Skip to main content

2000
Chevrolet Impala

Starts at:
$18,890
Shop options
New 2000 Chevrolet Impala
See ratings
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Shop Cars.com
Browse cars & save your favorites
Dealers near you
Find & contact a dealership near you
Listings near 43272
Change location See all listings

Available trims

See the differences side-by-side to compare trims.
  • 4dr Sdn
    Starts at
    $18,890
    20 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    6
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 4dr Sdn LS
    Starts at
    $22,790
    20 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs

Photo & video gallery

2000 Chevrolet Impala 2000 Chevrolet Impala 2000 Chevrolet Impala 2000 Chevrolet Impala 2000 Chevrolet Impala 2000 Chevrolet Impala 2000 Chevrolet Impala 2000 Chevrolet Impala 2000 Chevrolet Impala 2000 Chevrolet Impala 2000 Chevrolet Impala 2000 Chevrolet Impala 2000 Chevrolet Impala 2000 Chevrolet Impala 2000 Chevrolet Impala

The good & the bad

This vehicle doesn't have any good or bad insights yet.

Use our comparison tool to look at this model side-by-side with other vehicles or view the full specifications list .

Start your comparison

Expert 2000 Chevrolet Impala review

our expert's take
Our expert's take
By
Full article
our expert's take

Impala is one of the country’s most valuable trademarks, so not just Chevy fans were dismayed and disheartened a few seasons back when General Motors “permanently” retired it, for the second time.

Who knows, it may have been just a marketing scam like the one that brought us “Classic Coke,” but what counts is, the beast is back. It may be inherently silly to name aggregations of glass and plastic and metal after an animal, but such handles, when aptly chosen, do have a bit more charm than the difficult-to-translate numerical naming now so in vogue.

Impala debuted as a 1958 model, following the favorable reaction to a conceptual version shown two years earlier at a car show. Positioned as Chevrolet Division’s flagship, it was supposed to attract a slighter more affluent buyer than the traditional Everyman cars Chevy in those days was known for. “The performance attitude of a Corvette married to the luxurious flavor of a Cadillac,” gushed a copywriter who perhaps had been hitting the chocolate a bit hard.

It was an instant success, selling 473,000 copies in 1959 and becoming the top-selling car in the country the following year. It dominated the high-flying ’60s, with nearly 8 million iterations being shoved out the factory doors, most of them, as GM chortled, “loaded.” With gas prices low, it grew into a garage-stuffer (223 inches at its longest point) and could be had with a variety of monster V-8s, one of which, the 409, was immortalized by the Beach Boys.

The conspiracy known as OPEC brought the high living to a rapid halt in the early ’70s, as cars sales in general plunged, and gas guzzlers became pariahs. GM responded sluggishly, not producing a trimmer Impala until the 1977 model run. That version soldiered on with a face lift and evolutionary improvements until 1986, when the name was dropped in favor of the moniker Caprice. In 1994, a hotted-up Caprice variant appeared as a limited edition (read big margins) with a Corvette-derived 5.7-liter V-8 and bad boy styling conceits. In 1996, it, too, was sent to the home.

But now, it’s baaack, a spinoff from the Lumina platform. True to its heritage, Impala is available only as a four-door sedan, in two trim levels, base and LS. For the first time in its many lives, it cannot be had with a V-8, although I’d go so far as to say, if gas prices remain reasonably steady, GM might bow to the clamor and slip an LT1 in there, if only in a special edition. But for now, you get a V-6, either the 3400 or the 3800, their names telling you what you need to know about their displacement, in metric terms.

The base formulation starts at $18,705, a large car at an intermediate price, GM boasts. Even it has such niceties as the smaller of the two six-cylinder engines, automatic transmission, air conditioning, dual front air bags, power steering, windows and brakes, power remote outside mirrors, six-speaker AM-FM stereo, theft deterrent system, four-wheel d isc brakes, 16-inch steel wheels and a reconfigurable 17-message “telltale” amid the instruments.

