Skip to main content

2004
Land Rover Range Rover

Starts at:
$72,285
Shop options
New 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
See ratings
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Shop Cars.com
Browse cars & save your favorites
Dealers near you
Find & contact a dealership near you
no listings

We're not finding any listings in your area.
Change your location or search Cars.com to see more!

Change location

Available trims

See the differences side-by-side to compare trims.
  • 4dr Wgn HSE
    Starts at
    $72,285
    12 City / 16 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Four Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 4dr Wgn Westminster
    Starts at
    $84,035
    12 City / 16 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Four Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs

Photo & video gallery

2004 Land Rover Range Rover 2004 Land Rover Range Rover

Notable features

Imposing appearance
282-hp V-8
CommandShift automatic transmission
Permanent 4WD

The good & the bad

The good

Plush and spacious interior
Confident handling
Legendary offroad capability
Premium amenities
Well-behaved operation

The bad

Price
Complex controls
Fuel economy
Difficult entry and exit

Expert 2004 Land Rover Range Rover review

our expert's take
Our expert's take
By
Full article
our expert's take

Make way, peasants

Range Rover flaunts new-world excesses (heated steering wheel, electronic parking guide) but still retains old Europe allure. Let the others eat cake.

ENGLAND. A small, wind-blown country off the coast of Europe. A land of inscrutable dentistry, inedible food and sports figures in tiny pants.

Aside from Shakespeare, the Industrial Revolution and Radiohead, what has England ever done for you?

Well, England invented the sport utility vehicle, which should be of at least some interest to about half of you – the half who, statistically speaking, own SUVs. I understand there are those who would argue that the SUV’s provenance dates back to the 1960s-era International Harvester Scout, or Jeep Cherokee or Ford Bronco. Let them argue. The SUV as we currently know it is a luxury item, swaddled in leather upholstery and deep-pile carpeting and stocked with comfort engineering — from audiophile stereos to adaptive suspensions, the more the better.

And that particular arrow left the bow with the 1970 Range Rover.

Land Rover began in 1947 with the brothers Spencer and Maurice Wilks, who – tired of being teased about their names – built a very butch four-wheel-drive prototype in an effort to drum up business for their employer, Rover. The prototype was an old army Jeep chassis caparisoned in crude aluminum body panels of the brothers Wilks’ own design. As stylists, they were very talented mechanics.

The British Empire had gone a bit wonky by that time and there was a good market for vehicles that could patrol its far-flung reaches in Africa and Asia, where trouble was brewing in the form of, well, democracy. The Land Rover business took off.

Lightweight, simple, and tougher than wart hog jerky, production-version Land Rovers were all about function. Form went on holiday. They were boxy, upright and narrow, the better to navigate jungle trails; long-legged, with high ground clearance and big wheels for better articulation over obstacles; unadorned, with bare-metal interiors and bare minimum seats. The Series I Land Rovers came in a variety of wheelbase lengths. All of them were ugly. Its distinctive face — with the radiator grille pushed in like a Pekingese’s nose to make room for a front-mounted winch — has starred in more wildlife documentaries than Marlon Perkins.

Built in Solihull, near Birmingham, Land Rovers of the 1950s and 1960s were intensely agricultural in disposition, which was fine for game wardens and bush ambulance drivers. However, Britain’s landed gentry were, in the words of Queen Victoria, not amused. And so Land Rover set about to build a four-wheel-drive estate wagon — a comfortable and refined road car with serious off-road ability, a vehicle from which the ruling classes could survey their holdings. Enter the Range Rover (1970). Even the name sounds baronial.

In the three decades since the first Range Rover appeared (the vehicle came to the U.S. in 1987), much has changed — mostly ownership. Land Rover has been handed off more often than Winona Ryder. British Leyland, Rover Group, BMW and now Ford. What hasn’t changed, surprisingly, is the brand’s mystique. Land Rover is still clubby and ineffably British, with the slight reek of Empire; still a secret handshake among owners and enthusiasts. Land Rover still means something, as compared to the muddled mess of a brand like Lincoln, which means, what? The Great Emancipator?

