Skip to main content

2005
Mercedes-Benz SL-Class

Starts at:
$91,300
Shop options
New 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class
See ratings
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Shop Cars.com
Browse cars & save your favorites
Dealers near you
Find & contact a dealership near you
Change location See all listings

Available trims

See the differences side-by-side to compare trims.
  • 2dr Roadster 5.0L
    Starts at
    $91,300
    16 City / 23 Hwy
    MPG
    2
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Rear Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 2dr Roadster 5.5L AMG
    Starts at
    $123,300
    14 City / 20 Hwy
    MPG
    2
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Rear Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 2dr Roadster 5.5L
    Starts at
    $129,400
    13 City / 19 Hwy
    MPG
    2
    Seat capacity
    Gas V12
    Engine
    Rear Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 2dr Roadster 6.0L AMG
    Starts at
    $182,100
    12 City / 19 Hwy
    MPG
    2
    Seat capacity
    Gas V12
    Engine
    Rear Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs

Photo & video gallery

2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class

Notable features

Retractable roof
604-hp V-12 in new SL65 AMG
493-hp V-8 in SL55 AMG
493-hp V-12 in SL600
Seven-speed automatic in SL500
Active Body Control active suspension

The good & the bad

The good

Acceleration
Ride comfort
Luxury upholstery
Seat comfort
Handling

The bad

Navigation-system display
Minimal trunk space
Control layout
Price

Expert 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class review

our expert's take
Our expert's take
By Dan Neil
Full article
our expert's take

There is something distinctly epochal about the Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG, the twin-turbocharged, 12-cylinder, 604-horsepower version of the company’s quantum-luxury roadster. More powerful than the Ford GT and quicker than a Ferrari 360, the SL65 – an SL600 with gene-doping enhancement by AMG, the company’s tuner division – feels like a final, conflict-ending fusillade in the decade-long horsepower wars.

What comes after a car like this? More horsepower? I don’t think so. While it’s certainly possible to wring more horsepower out of an emissions-legal gasoline engine, such pursuits grow increasingly expensive and irrelevant, if not vain and silly. The SL65 is less than a second slower to 60 mph than a 650-horsepower Ferrari Enzo (3.3 seconds) – and that single second, that fig leaf of numerical superiority, costs about a half-million dollars more (assuming you could buy an Enzo at anything like its $680,000 MSRP).

The long-awaited Bugatti Veyron, a million-euro hyper-car built under the auspices of parent company VW Group, promises nearly 1,000 hp out of its quad-turbo W16 engine. But it looks to be a rather feckless enterprise; with its complex drivetrain (seven speeds, multiple differentials and all-wheel drive) the 4,300-pound car will not be quicker than the 3,000-pound Enzo, though if it manages to stay on the ground its top speed will probably be higher.

The horsepower wars are, at base, psychological warfare. It’s purely academic if the 400-hp Cadillac CTS-V is faster than the 500-hp BMW M5 (it isn’t), since both cars are horridly fast enough. You may indulge your pet theories about men and their sexual compensations and I, for one, wouldn’t argue – though I might cross my legs.

Extreme sports cars justify their ludicrous cost only by a few tenths of a second measured by some car magazine, and yet here the field seems to be reaching a natural equilibrium – they can all make the green-light dash in around 4 seconds; they can all turn a quarter-mile in about 12 seconds; and they can all cruise at 200 mph if they happen to be crossing the U.A.E. with one of the emir’s sons on board. In this category, you will find cars like the Porsche Carrera GT, Ford GT, Lamborghini Murcielago (3.6 seconds); and a handful of rare isotopes with names like Koenigsegg, Pagani and Mosler.

So where is the value of these cars when an SL65 can stalk them? All of these ground-bound rockets are purpose-built from lightweight, hard-to-spell metal alloys and carbon composites. The all-steel SL65 weighs 4,473 pounds and is, in its bones, the same chichi chariot seen tooling around Bel-Air, a courtesan cruiser. Its long-as-your-arm list of standard features includes a retractable hardtop, five-speed automatic transmission, air-conditioned and heated seats with massage function, surround-sound stereo, DVD navigation, even a climate-controlled glove box.

The SL65 goes from a standstill to 60 mph in 4.2 seconds, clears the quarter-mile traps in 12 seconds and only then does it find its stride in a jubilant, wind-cleaving roar. In the time it takes to read aloud this paragraph, the car will go from zero to its electronically limited top speed of 155 mph.

What’s that feel like? Ask the guy in the funny helmet who gets shot out of a cannon.

You can almost feel sorry for exotic cars. Stuffing more horses in the corral won’t help.

