Best Bet
  • (4.6) 55 reviews
  • Inventory Prices: $6,657–$14,449
  • Body Style: Sport Utility
  • Combined MPG: 23
  • Engine: 166-hp, 2.4-liter I-4 (regular gas)
  • Drivetrain: 4x4
  • Seats: 5
2009 Honda CR-V

Our Take on the Latest Model 2009 Honda CR-V

What We Don't Like

  • Base model seat fabric
  • No V-6 engine offered
  • Folding design of backseat

Notable Features

  • Standard stability system
  • Optional navigation system with backup camera
  • Improved handling
  • FWD or AWD

2009 Honda CR-V Reviews

Cars.com Expert Reviews

Now in its 12th model year, the Honda CR-V remains one of the best-selling compact SUVs on the market, ahead of veterans like the Ford Escape and Toyota RAV4. As of Dec. 1, it was 2008's best-selling SUV and No. 10 in overall sales behind three full-size pickups and six cars. Not bad for an SUV in a year marked by a flagging market and high fuel prices.

The auto market doesn't lie. The best products reveal themselves through sales numbers. However, sometimes the market can be slow to catch on, so we revisit the leaders as the landscape changes. The CR-V was redesigned for 2007, and though it's well-rounded and deserving of its success, a couple of shortcomings are evident.

Handling the Ride
The CR-V's ride quality was the first thing I noticed when I hit the road in a 2009 model. It felt rougher than that of other popular car-based SUVs. As a reviewer, I'm careful not to jump to conclusions; road surfaces vary, and something like a washboard surface can make one test vehicle seem worse than another solely because of a difference in wheelbases. But I gave the CR-V a week's workout and drove it back-to-back with two 2009 competitors, a Ford Escape and Subaru Forester, and I'll go so far as to say its firm ride is the CR-V's distinguishing characteristic.

Specifically, it doesn't isolate you a lot from the road. You know when the surface is uneven, and that includes when it's only slightly uneven. This isn't about the car's ability to absorb a big shock. I hit some major potholes, and it soaked them up quickly and well, with no dramatic aftereffects. But in the course of just driving along, there's simply a lot going on; the body is on the move. Both of the other models do a better job of hiding road imperfections, with the Escape as a clear leader. It might give up a little in terms of handling and body roll, but I think it's a much better compromise.

The CR-V also pitches in a way the other two don't: The nose and tail tend to rise and fall in opposition to each other, setting up a rocking motion. This isn't a matter of dive or squat, which can happen in some cars when you brake or accelerate hard. In my test car it happened when cruising along over roads that weren't especially bad. Note that both of the models to which I compared the Honda were redesigned for 2009, which underscores why we took a fresh look at the CR-V.

Acceleration
Typical of four-cylinder compact SUVs, the CR-V is no rocket. You'll do 0-60 mph in around 10 seconds. Our all-wheel-drive test vehicle felt adequately powered, but compared to competing models of similar weight, its torque rating is a little lean. This means you need to goose the pedal and raise the engine speed to get to the power zone. When the rpm get high, the engine gets loud but remains smooth. In normal driving, it's admirably quiet. The opposite would be the Escape, which drones under normal conditions and sounds a little rough.

In general, Honda's approach is a good one: modest power and high efficiency at low rpm, and more guts up high when you need them. Unfortunately, the resulting mileage isn't what I'd expect. Taking a look at the most efficient comparable models (equipped with automatic transmissions and two-wheel drive, where offered), the CR-V's combined city/highway mileage is in line with the Escape and the 2.4-liter Jeep Patriot, at 23 mpg. It's ahead of the Saturn Vue, Mitsubishi Outlander, Subaru Forester and Hyundai Tucson (all 22 mpg) as well as the Suzuki Grand Vitara (21 mpg) and Chevy Equinox (20 mpg with its six-cylinder engine; no four-cylinder is available).

The CR-V trails the 2.0-liter Jeep Patriot, Nissan Rogue and Toyota RAV4, all of which are rated for 24 mpg in combined city/highway driving. Rated at 22 mpg combined, the CR-V with all-wheel drive compares more favorably, tying or beating all but the Rogue AWD and RAV4 4x4. If mileage doesn't concern you, several other compact SUVs offer larger or turbocharged engines for quicker acceleration, at a price.

The Inside
The CR-V's interior improved markedly with its 2007 redesign, but even back then I found the materials to be of inconsistent quality. The surfaces are soft where they need to be, and the gloss level is nice and low, but I think the metallic-look trim appears cheap. In particular, the door handles are shiny and plasticky. Once again, models redesigned or introduced in the past couple years had an opportunity to leapfrog the CR-V — and they did. The Vue and Volkswagen Tiguan are examples. They're more expensive, but the CR-V isn't the most affordable in the field either.

I find the RAV4's front seats a bit uncomfortable due to a short bottom cushion. On its own merit, the CR-V's driver's seat is more comfy, but there were times I wished it would cushion me more, because the suspension clearly doesn't. I was also baffled by the center armrests — one on the inboard side of each front seat. They angle too sharply upward and aren't adjustable. They're either down or up, and if you recline the backrest much they reach for the sky like a mortar tube.