This mystique has kept the brand alive despite some truly horrific quality problems. I have tried, twice, to talk people out of buying a Land Rover Discovery, without success. Fact is, people don’t care. They want a little piece of imperial hauteur for themselves.

And, as ever, Range Rover is a cut above, retaining its stiff, lordly bearing in the face of competition that is itself stiff. There are three other vehicles in the Range Rover class: The Lexus LX47 , the Porsche Cayenne (S and Turbo) and the Mercedes-Benz G500 Gelandewagon. All of them are absurdly capable off-road — although no one in their right minds would take them there. Each offers stupefying luxury like mink-lined glove compartments — no, OK, I made that up, but stuff like that. And each deploys engineering that would make your mechanic swoon in his overalls.

But it’s the Range Rover HSE ($72,950 base price) that lights me up. I spent a week in one recently, and every time I got in it, I found myself getting misty with affection. Man, I love this car.

First, it just looks so cool. The current generation is only the third full-on redesign since the 1970 Range Rover, and the genealogy is apparent, as if the 1970 model had mated with a Power Mac G4 Cube. The bluff, horizontal grate of a face, set off with the bi-xenon headlights like compound eyes; the blacked-out roof pillars, creating the illusory “floating roof”; the shark-gill louvers behind the huge front wheels; the front and rear fog lamps. The Range Rover has the massive and tensed look of Lennox Lewis’ fist. As contrasted to the Porsche Cayenne Turbo’s styling, which goes from zero to boring in a little over 5 seconds.

The Range Rover, meanwhile, has the best seating positions in the business. The seats are set high in the tall cabin, so that the leg position is natural and comfortable relative to the floor. Also, the sill is low, so drivers can see close to the vehicle. Both ergonomic geometries date back to the original design, which helped drivers to better see the terrain they were negotiating.

With its fragrant Blenheim leather and contrast piping, blond cherry wood, chrome brightwork and matte metal finishes, the Rover cabin is luxurious and properly “old Europe,” in Rumsfeld’s happy phrase. All the touchable surfaces — the door handles, the switchgear, the steering wheel — have a wonderful overbuilt quality to them, sturdy as blacksmithing.

The Range Rover comes generously stocked with high-tech luxury: the 570-watt, 15-speaker Harmon Kardon stereo system (the CD changer is in the mink-lined glovebox), triple-zone climate control, object-sensing parking assist — but, in my test car with the heated accessories package, the heated steering wheel was my favorite. The test model I drove had a previous-generation GPS navigation system that used a less clever and much slower CD data storage system. New models use a DVD-based system.

For as British as it is, the Range Rover has a distinctly German accent. The vehicle was largely engineered during BMW’s ownership. Under the hood is BMW’s 4.4-liter, 282-hp V-8 buttoned to the five-speed automatic transmission. The power is shunted through a torque-sensing center differential that optimizes grip between the front and rear sets of wheels (50-50 torque split), and the four-wheel electronic traction control system limits wheel slippage on low traction surfaces. A dual-speed transfer case provides low-speed gear ratios at the touch of a button.

In city and highway traffic, the Range Rover is utterly composed and wieldy to drive, with authoritative power on command. The brakes are powerful but not in any way edgy. The rack-and-pinion has good on-center feel and light and direct control as speeds increase.

Much like the Cayenne, the Range Rover rests on an air suspension that puts a magic carpet over most highway surfaces; the suspension has four settings, including “kneel-down,” for easy entry and exit, and “off-road,” which raises the ground clearance to 11.1 inches. That’s nosebleed altitude for a luxury SUV.

The vast majority of these vehicles will spend their lives in suburbia, red in tooth and claw, and will never flex their off-road muscles. In terms of aristocratic excess, the Range Rover’s engineering is rather like artwork bought at auction and never uncrated, or a vacation house never visited. The pleasure isn’t in t e using, but the owning.

There is something important here. For those trying to puzzle out America’s complicated feelings toward these vehicles, it’s helpful to remember that the SUV was first a creature of aristocratic privilege, a perch of landholding scrutiny. I would argue that the formless angst some people feel toward SUVs is fueled by deep and dim class resentment — the serf’s sullen glare.

