Skip to main content

Lexus RC 200t vs. Mitsubishi Lancer

Add new car
$40,155
$17,795
Add new car
 
Hide similarities

Highlights

$40,155
Starting MSRP
$17,795
Starting MSRP
-
Starting MSRP
Intercooled Turbo Premium Unleaded I-4
Engine Type
Regular Unleaded I-4
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
22 City / 32 Hwy
MPG
24 City / 33 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
241 hp
Horsepower
148 hp
Horsepower
-
Horsepower
Rear Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front Wheel Drive
Drive Type
-
Drive Type
4
Seating Capacity
5
Seating Capacity
-
Seating Capacity
4 yr / 50,000 mi
Basic Warranty
5 yr / 60,000 mi
Basic Warranty
-
Basic Warranty

Engine

Intercooled Turbo Premium Unleaded I-4
Engine Type
Regular Unleaded I-4
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
2.0 L/122
Displacement
2.0 L/122
Displacement
-
Displacement
241 @ 5800
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
148 @ 6000
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
-
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
258 @ 1650
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
145 @ 4200
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
-
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
8-Speed A/T
A/T
Transmission w/Dual Shift Mode
Transmission Options
M/T
5-Speed M/T
Transmission Options
-
Transmission Options
22 City / 32 Hwy
MPG
24 City / 33 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
N/A
Total Cooling System Capacity
N/A
Total Cooling System Capacity
-
Total Cooling System Capacity

Tires & Wheels

P235/45VR18
Front Tire Size
P205/60HR16
Front Tire Size
-
Front Tire Size
P235/45VR18
Rear Tire Size
P205/60HR16
Rear Tire Size
-
Rear Tire Size
Compact
Spare Tire Size
Compact
Spare Tire Size
-
Spare Tire Size
18 X 8 in
Front Wheel Size
16 X 6.5 in
Front Wheel Size
-
Front Wheel Size
18 X 8 in
Rear Wheel Size
16 X 6.5 in
Rear Wheel Size
-
Rear Wheel Size
Compact in
Spare Wheel Size
Compact in
Spare Wheel Size
-
Spare Wheel Size
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
-
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
-
Rear Wheel Material
Steel
Spare Wheel Material
Steel
Spare Wheel Material
-
Spare Wheel Material

Suspension

Double Wishbone
Suspension Type - Front
Strut
Suspension Type - Front
-
Suspension Type - Front
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear
-
Suspension Type - Rear
Double Wishbone
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Strut
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)

Steering

Rack-Pinion
Steering Type
Rack-Pinion
Steering Type
-
Steering Type
N/A
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
N/A
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
-
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
N/A
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
N/A
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
-
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
34 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
33 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
-
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
-
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall

Measurements

4
Passenger Capacity
5
Passenger Capacity
-
Passenger Capacity
82 ft³
Passenger Volume
94 ft³
Passenger Volume
-
Passenger Volume
39 in
Front Head Room
40 in
Front Head Room
-
Front Head Room
45 in
Front Leg Room
42 in
Front Leg Room
-
Front Leg Room
55 in
Front Shoulder Room
55 in
Front Shoulder Room
-
Front Shoulder Room
54 in
Front Hip Room
53 in
Front Hip Room
-
Front Hip Room
35 in
Second Head Room
37 in
Second Head Room
-
Second Head Room
27 in
Second Leg Room
36 in
Second Leg Room
-
Second Leg Room
51 in
Second Shoulder Room
54 in
Second Shoulder Room
-
Second Shoulder Room
45 in
Second Hip Room
54 in
Second Hip Room
-
Second Hip Room
108 in
Wheelbase
104 in
Wheelbase
-
Wheelbase
185 in
Length, Overall
182 in
Length, Overall
-
Length, Overall
72 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
69 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
-
Width, Max w/o mirrors
55 in
Height, Overall
58 in
Height, Overall
-
Height, Overall
62 in
Track Width, Front
60 in
Track Width, Front
-
Track Width, Front
62 in
Track Width, Rear
60 in
Track Width, Rear
-
Track Width, Rear
5 in
Min Ground Clearance
6 in
Min Ground Clearance
-
Min Ground Clearance
N/A
Liftover Height
N/A
Liftover Height
-
Liftover Height
10 ft³
Trunk Volume
12 ft³
Trunk Volume
-
Trunk Volume

Weight & Capacity

3,737 lbs
Base Curb Weight
2,888 lbs
Base Curb Weight
-
Base Curb Weight
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
17 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
16 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx

Safety

-
Backup Camera
Standard
Backup Camera
-
Backup Camera
Standard
Stability Control
Standard
Stability Control
-
Stability Control

Entertainment

Standard
Bluetooth®
Standard
Bluetooth®
-
Bluetooth®

Electrical

N/A
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
620
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
-
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
100
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
130
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
-
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)

Brakes

4-Wheel Disc
Brake Type
4-Wheel Disc
Brake Type
-
Brake Type
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
-
Brake ABS System
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
-
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
-
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
-
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
13 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
11 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
12 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
10 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
N/A
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
N/A
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
-
Drum - Rear (Yes or )

FAQ

Which is more reliable, the 2017 Lexus RC 200t or the 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer?

The 2017 Lexus RC 200t is more reliable than the 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer according to Cars.com consumers, with a reliability rating of 5.0 for the 2017 RC 200t versus a reliability rating of 4.6 for the 2017 Lancer.

Which is more fuel efficient, the 2017 Lexus RC 200t or the 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer?

The 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer is more fuel efficient than the 2017 Lexus RC 200t with 28 MPG combined versus 26 MPG combined.

Which car is cheaper, the 2017 Lexus RC 200t or the 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer?

The 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer is cheaper than the 2017 Lexus RC 200t with a $17,795 starting MSRP versus a $40,155 starting MSRP.

Similar cars for sale

Compare the Lexus RC 200t

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer

Add car