Skip to main content

1999
Oldsmobile Aurora

Starts at:
$36,229
Shop options
New 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora
See ratings
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Shop Cars.com
Browse cars & save your favorites
Dealers near you
Find & contact a dealership near you
no listings

We're not finding any listings in your area.
Change your location or search Cars.com to see more!

Change location

The good & the bad

This vehicle doesn't have any good or bad insights yet.

Use our comparison tool to look at this model side-by-side with other vehicles or view the full specifications list .

Start your comparison

Expert 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora review

our expert's take
Our expert's take
By
Full article
our expert's take

I first drove the Oldsmobile Aurora in 1994, the year it was introduced. I was impressed then, mostly because I had believed that General Motors Corp. could never achieve what was represented by that car–modern, attractive, high-end quality. It was a pleasant surprise, though it wasn’t perfect.

The debutante Aurora’s back window had a defective curvature that obscured rear vision. The interior was well-assembled. But rear passenger space was deficient. It was supposed to seat five people but really accommodated four.

And there were those classic GM trademarks–fat A-pillars framing the windshield, and heavy, heavy doors.

But those shortcomings did not undermine the overall muscular beauty and superior highway performance of the car. Getting behind the Aurora’s wheel meant not having to get up for miles. It was seductive, a motorized siren song sung by an exquisitely tuned V-8 and accompanied by the muffled rhythms of an expertly suspended automobile moving over the road.

I recently recaptured that joy in a week-long affair with the 1999 Aurora, which essentially is unchanged since 1994, with the exception of some beneficial tweaks.

For example, that bothersome curvature in the rear window is gone, though there remains a visually challenging rear-panel hump created by the high-mounted center stop light.

Noise, vibration and harshness, barely evident in the first car, have even less presence in the current model, thanks to the addition of more hydraulic mounts to help dampen engine shake. And the Aurora’s suspension system, already good, has been made better over the years. The car snuggles into curves, with little body sway.

Still, annual sales of a bit more than 25,000 Aurora sedans are not enough. This is Oldsmobile’s lead car. It heads a lineup including the Alero and Intrigue mid-size sedans, the Bravada sport-utility wagon and the Silhouette minivan. (The Olds 88 and Cutlass have been deep-sixed.)

To help boost the Aurora’s numbers, Oldsmobile is giving the car a complete make-over for 2001 (which means that the 2000 Aurora will be a carry-over from 1999, and a probable luxury-car bargain as well).

The 2001 Aurora will be introduced next spring. In exterior styling, it will be sleeker than the current model. Yet, GM engineers say, it will have more interior space, meaning ample seating for five adults.

The fabulous 4-liter, 250-horsepower V-8 will remain, but no longer will be exclusive Aurora ware. Not everyone can afford, nor does everyone want, a V-8.

To help broaden the Aurora’s market, GM will add a 3.5-liter, 215-horsepower V-6, currently used in the 1999 Intrigue. Whether consumers will perceive the V-6 Aurora as a super-Intrigue or lesser Aurora remains to be seen. The spin could be the difference between sale and no sale.

I’m pleased that GM intends to stick with the Aurora. It is one of my favorite cars, largely because it is a symbol of America’s willingness to stay and fight rather than cut and run. Some folks might find that jingoistic. But a country without jingos, and the will to back them up, is one without a competitive economic future.

1999 Oldsmobile Aurora

Complaint: The 1999 Aurora has 14.9 cubic feet of trunk space, which seems sufficient, but it’s not. Usable trunk space is compromised by the swooped styling of the car’s rear end.

Praise: A solid car. Overall, it’s well-constructed and well-engineered. An absolute joy to drive long distances.

Ride, acceleration and handling: World competitive. One of the best-handling luxury sedans available. Excellent braking. Brakes include power four-wheel discs with standard anti-lock.

Head-turning quotient: Some people love it. Others loathe it. All are passionate. That’s the way it should be. The car makes a statement.