For me, I confess: I enjoyed my week of peerage. I was sorry to see it end.

2004 Range Rover HSE

Wheelbase: 113.4 inches

Length: 195 inches

Curb weight: 5,666 pounds

Powertrain: 4.4-liter V-8 with variable-valve timing, five-speed automatic transmission, full-time all-wheel drive

Horsepower: 282 horsepower at 5,400

Torque: 325 pound-feet at 3,600 rpm

Acceleration: 0 to 60 mph in 8.2 seconds

EPA rating: 12 miles per gallon city, 16 mpg highway

Price, base: $72,950

Price, as tested: $77,950

Competitor: Porsche Cayenne S, Mercedes G500

2004 Land Rover Range Rover review: Our expert's take
By

Make way, peasants

Range Rover flaunts new-world excesses (heated steering wheel, electronic parking guide) but still retains old Europe allure. Let the others eat cake.

ENGLAND. A small, wind-blown country off the coast of Europe. A land of inscrutable dentistry, inedible food and sports figures in tiny pants.

Aside from Shakespeare, the Industrial Revolution and Radiohead, what has England ever done for you?

Well, England invented the sport utility vehicle, which should be of at least some interest to about half of you – the half who, statistically speaking, own SUVs. I understand there are those who would argue that the SUV’s provenance dates back to the 1960s-era International Harvester Scout, or Jeep Cherokee or Ford Bronco. Let them argue. The SUV as we currently know it is a luxury item, swaddled in leather upholstery and deep-pile carpeting and stocked with comfort engineering — from audiophile stereos to adaptive suspensions, the more the better.

And that particular arrow left the bow with the 1970 Range Rover.

Land Rover began in 1947 with the brothers Spencer and Maurice Wilks, who – tired of being teased about their names – built a very butch four-wheel-drive prototype in an effort to drum up business for their employer, Rover. The prototype was an old army Jeep chassis caparisoned in crude aluminum body panels of the brothers Wilks’ own design. As stylists, they were very talented mechanics.

The British Empire had gone a bit wonky by that time and there was a good market for vehicles that could patrol its far-flung reaches in Africa and Asia, where trouble was brewing in the form of, well, democracy. The Land Rover business took off.

Lightweight, simple, and tougher than wart hog jerky, production-version Land Rovers were all about function. Form went on holiday. They were boxy, upright and narrow, the better to navigate jungle trails; long-legged, with high ground clearance and big wheels for better articulation over obstacles; unadorned, with bare-metal interiors and bare minimum seats. The Series I Land Rovers came in a variety of wheelbase lengths. All of them were ugly. Its distinctive face — with the radiator grille pushed in like a Pekingese’s nose to make room for a front-mounted winch — has starred in more wildlife documentaries than Marlon Perkins.

Built in Solihull, near Birmingham, Land Rovers of the 1950s and 1960s were intensely agricultural in disposition, which was fine for game wardens and bush ambulance drivers. However, Britain’s landed gentry were, in the words of Queen Victoria, not amused. And so Land Rover set about to build a four-wheel-drive estate wagon — a comfortable and refined road car with serious off-road ability, a vehicle from which the ruling classes could survey their holdings. Enter the Range Rover (1970). Even the name sounds baronial.

In the three decades since the first Range Rover appeared (the vehicle came to the U.S. in 1987), much has changed — mostly ownership. Land Rover has been handed off more often than Winona Ryder. British Leyland, Rover Group, BMW and now Ford. What hasn’t changed, surprisingly, is the brand’s mystique. Land Rover is still clubby and ineffably British, with the slight reek of Empire; still a secret handshake among owners and enthusiasts. Land Rover still means something, as compared to the muddled mess of a brand like Lincoln, which means, what? The Great Emancipator?

This mystique has kept the brand alive despite some truly horrific quality problems. I have tried, twice, to talk people out of buying a Land Rover Discovery, without success. Fact is, people don’t care. They want a little piece of imperial hauteur for themselves.

