Skip to main content

1995
Oldsmobile Aurora

Starts at:
$33,065
Shop options
New 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora
See ratings
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Shop Cars.com
Browse cars & save your favorites
Dealers near you
Find & contact a dealership near you
no listings

We're not finding any listings in your area.
Change your location or search Cars.com to see more!

Change location

The good & the bad

This vehicle doesn't have any good or bad insights yet.

Use our comparison tool to look at this model side-by-side with other vehicles or view the full specifications list .

Start your comparison

Expert 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora review

our expert's take
Our expert's take
By
Full article
our expert's take

When consumer groups focused on the clean steel statuary of Oldsmobile’s proposed Aurora, the feedback was like a head-on collision: damaging yet educational.

Led to believe that the car was built by Lexus, most critics for a day said they would consider buying the car.

Told it was an Oldsmobile, they changed their minds.

Company conclusions were inescapable: Oldsmobile had become a name synonymous with cars that didn’t work, usually limped home, looked frumpy and, frankly, weren’t as desirable as your father’s Oldsmobile 442.

Even the rocket ship logo–a symbol of Oldsmobile power and celestial sales ambitions since the space-traveling ’60s–was considered a leper.

So the 1995 Aurora luxury sedan comes to us naked of past symbology and stripped of familiar nomenclature in deep denial of being joined at the bloodline to General Motors.

The hood emblem is now an oval dissected by a chromium noodle that’s maybe an A but is definitely a squiggle and vaguely Toyotan. “Aurora” is the solitary name on the trunk lid. “Oldsmobile” appears only in pygmy letters on the radio.

Some may consider this a sleight of Detroit packaging, fresh wrapping around old weaknesses and the hollow distancing of new products from past shame. After all, Oldsmobile is the feeblest of GM’s seven car and truck divisions, sales have skidded 60% since 1986, fratricide has long been a whispered option, and that’s quite enough negative baggage for any company outside the savings and loan business.

Or one could view Aurora as an honest renaissance, a comeback car conceived and crafted to be a triumph with a new image critical to its promise of substance. In that case, turning to a new identity and understated origins to attract buyers is no worse than leaning on pen names: If the book is good enough, you really don’t need to know who wrote it.

And Aurora is good enough.

It could even be a bestseller.

This is a front-drive luxury car that replaces the aircraft carrier Toronado and is squarely aimed at splitting the mid-levels of Lexus and Infiniti. Yet with its V-8 pulling power, endless equipment, quiet comfort and satin-slick transmission, plus advanced and handsome styling, Aurora would be better matched against heavyweights Lexus LS400 and Infiniti Q45–and for about $20,000 less.

As Cadillac blew up the notion that two-ton American cars, particularly Oldsmobiles, should maneuver like backhoes, so Aurora with its brick-stiff chassis, self-leveling suspension, and superior combination of ride and handling makes an even better case for four-door ballerinas.

*

Aurora shares this fine platform with the new Buick Riviera coupe, but goes its own way with a V-8 engine that is a downsized, 250-horsepower variant of GM’s lusty 32-valve Northstar.

Externally, front and back, the Riviera is the better pinup with a rear deck that flatters by imperso nating Jaguar. Aurora’s squared-off, almost aristocratic rear is marred by huge backup lights bigger than warehouse floods.

The Riviera presents a nose and chin with delicate chrome accents. Aurora is almost artless with a deep crease above a bottom-breathing grille and fog lights framed by a long figure eight of black rubber. Like two flashlights in a Thighmaster.

But inside . . . ah, as Aurora is probably the best car in the 98-year history of Oldsmobile–and at $32,000 the most expensive–so is its interior the finest in carpeting and traveling comfort since Cesar Ritz furnished his first hotel.

Much has been made of modern car interiors that are cockpits. An Aurora pilot commands a flight deck that sweeps around the human form and encapsules without cramping, brings every control within instant reach of fingers and eyes without confusing either sense.

All window and mirror buttons are on the upslope of the door rest, just below a pictograph p wer-seat switch purloined from Mercedes-Benz. Instruments are large and s peak to you. There’s no squinting and reaching for trunk and gas flap remotes because they’re conveniently set in the dashboard, just above the knee bolster.

From leather armchairs to computerized trip monitoring, through mine ‘n’ yours air bags and an overhead cubbyhole for the garage door remote, the Aurora glows with little luxuries.

Front seating is spacious, rear seat room not so airy. If Oldsmobile has to use a foot pedal for a parking brake, we wish it would disengage when the transmission is shifted to drive. And unless someone out there is converting Dodge Rams and Lincoln Town Cars into low riders, heating wires in the back window are distorting the rear view of following vehicles.

*

Despite their refinements and growing excellence, there remain subtleties–apparently unattainable, for they surely have been recognized–that continue to separate imported from domestic luxury. A Mercedes rides like it was carved from a solid billet. In a Lexus, touch the ashtray and it opens with a hiss.

On Aurora, the ashtray clatters about its business. Close the center armrest too smartly and a collection of crab claws posing as cup holders start groping for something to do. Sadly, these items retain the feel and sound of low bidders in GM’s component programs.

