Skip to main content

Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. Mitsubishi Eclipse

Add new car
$19,499
3dr Cpe Man GS 3dr Cpe Auto GS 3dr Cpe Auto GS Sport 3dr Cpe Auto SE 2dr Spyder Auto GS Sport 2dr Spyder Auto SE 3dr Cpe Auto GT 2dr Spyder Auto GT
Add new car
 

Highlights

Highlights comparison
2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse
Starting MSRP
$18,275
$19,499
Engine Type
Gas I4
Gas I4
MPG
19 City / 24 Hwy
20 City / 28 Hwy
Horsepower
150 hp
162 hp
Drive Type
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Seating Capacity
5
4
Basic Warranty
3 yr / 36,000 mi
5 yr / 60,000 mi

Engine

Engine comparison
2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse
Displacement
2.4L/148
2.4L/145
Engine Type
Gas I4
Gas I4
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
150 @ 5100
162 @ 6000
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
165 @ 4000
162 @ 4000
Transmission Options
  • A/T
  • 4-Speed A/T
  • M/T
  • 5-Speed M/T
MPG
19 City / 24 Hwy
20 City / 28 Hwy
Total Cooling System Capacity
7.4 qts
N/A

Tires & Wheels

Tires & Wheels comparison
2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse
Spare Tire Size
Compact
T125/70D16
Rear Wheel Material
Aluminum
Aluminum
Spare Wheel Material
N/A
Steel
Spare Wheel Size
N/A
16 x -TBD- in
Rear Tire Size
P205/55R16
P235/45R18
Front Wheel Size
16 x 6.0 in
18 x 8.0 in
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Size
16 x 6.0 in
18 x 8.0 in
Front Tire Size
P205/55R16
P235/45R18

Suspension

Suspension comparison
2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
w/Coil Springs
w/Stabilizer Bar
Suspension Type - Rear
Twist beam
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Front
Macpherson Strut
MacPherson Strut
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
w/Coil Springs
w/Stabilizer Bar

Steering

Steering comparison
2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
N/A
N/A
Steering Type
Pwr Rack & Pinion
Pwr Rack & Pinion
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
3
3
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
18
17
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
40 ft
40 ft

Measurements

Measurements comparison
2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse
Passenger Capacity
5
4
Height, Overall
63 in
53 in
Second Shoulder Room
54 in
51 in
Length, Overall
169 in
180 in
Second Leg Room
41 in
29 in
Liftover Height
N/A
N/A
Second Hip Room
47 in
44 in
Front Leg Room
41 in
43 in
Min Ground Clearance
6 in
6 in
Track Width, Front
58 in
62 in
Front Head Room
39 in
39 in
Wheelbase
103 in
101 in
Passenger Volume
99 ft³
82 ft³
Width, Max w/o mirrors
67 in
72 in
Front Hip Room
50 in
54 in
Second Head Room
40 in
35 in
Front Shoulder Room
54 in
54 in
Trunk Volume
N/A
16 ft³
Track Width, Rear
58 in
62 in
Cargo Volume to Seat 3
Not Available ft³
Not available
Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings
N/A
Not available
Cargo Area Width @ Beltline
N/A
Not available
Rear Door Opening Height
N/A
Not available
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 3
N/A
Not available
Cargo Volume to Seat 2
22 ft³
Not available
Cargo Volume to Seat 1
63 ft³
Not available
Cargo Box (Area) Height
N/A
Not available
Rear Door Opening Width
N/A
Not available
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2
N/A
Not available
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1
N/A
Not available

Weight & Capacity

Weight & Capacity comparison
2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
N/A
Not Available lbs
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
15 gal
18 gal
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A
N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
1,000 lbs
Not Available lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
100 lbs
Not Available lbs
Base Curb Weight
3,222 lbs
3,272 lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Not Available lbs

Safety

Safety comparison
2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse
Stability Control
Not available
Standard

Electrical

Electrical comparison
2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
510
525
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
120
110

Brakes

Brakes comparison
2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse
Brake ABS System
4-wheel
4-Wheel
Brake Type
Pwr
Pwr
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Yes
Yes
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
Not Available
Not Available
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
N/A
N/A
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
11 x 0.9 in
11.6 x -TBD- in
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes
Yes
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
10.62 x 0.35 in
10.3 x -TBD- in

FAQ

Which is more reliable, the 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser or the 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse?

The 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse is more reliable than the 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser according to Cars.com consumers, with a reliability rating of 4.7 for the 2012 Eclipse versus a reliability rating of 4.4 for the 2010 PT Cruiser.

Which is more fuel efficient, the 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser or the 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse?

The 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse is more fuel efficient than the 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser with 23 MPG combined versus 21 MPG combined.

Which car is cheaper, the 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser or the 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse?

The 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser is cheaper than the 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse with a $18,275 starting MSRP versus a $19,499 starting MSRP.

Similar cars for sale

Compare the Chrysler PT Cruiser

Compare the Mitsubishi Eclipse

Add car to comparison