And, as ever, Range Rover is a cut above, retaining its stiff, lordly bearing in the face of competition that is itself stiff. There are three other vehicles in the Range Rover class: The Lexus LX47 , the Porsche Cayenne (S and Turbo) and the Mercedes-Benz G500 Gelandewagon. All of them are absurdly capable off-road — although no one in their right minds would take them there. Each offers stupefying luxury like mink-lined glove compartments — no, OK, I made that up, but stuff like that. And each deploys engineering that would make your mechanic swoon in his overalls.

But it’s the Range Rover HSE ($72,950 base price) that lights me up. I spent a week in one recently, and every time I got in it, I found myself getting misty with affection. Man, I love this car.

First, it just looks so cool. The current generation is only the third full-on redesign since the 1970 Range Rover, and the genealogy is apparent, as if the 1970 model had mated with a Power Mac G4 Cube. The bluff, horizontal grate of a face, set off with the bi-xenon headlights like compound eyes; the blacked-out roof pillars, creating the illusory “floating roof”; the shark-gill louvers behind the huge front wheels; the front and rear fog lamps. The Range Rover has the massive and tensed look of Lennox Lewis’ fist. As contrasted to the Porsche Cayenne Turbo’s styling, which goes from zero to boring in a little over 5 seconds.

The Range Rover, meanwhile, has the best seating positions in the business. The seats are set high in the tall cabin, so that the leg position is natural and comfortable relative to the floor. Also, the sill is low, so drivers can see close to the vehicle. Both ergonomic geometries date back to the original design, which helped drivers to better see the terrain they were negotiating.

With its fragrant Blenheim leather and contrast piping, blond cherry wood, chrome brightwork and matte metal finishes, the Rover cabin is luxurious and properly “old Europe,” in Rumsfeld’s happy phrase. All the touchable surfaces — the door handles, the switchgear, the steering wheel — have a wonderful overbuilt quality to them, sturdy as blacksmithing.

The Range Rover comes generously stocked with high-tech luxury: the 570-watt, 15-speaker Harmon Kardon stereo system (the CD changer is in the mink-lined glovebox), triple-zone climate control, object-sensing parking assist — but, in my test car with the heated accessories package, the heated steering wheel was my favorite. The test model I drove had a previous-generation GPS navigation system that used a less clever and much slower CD data storage system. New models use a DVD-based system.

For as British as it is, the Range Rover has a distinctly German accent. The vehicle was largely engineered during BMW’s ownership. Under the hood is BMW’s 4.4-liter, 282-hp V-8 buttoned to the five-speed automatic transmission. The power is shunted through a torque-sensing center differential that optimizes grip between the front and rear sets of wheels (50-50 torque split), and the four-wheel electronic traction control system limits wheel slippage on low traction surfaces. A dual-speed transfer case provides low-speed gear ratios at the touch of a button.

In city and highway traffic, the Range Rover is utterly composed and wieldy to drive, with authoritative power on command. The brakes are powerful but not in any way edgy. The rack-and-pinion has good on-center feel and light and direct control as speeds increase.

Much like the Cayenne, the Range Rover rests on an air suspension that puts a magic carpet over most highway surfaces; the suspension has four settings, including “kneel-down,” for easy entry and exit, and “off-road,” which raises the ground clearance to 11.1 inches. That’s nosebleed altitude for a luxury SUV.

The vast majority of these vehicles will spend their lives in suburbia, red in tooth and claw, and will never flex their off-road muscles. In terms of aristocratic excess, the Range Rover’s engineering is rather like artwork bought at auction and never uncrated, or a vacation house never visited. The pleasure isn’t in t e using, but the owning.

There is something important here. For those trying to puzzle out America’s complicated feelings toward these vehicles, it’s helpful to remember that the SUV was first a creature of aristocratic privilege, a perch of landholding scrutiny. I would argue that the formless angst some people feel toward SUVs is fueled by deep and dim class resentment — the serf’s sullen glare.

For me, I confess: I enjoyed my week of peerage. I was sorry to see it end.

