Skip to main content

1997
Ford Taurus

Starts at:
$17,995
Shop options
New 1997 Ford Taurus
See ratings
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Shop Cars.com
Browse cars & save your favorites
Dealers near you
Find & contact a dealership near you
no listings

We're not finding any listings in your area.
Change your location or search Cars.com to see more!

Change location

Available trims

See the differences side-by-side to compare trims.
  • 4dr Sdn G
    Starts at
    $17,995
    20 City / 28 Hwy
    MPG
    6
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 4dr Sdn GL
    Starts at
    $18,985
    19 City / 28 Hwy
    MPG
    8
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 4dr Wgn GL
    Starts at
    $20,195
    19 City / 27 Hwy
    MPG
    8
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 4dr Sdn LX
    Starts at
    $21,610
    19 City / 28 Hwy
    MPG
    6
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 4dr Wgn LX
    Starts at
    $22,715
    18 City / 26 Hwy
    MPG
    8
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 4dr Sdn SHO
    Starts at
    $26,460
    17 City / 26 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs

The good & the bad

This vehicle doesn't have any good or bad insights yet.

Use our comparison tool to look at this model side-by-side with other vehicles or view the full specifications list .

Start your comparison

Expert 1997 Ford Taurus review

our expert's take
Our expert's take
By
Full article
our expert's take

In 1995, Ford officials told me that the shape of the new Taurus would grow on me over time.

Well, two years down the road has proved Ford correct. I dislike the Taurus’ design quite a bit less than I did.

Perhaps all the Taurus really needs is a redesign of the rear end, some nicer-looking taillights and a more cleanly designed trunk lid. In any case, I almost like it. The avant-garde styling is starting to look familiar.

Even though some people still consider the shape of the Taurus to be controversial, few would argue that Ford engineers smacked a solid hit with the car’s performance, handling and quality.

Technically, this is an excellent car. And it’s hard not to like a car as well-made as the Taurus.

I tested the SHO version, which has a high-performance engine, suspension system and brakes. It is designed for those who would like a BMW-like sports sedan but don’t have $45,000 or so to spend.

PERFORMANCE, HANDLING

The Taurus SHO is powered by a3.4-liter, double-overhead cam V-8 engine that has four valves per cylinder. The lightweight engine, which is made of aluminum, develops 235 horsepower.

A four-speed automatic transmission is the only gearbox available. The previous generation SHO could be ordered with a five-speed stick shift, but only about 5 percent of SHO buyers ordered the manual transmission, so Ford dropped it from the option list when the new SHO came out last year.

By the way, this SHO is the first Taurus to be powered by a V-8, and it’s the only Ford vehicle to use the 3.4-liter engine.

Performance is excellent at all speeds. The SHO is fast from a stop, and it delivers plenty of punch all the way to the red line on the tachometer. The smooth-running engine makes a serious snarl as it revs, underscoring the performance nature of the car and giving it plenty of character.

The original V-6-powered SHO attracted a cult following for its wonderful high-performance engine and sensible design. The new model takes the SHO to the next level. This is a serious performance sports sedan. Motor Trend tested an SHO recently and clocked a 0-to-60 mph time of 7.5 seconds.

The SHO has just one American-made competitor, the new Pontiac Grand Prix GTP. Chrysler doesn’t really offer a true high-performance sports sedan, and neither do any of the Japanese automakers who build cars here.

Motor Trend also tested a 1997 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP, which has five more horsepower, costs $5,000 less and races from 0 to 60 mph in 6.6 seconds. So the SHO takes a back seat to the Pontiac is several areas.

Though the SHO’s acceleration is strong, it does not have the same finesse as the Grand Prix GTP, the best car I tested last year.

Under full acceleration from a stop, you can feel what engineers call torque steer, a slight pull to the left or right. You won’t feel it unless you hammer the accelerator from a dead stop. It’s not dangerous, but it gives th e SHO a slightly unrefined feeling.

However, there is nothing else about the car’s handling performance that is less than excellent.

The powerful four-wheel disc brakes are fabulous. They have a strong confidence-inspiring feel, and the anti-lock system is smooth and quiet. I also like the firm, speed-sensitive power rack-and-pinion steering system. When you turn the wheel, the SHO responds instantly.

