Mitsubishi Lancer vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution

Add new car
2017 Mitsubishi Lancer
$17,795
See all results
2015 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
$34,495
See all results
Add new car
 
Hide similarities

Highlights

$17,795
Starting MSRP
$34,495
Starting MSRP
-
Starting MSRP
Regular Unleaded I-4
Engine Type
Intercooled Turbo Premium Unleaded I-4
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
24 City / 33 Hwy
MPG
17 City / 23 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
148 hp
Horsepower
291 hp
Horsepower
-
Horsepower
Front Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All Wheel Drive
Drive Type
-
Drive Type
5
Seating Capacity
5
Seating Capacity
-
Seating Capacity
5 yr / 60,000 mi
Basic Warranty
3 yr / 36,000 mi
Basic Warranty
-
Basic Warranty

Engine

Regular Unleaded I-4
Engine Type
Intercooled Turbo Premium Unleaded I-4
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
2.0 L/122
Displacement
2.0 L/122
Displacement
-
Displacement
145 @ 4200
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
300 @ 4000
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
-
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
148 @ 6000
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
291 @ 6500
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
-
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
M/T
5-Speed M/T
Transmission Options
M/T
5-Speed M/T
Transmission Options
-
Transmission Options
24 City / 33 Hwy
MPG
17 City / 23 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
N/A
Total Cooling System Capacity
N/A
Total Cooling System Capacity
-
Total Cooling System Capacity

Tires & Wheels

Compact
Spare Tire Size
Compact
Spare Tire Size
-
Spare Tire Size
P205/60HR16
Rear Tire Size
P245/40YR18
Rear Tire Size
-
Rear Tire Size
Compact in
Spare Wheel Size
Compact in
Spare Wheel Size
-
Spare Wheel Size
16 X 6.5 in
Front Wheel Size
18 X 8.5 in
Front Wheel Size
-
Front Wheel Size
P205/60HR16
Front Tire Size
P245/40YR18
Front Tire Size
-
Front Tire Size
Steel
Spare Wheel Material
Steel
Spare Wheel Material
-
Spare Wheel Material
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
-
Front Wheel Material
16 X 6.5 in
Rear Wheel Size
18 X 8.5 in
Rear Wheel Size
-
Rear Wheel Size
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
-
Rear Wheel Material

Suspension

Strut
Suspension Type - Front
Strut
Suspension Type - Front
-
Suspension Type - Front
Strut
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Strut
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear
-
Suspension Type - Rear

Steering

N/A
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
N/A
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
-
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
33 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
39 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
-
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
Rack-Pinion
Steering Type
Rack-Pinion
Steering Type
-
Steering Type
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
-
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
N/A
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
N/A
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
-
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)

Measurements

69 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
71 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
-
Width, Max w/o mirrors
5
Passenger Capacity
5
Passenger Capacity
-
Passenger Capacity
94 ft³
Passenger Volume
93 ft³
Passenger Volume
-
Passenger Volume
104 in
Wheelbase
104 in
Wheelbase
-
Wheelbase
40 in
Front Head Room
41 in
Front Head Room
-
Front Head Room
54 in
Second Shoulder Room
54 in
Second Shoulder Room
-
Second Shoulder Room
182 in
Length, Overall
177 in
Length, Overall
-
Length, Overall
60 in
Track Width, Front
61 in
Track Width, Front
-
Track Width, Front
55 in
Front Shoulder Room
55 in
Front Shoulder Room
-
Front Shoulder Room
58 in
Height, Overall
58 in
Height, Overall
-
Height, Overall
36 in
Second Leg Room
36 in
Second Leg Room
-
Second Leg Room
12 ft³
Trunk Volume
7 ft³
Trunk Volume
-
Trunk Volume
42 in
Front Leg Room
42 in
Front Leg Room
-
Front Leg Room
37 in
Second Head Room
37 in
Second Head Room
-
Second Head Room
60 in
Track Width, Rear
61 in
Track Width, Rear
-
Track Width, Rear
N/A
Liftover Height
N/A
Liftover Height
-
Liftover Height
6 in
Min Ground Clearance
6 in
Min Ground Clearance
-
Min Ground Clearance
53 in
Front Hip Room
53 in
Front Hip Room
-
Front Hip Room
54 in
Second Hip Room
54 in
Second Hip Room
-
Second Hip Room

Weight & Capacity

N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
16 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
15 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
2,888 lbs
Base Curb Weight
3,527 lbs
Base Curb Weight
-
Base Curb Weight
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.

Safety

Standard
Stability Control
Standard
Stability Control
-
Stability Control
Standard
Backup Camera
-
Backup Camera
-
Backup Camera

Entertainment

Standard
Bluetooth®
Standard
Bluetooth®
-
Bluetooth®

Electrical

130
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
130
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
-
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
620
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
710
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
-
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)

Brakes

Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
-
Disc - Front (Yes or )
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
-
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
N/A
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
Not Available
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
-
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
10 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
13 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
-
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
4-Wheel Disc
Brake Type
4-Wheel Disc
Brake Type
-
Brake Type
11 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
14 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
-
Brake ABS System

FAQ

Which is more reliable, the 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer or the 2015 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution?

The 2015 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is more reliable than the 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer according to Cars.com consumers, with a reliability rating of 4.7 for the 2015 Lancer Evolution versus a reliability rating of 4.6 for the 2017 Lancer.

Which is more fuel efficient, the 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer or the 2015 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution?

The 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer is more fuel efficient than the 2015 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution with 28 MPG combined versus 19 MPG combined.

Which car is cheaper, the 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer or the 2015 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution?

The 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer is cheaper than the 2015 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution with a $17,795 starting MSRP versus a $34,495 starting MSRP.

Similar cars for sale

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution

Add car