Among the limiting factors: street tires. The SL65’s bi-turbo V12 is a veritable Vesuvius of torque – 738 pound-feet between 2,000 and 4,000 rpm – yet the trick is converting all that driveshaft twist to acceleration. If you nail the throttle in the SL65 (traction control turned off) the rear wheels simply boil off a few hundred dollars of exotic Italian rubber (even with its relatively high rear-end ratio of 2.65:1, which favors top-end speed over hole-shot quickness). You could increase the width of the tire or reduce the water-channeling grooves – increasing the overall “contact patch” – but you only make the tires louder, less compliant in ride quality and less secure in wet conditions. You could make the rubber compound softer and more adhesive but then the tires would wear rapidly.

All-wheel-drive divvies up engine torque among four wheels, but given the additional driveline weight and complication a car may actually go slower, as in the case of the Veyron. Also, highly strung engines require more cooling airflow, which complicates high-speed stability. Monster torque at the output shaft requires a transmission that can handle it. Again, more weight, more complication. These are the sorts of where-the-lines-cross considerations automotive engineers make all the time.

Another limiting factor: durability. There are import tuners out there who are getting 500 horsepower out of their turbocharged four-cylinder Mitsubishi Evos – once, maybe twice, before they grenade in a shower of exotic particles.

Manufacturers, on the other hand, can’t simply set their engines to kill. They have warranties to serve and reputations to protect. Each SL65 engine – a 6.0-liter, 36-valve, all-aluminum unit also found under the hood of the CL65 – is hand-built by a senior technician at the AMG factory in Affalterbach, Germany, whose signature is engraved on a plaque atop the carbon-fiber engine cowling. It’s the automotive equivalent to artisan cheese. The engine’s innards include a high-strength forged steel crankshaft, reinforced main bearings, titanium connecting rods, forged aluminum pistons, an oversized oil pump, auxiliary oil cooler and all sorts of clever plumbing to make sure the oil sprays around inside the engine like suds in a car wash. The fire is provided by phased twin-spark ignition with twin ignition coils per cylinder, the fuel-by-fuel injectors computer-controlled for each cylinder, and the air by two bowling-ball-sized turbochargers.

The amazing thing is not that this engine rocks the seismograph like a square-dancing Godzilla, but that it carries Mercedes’ usual 4/48 warranty.

Finally, there is the matter of emissions. It will become increasingly difficult – which equals expensive – to wage the horsepower wars as standards tighten. As it is, the SL65 isn’t exactly Kermit green, and it will only return its EPA-rated 12 miles per gallon city, 19 mpg highway if you don’t start it.

AMG performance upgrades include outrageously large and powerful compound brakes, ultra-cool 19-inch composite alloy wheels, up-rated suspension hardware and software, special front air dam with black-mesh grille coverings, intakes and heat extractors, as well as an AMG quad exhaust that broadcasts the engine’s deep, unearthly sound, like Tibetan throat singing.

End-of-history arguments are treacherous. But it seems to me the awesome SL65 marks a kind of roll-credits moment for the gas-and-steel automobile. Mercedes itself has announced it will follow Lexus in building hybrid-electric luxury cars, and Lexus execs will happily tell you their goal is not so much efficiency as performance. There is even a Toyota Prius “GT” out there somewhere. One nice thing about electric traction motors is peak torque is available at any speed. Also, it would be easier to maximize grip under acceleration with electric motor-driven wheels. A smarter traction control, if you will.

It will be a while before the SL65 is obsolete in any fundamental sense. But at some point – 10 years, 20 years from now – I think we might look back on this car as the highest and most artful example of a doomed technology, like the Curta mechanical calculator, the tube Marshall amplifier or the Denon direct-drive turntable. Each of these items still has its collectors and aficionados, so it wouldn’t surprise me to see an SL65 still on the road, a magnificent anachronism.

*

Automotive critic Dan Neil can be reached at dan.neil@latimes.com.

*

Mercedes-Benz 2005 SL65 AMG

Base price: $179,720

Price, as tested: $192,340

Drivetrain: 6.0-liter, twin-turbocharged and intercooled V12, single-overhead cam, three-valve-per-cylinder, alloy block and heads, phased twin-spark ignition, computer-controlled fuel injection at each cylinder; five-speed adaptive transmission with manual-shift; 2.65:1 rear drive ratio; rear-wheel drive

Chassis: Active suspension, with independent multi-link front and rear suspension, coil springs in series with active electro-hydraulic springs, gas-pressured shocks