Ford engineers did a superb job tuning the SHO’s four-wheel independent suspension. The car is extremely quiet. When you are driving over the roughest brick roads, you hear only the sound of the tires. The stiff body allows the suspension to absorb the energy from bumps without transmitting much of the ruckus to the interior.

Overall, the SHO got 15 miles per gallon in combined city/highway driving. This is far below EPA estimates. But I drove the car with a heavy foot, and the car wasn’t broken in (it had only 218 miles on the odometer when it was delivered.)O ce a car gets to 2,000 miles or so, the parts loosen up abit and the mileage improves.

FIT AND FINISH

In many ways the new Taurus is a world-class automobile.

The solid way the doors close makes you think that Ford sculpted the SHO from a single block of steel.

Ford’s interior decorators really sweated the details, making sure all the various trim pieces look good and fit right. The analog instruments, featuring white numbers on a black background, were easy to read and well laid out.

The controversial part of the interior is the integrated control panel, or ICP, in the center of the dash. Within the oval area, Ford has placed all the buttons for the air conditioner, defroster and radio. This gives the Taurus a very futuristic look. Unfortunately, form does not follow function very well. Many of the buttons are the same size and shape, so changing the settings can be somewhat distracting. However, after a few days, I learned where each button was located.

The sumptuous tan leather seats didn’t take any getting used to at all. I liked them immediately. The front bucket seats were very comfortable and extremely supportive of my lower back and thighs. I made several two-hour trips and felt no fatigue.

Rearpassengerswill find plenty of head, leg and foot room. The rear seats split and fold forward, which is somewhat unusual for a mid-size car. There is plenty of room to transport long objects.

My major gripe with the SHO is its price – $30,000 is a lot of money for a Ford Taurus, even if it has a high-performance motor and all the bells and whistles of an import.

Even though our test car came fully loaded, including such things as a six-disc CD player, an electric sunroof and a full array of power accessories, I feel as if Ford has placed too high a price on the SHO for it to sell in large numbers.

Having tested both true mid-size American sports sedans, I feel that the Pontiac Grand Prix GTP is much better looking and that it has the edge on the Taurus SHO when it comes to value for the dollar. With the Grand Prix you pay less and get more than you do with the SHO.

Specifications:

1997 Ford Taurus SHO Base price: $26,640. Safety: Dual air bags, anti-lock brakes, side-impact protection, daytime running lights, front and rear crumple zones. Price as tested: $30,380. EPA rating: 17 mpg city/26 mpg highway. Incentives: $1,000.

Truett’s tip: The Taurus SHO is quick, comfortable, well-equipped and tightly assembled. It handles well and is a pleasure to drive. However, it may be priced too high.

1997 Ford Taurus review: Our expert's take
By

In 1995, Ford officials told me that the shape of the new Taurus would grow on me over time.

Well, two years down the road has proved Ford correct. I dislike the Taurus’ design quite a bit less than I did.

Perhaps all the Taurus really needs is a redesign of the rear end, some nicer-looking taillights and a more cleanly designed trunk lid. In any case, I almost like it. The avant-garde styling is starting to look familiar.

Even though some people still consider the shape of the Taurus to be controversial, few would argue that Ford engineers smacked a solid hit with the car’s performance, handling and quality.

Technically, this is an excellent car. And it’s hard not to like a car as well-made as the Taurus.

I tested the SHO version, which has a high-performance engine, suspension system and brakes. It is designed for those who would like a BMW-like sports sedan but don’t have $45,000 or so to spend.

PERFORMANCE, HANDLING

The Taurus SHO is powered by a3.4-liter, double-overhead cam V-8 engine that has four valves per cylinder. The lightweight engine, which is made of aluminum, develops 235 horsepower.

A four-speed automatic transmission is the only gearbox available. The previous generation SHO could be ordered with a five-speed stick shift, but only about 5 percent of SHO buyers ordered the manual transmission, so Ford dropped it from the option list when the new SHO came out last year.

By the way, this SHO is the first Taurus to be powered by a V-8, and it’s the only Ford vehicle to use the 3.4-liter engine.

