Skip to main content

Acura CL vs. Mitsubishi Lancer

Add new car
$28,200
$17,795
Add new car
 
Hide similarities

Highlights

$28,200
Starting MSRP
$17,795
Starting MSRP
-
Starting MSRP
Gas V6
Engine Type
Regular Unleaded I-4
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
20 City / 29 Hwy
MPG
24 City / 33 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
225 hp
Horsepower
148 hp
Horsepower
-
Horsepower
Front Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front Wheel Drive
Drive Type
-
Drive Type
4
Seating Capacity
5
Seating Capacity
-
Seating Capacity
4 yr / 50,000 mi
Basic Warranty
5 yr / 60,000 mi
Basic Warranty
-
Basic Warranty

Engine

216 @ 4700
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
145 @ 4200
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
-
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
225 @ 5600
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
148 @ 6000
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
-
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
3.2L/196
Displacement
2.0 L/122
Displacement
-
Displacement
Gas V6
Engine Type
Regular Unleaded I-4
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
A/T
Transmission w/Dual Shift Mode
5-Speed A/T
Transmission Options
M/T
5-Speed M/T
Transmission Options
-
Transmission Options
20 City / 29 Hwy
MPG
24 City / 33 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
7.8 qts
Total Cooling System Capacity
N/A
Total Cooling System Capacity
-
Total Cooling System Capacity

Tires & Wheels

16" x 6.5" in
Front Wheel Size
16 X 6.5 in
Front Wheel Size
-
Front Wheel Size
N/A
Spare Wheel Material
Steel
Spare Wheel Material
-
Spare Wheel Material
16" x 6.5" in
Rear Wheel Size
16 X 6.5 in
Rear Wheel Size
-
Rear Wheel Size
N/A
Spare Wheel Size
Compact in
Spare Wheel Size
-
Spare Wheel Size
P205/60VR16
Rear Tire Size
P205/60HR16
Rear Tire Size
-
Rear Tire Size
Compact
Spare Tire Size
Compact
Spare Tire Size
-
Spare Tire Size
P205/60VR16
Front Tire Size
P205/60HR16
Front Tire Size
-
Front Tire Size
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
-
Rear Wheel Material
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
-
Front Wheel Material

Suspension

Double-Wishbone
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Independent
Suspension Type - Front
Strut
Suspension Type - Front
-
Suspension Type - Front
Independent
Suspension Type - Rear
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear
-
Suspension Type - Rear
Double-Wishbone
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Strut
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)

Steering

Variable pwr
Steering Type
Rack-Pinion
Steering Type
-
Steering Type
37 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
33 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
-
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
-
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
16
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
N/A
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
-
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
3
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
N/A
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
-
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)

Measurements

50 in
Second Hip Room
54 in
Second Hip Room
-
Second Hip Room
56 in
Front Shoulder Room
55 in
Front Shoulder Room
-
Front Shoulder Room
N/A
Liftover Height
N/A
Liftover Height
-
Liftover Height
61 in
Track Width, Front
60 in
Track Width, Front
-
Track Width, Front
192 in
Length, Overall
182 in
Length, Overall
-
Length, Overall
14 ft³
Trunk Volume
12 ft³
Trunk Volume
-
Trunk Volume
69 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
69 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
-
Width, Max w/o mirrors
37 in
Second Head Room
37 in
Second Head Room
-
Second Head Room
33 in
Second Leg Room
36 in
Second Leg Room
-
Second Leg Room
61 in
Track Width, Rear
60 in
Track Width, Rear
-
Track Width, Rear
90 ft³
Passenger Volume
94 ft³
Passenger Volume
-
Passenger Volume
6 in
Min Ground Clearance
6 in
Min Ground Clearance
-
Min Ground Clearance
53 in
Height, Overall
58 in
Height, Overall
-
Height, Overall
107 in
Wheelbase
104 in
Wheelbase
-
Wheelbase
54 in
Second Shoulder Room
54 in
Second Shoulder Room
-
Second Shoulder Room
53 in
Front Hip Room
53 in
Front Hip Room
-
Front Hip Room
4
Passenger Capacity
5
Passenger Capacity
-
Passenger Capacity
42 in
Front Leg Room
42 in
Front Leg Room
-
Front Leg Room
38 in
Front Head Room
40 in
Front Head Room
-
Front Head Room

Weight & Capacity

17 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
16 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
3,470 lbs
Base Curb Weight
2,888 lbs
Base Curb Weight
-
Base Curb Weight
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx

Safety

-
Backup Camera
Standard
Backup Camera
-
Backup Camera
-
Stability Control
Standard
Stability Control
-
Stability Control

Entertainment

-
Bluetooth®
Standard
Bluetooth®
-
Bluetooth®

Electrical

N/A
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
620
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
-
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
110
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
130
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
-
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)

Brakes

11.8 x 1.1 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
11 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
-
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
-
Brake ABS System
Pwr
Brake Type
4-Wheel Disc
Brake Type
-
Brake Type
Not Available
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
N/A
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
-
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
-
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
11.1 x .35 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
10 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
-
Disc - Front (Yes or )

FAQ

Which is more reliable, the 2003 Acura CL or the 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer?

The 2003 Acura CL and the 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer are equally reliable according to Cars.com consumers, with a reliability rating of 4.6.

Which is more fuel efficient, the 2003 Acura CL or the 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer?

The 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer is more fuel efficient than the 2003 Acura CL with 28 MPG combined versus 0 MPG combined.

Which car is cheaper, the 2003 Acura CL or the 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer?

The 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer is cheaper than the 2003 Acura CL with a $17,795 starting MSRP versus a $28,200 starting MSRP.

Compare the Acura CL

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer

Add car