Horsepower: 604 at 5,500 rpm

Torque: 738 pound-feet at 2,000 to 4,000 rpm

Curb weight: 4,473 pounds

0-60 mph: 4.2 seconds

Wheelbase: 100.8 inches

Overall length: 178.5 inches

Wheels: Composite alloy, 8.5JX19 front, 9.5JX19 rear

Tires: High performance 255/35 ZR19 front, 285/30 ZR19 rear

EPA mileage: 12 miles per gallon city, 19 mpg highway

Final thoughts: Guns and butter

2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class review: Our expert's take
By Dan Neil

There is something distinctly epochal about the Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG, the twin-turbocharged, 12-cylinder, 604-horsepower version of the company’s quantum-luxury roadster. More powerful than the Ford GT and quicker than a Ferrari 360, the SL65 – an SL600 with gene-doping enhancement by AMG, the company’s tuner division – feels like a final, conflict-ending fusillade in the decade-long horsepower wars.

What comes after a car like this? More horsepower? I don’t think so. While it’s certainly possible to wring more horsepower out of an emissions-legal gasoline engine, such pursuits grow increasingly expensive and irrelevant, if not vain and silly. The SL65 is less than a second slower to 60 mph than a 650-horsepower Ferrari Enzo (3.3 seconds) – and that single second, that fig leaf of numerical superiority, costs about a half-million dollars more (assuming you could buy an Enzo at anything like its $680,000 MSRP).

The long-awaited Bugatti Veyron, a million-euro hyper-car built under the auspices of parent company VW Group, promises nearly 1,000 hp out of its quad-turbo W16 engine. But it looks to be a rather feckless enterprise; with its complex drivetrain (seven speeds, multiple differentials and all-wheel drive) the 4,300-pound car will not be quicker than the 3,000-pound Enzo, though if it manages to stay on the ground its top speed will probably be higher.

The horsepower wars are, at base, psychological warfare. It’s purely academic if the 400-hp Cadillac CTS-V is faster than the 500-hp BMW M5 (it isn’t), since both cars are horridly fast enough. You may indulge your pet theories about men and their sexual compensations and I, for one, wouldn’t argue – though I might cross my legs.

Extreme sports cars justify their ludicrous cost only by a few tenths of a second measured by some car magazine, and yet here the field seems to be reaching a natural equilibrium – they can all make the green-light dash in around 4 seconds; they can all turn a quarter-mile in about 12 seconds; and they can all cruise at 200 mph if they happen to be crossing the U.A.E. with one of the emir’s sons on board. In this category, you will find cars like the Porsche Carrera GT, Ford GT, Lamborghini Murcielago (3.6 seconds); and a handful of rare isotopes with names like Koenigsegg, Pagani and Mosler.

So where is the value of these cars when an SL65 can stalk them? All of these ground-bound rockets are purpose-built from lightweight, hard-to-spell metal alloys and carbon composites. The all-steel SL65 weighs 4,473 pounds and is, in its bones, the same chichi chariot seen tooling around Bel-Air, a courtesan cruiser. Its long-as-your-arm list of standard features includes a retractable hardtop, five-speed automatic transmission, air-conditioned and heated seats with massage function, surround-sound stereo, DVD navigation, even a climate-controlled glove box.

The SL65 goes from a standstill to 60 mph in 4.2 seconds, clears the quarter-mile traps in 12 seconds and only then does it find its stride in a jubilant, wind-cleaving roar. In the time it takes to read aloud this paragraph, the car will go from zero to its electronically limited top speed of 155 mph.

What’s that feel like? Ask the guy in the funny helmet who gets shot out of a cannon.

You can almost feel sorry for exotic cars. Stuffing more horses in the corral won’t help.

Among the limiting factors: street tires. The SL65’s bi-turbo V12 is a veritable Vesuvius of torque – 738 pound-feet between 2,000 and 4,000 rpm – yet the trick is converting all that driveshaft twist to acceleration. If you nail the throttle in the SL65 (traction control turned off) the rear wheels simply boil off a few hundred dollars of exotic Italian rubber (even with its relatively high rear-end ratio of 2.65:1, which favors top-end speed over hole-shot quickness). You could increase the width of the tire or reduce the water-channeling grooves – increasing the overall “contact patch” – but you only make the tires louder, less compliant in ride quality and less secure in wet conditions. You could make the rubber compound softer and more adhesive but then the tires would wear rapidly.

All-wheel-drive divvies up engine torque among four wheels, but given the additional driveline weight and complication a car may actually go slower, as in the case of the Veyron. Also, highly strung engines require more cooling airflow, which complicates high-speed stability. Monster torque at the output shaft requires a transmission that can handle it. Again, more weight, more complication. These are the sorts of where-the-lines-cross considerations automotive engineers make all the time.