Capacities: Seats two people up front and two comfortably in the rear. The third rear passenger had better be small. Fuel tank holds 20 gallons; premium unleaded required.

Engine: A cast-aluminum, 4-liter V-8 that produces 250 horsepower at 5,600 rpm and 260 pound-feet of torque at 4,400 rpm.

Mileage: About 23 miles per gallon in city/highway driving. Estimated 450-mile range.

Safety: Active safety equipment, including a standard traction-control system. The usual passive safety devices, dual front air bags and side-impact protection.

Price: Base price on the 1999 Aurora is $36,229. Dealer invoice price on base model is $32,787. Keep in mind that “base” here practically means fully loaded; there’s a short options list. Price as tested was $38,865, including $1,095 for power sliding glass sunroof, $871 for a Bose Acoustimass sound system and a $670 destination charge.

Purse-strings note: You can bargain on the 1999 and 2000 Auroras, which basically are the same. Compare with the Lexus ES 300, Mercedes-Benz E320, Lincoln Continental and Volvo S80 sedan. Seriously.

1999 Oldsmobile Aurora review: Our expert's take
By

I first drove the Oldsmobile Aurora in 1994, the year it was introduced. I was impressed then, mostly because I had believed that General Motors Corp. could never achieve what was represented by that car–modern, attractive, high-end quality. It was a pleasant surprise, though it wasn’t perfect.

The debutante Aurora’s back window had a defective curvature that obscured rear vision. The interior was well-assembled. But rear passenger space was deficient. It was supposed to seat five people but really accommodated four.

And there were those classic GM trademarks–fat A-pillars framing the windshield, and heavy, heavy doors.

But those shortcomings did not undermine the overall muscular beauty and superior highway performance of the car. Getting behind the Aurora’s wheel meant not having to get up for miles. It was seductive, a motorized siren song sung by an exquisitely tuned V-8 and accompanied by the muffled rhythms of an expertly suspended automobile moving over the road.

I recently recaptured that joy in a week-long affair with the 1999 Aurora, which essentially is unchanged since 1994, with the exception of some beneficial tweaks.

For example, that bothersome curvature in the rear window is gone, though there remains a visually challenging rear-panel hump created by the high-mounted center stop light.

Noise, vibration and harshness, barely evident in the first car, have even less presence in the current model, thanks to the addition of more hydraulic mounts to help dampen engine shake. And the Aurora’s suspension system, already good, has been made better over the years. The car snuggles into curves, with little body sway.

Still, annual sales of a bit more than 25,000 Aurora sedans are not enough. This is Oldsmobile’s lead car. It heads a lineup including the Alero and Intrigue mid-size sedans, the Bravada sport-utility wagon and the Silhouette minivan. (The Olds 88 and Cutlass have been deep-sixed.)

To help boost the Aurora’s numbers, Oldsmobile is giving the car a complete make-over for 2001 (which means that the 2000 Aurora will be a carry-over from 1999, and a probable luxury-car bargain as well).

The 2001 Aurora will be introduced next spring. In exterior styling, it will be sleeker than the current model. Yet, GM engineers say, it will have more interior space, meaning ample seating for five adults.

The fabulous 4-liter, 250-horsepower V-8 will remain, but no longer will be exclusive Aurora ware. Not everyone can afford, nor does everyone want, a V-8.

To help broaden the Aurora’s market, GM will add a 3.5-liter, 215-horsepower V-6, currently used in the 1999 Intrigue. Whether consumers will perceive the V-6 Aurora as a super-Intrigue or lesser Aurora remains to be seen. The spin could be the difference between sale and no sale.

I’m pleased that GM intends to stick with the Aurora. It is one of my favorite cars, largely because it is a symbol of America’s willingness to stay and fight rather than cut and run. Some folks might find that jingoistic. But a country without jingos, and the will to back them up, is one without a competitive economic future.

1999 Oldsmobile Aurora

Complaint: The 1999 Aurora has 14.9 cubic feet of trunk space, which seems sufficient, but it’s not. Usable trunk space is compromised by the swooped styling of the car’s rear end.