Performance is excellent at all speeds. The SHO is fast from a stop, and it delivers plenty of punch all the way to the red line on the tachometer. The smooth-running engine makes a serious snarl as it revs, underscoring the performance nature of the car and giving it plenty of character.

The original V-6-powered SHO attracted a cult following for its wonderful high-performance engine and sensible design. The new model takes the SHO to the next level. This is a serious performance sports sedan. Motor Trend tested an SHO recently and clocked a 0-to-60 mph time of 7.5 seconds.

The SHO has just one American-made competitor, the new Pontiac Grand Prix GTP. Chrysler doesn’t really offer a true high-performance sports sedan, and neither do any of the Japanese automakers who build cars here.

Motor Trend also tested a 1997 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP, which has five more horsepower, costs $5,000 less and races from 0 to 60 mph in 6.6 seconds. So the SHO takes a back seat to the Pontiac is several areas.

Though the SHO’s acceleration is strong, it does not have the same finesse as the Grand Prix GTP, the best car I tested last year.

Under full acceleration from a stop, you can feel what engineers call torque steer, a slight pull to the left or right. You won’t feel it unless you hammer the accelerator from a dead stop. It’s not dangerous, but it gives th e SHO a slightly unrefined feeling.

However, there is nothing else about the car’s handling performance that is less than excellent.

The powerful four-wheel disc brakes are fabulous. They have a strong confidence-inspiring feel, and the anti-lock system is smooth and quiet. I also like the firm, speed-sensitive power rack-and-pinion steering system. When you turn the wheel, the SHO responds instantly.

Ford engineers did a superb job tuning the SHO’s four-wheel independent suspension. The car is extremely quiet. When you are driving over the roughest brick roads, you hear only the sound of the tires. The stiff body allows the suspension to absorb the energy from bumps without transmitting much of the ruckus to the interior.

Overall, the SHO got 15 miles per gallon in combined city/highway driving. This is far below EPA estimates. But I drove the car with a heavy foot, and the car wasn’t broken in (it had only 218 miles on the odometer when it was delivered.)O ce a car gets to 2,000 miles or so, the parts loosen up abit and the mileage improves.

FIT AND FINISH

In many ways the new Taurus is a world-class automobile.

The solid way the doors close makes you think that Ford sculpted the SHO from a single block of steel.

Ford’s interior decorators really sweated the details, making sure all the various trim pieces look good and fit right. The analog instruments, featuring white numbers on a black background, were easy to read and well laid out.

The controversial part of the interior is the integrated control panel, or ICP, in the center of the dash. Within the oval area, Ford has placed all the buttons for the air conditioner, defroster and radio. This gives the Taurus a very futuristic look. Unfortunately, form does not follow function very well. Many of the buttons are the same size and shape, so changing the settings can be somewhat distracting. However, after a few days, I learned where each button was located.

The sumptuous tan leather seats didn’t take any getting used to at all. I liked them immediately. The front bucket seats were very comfortable and extremely supportive of my lower back and thighs. I made several two-hour trips and felt no fatigue.

Rearpassengerswill find plenty of head, leg and foot room. The rear seats split and fold forward, which is somewhat unusual for a mid-size car. There is plenty of room to transport long objects.

My major gripe with the SHO is its price – $30,000 is a lot of money for a Ford Taurus, even if it has a high-performance motor and all the bells and whistles of an import.

Even though our test car came fully loaded, including such things as a six-disc CD player, an electric sunroof and a full array of power accessories, I feel as if Ford has placed too high a price on the SHO for it to sell in large numbers.

Having tested both true mid-size American sports sedans, I feel that the Pontiac Grand Prix GTP is much better looking and that it has the edge on the Taurus SHO when it comes to value for the dollar. With the Grand Prix you pay less and get more than you do with the SHO.

Specifications:

1997 Ford Taurus SHO Base price: $26,640. Safety: Dual air bags, anti-lock brakes, side-impact protection, daytime running lights, front and rear crumple zones. Price as tested: $30,380. EPA rating: 17 mpg city/26 mpg highway. Incentives: $1,000.