Another limiting factor: durability. There are import tuners out there who are getting 500 horsepower out of their turbocharged four-cylinder Mitsubishi Evos – once, maybe twice, before they grenade in a shower of exotic particles.

Manufacturers, on the other hand, can’t simply set their engines to kill. They have warranties to serve and reputations to protect. Each SL65 engine – a 6.0-liter, 36-valve, all-aluminum unit also found under the hood of the CL65 – is hand-built by a senior technician at the AMG factory in Affalterbach, Germany, whose signature is engraved on a plaque atop the carbon-fiber engine cowling. It’s the automotive equivalent to artisan cheese. The engine’s innards include a high-strength forged steel crankshaft, reinforced main bearings, titanium connecting rods, forged aluminum pistons, an oversized oil pump, auxiliary oil cooler and all sorts of clever plumbing to make sure the oil sprays around inside the engine like suds in a car wash. The fire is provided by phased twin-spark ignition with twin ignition coils per cylinder, the fuel-by-fuel injectors computer-controlled for each cylinder, and the air by two bowling-ball-sized turbochargers.

The amazing thing is not that this engine rocks the seismograph like a square-dancing Godzilla, but that it carries Mercedes’ usual 4/48 warranty.

Finally, there is the matter of emissions. It will become increasingly difficult – which equals expensive – to wage the horsepower wars as standards tighten. As it is, the SL65 isn’t exactly Kermit green, and it will only return its EPA-rated 12 miles per gallon city, 19 mpg highway if you don’t start it.

AMG performance upgrades include outrageously large and powerful compound brakes, ultra-cool 19-inch composite alloy wheels, up-rated suspension hardware and software, special front air dam with black-mesh grille coverings, intakes and heat extractors, as well as an AMG quad exhaust that broadcasts the engine’s deep, unearthly sound, like Tibetan throat singing.

End-of-history arguments are treacherous. But it seems to me the awesome SL65 marks a kind of roll-credits moment for the gas-and-steel automobile. Mercedes itself has announced it will follow Lexus in building hybrid-electric luxury cars, and Lexus execs will happily tell you their goal is not so much efficiency as performance. There is even a Toyota Prius “GT” out there somewhere. One nice thing about electric traction motors is peak torque is available at any speed. Also, it would be easier to maximize grip under acceleration with electric motor-driven wheels. A smarter traction control, if you will.

It will be a while before the SL65 is obsolete in any fundamental sense. But at some point – 10 years, 20 years from now – I think we might look back on this car as the highest and most artful example of a doomed technology, like the Curta mechanical calculator, the tube Marshall amplifier or the Denon direct-drive turntable. Each of these items still has its collectors and aficionados, so it wouldn’t surprise me to see an SL65 still on the road, a magnificent anachronism.

*

Automotive critic Dan Neil can be reached at dan.neil@latimes.com.

*

Mercedes-Benz 2005 SL65 AMG

Base price: $179,720

Price, as tested: $192,340

Drivetrain: 6.0-liter, twin-turbocharged and intercooled V12, single-overhead cam, three-valve-per-cylinder, alloy block and heads, phased twin-spark ignition, computer-controlled fuel injection at each cylinder; five-speed adaptive transmission with manual-shift; 2.65:1 rear drive ratio; rear-wheel drive

Chassis: Active suspension, with independent multi-link front and rear suspension, coil springs in series with active electro-hydraulic springs, gas-pressured shocks

Horsepower: 604 at 5,500 rpm

Torque: 738 pound-feet at 2,000 to 4,000 rpm

Curb weight: 4,473 pounds

0-60 mph: 4.2 seconds

Wheelbase: 100.8 inches

Overall length: 178.5 inches

Wheels: Composite alloy, 8.5JX19 front, 9.5JX19 rear

Tires: High performance 255/35 ZR19 front, 285/30 ZR19 rear

EPA mileage: 12 miles per gallon city, 19 mpg highway

Final thoughts: Guns and butter

Available cars near you

Factory warranties

New car program benefits

Basic
4 years / 50,000 miles
Corrosion
4 years / 50,000 miles
Powertrain
4 years / 50,000 miles

Certified Pre-Owned program benefits

Age / mileage
6 years old or less / less than 75,000 miles
Basic
1 year / unlimited miles
Dealer certification
164-point inspection

