1998 Galant

Consumer Reviews
1998 Mitsubishi Galant

Change Vehicle

Reviews Summary

3.0 out of 5 stars

3.0

4 Reviews
3.5 out of 5 starsComfort
3.5 out of 5 starsPerformance
3.2 out of 5 starsExterior Styling
3.5 out of 5 starsInterior Design
4 out of 5 starsValue for the Money
3.5 out of 5 starsReliability
Write a Review
Write a Review

All Reviews

1 - 4 of 4 reviews

4 out of 5 stars

MITSU TUFF

by STEP from JAMAICA on July 21, 2006

I HAVE BEEN DRIVING THIS CAR FOR THREE YEARS NOW, WITHOUT ANY MAJOR PROBLEM, CONSIDERING I PURCHASE IT FROM A CAR RENTAL COMPANY WITH 145000KM ON IT. TRULY A GOOD CAR MITSU TUFF

4 out of 5 starsComfort
3 out of 5 starsPerformance
3 out of 5 starsExterior Styling
4 out of 5 starsInterior Design
4 out of 5 starsValue for the Money
4 out of 5 starsReliability

Purchased a Used car

Does recommend this car!!

4 out of 5 people found this review helpful. Did you?

Your feedback has been sent to Cars.com

3 out of 5 stars

A competent but unexciting mid-size family car

by Erik from Wichita, KS on October 8, 2007

This car does most things you would want it to do adequately well, but has no exceptional qualities to recommend it nor any exceptional defects to condemn it. Best points: - Brisk acceleration despite the somewhat unpredictable timing of the automatic gearchange (worst when cold) - Good braking performance - Reliable, except for (in my case) a transmission rebuild at only 63,000 miles - Little rolling round bends - Comfortable for short to medium-length drives; suspension absorbs well all but the largest bumps in the road - Good sound from factory stereo/cassette - Reasonably quiet; at highway speeds, loudest sound is from tire roar - Roomy interior for up to 4 people; 5 is a squeeze - Large trunk, although intrusive hinges can crush tall objects - Efficient heating and cooling, with separate hot and cold air vents to the face Worst points: - Indifferent but predictable handling, with front wheels soon scrubbing when pushed hard round corners - Vague road feel - Poor mpg for size of car (23 town, 27 hwy), with range of just over 300 miles max. - Awkward cupholder placement in front of radio - Rather small glovebox - Large gap between sun visors (although they can swivel to the side when required) Overall, you could do a lot worse than buy this model, but you could also do quite a bit better; its blandness gives it many competitors among similar models.

4 out of 5 starsComfort
4 out of 5 starsPerformance
3 out of 5 starsExterior Styling
3 out of 5 starsInterior Design
3 out of 5 starsValue for the Money
4 out of 5 starsReliability

Purchased a Used car

Does not recommend this car!!

3 out of 5 people found this review helpful. Did you?

Your feedback has been sent to Cars.com

1 out of 5 stars

Bad

by Lucheni from on January 23, 2012

maintenance is so bad. Room light, cigar charger and audio don't working. But employee didn't tell me about it.

2 out of 5 starsComfort
3 out of 5 starsPerformance
4 out of 5 starsExterior Styling
4 out of 5 starsInterior Design
4 out of 5 starsValue for the Money
2 out of 5 starsReliability

Purchased a Used car

Does not recommend this car!!

2 out of 4 people found this review helpful. Did you?

Your feedback has been sent to Cars.com

4 out of 5 stars

Very reliable car for the price

by Shleubs from Winston, Georgia on May 16, 2017

This is a good car. Very reliable. The design is about average but the gas mileage and the reliability make up for it. Good starter car for a teen or a computer car for a college student.

4 out of 5 starsComfort
4 out of 5 starsPerformance
3 out of 5 starsExterior Styling
3 out of 5 starsInterior Design
5 out of 5 starsValue for the Money
4 out of 5 starsReliability

Purchased a Used car

Uses car for Commuting

Does recommend this car!!

Did you find this review helpful?

Your feedback has been sent to Cars.com

1
Our Expert Review: 1998 Mitsubishi Galant