The LS version (tested by moi) gets the bigger engine and a raft of extras and improvements, as well it might, considering the $22,365 entry price. It has a driver’s side side-impact air bag, center floor console, overhead console, upgraded stereo with cassette deck, remote keyless entry, six-way power-adjustable driver’s seat with manual lumbar adjustments, cruise control, cast aluminum wheels, antilock brakes with tire inflation monitor, traction control, “ride and handling” suspension package and numerous detail upgrades.

The PR department found a few items with which to gild the tester. A power moonroof added $700; leather bucket seats, $625; power seat for the co-pilot plus heated seats for that worthy and the driver, $425; whiz-bang radio upgrade with eight speakers and added CD player, $223; and a “preferred equipment group,” $517. This consists of a driver info center, universal garage opener, alarm system, electrochromic rearview mirror and steering-wheel-mounted radio controls. So freighted, the car came to $25,415, including the haulers’ fee. Which happens to be just about the average new-vehicle outlay these days. For a heavily-equipped, roomy and comfortable family car, that is a sensational value.

Recognizing, perhaps, that as a front-wheel-drive machine, the Impala might not appeal to the traditional buyers of the corresponding, rear-drive Ford products (Crown Victoria/Grand Marquis), which have a V-8 and are better suited to towing chores, GM positions the Impala as a step-up alternative for would-be buyers of intermediates like the Ford Taurus, Dodge Intrepid and Toyota Avalon. Having driven one for a week, I find that a reasonable proposition, for the car does not feel like a full-sized machine. With its quick throttle tip-in and fast, light steering, it does a good job of simulating a smaller mass, though it still goes about 3,600 pounds when heavily equipped. Without the center console, it could hold six people, although I’ve never found that a satisfactory arrangement. More to the point, the rear provides livable space for up to three adults of normative size, and an abundance for two.

GM asserts the Impala is fun to drive. I did not find that to be the case, but neither is it terribly unpleasant. Instead of building unreasonable expectations, they’d be better off with a value pitch. Sister divisions Buick and Pontiac have their more expensive versions ­ LeSabre and Bonneville ­ which play a somewhat different role. There are several hurdles the Impala must surmount before it achieves the “long way home” status its maker claims. Chassis rigidity is a bit of an issue. I could feel some flex and hear some creaking when subjecting the Impala to not-unreasonable stress. The steering is so light and fast it isolates the driver from the tire-road nuances, and the transmission ­ superb functionary that it is ­ is geared so high (presumably in the interest of fuel economy) that the car felt as if it were running away, even when I pulled the floor-mounted shifter into third from overdrive. This can be disconcerting, if not downright unsafe. Perhaps that’s why GM gave the car four-wheel disc brakes ­ you’ll use them a lot around town. Overdrive yields more than 30 mph per 1,000 engine turns ­ exceptionally high. In panic stops (simulated) on wet pavement, the antilock mechanism allowed the brakes to grab a little, but generally did its job all right. Stopping distances lay somewhere between impressive and worrisome ­ midrange.

Ride quality of the Impala was good. It did a good job of isolating the cabin from road problems, and, on terrible surfaces, maintained its composure tolerably well. Certain frequencies of road irregularities, though, came through as an unpleasant vibration. Overall noise level was moderate at the highest legal speeds. The top-of-the-line stereo sys tem had just so-so overall sound quality and its FM performance, I theorize, was badly compromised by the antenna buried in the rear glass. GM says this is done not only to foil vandals (ever hear of power antennas?), but also to reduce wind noise (ever hear of mounting it on the rear flank?). Even where it should have been getting a good signal, the FM tuner had an edge of distortion, and ambience was lacking.

EPA mileage estimates are 20 mpg city, 29 highway. My overall tally of 24.4 fell neatly in that range, and the car demands nothing more than regular unleaded. The car was well made, with surprisingly good-looking materials. Final assembly is at the Oshawa, Ontario plant. Overall, I think that Buick did a better job with their equivalent car, the LeSabre, and am looking forward to seeing soon how Pontiac did with the Bonneville.