Truett’s tip: The Taurus SHO is quick, comfortable, well-equipped and tightly assembled. It handles well and is a pleasure to drive. However, it may be priced too high.

Safety review

Based on the 1997 Ford Taurus base trim
NHTSA crash test and rollover ratings, scored out of 5.
Frontal driver
4/5
Frontal passenger
4/5
Side driver
3/5
Side rear passenger
3/5

Factory warranties

New car program benefits

Basic
3 years / 36,000 miles
Corrosion
5 years

Certified Pre-Owned program benefits

Age / mileage
Fords and many non-Ford vehicles up to 10 years old with less than 150,000 miles
Basic
90-Day / 4,000-Mile (whichever comes first) Comprehensive Limited Warranty
Dealer certification
139-point inspection

Compare similar vehicles

Select cars to compare for more detailed info.
  • 1997
    4.0
    Ford Taurus
    Starts at
    $17,995
    20 City / 28 Hwy
    MPG
    6
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2008
    4.4
    Mercury Mariner
    Starts at
    $21,540
    20 City / 26 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 1996
    4.0
    Ford Taurus
    Starts at
    $17,995
    20 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    6
    Seat capacity
    -
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2007
    4.1
    Pontiac G6
    Starts at
    $17,245
    23 City / 33 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare

Consumer reviews

4.0 / 5
Based on 26 reviews
Write a review
Comfort 4.1
Interior 4.0
Performance 3.8
Value 4.3
Exterior 3.8
Reliability 3.8

Most recent

GET THE CAR!

I've had my 97' G for 2 years now. No one ever thought this car would last but i know Taurus's. I got it at 89k miles and its currently at 109655k and running amazing! The car sat for 7 years before I bought it off someone. Only needed to do minor maintenance and now she runs like brand new. I have a feeling i'm going to have this car for a long time. I would take it over any new car any day! Plus she looks beautiful inside and out. I love how it doesn't look like every car on the road. Plus the almost 360 view around the car makes for good driving experience. I would highly recommend getting a ford taurus if your thinking about one. Also, working on the car is very easy if you ever needed too.
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Used for Commuting
  • Does recommend this car
Comfort 5.0
Interior 5.0
Performance 5.0
Value 5.0
Exterior 5.0
Reliability 5.0
3 people out of 3 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Get one if you can. Get one if you can.

Of course you can't buy them new, but a well-maintained one is worth over $5,000. Give it $2000 per year for maint. Tran is the weak link.
  • Purchased a New car
  • Used for Commuting
  • Does recommend this car
Comfort 5.0
Interior 5.0
Performance 5.0
Value 5.0
Exterior 5.0
Reliability 5.0
2 people out of 2 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Latest news from cars.com

See all news

Ford dealers near you

FAQ

What trim levels are available for the 1997 Ford Taurus?

The 1997 Ford Taurus is available in 4 trim levels:

  • G (1 style)
  • GL (2 styles)
  • LX (2 styles)
  • SHO (1 style)

What is the MPG of the 1997 Ford Taurus?

The 1997 Ford Taurus offers up to 20 MPG in city driving and 28 MPG on the highway. These figures are based on EPA mileage ratings and are for comparison purposes only. The actual mileage will vary depending on vehicle options, trim level, driving conditions, driving habits, vehicle maintenance, and other factors.

What are some similar vehicles and competitors of the 1997 Ford Taurus?

The 1997 Ford Taurus compares to and/or competes against the following vehicles:

Is the 1997 Ford Taurus reliable?

The 1997 Ford Taurus has an average reliability rating of 3.8 out of 5 according to cars.com consumers. Find real-world reliability insights within consumer reviews from 1997 Ford Taurus owners.

Is the 1997 Ford Taurus a good Sedan?

Below are the cars.com consumers ratings for the 1997 Ford Taurus. 76.9% of drivers recommend this vehicle.

4.0 / 5
Based on 26 reviews
  • Comfort: 4.1
  • Interior: 4.0
  • Performance: 3.8
  • Value: 4.3
  • Exterior: 3.8
  • Reliability: 3.8

Ford Taurus history

Your list was successfully saved.
Your comparisons
 
 
 
 
Save list Compare