Skip to main content

Lexus IS 350C vs. Mitsubishi Lancer

Add new car
$47,640
$17,795
Add new car
 
Hide similarities

Highlights

$47,640
Starting MSRP
$17,795
Starting MSRP
-
Starting MSRP
Premium Unleaded V-6
Engine Type
Regular Unleaded I-4
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
19 City / 27 Hwy
MPG
24 City / 33 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
306 hp
Horsepower
148 hp
Horsepower
-
Horsepower
Rear Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front Wheel Drive
Drive Type
-
Drive Type
4
Seating Capacity
5
Seating Capacity
-
Seating Capacity
4 yr / 50,000 mi
Basic Warranty
5 yr / 60,000 mi
Basic Warranty
-
Basic Warranty

Engine

306 @ 6400
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
148 @ 6000
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
-
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
Premium Unleaded V-6
Engine Type
Regular Unleaded I-4
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
277 @ 4800
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
145 @ 4200
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
-
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
3.5 L/211
Displacement
2.0 L/122
Displacement
-
Displacement
6-Speed A/T
A/T
Transmission w/Dual Shift Mode
Transmission Options
M/T
5-Speed M/T
Transmission Options
-
Transmission Options
19 City / 27 Hwy
MPG
24 City / 33 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
N/A
Total Cooling System Capacity
N/A
Total Cooling System Capacity
-
Total Cooling System Capacity

Tires & Wheels

P225/45VR17
Front Tire Size
P205/60HR16
Front Tire Size
-
Front Tire Size
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
-
Front Wheel Material
Compact in
Spare Wheel Size
Compact in
Spare Wheel Size
-
Spare Wheel Size
P245/45VR17
Rear Tire Size
P205/60HR16
Rear Tire Size
-
Rear Tire Size
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
-
Rear Wheel Material
17 X 8 in
Front Wheel Size
16 X 6.5 in
Front Wheel Size
-
Front Wheel Size
17 X 8 in
Rear Wheel Size
16 X 6.5 in
Rear Wheel Size
-
Rear Wheel Size
Steel
Spare Wheel Material
Steel
Spare Wheel Material
-
Spare Wheel Material
Compact
Spare Tire Size
Compact
Spare Tire Size
-
Spare Tire Size

Suspension

Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear
-
Suspension Type - Rear
Double Wishbone
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Strut
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Double Wishbone
Suspension Type - Front
Strut
Suspension Type - Front
-
Suspension Type - Front

Steering

N/A
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
N/A
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
-
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
-
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
Rack-Pinion
Steering Type
Rack-Pinion
Steering Type
-
Steering Type
34 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
33 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
-
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
N/A
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
N/A
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
-
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall

Measurements

44 in
Front Leg Room
42 in
Front Leg Room
-
Front Leg Room
26 in
Second Leg Room
36 in
Second Leg Room
-
Second Leg Room
4
Passenger Capacity
5
Passenger Capacity
-
Passenger Capacity
88 ft³
Passenger Volume
94 ft³
Passenger Volume
-
Passenger Volume
N/A
Liftover Height
N/A
Liftover Height
-
Liftover Height
54 in
Front Shoulder Room
55 in
Front Shoulder Room
-
Front Shoulder Room
36 in
Second Head Room
37 in
Second Head Room
-
Second Head Room
2 ft³
Trunk Volume
12 ft³
Trunk Volume
-
Trunk Volume
60 in
Track Width, Front
60 in
Track Width, Front
-
Track Width, Front
54 in
Front Hip Room
53 in
Front Hip Room
-
Front Hip Room
108 in
Wheelbase
104 in
Wheelbase
-
Wheelbase
71 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
69 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
-
Width, Max w/o mirrors
38 in
Front Head Room
40 in
Front Head Room
-
Front Head Room
56 in
Height, Overall
58 in
Height, Overall
-
Height, Overall
43 in
Second Hip Room
54 in
Second Hip Room
-
Second Hip Room
183 in
Length, Overall
182 in
Length, Overall
-
Length, Overall
45 in
Second Shoulder Room
54 in
Second Shoulder Room
-
Second Shoulder Room
5 in
Min Ground Clearance
6 in
Min Ground Clearance
-
Min Ground Clearance
60 in
Track Width, Rear
60 in
Track Width, Rear
-
Track Width, Rear

Weight & Capacity

N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
3,880 lbs
Base Curb Weight
2,888 lbs
Base Curb Weight
-
Base Curb Weight
17 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
16 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx

Safety

-
Backup Camera
Standard
Backup Camera
-
Backup Camera
Standard
Stability Control
Standard
Stability Control
-
Stability Control

Entertainment

Standard
Bluetooth®
Standard
Bluetooth®
-
Bluetooth®

Electrical

100
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
130
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
-
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
N/A
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
620
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
-
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)

Brakes

Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
-
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
-
Disc - Front (Yes or )
12 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
10 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
-
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
13 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
11 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
-
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel Disc
Brake Type
4-Wheel Disc
Brake Type
-
Brake Type
Not Available
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
N/A
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
-
Drum - Rear (Yes or )

FAQ

Which is more reliable, the 2015 Lexus IS 350C or the 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer?

The 2015 Lexus IS 350C is more reliable than the 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer according to Cars.com consumers, with a reliability rating of 5.0 for the 2015 IS 350C versus a reliability rating of 4.6 for the 2017 Lancer.

Which is more fuel efficient, the 2015 Lexus IS 350C or the 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer?

The 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer is more fuel efficient than the 2015 Lexus IS 350C with 28 MPG combined versus 22 MPG combined.

Which car is cheaper, the 2015 Lexus IS 350C or the 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer?

The 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer is cheaper than the 2015 Lexus IS 350C with a $17,795 starting MSRP versus a $47,640 starting MSRP.

Compare the Lexus IS 350C

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer

Add car