No complaints, however, about the mood of Aurora on a roll.

The Northstar engine–although diluted by some 20 horsepower to prevent Oldsmobile stomping on Cadillac’s turf–is a throaty, muscular thing built to humiliate all lane laggards and on-ramp turtles.

Anti-lock brakes easily slow the car from the supersonic; the speed-sensitive power steering is a smidge on the heavy side, which is the way it should be, and the automatic transmission, except when kicking down and playing to the grandstand, never breaks its smoothness.

This is an effortless car, one of high performance and matching grandeur shod with premium wheels and tires that willingly remove the noise and vibrations of freeway hammering from the concern of its owner.

Meanwhile, back in the land of pseudonyms, the Aurora certainly intrigued those who thought they knew ’em all.

“Whatissit? Whomakesit?” begged one spectator.

It’s an Aurora, we told him, made by a company in Alaska. They plan to market a compact car, the Borealis. And maybe a convertible named Northern Exposure.

1995 Aurora

Price: $31,370

The Good: Efficient, stylish break away from weary old Olds. Luxury levels that match Asian cars. Hard-pulling, high-powered Northstar V-8 engine. Interior sets an industry standard.

The Bad: Small details require attention.

The Ugly: Ghastly oversized backup lights.

Cost As tested, $33,385 (includes standard anti-lock brakes, traction control, two air bags, remote keyless entry, automatic lock s, air conditioning, four-speed automatic, leather seats and automatic headlights. Plus optional glass sunroof and performance tires).

Engine 4.0-liter, 32-valve, Northstar V-8 developing 250 horsepower.

Type Front-engine, front-drive, mid-size luxury sedan.

Performance 0-60 m.p.h., as tested, 9.4 seconds. Top speed, estimated, 135 m.p.h. Fuel consumption, EPA city and highway, 17 and 24 m.p.g.

Curb Weight 3,967 pounds.

1995 Oldsmobile Aurora review: Our expert's take
By

When consumer groups focused on the clean steel statuary of Oldsmobile’s proposed Aurora, the feedback was like a head-on collision: damaging yet educational.

Led to believe that the car was built by Lexus, most critics for a day said they would consider buying the car.

Told it was an Oldsmobile, they changed their minds.

Company conclusions were inescapable: Oldsmobile had become a name synonymous with cars that didn’t work, usually limped home, looked frumpy and, frankly, weren’t as desirable as your father’s Oldsmobile 442.

Even the rocket ship logo–a symbol of Oldsmobile power and celestial sales ambitions since the space-traveling ’60s–was considered a leper.

So the 1995 Aurora luxury sedan comes to us naked of past symbology and stripped of familiar nomenclature in deep denial of being joined at the bloodline to General Motors.

The hood emblem is now an oval dissected by a chromium noodle that’s maybe an A but is definitely a squiggle and vaguely Toyotan. “Aurora” is the solitary name on the trunk lid. “Oldsmobile” appears only in pygmy letters on the radio.

Some may consider this a sleight of Detroit packaging, fresh wrapping around old weaknesses and the hollow distancing of new products from past shame. After all, Oldsmobile is the feeblest of GM’s seven car and truck divisions, sales have skidded 60% since 1986, fratricide has long been a whispered option, and that’s quite enough negative baggage for any company outside the savings and loan business.

Or one could view Aurora as an honest renaissance, a comeback car conceived and crafted to be a triumph with a new image critical to its promise of substance. In that case, turning to a new identity and understated origins to attract buyers is no worse than leaning on pen names: If the book is good enough, you really don’t need to know who wrote it.

And Aurora is good enough.

It could even be a bestseller.

This is a front-drive luxury car that replaces the aircraft carrier Toronado and is squarely aimed at splitting the mid-levels of Lexus and Infiniti. Yet with its V-8 pulling power, endless equipment, quiet comfort and satin-slick transmission, plus advanced and handsome styling, Aurora would be better matched against heavyweights Lexus LS400 and Infiniti Q45–and for about $20,000 less.

As Cadillac blew up the notion that two-ton American cars, particularly Oldsmobiles, should maneuver like backhoes, so Aurora with its brick-stiff chassis, self-leveling suspension, and superior combination of ride and handling makes an even better case for four-door ballerinas.

*

Aurora shares this fine platform with the new Buick Riviera coupe, but goes its own way with a V-8 engine that is a downsized, 250-horsepower variant of GM’s lusty 32-valve Northstar.

Externally, front and back, the Riviera is the better pinup with a rear deck that flatters by imperso nating Jaguar. Aurora’s squared-off, almost aristocratic rear is marred by huge backup lights bigger than warehouse floods.

The Riviera presents a nose and chin with delicate chrome accents. Aurora is almost artless with a deep crease above a bottom-breathing grille and fog lights framed by a long figure eight of black rubber. Like two flashlights in a Thighmaster.

But inside . . . ah, as Aurora is probably the best car in the 98-year history of Oldsmobile–and at $32,000 the most expensive–so is its interior the finest in carpeting and traveling comfort since Cesar Ritz furnished his first hotel.

