Toyota Celica vs. Toyota Matrix
Hide similarities
Highlights
|
$17,670
Starting MSRP
|
$19,275
Starting MSRP
|
-
Starting MSRP
|
|
|
Gas I4
Engine Type
|
Gas I4
Engine Type
|
-
Engine Type
|
|
|
27 City / 33 Hwy
MPG
|
26 City / 32 Hwy
MPG
|
-
MPG
|
|
|
140 hp
Horsepower
|
132 hp
Horsepower
|
-
Horsepower
|
|
|
Front Wheel Drive
Drive Type
|
Front Wheel Drive
Drive Type
|
-
Drive Type
|
|
|
4
Seating Capacity
|
5
Seating Capacity
|
-
Seating Capacity
|
|
|
3 yr / 36,000 mi
Basic Warranty
|
3 yr / 36,000 mi
Basic Warranty
|
-
Basic Warranty
|
Engine
|
125 @ 4200
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
|
128 @ 4400
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
|
-
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
|
|
|
140 @ 6400
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
|
132 @ 6000
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
|
-
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
|
|
|
1.8L/110
Displacement
|
1.8L/110
Displacement
|
-
Displacement
|
|
|
Gas I4
Engine Type
|
Gas I4
Engine Type
|
-
Engine Type
|
|
|
M/T
5-Speed M/T Transmission Options
|
M/T
5-Speed M/T Transmission Options
|
-
Transmission Options
|
|
|
27 City / 33 Hwy
MPG
|
26 City / 32 Hwy
MPG
|
-
MPG
|
|
|
5.6 qts
Total Cooling System Capacity
|
5.8 qts
Total Cooling System Capacity
|
-
Total Cooling System Capacity
|
Tires & Wheels
|
Steel
Spare Wheel Material
|
Steel
Spare Wheel Material
|
-
Spare Wheel Material
|
|
|
Steel
Rear Wheel Material
|
Steel
Rear Wheel Material
|
-
Rear Wheel Material
|
|
|
Steel
Front Wheel Material
|
Steel
Front Wheel Material
|
-
Front Wheel Material
|
|
|
16 x 4 in
Spare Wheel Size
|
Compact in
Spare Wheel Size
|
-
Spare Wheel Size
|
|
|
15 x 6.5 in
Rear Wheel Size
|
16 x 6.5 in
Rear Wheel Size
|
-
Rear Wheel Size
|
|
|
15 x 6.5 in
Front Wheel Size
|
16 x 6.5 in
Front Wheel Size
|
-
Front Wheel Size
|
|
|
T125/70D16
Spare Tire Size
|
Compact
Spare Tire Size
|
-
Spare Tire Size
|
|
|
P195/60R15
Rear Tire Size
|
P205/55R16
Rear Tire Size
|
-
Rear Tire Size
|
|
|
P195/60R15
Front Tire Size
|
P205/55R16
Front Tire Size
|
-
Front Tire Size
|
Suspension
|
Not Available
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
|
Not Available
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
|
-
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
|
|
|
MacPherson strut
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
|
Not Available
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
|
-
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
|
|
|
Double wishbone
Suspension Type - Rear
|
Independent
Suspension Type - Rear
|
-
Suspension Type - Rear
|
|
|
Independent
Suspension Type - Front
|
MacPherson Strut
Suspension Type - Front
|
-
Suspension Type - Front
|
Steering
|
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
|
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
|
-
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
|
|
|
36 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
|
36 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
|
-
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
|
|
|
3
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
|
3
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
|
-
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
|
|
|
14
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
|
16
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
|
-
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
|
|
|
Pwr Rack & Pinion
Steering Type
|
Pwr rack & pinion
Steering Type
|
-
Steering Type
|
Measurements
|
N/A
Trunk Volume
|
N/A
Trunk Volume
|
-
Trunk Volume
|
|
|
17 ft³
Cargo Volume with Rear Seat Down
|
49 ft³
Cargo Volume with Rear Seat Down
|
-
Cargo Volume with Rear Seat Down
|
|
|
13 ft³
Cargo Volume with Rear Seat Up
|
20 ft³
Cargo Volume with Rear Seat Up
|
-
Cargo Volume with Rear Seat Up
|
|
|
N/A
Liftover Height
|
N/A
Liftover Height
|
-
Liftover Height
|
|
|
6 in
Min Ground Clearance
|
6 in
Min Ground Clearance
|
-
Min Ground Clearance
|
|
|
58 in
Track Width, Rear
|
60 in
Track Width, Rear
|
-
Track Width, Rear
|
|
|
59 in
Track Width, Front
|
60 in
Track Width, Front
|
-
Track Width, Front
|
|
|
51 in
Height, Overall
|
61 in
Height, Overall
|
-
Height, Overall
|
|
|
68 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
|
70 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