“The Gannett News Service”

2000 Chevrolet Impala review: Our expert's take
By

Impala is one of the country’s most valuable trademarks, so not just Chevy fans were dismayed and disheartened a few seasons back when General Motors “permanently” retired it, for the second time.

Who knows, it may have been just a marketing scam like the one that brought us “Classic Coke,” but what counts is, the beast is back. It may be inherently silly to name aggregations of glass and plastic and metal after an animal, but such handles, when aptly chosen, do have a bit more charm than the difficult-to-translate numerical naming now so in vogue.

Impala debuted as a 1958 model, following the favorable reaction to a conceptual version shown two years earlier at a car show. Positioned as Chevrolet Division’s flagship, it was supposed to attract a slighter more affluent buyer than the traditional Everyman cars Chevy in those days was known for. “The performance attitude of a Corvette married to the luxurious flavor of a Cadillac,” gushed a copywriter who perhaps had been hitting the chocolate a bit hard.

It was an instant success, selling 473,000 copies in 1959 and becoming the top-selling car in the country the following year. It dominated the high-flying ’60s, with nearly 8 million iterations being shoved out the factory doors, most of them, as GM chortled, “loaded.” With gas prices low, it grew into a garage-stuffer (223 inches at its longest point) and could be had with a variety of monster V-8s, one of which, the 409, was immortalized by the Beach Boys.

The conspiracy known as OPEC brought the high living to a rapid halt in the early ’70s, as cars sales in general plunged, and gas guzzlers became pariahs. GM responded sluggishly, not producing a trimmer Impala until the 1977 model run. That version soldiered on with a face lift and evolutionary improvements until 1986, when the name was dropped in favor of the moniker Caprice. In 1994, a hotted-up Caprice variant appeared as a limited edition (read big margins) with a Corvette-derived 5.7-liter V-8 and bad boy styling conceits. In 1996, it, too, was sent to the home.

But now, it’s baaack, a spinoff from the Lumina platform. True to its heritage, Impala is available only as a four-door sedan, in two trim levels, base and LS. For the first time in its many lives, it cannot be had with a V-8, although I’d go so far as to say, if gas prices remain reasonably steady, GM might bow to the clamor and slip an LT1 in there, if only in a special edition. But for now, you get a V-6, either the 3400 or the 3800, their names telling you what you need to know about their displacement, in metric terms.

The base formulation starts at $18,705, a large car at an intermediate price, GM boasts. Even it has such niceties as the smaller of the two six-cylinder engines, automatic transmission, air conditioning, dual front air bags, power steering, windows and brakes, power remote outside mirrors, six-speaker AM-FM stereo, theft deterrent system, four-wheel d isc brakes, 16-inch steel wheels and a reconfigurable 17-message “telltale” amid the instruments.

The LS version (tested by moi) gets the bigger engine and a raft of extras and improvements, as well it might, considering the $22,365 entry price. It has a driver’s side side-impact air bag, center floor console, overhead console, upgraded stereo with cassette deck, remote keyless entry, six-way power-adjustable driver’s seat with manual lumbar adjustments, cruise control, cast aluminum wheels, antilock brakes with tire inflation monitor, traction control, “ride and handling” suspension package and numerous detail upgrades.

The PR department found a few items with which to gild the tester. A power moonroof added $700; leather bucket seats, $625; power seat for the co-pilot plus heated seats for that worthy and the driver, $425; whiz-bang radio upgrade with eight speakers and added CD player, $223; and a “preferred equipment group,” $517. This consists of a driver info center, universal garage opener, alarm system, electrochromic rearview mirror and steering-wheel-mounted radio controls. So freighted, the car came to $25,415, including the haulers’ fee. Which happens to be just about the average new-vehicle outlay these days. For a heavily-equipped, roomy and comfortable family car, that is a sensational value.

