2000 Mercury Cougar

Change year or car

Change year or car


starting MSRP

2000 Mercury Cougar

Key specs

Base trim shown


Body style


Seating capacity

185.0” x 52.2”


Front-wheel drive



2 trims

Starting msrp listed lowest to highest price

Wondering which trim is right for you?

Our 2000 Mercury Cougar trim comparison will help you decide.

See also: Find the best Coupes for 2023

2000 Mercury Cougar review: Our expert's take


We first tested the Mercury Cougar when it arrived in Lincoln Mercury dealerships more than a year ago. Our harshest criticism of the car – a rather cheap-looking interior – has yet to be addressed on the 2000 model. But our overall impression of the Cougar has been tempered somewhat, if not downright improved, after comparing it with Toyota’s all-new Celica, a head-to-head competitor that we wrote about last week.

He: Normally, we don’t review a relatively new car in its second year. But the 2000 Cougar is such a better car than the new Celica in so many ways, we felt compelled to give it some ink. The one place where Toyota still wins is assembly quality. Our Cougar had some trim out of place and some bunched-up seat fabric. But it was still a much more pleasant vehicle to live in – despite a cabin that’s pretty cramped in the rear – and more of a pleasure to drive, thanks to the optional V-6 engine. What really amazed me was the sticker, which was $4,000 cheaper than the Celica!

She: Well, you were almost on your own for this test drive. I couldn’t figure out how to get the $235 power driver’s seat closer to the pedals. It’s my fault. I sat in our driveway for 20 minutes, fretting about missing a plane flight. The owner’s manual didn’t help me. And I just couldn’t figure it out. Talk about embarrassing. I had to unload all my luggage and get into my Beetle. It was the first time since second grade that I couldn’t reach the pedals.

He: Actually, it was the first time in about two days that you couldn’t figure out something mechanical. I couldn’t believe it when you asked me how to use the jar wrench the other day. Duh!

She: I thought you were going to defend me against the evil engineers.

He: OK, honey. Let me set the record straight. Instead of putting the seat switch on the side, Ford put it on the front. Wow. That was tough. Next question.

She: OK, I have another question. Why doesn’t the Cougar come with adjustable pedals like the Taurus? Then it wouldn’t matter how dumb I am. Certainly I could figure that out.

He: Why don’t women come with adjustable legs and save us the trouble?

She: Are you talking about Barbie? She drives a Corvette. Or is it a Jeep Grand Cherokee now? Speaking of women, when I was coming out of St. Joan of Arc Church this week, a woman came running up to me in the parking lot, anxious to talk about the Cougar. She said, “How do you like it? I can’t believe I’m asking you that, but it’s one of the few cars I’ve actually noticed recently.” You know, that is saying something in an age of cookie-cutter cars. Personally, I like the Cougar because it’s less gender-specific than cars like the Celica, which just screams “GUY!”

He: So far, you’re batting about one for three. Sorry, but you’re dead wrong on the Cougar. Total chick car. Don’t you pay attention to who’s driving these vehicles in the real world? I have yet to see a member of the male sex in a Cougar. But you are right about the Celica.

She: Wait. Let’s go back to the seat switch. I knew where the darn thing was. I just couldn’t get it to move forward. I could go up and down, but I couldn’t go forward.

He: I’ll bet you were a terror on your little rocking horse, dear.

She: Never had one. But I do give the Cougar a very solid three-star recommendation. It’ll get you noticed, and it won’t break the bank. If you so desire, you can add safety options like antilock brakes for $500, side air bags for $390 and traction control for $235, all of which were on our test car. And all of which I found quite valuable – once I figured out how to work the power seat. Hey, I’m not afraid to look like an idiot. Do you agree?

He: I agree. You shouldn’t be afraid.

2000 Mercury Cougar

Anita’s rating: above average

Paul’s rating: above average

Likes: Styling is near-perfect. All this, and a V-6 too, for only $20,000. More civilized than the w Celica. Side air bags available. Decent gas mileage for a six-cylinder sports car.

Dislikes: Seats are uncomfortable and side mirrors stylish but too small (Anita). Sloppy trim in places. Power-seat switch confusing. ABS is an extra-cost option.

Type: Front-engine, front-wheel drive, four-passenger hatchback

Price: Base, $16,945; as tested, $20,585 (inc. $400 destination charge)

Engine: 2.5-liter V-6; 170-hp; 165 lb-ft torque

EPA fuel economy: 19 mpg city/28 mpg highway

12-month insurance cost, according to AAA Michigan*: $1,026 (* Estimate. Rates may be higher or lower, depending on coverage and driving record.)

Where built: Flat Rock

Consumer reviews

Rating breakdown (out of 5):
  • Comfort 3.7
  • Interior 3.7
  • Performance 3.9
  • Value 3.5
  • Exterior 4.1
  • Reliability 3.4

Most recent consumer reviews


Not the car you want

This car is terrible and flat-out ugly compared to its 1st and 2nd gen models. I would not buy one now as any around now will break down easily. I rented one in Dallas, and I didn't drive 5 miles and the engine sputtered and came to a stop. Just buy a better car and definitely don't rent one.


The worst car I ever owned.

This car was a money pit. Electrical problems. Windows went down, but not back up. Alternator problems. I went through 3 alternators and the extended warrenty I bought (3000.00) through toyota was voided because Ford took out the original alternator. I finally found a guy who knew what was wrong. A connection wire was defective. Fuel tank recalled,but was not fix properly by Ford in Grande Prairie,Ab. It ended up dying on me while I was in Calgary Ab. I ended up getting 500.00 for it in 2014. Loved the shape, and handled well summer driving. Winter driving was not so good. It was a lemon.


Love this car and would buy another one.

I am 75 and have owned a lot of cars; my 1998 Lumina LTZ is in the shop for some major repairs. My Neighbor had this 2000 SE v6 cougar for sale. I love the car, I like everything about it, it is a bit noisy compared to the LTZ which is a very quite car, but that is okay. It is a really good road car or a great GT,, I just get settled in, set the cruse and cruse along. The gas millage is very good, better then the LTZ which has a 3.8 Buick V6. visibility is excellent, accessibility under the hood is excellent,. The power string on the Lumina LTZ is hidden next to the fire wall and you have to be careful not to burn your hand on a hot heater hose when checking the fluid level, it is not easy at all.! The 1998 Lumina LTZ was basely a 4 door Monte Carlo, so it is a Sport sedan. The quality of the Cougar is for superior then the LTZ and both cars sold for about the same price new. I am really surprised how GM/ Chevrolet would produce cars of lower quality then Ford/ Mercury of that period. Maby this was a Mercury standard, this is the first Mercury product I have owned. And I am very pleased. I would buy another Cougar, From what I can tell by my internet experiences these cars are popular in Europe, and they are easy to find online. Rob Gray

See all 24 consumer reviews


New car program benefits
36 months/36,000 miles
60 months/unlimited distance
36 months/36,000 miles
Roadside assistance
36 months/36,000 miles