Praise: A solid car. Overall, it’s well-constructed and well-engineered. An absolute joy to drive long distances.

Ride, acceleration and handling: World competitive. One of the best-handling luxury sedans available. Excellent braking. Brakes include power four-wheel discs with standard anti-lock.

Head-turning quotient: Some people love it. Others loathe it. All are passionate. That’s the way it should be. The car makes a statement.

Capacities: Seats two people up front and two comfortably in the rear. The third rear passenger had better be small. Fuel tank holds 20 gallons; premium unleaded required.

Engine: A cast-aluminum, 4-liter V-8 that produces 250 horsepower at 5,600 rpm and 260 pound-feet of torque at 4,400 rpm.

Mileage: About 23 miles per gallon in city/highway driving. Estimated 450-mile range.

Safety: Active safety equipment, including a standard traction-control system. The usual passive safety devices, dual front air bags and side-impact protection.

Price: Base price on the 1999 Aurora is $36,229. Dealer invoice price on base model is $32,787. Keep in mind that “base” here practically means fully loaded; there’s a short options list. Price as tested was $38,865, including $1,095 for power sliding glass sunroof, $871 for a Bose Acoustimass sound system and a $670 destination charge.

Purse-strings note: You can bargain on the 1999 and 2000 Auroras, which basically are the same. Compare with the Lexus ES 300, Mercedes-Benz E320, Lincoln Continental and Volvo S80 sedan. Seriously.

Safety review

Based on the 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora base trim
NHTSA crash test and rollover ratings, scored out of 5.
Frontal driver
3/5
Frontal passenger
3/5

Factory warranties

Basic
4 years / 50,000 miles
Corrosion
6 years / 100,000 miles
Roadside Assistance
4 years / 50,000 miles

Consumer reviews

4.5 / 5
Based on 17 reviews
Write a review
Comfort 4.8
Interior 4.5
Performance 4.7
Value 4.5
Exterior 4.9
Reliability 4.2

Most recent

Eventually leaked oil like crazy.

Eventually leaked oil like crazy. Northstar engine had bad inherent design flaws thus had to eventually be killed by GM. At the time body design was good and interior nice appointments. I was a Realtor at the time and would leave my mark (oil spots) everywhere I parked the dam thing.
  • Does not recommend this car
Comfort 3.0
Interior 3.0
Performance 4.0
Value 3.0
Exterior 4.0
Reliability 2.0
2 people out of 2 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Aurora-best car of it's class

The only thing I have had complications with is the cup holders and space it allows. Definitely for long trips it needs a more stable cup holder. Other than that it's a really great car and awesome on fuel considering it's a v8
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Used for Having fun
  • Does recommend this car
Comfort 5.0
Interior 3.0
Performance 5.0
Value 5.0
Exterior 5.0
Reliability 5.0
3 people out of 3 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Latest news from cars.com

See all news

FAQ

What trim levels are available for the 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora?

The 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora is available in 1 trim level:

  • (1 style)

What is the MPG of the 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora?

The 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora offers up to 17 MPG in city driving and 26 MPG on the highway. These figures are based on EPA mileage ratings and are for comparison purposes only. The actual mileage will vary depending on vehicle options, trim level, driving conditions, driving habits, vehicle maintenance, and other factors.

Is the 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora reliable?

The 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora has an average reliability rating of 4.2 out of 5 according to cars.com consumers. Find real-world reliability insights within consumer reviews from 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora owners.

Is the 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora a good Sedan?

Below are the cars.com consumers ratings for the 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora. 82.4% of drivers recommend this vehicle.

4.5 / 5
Based on 17 reviews
  • Comfort: 4.8
  • Interior: 4.5
  • Performance: 4.7
  • Value: 4.5
  • Exterior: 4.9
  • Reliability: 4.2
Your list was successfully saved.
Your comparisons
 
 
 
 
Save list Compare