Recognizing, perhaps, that as a front-wheel-drive machine, the Impala might not appeal to the traditional buyers of the corresponding, rear-drive Ford products (Crown Victoria/Grand Marquis), which have a V-8 and are better suited to towing chores, GM positions the Impala as a step-up alternative for would-be buyers of intermediates like the Ford Taurus, Dodge Intrepid and Toyota Avalon. Having driven one for a week, I find that a reasonable proposition, for the car does not feel like a full-sized machine. With its quick throttle tip-in and fast, light steering, it does a good job of simulating a smaller mass, though it still goes about 3,600 pounds when heavily equipped. Without the center console, it could hold six people, although I’ve never found that a satisfactory arrangement. More to the point, the rear provides livable space for up to three adults of normative size, and an abundance for two.

GM asserts the Impala is fun to drive. I did not find that to be the case, but neither is it terribly unpleasant. Instead of building unreasonable expectations, they’d be better off with a value pitch. Sister divisions Buick and Pontiac have their more expensive versions ­ LeSabre and Bonneville ­ which play a somewhat different role. There are several hurdles the Impala must surmount before it achieves the “long way home” status its maker claims. Chassis rigidity is a bit of an issue. I could feel some flex and hear some creaking when subjecting the Impala to not-unreasonable stress. The steering is so light and fast it isolates the driver from the tire-road nuances, and the transmission ­ superb functionary that it is ­ is geared so high (presumably in the interest of fuel economy) that the car felt as if it were running away, even when I pulled the floor-mounted shifter into third from overdrive. This can be disconcerting, if not downright unsafe. Perhaps that’s why GM gave the car four-wheel disc brakes ­ you’ll use them a lot around town. Overdrive yields more than 30 mph per 1,000 engine turns ­ exceptionally high. In panic stops (simulated) on wet pavement, the antilock mechanism allowed the brakes to grab a little, but generally did its job all right. Stopping distances lay somewhere between impressive and worrisome ­ midrange.

Ride quality of the Impala was good. It did a good job of isolating the cabin from road problems, and, on terrible surfaces, maintained its composure tolerably well. Certain frequencies of road irregularities, though, came through as an unpleasant vibration. Overall noise level was moderate at the highest legal speeds. The top-of-the-line stereo sys tem had just so-so overall sound quality and its FM performance, I theorize, was badly compromised by the antenna buried in the rear glass. GM says this is done not only to foil vandals (ever hear of power antennas?), but also to reduce wind noise (ever hear of mounting it on the rear flank?). Even where it should have been getting a good signal, the FM tuner had an edge of distortion, and ambience was lacking.

EPA mileage estimates are 20 mpg city, 29 highway. My overall tally of 24.4 fell neatly in that range, and the car demands nothing more than regular unleaded. The car was well made, with surprisingly good-looking materials. Final assembly is at the Oshawa, Ontario plant. Overall, I think that Buick did a better job with their equivalent car, the LeSabre, and am looking forward to seeing soon how Pontiac did with the Bonneville.

“The Gannett News Service”

Available cars near you

Safety review

Based on the 2000 Chevrolet Impala base trim
NHTSA crash test and rollover ratings, scored out of 5.
Frontal driver
5/5
Frontal passenger
5/5
Side driver
4/5
Side rear passenger
4/5

Factory warranties

New car program benefits

Basic
3 years / 36,000 miles
Corrosion
6 years / 100,000 miles
Powertrain
3 years / 36,000 miles
Roadside Assistance
3 years / 36,000 miles

Certified Pre-Owned program benefits

Age / mileage
5 model years or newer / up to 75,000 miles
Basic
12 months / 12,000 miles bumper-to-bumper original warranty, then may continue to 6 years / 100,000 miles limited (depending on variables)
Dealer certification
172-point inspection

Compare similar vehicles

Select cars to compare for more detailed info.
  • 2000
    4.1
    Chevrolet Impala
    Starts at
    $18,890
    20 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    6
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2006
    4.4
    Buick Lucerne
    Starts at
    $25,265
    19 City / 28 Hwy
    MPG
    6
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2003
    4.5
    Chevrolet Monte Carlo
    Starts at
    $21,160
    21 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2003
    3.9
    Chevrolet Impala
    Starts at
    $21,160
    21 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2003
    4.6
    Buick Regal
    Starts at
    $24,235
    19 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2001
    4.5
    Buick LeSabre
    Starts at
    $24,230
    19 City / 30 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 1999
    4.1
    Cadillac DeVille
    Starts at
    $38,830
    15 City / 24 Hwy
    MPG
    6
    Seat capacity
    -
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • Compare more options
    Use our comparison tool to add any vehicle of your choice and see a full list of specifications and features side-by-side.
    Try it now

