Mitsubishi Eclipse vs. Toyota Celica

Add new car
2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse
$19,499
See all results
2005 Toyota Celica
$17,670
See all results
Add new car
 
Hide similarities

Highlights

$19,499
Starting MSRP
$17,670
Starting MSRP
-
Starting MSRP
Gas I4
Engine Type
Gas I4
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
20 City / 28 Hwy
MPG
27 City / 33 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
162 hp
Horsepower
140 hp
Horsepower
-
Horsepower
Front Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front Wheel Drive
Drive Type
-
Drive Type
4
Seating Capacity
4
Seating Capacity
-
Seating Capacity
5 yr / 60,000 mi
Basic Warranty
3 yr / 36,000 mi
Basic Warranty
-
Basic Warranty

Engine

2.4L/145
Displacement
1.8L/110
Displacement
-
Displacement
Gas I4
Engine Type
Gas I4
Engine Type
-
Engine Type
162 @ 6000
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
140 @ 6400
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
-
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
162 @ 4000
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
125 @ 4200
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
-
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
M/T
5-Speed M/T
Transmission Options
M/T
5-Speed M/T
Transmission Options
-
Transmission Options
20 City / 28 Hwy
MPG
27 City / 33 Hwy
MPG
-
MPG
N/A
Total Cooling System Capacity
5.6 qts
Total Cooling System Capacity
-
Total Cooling System Capacity

Tires & Wheels

Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
Steel
Front Wheel Material
-
Front Wheel Material
P235/45R18
Rear Tire Size
P195/60R15
Rear Tire Size
-
Rear Tire Size
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
Steel
Rear Wheel Material
-
Rear Wheel Material
18 x 8.0 in
Front Wheel Size
15 x 6.5 in
Front Wheel Size
-
Front Wheel Size
T125/70D16
Spare Tire Size
T125/70D16
Spare Tire Size
-
Spare Tire Size
18 x 8.0 in
Rear Wheel Size
15 x 6.5 in
Rear Wheel Size
-
Rear Wheel Size
P235/45R18
Front Tire Size
P195/60R15
Front Tire Size
-
Front Tire Size
16 x -TBD- in
Spare Wheel Size
16 x 4 in
Spare Wheel Size
-
Spare Wheel Size
Steel
Spare Wheel Material
Steel
Spare Wheel Material
-
Spare Wheel Material

Suspension

Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear
Double wishbone
Suspension Type - Rear
-
Suspension Type - Rear
MacPherson Strut
Suspension Type - Front
Independent
Suspension Type - Front
-
Suspension Type - Front
w/Stabilizer Bar
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Not Available
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
w/Stabilizer Bar
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
MacPherson strut
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
-
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)

Steering

40 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
36 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
-
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
3
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
3
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
-
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
Pwr Rack & Pinion
Steering Type
Pwr Rack & Pinion
Steering Type
-
Steering Type
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
-
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
17
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
14
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
-
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall

Measurements

35 in
Second Head Room
35 in
Second Head Room
-
Second Head Room
62 in
Track Width, Rear
58 in
Track Width, Rear
-
Track Width, Rear
N/A
Liftover Height
N/A
Liftover Height
-
Liftover Height
29 in
Second Leg Room
27 in
Second Leg Room
-
Second Leg Room
4
Passenger Capacity
4
Passenger Capacity
-
Passenger Capacity
6 in
Min Ground Clearance
6 in
Min Ground Clearance
-
Min Ground Clearance
-
Cargo Volume with Rear Seat Up
13 ft³
Cargo Volume with Rear Seat Up
-
Cargo Volume with Rear Seat Up
54 in
Front Shoulder Room
53 in
Front Shoulder Room
-
Front Shoulder Room
180 in
Length, Overall
171 in
Length, Overall
-
Length, Overall
82 ft³
Passenger Volume
78 ft³
Passenger Volume
-
Passenger Volume
16 ft³
Trunk Volume
N/A
Trunk Volume
-
Trunk Volume
44 in
Second Hip Room
47 in
Second Hip Room
-
Second Hip Room
39 in
Front Head Room
38 in
Front Head Room
-
Front Head Room
72 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
68 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
-
Width, Max w/o mirrors
-
Cargo Volume with Rear Seat Down
17 ft³
Cargo Volume with Rear Seat Down
-
Cargo Volume with Rear Seat Down
53 in
Height, Overall
51 in
Height, Overall
-
Height, Overall
51 in
Second Shoulder Room
51 in
Second Shoulder Room
-
Second Shoulder Room
54 in
Front Hip Room
51 in
Front Hip Room
-
Front Hip Room
101 in
Wheelbase
102 in
Wheelbase
-
Wheelbase
62 in
Track Width, Front
59 in
Track Width, Front
-
Track Width, Front
43 in
Front Leg Room
44 in
Front Leg Room
-
Front Leg Room

Weight & Capacity

N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
18 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
15 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
-
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
3,272 lbs
Base Curb Weight
2,425 lbs
Base Curb Weight
-
Base Curb Weight
Not Available lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
Not Available lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
2,000 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
Not Available lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
200 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
Not Available lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.

Safety

Standard
Stability Control
-
Stability Control
-
Stability Control

Electrical

525
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
356
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
-
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
110
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
80
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
-
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)

Brakes

Not Available
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
Yes
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
-
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Not Available
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
-
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Pwr
Brake Type
Pwr
Brake Type
-
Brake Type
10.3 x -TBD- in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
Not Available in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
11.6 x -TBD- in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
10.8 x 1.0 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
-
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
Not Available
Brake ABS System
-
Brake ABS System
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
-
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
-
Disc - Front (Yes or )

FAQ

Which is more reliable, the 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse or the 2005 Toyota Celica?

The 2005 Toyota Celica is more reliable than the 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse according to Cars.com consumers, with a reliability rating of 5.0 for the 2005 Celica versus a reliability rating of 4.7 for the 2012 Eclipse.

Which is more fuel efficient, the 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse or the 2005 Toyota Celica?

The 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse is more fuel efficient than the 2005 Toyota Celica with 23 MPG combined versus 0 MPG combined.

Which car is cheaper, the 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse or the 2005 Toyota Celica?

The 2005 Toyota Celica is cheaper than the 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse with a $17,670 starting MSRP versus a $19,499 starting MSRP.

Similar cars for sale

Compare the Mitsubishi Eclipse

Compare the Toyota Celica

Add car