|
-
Width, Max w/o mirrors
|
|
|
171 in
Length, Overall
|
172 in
Length, Overall
|
-
Length, Overall
|
|
|
102 in
Wheelbase
|
102 in
Wheelbase
|
-
Wheelbase
|
|
|
47 in
Second Hip Room
|
44 in
Second Hip Room
|
-
Second Hip Room
|
|
|
51 in
Second Shoulder Room
|
53 in
Second Shoulder Room
|
-
Second Shoulder Room
|
|
|
27 in
Second Leg Room
|
36 in
Second Leg Room
|
-
Second Leg Room
|
|
|
35 in
Second Head Room
|
39 in
Second Head Room
|
-
Second Head Room
|
|
|
51 in
Front Hip Room
|
52 in
Front Hip Room
|
-
Front Hip Room
|
|
|
53 in
Front Shoulder Room
|
53 in
Front Shoulder Room
|
-
Front Shoulder Room
|
|
|
44 in
Front Leg Room
|
42 in
Front Leg Room
|
-
Front Leg Room
|
|
|
38 in
Front Head Room
|
41 in
Front Head Room
|
-
Front Head Room
|
|
|
78 ft³
Passenger Volume
|
94 ft³
Passenger Volume
|
-
Passenger Volume
|
|
|
4
Passenger Capacity
|
5
Passenger Capacity
|
-
Passenger Capacity
|
Weight & Capacity
|
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
-
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
|
|
15 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
13 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
-
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
|
|
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
225 lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
|
|
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
1,500 lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
|
|
200 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
150 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
|
|
2,000 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
1,500 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
|
|
2,425 lbs
Base Curb Weight
|
2,844 lbs
Base Curb Weight
|
-
Base Curb Weight
|
Safety
|
-
Brake Assist
|
Standard
Brake Assist
|
-
Brake Assist
|
|
|
-
Stability Control
|
Standard
Stability Control
|
-
Stability Control
|
Entertainment
|
-
Bluetooth®
|
Standard
Bluetooth®
|
-
Bluetooth®
|
Electrical
|
80
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
|
N/A
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
|
-
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
|
|
|
356
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
|
N/A
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
|
-
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
|
Brakes
|
Yes
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
|
Not Available
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
|
-
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
|
|
|
Not Available in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
10.1 x -TBD- in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
-
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
|
|
10.8 x 1.0 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
10.7 x -TBD- in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
-
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
|
|
Not Available
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
|
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
|
-
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
|
|
|
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
|
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
|
-
Disc - Front (Yes or )
|
|
|
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
|
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
|
-
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
|
|
|
Not Available
Brake ABS System
|
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
|
-
Brake ABS System
|
|
|
Pwr
Brake Type
|
Pwr
Brake Type
|
-
Brake Type
|
FAQ
Which is more reliable, the 2005 Toyota Celica or the 2013 Toyota Matrix?
The 2005 Toyota Celica is more reliable than the 2013 Toyota Matrix according to Cars.com consumers, with a reliability rating of 5.0 for the 2005 Celica versus a reliability rating of 4.5 for the 2013 Matrix.
Which is more fuel efficient, the 2005 Toyota Celica or the 2013 Toyota Matrix?
The 2013 Toyota Matrix is more fuel efficient than the 2005 Toyota Celica with 29 MPG combined versus 0 MPG combined.
Which car is cheaper, the 2005 Toyota Celica or the 2013 Toyota Matrix?
The 2005 Toyota Celica is cheaper than the 2013 Toyota Matrix with a $17,670 starting MSRP versus a $19,275 starting MSRP.
Compare the Toyota Celica
Compare the Toyota Matrix
Add car