Consumer reviews

4.1 / 5
Based on 26 reviews
Write a review
Comfort 4.7
Interior 4.1
Performance 4.1
Value 4.1
Exterior 4.1
Reliability 4.0

Most recent

  • Best car

    My dad used to own a 2000 Impala Base, he loved how it handled in the illinois snow and how it flowed over the bumps and so on the road.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 3.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 5.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Safe, Large Car, great for a retired truck driver.

    I am 6-2 and 200 lb's and long legs appreciate a big roomy car. It is a safe car for my grandchildren to be learning how to drive. You can trust it mechanically and reliability. This is a good car for long trips and is comfortable.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 4.0
    5 people out of 5 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • It's 2019 and I wish I could find a nice 2000!

    For those folks that can't finance a dependable work car- Look for a low mileage, low owner, 2000 Impala. Either base or LS. Back in 2003, 2004 I had the pleasure of driving my son's sassy red 2000 Impala LS for errands when I visited the grand children, and to take on a short road trip. The bucket seats were comfy as heck, the power options great, the sound system gave me all my old-school tunes with strong bass how I like it. The V-6 gave me all the power I needed, and to boot, it wasn't a gas guzzler for being a big-to-mid-size car (I owned a little old Ford Ranger myself, so the Impala felt spacious) My son's family of 4.5 drove their 2000 Impala LS near to death, then sold it next to their teenage brother-in-law. This kid never took care of the car, other than put gas in it. One can imagine what that male teenager did to the car's neglected engine and drive-train ... The last I heard it had 200,000 plus miles on it, and the dumb brother-in-law blew the engine by leaving the radiator dry then racing one of his buddies on a freeway. Sheesh! In my book, this particular Chevy model is a testament to American car building. It would still be going strong if it had owners who took care of it.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 4.0
    8 people out of 8 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • 253k and still going strong!

    I bought my Impala as a beater for work, and I haven't been too disappointed! Bought it at 250k miles in February of this year and besides the fact my exhaust system is shot, she's a good car. Still shifts like it's almost new, and even after past owners neglecting proper maintenance on the car she still roars to life every time. The growl of the engine is the best part of this jalopy of a car. The exterior is your typical early 2000s sedan, nothing special really but not hard on the eyes either. Guy before me hit a deer going 55mph and all that got damaged was the bumper cover. Besides the obvious plastic bumper covers, this car can take a beating. If you bought one in better condition than I did, I would definitely recommend this car, especially to younger drivers like myself who need something reliable and affordable. Gas mileage is dang good for a full size sedan. Trunk space is insane! Always impressed with older Chevys!
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 4.0
    5 people out of 5 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Very reliable

    This car gets you from point a to point b. It?s a good car with a decent mpg so you won?t have to fill up constantly . It?s not an expensive car .
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 3.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 2.0
    Reliability 5.0
    2 people out of 2 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Most reliable car I owed

    I think this vehicle is in very good condition for its year, and has great mileage and has no problems!
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 3.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 5.0
    2 people out of 2 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Third Car I've ever owned.

    It has just enough legroom for a giant person like myself (7'0/300 pounds). When it comes to comfort, the car easily fit five people and a dog. I dislike the center console, but it was functional. The radio was very poor quality when we bought it, but the car comes equipped with a amp and subwoofer, and it is supremely high quality sound. This car has put up with 100 mile round trips daily, and it still works, despite us not taking great care of it. We have had to replace a lot of parts in the engine, partially because we didn't keep it up to standards, but also partially because of it's age. I would highly recommend this as a first time vehicle, or a high schooler vehicle, if you can get it for under $3,000.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 3.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 2.0
    Exterior 3.0
    Reliability 4.0
    1 person out of 1 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Overall nice, but...