2004 Range Rover HSE

Wheelbase: 113.4 inches

Length: 195 inches

Curb weight: 5,666 pounds

Powertrain: 4.4-liter V-8 with variable-valve timing, five-speed automatic transmission, full-time all-wheel drive

Horsepower: 282 horsepower at 5,400

Torque: 325 pound-feet at 3,600 rpm

Acceleration: 0 to 60 mph in 8.2 seconds

EPA rating: 12 miles per gallon city, 16 mpg highway

Price, base: $72,950

Price, as tested: $77,950

Competitor: Porsche Cayenne S, Mercedes G500

Factory warranties

Basic
4 years / 50,000 miles
Corrosion
6 years
Powertrain
4 years / 50,000 miles
Roadside Assistance
4 years / 50,000 miles

Compare similar vehicles

Select cars to compare for more detailed info.
  • 2004
    3.7
    Land Rover Range Rover
    Starts at
    $72,285
    12 City / 16 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Four-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2008
    4.7
    Mercedes-Benz G-Class
    Starts at
    $88,200
    12 City / 15 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Four-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2001
    4.1
    Ford Explorer
    Starts at
    $25,210
    16 City / 22 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2006
    4.3
    Land Rover LR3
    Starts at
    $38,285
    14 City / 19 Hwy
    MPG
    7
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Four-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2012
    4.5
    Land Rover Range Rover
    Starts at
    $79,425
    12 City / 18 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Four-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • Compare more options
    Use our comparison tool to add any vehicle of your choice and see a full list of specifications and features side-by-side.
    Try it now

Consumer reviews

3.7 / 5
Based on 27 reviews
Write a review
Comfort 4.4
Interior 4.2
Performance 4.1
Value 3.5
Exterior 4.4
Reliability 3.4

Most recent

  • 2006 not a 2004

    Too many dials/ buttons to tend to while operating this 2006 vehicle. Sceen in middle of front dash too distracting, could possibly cause driving accident.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Transporting family
    • Does not recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 3.0
    Performance 1.0
    Value 1.0
    Exterior 3.0
    Reliability 1.0
    13 people out of 17 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • If I could give negative 10 stars I would 2004 RR

    I now have bought 3 2004 RR HSE's in last 90 days....These have rubber stamp issues..Steering Column/Key wont turn issue, leaks, head gaskets, front grill, radio display, shaking, oil leakage , transmission issues, lug nuts worn out at 90k miles. electrical issues and on and on
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does not recommend this car
    Comfort 3.0
    Interior 3.0
    Performance 1.0
    Value 1.0
    Exterior 1.0
    Reliability 1.0
    21 people out of 26 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Okay got a call back from the owner

    Alright it's okay that's all I can say ? Not much to say about it really still looking for a Range with low miles.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Does not recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 2.0
    Performance 3.0
    Value 2.0
    Exterior 3.0
    5 people out of 6 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • id love to own one.

    i loved it and im interested in buying it. it was very comfortable and spacious and not too bulky which i liked.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 3.0
    Exterior 4.0
    1 person out of 2 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • The best car i have owned

    This car is the best car I have owned, even it is 2004 the technology and comfort it offers are incredible.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Transporting family
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    3 people out of 4 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • SUPERIOR VEHICLE FOR OVER 11 YEARS

    WE purchased a 2004 RR certified pre-owned in 2005 with ultra low miles. We have had only a GREAT EXPERIENCE with this THE BEST YEAR ('04 & '05) BMW designed- BMW 750i engine and drivetrain POWERFUL. Have been tempted to buy a newer model - My husband is a successful Realtor and could easily buy a new(er) one,,,but we find absolutely no reason too !- A CLASSY head turner even after 12 years on the road. If you do not have the funds to cover a major repair - DO NOT BUY - we have been fortunate - Have heard of buyers purchasing out of warranty and not being able to cover expenses. These vehicles of course have that prestige factor...this was our 4th and by for the BEST - we bought it for a QUALITY driving experience for ourselves and clients..... and this is why you should highly consider....just stick to a 2004 or 2005, If you are buying an older model !
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    9 people out of 9 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Pre-owned? A Great Value