The CR-V's interior dimensions are comparable to its competitors. The backseat is reasonably roomy, thanks in part to its ability to slide forward and back. While this feature is most useful in an SUV with three rows of seats, here it lets you choose where the extra space goes: to the backseat passengers or the cargo area. (In the compact SUV class, the RAV4 and Outlander offer seven seats ... if you can count their third rows as seats.) The backseat's bottom cushion is split 60/40, but the backrest is split 40/20/40, with each segment independently adjustable — a rare feature.

Cargo
The three-way-split backrest also grants more cargo flexibility because you can fold the center down to create a pass-thru flanked by passengers. Most backrests fold in 60/40 segments. Less agreeable is the way the folding seats operate: When the backrests are lowered, they're still way taller than the cargo floor. You can pull a strap at the rear and tumble them forward 90 degrees, which helps, but it isn't what most people prefer. A backrest that folds flat with the cargo floor in one step is ideal. The forward-and-back adjustment, reclining backrests and nested head restraints are progressive features, which is why the old-school tumble seems, well, regressive in a five-seat SUV.

CR-V in the Market
People often ask what makes a particular model worth the sales price. The answer couldn't be simpler: a buyer willing to pay that price. While the CR-V isn't a price leader in the compact-SUV class, buyers are more than willing to pay, making it the best-selling SUV in this troubled market. There's much to recommend it, including an exemplary reliability history and crash-test results second only to the VW Tiguan, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The wisest shoppers will always survey the whole field, though, and see what has come along recently. They'll also scrutinize the ride quality; it's something you simply can't change after you buy.

Send Joe an email 


Consumer Reviews

(4.6)

Average based on 55 reviews

Write a Review

Durability and Reliability reborn.

by Bamscrv from Chicago, Illinois on December 21, 2017

The car drives perfectly, feels so comfortable and makes me have rest of mind on the road. All systems works. It is definitely a very good car for family and personal use.

Read All Consumer Reviews

6 Trims Available

Photo of undefined
Wondering which configuration is right for you?
Our 2009 Honda CR-V trim comparison will help you decide.
 

Honda CR-V Articles

2009 Honda CR-V Safety Ratings

Crash-Test Reports

IIHS Ratings

Based on Honda CR-V EX

Head Restraints and Seats
G
Moderate overlap front
G
Roof Strength
M
Side
G

IIHS Ratings

Based on Honda CR-V EX

G Good
A Acceptable
M Marginal
P Poor

Head Restraints and Seats

Dynamic Rating
G
Overall Rear
G
Seat Head/Restraint Geometry
G

Moderate overlap front

Chest
G
Head/Neck
G
Left Leg/Foot
G
Overall Front
G
Restraints
G
Right Leg/Foot
G
Structure/safety cage
G

Other

Roof Strength
M

Side

Driver Head Protection
G
Driver Head and Neck
G
Driver Pelvis/Leg
A
Driver Torso
G
Overall Side
G
Rear Passenger Head Protection
G
Rear Passenger Head and Neck
G
Rear Passenger Pelvis/Leg
G
Rear Passenger Torso
G
Structure/safety cage
G
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) is a nonprofit research and communications organization funded by auto insurers. IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in high-speed front and side crash tests. IIHS also evaluates seat/head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.

NHTSA Ratings

Based on Honda CR-V EX

Overall Rollover Rating

NHTSA Ratings

Based on Honda CR-V EX

Overall Rollover Rating
Driver's
Passenger's
Front Seat
Rear Seat
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation. NHTSA provides vehicle safety information such as front- and side-crash ratings and rollover ratings. Vehicles are rated using a star rating system from 1-5 stars, with 5 being the highest.

Recalls

There are currently 6 recalls for this car.


Safety defects and recalls are relatively common. Stay informed and know what to do ahead of time.

Safety defects and recalls explained

Service & Repair

Estimated Service & Repair cost: $4,100 per year.

Save on maintenance costs and do your own repairs.

Warranty Coverage

Bumper-to-Bumper

36mo/36,000mi

Powertrain

60mo/60,000mi

What you should get in your warranty can be confusing. Make sure you are informed.

Learn More About Warranties

Warranties Explained

Bumper-to-Bumper

Often called a basic warranty or new-vehicle warranty, a bumper-to-bumper policy covers components like air conditioning, audio systems, vehicle sensors, fuel systems and major electrical components. Most policies exclude regular maintenance like fluid top offs and oil changes, but a few brands have separate free-maintenance provisions, and those that do offer them is slowly rising. Bumper-to-bumper warranties typically expire faster than powertrain warranties.

Powertrain

Don't be misled a 10-year or 100,000-mile powertrain warranty doesn't promise a decade of free repairs for your car. It typically covers just the engine and transmission, along with any other moving parts that lead to the wheels, like the driveshaft and constant velocity joints. Some automakers also bundle seat belts and airbags into their powertrain warranties. With a few exceptions, powertrain warranties don't cover regular maintenance like engine tuneups and tire rotations.

Roadside Assistance

Some automakers include roadside assistance with their bumper-to-bumper or powertrain warranties, while others have separate policies. These programs cover anything from flat-tire changes and locksmith services to jump-starts and towing. Few reimburse incidental costs like motel rooms (if you have to wait for repairs).

Free Scheduled Maintenance

Some automakers include free scheduled maintenance for items such as oil changes, air filters and tire rotations. Some include consumables including brake pads and windshield wipers; others do not. They are typically for the first couple of years of ownership of a new car.

Other Years