    This car is in constant repair mode. When it's fixed, it runs like a dream, but every month it seems something else breaks down. It's a shame, because as a larger person, this car has plenty of room for me, and the bench seating is something I'll sorely miss. However, it's not worth having what's essentially a monthly car payment's worth of repairs.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does not recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 4.0
    Exterior 3.0
    Reliability 1.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Fast car.

    I love this car. Its reliable. Fast. 4 wheel drive. What else do you need? I would deffiantly purchase another one.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    1 person out of 1 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Great car for everything

    We bought our Impala over a year ago and we still love it. Great for tall and plus size people. Four adults can travel out to dinner in comfort without feeling cramped. The trunk is enormous holds my roommates wheelchair plus and months worth of groceries. It could get better gas mileage but it is a very big car. It drives and maneuvers excellent in tight parking lots without seeming like a boat. I would buy another one tomorrow. The only real con about the car is the very dim interior lights.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Having fun
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 4.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 5.0
    1 person out of 1 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Best Car I've Owned

    I bought this car new in September, 1999, and have been driving it for nearly 16 years. Outside of a few warranty-covered repairs early on (cooling system, battery & ignition switch) it has been a first-rate performer. I did have to have the hub bearings on one of the front wheels replaced recently. I am now retired (since 2010), so the amount of driving I do has decreased, but it still has over 100,000 miles on it. This car is the most reliable vehicle I've ever owned - only once has it failed to start (dead battery, caused by a very hot summer). It no longer gets much over 20 MPG, but that's mainly because most of my driving is urban. It is great for trips - very comfortable. Handling is very sure - I always feel confident that the car will respond quickly to brakes and steering. The air conditioning has not been touched since purchase, and it still keeps the car cold on the warmest days of summer. What can I say? I love this car!
    • Purchased a New car
    • Used for Transporting family
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • What you see is not what you get!

    What may look like a decent car, is everything but. My grandfather bought this car from a friend, and I bought it from him. The man assured it was a great car, and from the looks it was. Well little did we know we would later on have to replace every motor mount and just about everything else under the hood, but the motor and transmission. The hair and heat only blows on defrost, and it makes a loud whistle when you mash the gas! Wow, yeah I hate this car!
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Transporting family
    • Does not recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 3.0
    Performance 3.0
    Value 2.0
    Exterior 3.0
    Reliability 3.0
    0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No

Latest news from cars.com

See all news

Chevrolet dealers near you

FAQ

What trim levels are available for the 2000 Chevrolet Impala?

The 2000 Chevrolet Impala is available in 2 trim levels:

  • (1 style)
  • LS (1 style)

What is the MPG of the 2000 Chevrolet Impala?

The 2000 Chevrolet Impala offers up to 20 MPG in city driving and 32 MPG on the highway. These figures are based on EPA mileage ratings and are for comparison purposes only. The actual mileage will vary depending on vehicle options, trim level, driving conditions, driving habits, vehicle maintenance, and other factors.

What are some similar vehicles and competitors of the 2000 Chevrolet Impala?

The 2000 Chevrolet Impala compares to and/or competes against the following vehicles:

Is the 2000 Chevrolet Impala reliable?

The 2000 Chevrolet Impala has an average reliability rating of 4.0 out of 5 according to cars.com consumers. Find real-world reliability insights within consumer reviews from 2000 Chevrolet Impala owners.

Is the 2000 Chevrolet Impala a good Sedan?

Below are the cars.com consumers ratings for the 2000 Chevrolet Impala. 80.8% of drivers recommend this vehicle.

4.1 / 5
Based on 26 reviews
  • Comfort: 4.7
  • Interior: 4.1
  • Performance: 4.1
  • Value: 4.1
  • Exterior: 4.1
  • Reliability: 4.0

Chevrolet Impala history

Your list was successfully saved.
 
 
 
 
Save list Compare
[{"cat":"sedan_fullsize","stock_type":"used","bodystyle":"Sedan","page_type":"research/make-model-year","oem_page":false,"search_fuel_types":["Gasoline Fuel"]}]