    I just purchased a 2004 Range Rover HSE from used car dealership. Before this car, I owned a 2000 Discovery II. I loved that vehicle and I love this one even more. I have already put a 1000 miles on the Range with no problems. I didn't have many problems with the Disco which is why I boldly went forward on the Range. It is a dream vehicle. The ride is heavenly, the styling is incomparable. The amenities are beyond reproach. The air suspension adjusts to the driving conditions, The windscreen wipers adust automatically to amount of water on the windscreen, The only thing that I would seek to improve on would be to install a device that will allow me to connect my android phone to the audio system. People say "Beware!" but even when I have had to have a repair done, it is reasonably priced if you find yourself a good Rover mechanic (NOT THE DEALER!!). i intend to stay with my Range Rover for the duration.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 4.0
    8 people out of 8 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Range Rover, Range Headache

    When buying a used second hand Range Rover, you better be careful and mindful of what you're getting into. Be prepared to shell out thousands in repair costs, You would most likely replace Radiator, transmission, even upgrade Navigation system in order to even get your radio to work. Some of these anomalies are know to Land Rover and not sure why they are not issuing recall orders. Over all, Range Rover is hype.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Does not recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 3.0
    Value 1.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 3.0
    4 people out of 6 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • range rover

    The sales people are wonderful I feel like I really got a good deal and car I wish the show room was my garage
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Having fun
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    0 people out of 1 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Think Twice!

    In my opinion, I wouldn't buy a Range Rover on a bet. As someone else has already said, "The money pit of SUVs". Only if you want to help the local economy by giving your money to the Land Rover dealer, would I recommend.
    • Purchased a New car
    • Does not recommend this car
    Comfort 3.0
    Interior 2.0
    Performance 3.0
    Value 1.0
    Exterior 2.0
    Reliability 1.0
    3 people out of 4 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Simply The Best

    Love it! Had a Disco but now I'm a serious fan of the Range. But, it's true. If you can't afford to maintain,don't buy one.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • not a very good car for soccer mom

    The repairs on this Suv has cost me thousands. Also, it is comfortabe in the fron seats but in the back seat my teenage kids have know room. I definitly wouldnt take this car on a long road trip. Lastly, you would want to buy it certified pre owned so all the expences dont fall back on you.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Having fun
    • Does not recommend this car
    Comfort 2.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 3.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    1 person out of 1 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No

Latest news from cars.com

See all news

Land Rover dealers near you

FAQ

What trim levels are available for the 2004 Land Rover Range Rover?

The 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is available in 2 trim levels:

  • HSE (1 style)
  • Westminster (1 style)

What is the MPG of the 2004 Land Rover Range Rover?

The 2004 Land Rover Range Rover offers up to 12 MPG in city driving and 16 MPG on the highway. These figures are based on EPA mileage ratings and are for comparison purposes only. The actual mileage will vary depending on vehicle options, trim level, driving conditions, driving habits, vehicle maintenance, and other factors.

What are some similar vehicles and competitors of the 2004 Land Rover Range Rover?

The 2004 Land Rover Range Rover compares to and/or competes against the following vehicles:

Is the 2004 Land Rover Range Rover reliable?

The 2004 Land Rover Range Rover has an average reliability rating of 3.4 out of 5 according to cars.com consumers. Find real-world reliability insights within consumer reviews from 2004 Land Rover Range Rover owners.

Is the 2004 Land Rover Range Rover a good SUV?

Below are the cars.com consumers ratings for the 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. 63.0% of drivers recommend this vehicle.

3.7 / 5
Based on 27 reviews
  • Comfort: 4.4
  • Interior: 4.2
  • Performance: 4.1
  • Value: 3.5
  • Exterior: 4.4
  • Reliability: 3.4

Land Rover Range Rover history

Your list was successfully saved.
 
 
 
 
Save list Compare
[{"cat":"luxurysuv_suv","stock_type":"used","bodystyle":"SUV","page_type":"research/make-model-year","oem_page":false,"search_fuel_types":["Gasoline Fuel"]}]