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
|
|
-
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
11.7 x -TBD- in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
-
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
|
|
-
Disc - Front (Yes or )
|
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
|
-
Disc - Front (Yes or )
|
|
|
-
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
|
Not Available
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
|
-
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
|
|
|
-
Brake ABS System
|
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
|
-
Brake ABS System
|
|
|
-
Brake Type
|
Pwr
Brake Type
|
-
Brake Type
|
|
|
-
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
|
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
|
-
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
|
FAQ
Which is more reliable, the 1996 Jaguar XJS or the 2006 Pontiac GTO?
The 1996 Jaguar XJS is more reliable than the 2006 Pontiac GTO according to Cars.com consumers, with a reliability rating of 4.8 for the 1996 XJS versus a reliability rating of 4.6 for the 2006 GTO.
Which is more fuel efficient, the 1996 Jaguar XJS or the 2006 Pontiac GTO?
The 1996 Jaguar XJS and the 2006 Pontiac GTO both get 0 MPG combined.
Which car is cheaper, the 1996 Jaguar XJS or the 2006 Pontiac GTO?
The 2006 Pontiac GTO is cheaper than the 1996 Jaguar XJS with a $31,290 starting MSRP versus a $61,570 starting MSRP.
Compare the Jaguar XJS
Compare the Pontiac GTO
Add car