BMW 525 vs. Chrysler Sebring

Add new car

2007 BMW 525

$43,500

See all results

2010 Chrysler Sebring

$20,120

See all results

Add new car

Hide similarities

Highlights

$43,500 Starting MSRP	$20,120 Starting MSRP	- Starting MSRP
Gas I6 Engine Type	Gas I4 Engine Type	- Engine Type
21 City / 30 Hwy MPG	20 City / 29 Hwy MPG	- MPG
215 hp Horsepower	- Horsepower	- Horsepower
Rear Wheel Drive Drive Type	Front Wheel Drive Drive Type	- Drive Type
5 Seating Capacity	4 Seating Capacity	- Seating Capacity
4 yr / 50,000 mi Basic Warranty	3 yr / 36,000 mi Basic Warranty	- Basic Warranty

Engine

Gas I6 Engine Type	Gas I4 Engine Type	- Engine Type
215 @ 6250 SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM	173 @ 6000 SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM	- SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
3.0L/183 Displacement	2.4L/144 Displacement	- Displacement
185 @ 2750 SAE Net Torque @ RPM	166 @ 4400 SAE Net Torque @ RPM	- SAE Net Torque @ RPM
6-Speed A/T M/T 6-Speed M/T A/T Transmission w/Dual Shift Mode Transmission Options	A/T 4-Speed A/T Transmission Options	- Transmission Options
21 City / 30 Hwy MPG	20 City / 29 Hwy MPG	- MPG
N/A Total Cooling System Capacity	7.2 qts Total Cooling System Capacity	- Total Cooling System Capacity

Tires & Wheels

Alloy Front Wheel Material	Steel Front Wheel Material	- Front Wheel Material
Steel Spare Wheel Material	N/A Spare Wheel Material	- Spare Wheel Material
Compact Spare Tire Size	Compact Spare Tire Size	- Spare Tire Size
P225/50R17 Front Tire Size	P215/65R16 Front Tire Size	- Front Tire Size
Alloy Rear Wheel Material	Steel Rear Wheel Material	- Rear Wheel Material
P225/50R17 Rear Tire Size	P215/65R16 Rear Tire Size	- Rear Tire Size
17 x 7.5 in Front Wheel Size	16 x 6.5 in Front Wheel Size	- Front Wheel Size
17 x 7.5 in Rear Wheel Size	16 x 6.5 in Rear Wheel Size	- Rear Wheel Size
Compact in Spare Wheel Size	Compact in Spare Wheel Size	- Spare Wheel Size

Suspension

Not Available Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)	Not Available Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)	- Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Double-Pivot Suspension Type - Front	N/A Suspension Type - Front	- Suspension Type - Front
4-link Integral Suspension Type - Rear	N/A Suspension Type - Rear	- Suspension Type - Rear
w/Lower Arms Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)	Not Available Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)	- Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)

Steering

Servotronic Variable Pwr Steering Type	Pwr Rack & Pinion Steering Type	- Steering Type
14 Steering Ratio (:1), Overall	17 Steering Ratio (:1), Overall	- Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
38 ft Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb	37 ft Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb	- Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
N/A Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall	N/A Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall	- Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
N/A Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)	3 Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)	- Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)

Measurements

57 in Second Shoulder Room	56 in Second Shoulder Room	- Second Shoulder Room
N/A Second Hip Room	53 in Second Hip Room	- Second Hip Room
N/A Front Hip Room	53 in Front Hip Room	- Front Hip Room
5 Passenger Capacity	5 Passenger Capacity	- Passenger Capacity
191 in Length, Overall	191 in Length, Overall	- Length, Overall
62 in Track Width, Rear	62 in Track Width, Rear	- Track Width, Rear
99 ft³ Passenger Volume	103 ft³ Passenger Volume	- Passenger Volume
N/A Liftover Height	32 in Liftover Height	- Liftover Height
42 in Front Leg Room	42 in Front Leg Room	- Front Leg Room
58 in Height, Overall	59 in Height, Overall	- Height, Overall
14 ft³ Trunk Volume	14 ft³ Trunk Volume	- Trunk Volume
73 in Width, Max w/o mirrors	71 in Width, Max w/o mirrors	- Width, Max w/o mirrors
57 in Front Shoulder Room	56 in Front Shoulder Room	- Front Shoulder Room
N/A Min Ground Clearance	5 in Min Ground Clearance	- Min Ground Clearance
38 in Front Head Room	40 in Front Head Room	- Front Head Room
37 in Second Head Room	38 in Second Head Room	- Second Head Room
114 in Wheelbase	109 in Wheelbase	- Wheelbase
36 in Second Leg Room	38 in Second Leg Room	- Second Leg Room
61 in Track Width, Front	62 in Track Width, Front	- Track Width, Front

Weight & Capacity

Not Available lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.	100 lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.	- Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
19 gal Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx	17 gal Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx	- Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx	N/A Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx	- Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.	1,000 lbs Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.	- Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
3,396 lbs Base Curb Weight	3,310 lbs Base Curb Weight	- Base Curb Weight
N/A Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.	100 lbs Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.	- Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
Not Available lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.	1,000 lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.	- Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.

Safety

Standard

Stability Control

Electrical

110 Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)	120 Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)		- Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
N/A Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)	525 Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)		- Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)

Brakes

Not Available Drum - Rear (Yes or )	Yes Drum - Rear (Yes or )	- Drum - Rear (Yes or )
N/A Brake ABS System (Second Line)	N/A Brake ABS System (Second Line)	- Brake ABS System (Second Line)
12.8 x 1.18 in Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness	11.5 x 1.0 in Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness	- Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
Pwr-Assisted Brake Type	Pwr Brake Type	- Brake Type
12.6 x 0.79 in Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness	Not Available in Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness	- Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
Yes Disc - Rear (Yes or )	Not Available Disc - Rear (Yes or )	- Disc - Rear (Yes or )
4-Wheel Brake ABS System	4-wheel Brake ABS System	- Brake ABS System
Yes Disc - Front (Yes or )	Yes Disc - Front (Yes or )	- Disc - Front (Yes or )

FAQ

Which is more reliable, the 2007 BMW 525 or the 2010 Chrysler Sebring?

The 2010 Chrysler Sebring is more reliable than the 2007 BMW 525 according to Cars.com consumers, with a reliability rating of 4.4 for the 2010 Sebring versus a reliability rating of 4.3 for the 2007 525.

Which is more fuel efficient, the 2007 BMW 525 or the 2010 Chrysler Sebring?

The 2010 Chrysler Sebring is more fuel efficient than the 2007 BMW 525 with 22 MPG combined versus 0 MPG combined.

Which car is cheaper, the 2007 BMW 525 or the 2010 Chrysler Sebring?

The 2010 Chrysler Sebring is cheaper than the 2007 BMW 525 with a $20,120 starting MSRP versus a $43,500 starting MSRP.