Much has been made of modern car interiors that are cockpits. An Aurora pilot commands a flight deck that sweeps around the human form and encapsules without cramping, brings every control within instant reach of fingers and eyes without confusing either sense.

All window and mirror buttons are on the upslope of the door rest, just below a pictograph p wer-seat switch purloined from Mercedes-Benz. Instruments are large and s peak to you. There’s no squinting and reaching for trunk and gas flap remotes because they’re conveniently set in the dashboard, just above the knee bolster.

From leather armchairs to computerized trip monitoring, through mine ‘n’ yours air bags and an overhead cubbyhole for the garage door remote, the Aurora glows with little luxuries.

Front seating is spacious, rear seat room not so airy. If Oldsmobile has to use a foot pedal for a parking brake, we wish it would disengage when the transmission is shifted to drive. And unless someone out there is converting Dodge Rams and Lincoln Town Cars into low riders, heating wires in the back window are distorting the rear view of following vehicles.

*

Despite their refinements and growing excellence, there remain subtleties–apparently unattainable, for they surely have been recognized–that continue to separate imported from domestic luxury. A Mercedes rides like it was carved from a solid billet. In a Lexus, touch the ashtray and it opens with a hiss.

On Aurora, the ashtray clatters about its business. Close the center armrest too smartly and a collection of crab claws posing as cup holders start groping for something to do. Sadly, these items retain the feel and sound of low bidders in GM’s component programs.

No complaints, however, about the mood of Aurora on a roll.

The Northstar engine–although diluted by some 20 horsepower to prevent Oldsmobile stomping on Cadillac’s turf–is a throaty, muscular thing built to humiliate all lane laggards and on-ramp turtles.

Anti-lock brakes easily slow the car from the supersonic; the speed-sensitive power steering is a smidge on the heavy side, which is the way it should be, and the automatic transmission, except when kicking down and playing to the grandstand, never breaks its smoothness.

This is an effortless car, one of high performance and matching grandeur shod with premium wheels and tires that willingly remove the noise and vibrations of freeway hammering from the concern of its owner.

Meanwhile, back in the land of pseudonyms, the Aurora certainly intrigued those who thought they knew ’em all.

“Whatissit? Whomakesit?” begged one spectator.

It’s an Aurora, we told him, made by a company in Alaska. They plan to market a compact car, the Borealis. And maybe a convertible named Northern Exposure.

1995 Aurora

Price: $31,370

The Good: Efficient, stylish break away from weary old Olds. Luxury levels that match Asian cars. Hard-pulling, high-powered Northstar V-8 engine. Interior sets an industry standard.

The Bad: Small details require attention.

The Ugly: Ghastly oversized backup lights.

Cost As tested, $33,385 (includes standard anti-lock brakes, traction control, two air bags, remote keyless entry, automatic lock s, air conditioning, four-speed automatic, leather seats and automatic headlights. Plus optional glass sunroof and performance tires).

Engine 4.0-liter, 32-valve, Northstar V-8 developing 250 horsepower.

Type Front-engine, front-drive, mid-size luxury sedan.

Performance 0-60 m.p.h., as tested, 9.4 seconds. Top speed, estimated, 135 m.p.h. Fuel consumption, EPA city and highway, 17 and 24 m.p.g.

Curb Weight 3,967 pounds.

Factory warranties

Currently no warranties for this model year
This vehicle doesn’t currently have warranty details.
You can still learn about car warranties, review what’s best, and identify coverage that may be right for you.
Cars.com warranty hub

Consumer reviews

3.8 / 5
Based on 6 reviews
Write a review
Comfort 4.5
Interior 4.2
Performance 4.3
Value 3.5
Exterior 4.2
Reliability 3.5

Most recent

Worst car ever owned

Always needed repair. Poor designed caused high repair bills. Welds kept breaking. Oil leaks consistently. Spent $12,000.00 in repairs over 7 years.
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Does not recommend this car
Comfort 4.0
Interior 4.0
Performance 3.0
Value 2.0
Exterior 4.0
Reliability 1.0
4 people out of 5 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Great Car

I bought my baby in 1997. Never had to be towed. I currently have 137,000 miles. I promise my wife I would sell my Baby in 2007. I will now place an add on my baby for $2700.00.
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Used for Commuting
  • Does recommend this car
Comfort 4.0
Interior 4.0
Performance 4.0
Value 4.0
Exterior 4.0
Reliability 4.0
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Latest news from cars.com

See all news

FAQ

What trim levels are available for the 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora?

The 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora is available in 1 trim level:

  • (1 style)

Is the 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora reliable?

The 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora has an average reliability rating of 3.5 out of 5 according to cars.com consumers. Find real-world reliability insights within consumer reviews from 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora owners.

Is the 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora a good Sedan?

Below are the cars.com consumers ratings for the 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora. 83.3% of drivers recommend this vehicle.

3.8 / 5
Based on 6 reviews
  • Comfort: 4.5
  • Interior: 4.2
  • Performance: 4.3
  • Value: 3.5
  • Exterior: 4.2
  • Reliability: 3.5
Your list was successfully saved.
Your comparisons
 
 
 
 
Save list Compare