Compare similar vehicles

Select cars to compare for more detailed info.
  • 2005
    4.9
    Mercedes-Benz SL-Class
    Starts at
    $91,300
    16 City / 23 Hwy
    MPG
    2
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2009
    4.4
    BMW 650
    Starts at
    $78,200
    15 City / 23 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2006
    4.6
    Mercedes-Benz SL-Class
    Starts at
    $92,900
    16 City / 24 Hwy
    MPG
    2
    Seat capacity
    Gas V12
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2007
    5.0
    Bentley Continental Flying Spur
    Starts at
    $169,990
    10 City / 17 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas W12
    Engine
    All-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2005
    4.9
    Lexus SC 430
    Starts at
    $63,575
    18 City / 23 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2007
    4.7
    Bentley Continental GT
    Starts at
    $169,990
    12 City / 19 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas W12
    Engine
    All-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2013
    5.0
    Aston Martin DB9
    Starts at
    $183,300
    13 City / 19 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas V12
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2002
    4.5
    Jaguar XK8
    Starts at
    $69,330
    17 City / 24 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • Compare more options
    Use our comparison tool to add any vehicle of your choice and see a full list of specifications and features side-by-side.
    Try it now

Consumer reviews

4.9 / 5
Based on 41 reviews
Write a review
Comfort 4.9
Interior 4.9
Performance 4.9
Value 4.7
Exterior 4.9
Reliability 4.5

Most recent

Draws too much attention from the ladies!

A few concerns to address, the first is ABC active body control is a concern for this car. I own Phone Doctor in Frederick Maryland and hardware tech is my passion so I want to give my feedback. I love the classy lines of the exterior. The interior is equally elegant and tasteful without gaudy disco lights. I was mesmerized into test driving a 2005 SL500 because my daily driver is a 2001 Mercedes s600. The audio system is lackluster, next weakness is the headlights, but the biggest problem is the ABC (active body control) hydraulic suspension. The audio system is disappointing and leaves me feeling flaccid but I’m used to twelve inches of JL systems shimmed into my high school hoopties. The audio system is not the deal-breaker for this $90,000 machine. And the mediocre headlights can be remedied with aftermarket auxiliary lights. The biggest weakness is the high performance suspension system. Mercedes likes to call it ABC (active body control). The hydraulic pump, seals, and mechanical moving parts gets weak and loses its performance anywhere between 80,000 to 150,000 miles. It’ll cost just as much to replace the ABC system than it does to purchase your 2nd hand sl500. If you’re in the market for one make sure you have an extra $20,000 in socked up before you drop your drawers and plop $15k on your first SL500. A dream ride with one last caveat: This car will draw a lot of attention from single ladies!
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Used for Having fun
  • Does recommend this car
Comfort 5.0
Interior 4.0
Performance 5.0
Value 4.0
Exterior 5.0
Reliability 4.0
21 people out of 23 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

MY 2005 SL500 was a great purchase. Not for sale.

My 2005 sl has been nothing but great! The inerior is just about perfect, and the exterior shines better than new. ONE notoriours problem is with the leveling system. Mine as others started to sink to the left when garaged..yikes! I was quoted around $3500 to fix it, but I found a great mechanic to do this for $800 including other maintenence. Thus car handles like a dream. Top up or down, it has great appeal and I cant tell you with way Iike it best. You can steal one of these cheap too..but make sure the owner kept it nice! My interior is perfect, yet Ive seen others quite shabby.
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Used for Having fun
  • Does recommend this car
Comfort 5.0
Interior 5.0
Performance 5.0
Value 4.0
Exterior 5.0
Reliability 4.0
14 people out of 14 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Latest news from cars.com

See all news

Mercedes-Benz dealers near you

FAQ

What trim levels are available for the 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class?

The 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class is available in 4 trim levels:

  • 5.0L (1 style)
  • 5.5L (1 style)
  • 5.5L AMG (1 style)
  • 6.0L AMG (1 style)

What is the MPG of the 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class?

The 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class offers up to 16 MPG in city driving and 23 MPG on the highway. These figures are based on EPA mileage ratings and are for comparison purposes only. The actual mileage will vary depending on vehicle options, trim level, driving conditions, driving habits, vehicle maintenance, and other factors.

What are some similar vehicles and competitors of the 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class?

The 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class compares to and/or competes against the following vehicles:

Is the 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class reliable?

The 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class has an average reliability rating of 4.5 out of 5 according to cars.com consumers. Find real-world reliability insights within consumer reviews from 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class owners.

Is the 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class a good Convertible?

Below are the cars.com consumers ratings for the 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class. 100.0% of drivers recommend this vehicle.

4.9 / 5
Based on 41 reviews
  • Comfort: 4.9
  • Interior: 4.9
  • Performance: 4.9
  • Value: 4.7
  • Exterior: 4.9
  • Reliability: 4.5

Mercedes-Benz SL-Class history

Your list was successfully saved.
Your comparisons
 
 
 
 
Save list Compare