Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. Mitsubishi Eclipse
Hide similarities
Highlights
|
$18,275
Starting MSRP
|
$19,499
Starting MSRP
|
-
Starting MSRP
|
|
|
Gas I4
Engine Type
|
Gas I4
Engine Type
|
-
Engine Type
|
|
|
19 City / 24 Hwy
MPG
|
20 City / 28 Hwy
MPG
|
-
MPG
|
|
|
150 hp
Horsepower
|
162 hp
Horsepower
|
-
Horsepower
|
|
|
Front Wheel Drive
Drive Type
|
Front Wheel Drive
Drive Type
|
-
Drive Type
|
|
|
5
Seating Capacity
|
4
Seating Capacity
|
-
Seating Capacity
|
|
|
3 yr / 36,000 mi
Basic Warranty
|
5 yr / 60,000 mi
Basic Warranty
|
-
Basic Warranty
|
Engine
|
150 @ 5100
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
|
162 @ 6000
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
|
-
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
|
|
|
2.4L/148
Displacement
|
2.4L/145
Displacement
|
-
Displacement
|
|
|
Gas I4
Engine Type
|
Gas I4
Engine Type
|
-
Engine Type
|
|
|
165 @ 4000
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
|
162 @ 4000
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
|
-
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
|
|
|
A/T
4-Speed A/T Transmission Options
|
M/T
5-Speed M/T Transmission Options
|
-
Transmission Options
|
|
|
19 City / 24 Hwy
MPG
|
20 City / 28 Hwy
MPG
|
-
MPG
|
|
|
7.4 qts
Total Cooling System Capacity
|
N/A
Total Cooling System Capacity
|
-
Total Cooling System Capacity
|
Tires & Wheels
|
P205/55R16
Rear Tire Size
|
P235/45R18
Rear Tire Size
|
-
Rear Tire Size
|
|
|
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
|
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
|
-
Rear Wheel Material
|
|
|
16 x 6.0 in
Front Wheel Size
|
18 x 8.0 in
Front Wheel Size
|
-
Front Wheel Size
|
|
|
N/A
Spare Wheel Material
|
Steel
Spare Wheel Material
|
-
Spare Wheel Material
|
|
|
P205/55R16
Front Tire Size
|
P235/45R18
Front Tire Size
|
-
Front Tire Size
|
|
|
N/A
Spare Wheel Size
|
16 x -TBD- in
Spare Wheel Size
|
-
Spare Wheel Size
|
|
|
Compact
Spare Tire Size
|
T125/70D16
Spare Tire Size
|
-
Spare Tire Size
|
|
|
16 x 6.0 in
Rear Wheel Size
|
18 x 8.0 in
Rear Wheel Size
|
-
Rear Wheel Size
|
|
|
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
|
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
|
-
Front Wheel Material
|
Suspension
|
w/Coil Springs
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
|
w/Stabilizer Bar
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
|
-
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
|
|
|
w/Coil Springs
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
|
w/Stabilizer Bar
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
|
-
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
|
|
|
Twist beam
Suspension Type - Rear
|
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear
|
-
Suspension Type - Rear
|
|
|
Macpherson Strut
Suspension Type - Front
|
MacPherson Strut
Suspension Type - Front
|
-
Suspension Type - Front
|
Steering
|
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
|
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
|
-
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
|
|
|
Pwr Rack & Pinion
Steering Type
|
Pwr Rack & Pinion
Steering Type
|
-
Steering Type
|
|
|
3
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
|
3
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
|
-
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
|
|
|
40 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
|
40 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
|
-
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
|
|
|
18
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
|
17
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
|
-
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
|
Measurements
|
50 in
Front Hip Room
|
54 in
Front Hip Room
|
-
Front Hip Room
|
|
|
40 in
Second Head Room
|
35 in
Second Head Room
|
-
Second Head Room
|
|
|
58 in
Track Width, Front
|
62 in
Track Width, Front
|
-
Track Width, Front
|
|
|
54 in
Front Shoulder Room
|
54 in
Front Shoulder Room
|
-
Front Shoulder Room
|
|
|
39 in
Front Head Room
|
39 in
Front Head Room
|
-
Front Head Room
|
|
|
N/A
Trunk Volume
|
16 ft³
Trunk Volume
|
-
Trunk Volume
|
|
|
6 in
Min Ground Clearance
|
6 in
Min Ground Clearance
|
-
Min Ground Clearance
|
|
|
N/A
Liftover Height
|
N/A
Liftover Height
|
-
Liftover Height
|
|
|
63 in
Height, Overall
|
53 in
Height, Overall
|
-
Height, Overall
|
|
|
41 in
Front Leg Room
|
43 in
Front Leg Room
|
-
Front Leg Room
|
|
|
103 in
Wheelbase
|
101 in
Wheelbase
|
-
Wheelbase
|
|
|
67 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
|
72 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
|
-
Width, Max w/o mirrors
|
|
|
47 in
Second Hip Room
|
44 in
Second Hip Room
|
-
Second Hip Room
|
|
|
169 in
Length, Overall
|
180 in
Length, Overall
|
-
Length, Overall
|
|
|
99 ft³
Passenger Volume
|
82 ft³
Passenger Volume
|
-
Passenger Volume
|
|
|
58 in
Track Width, Rear
|
62 in
Track Width, Rear
|
-
Track Width, Rear
|
|
|
41 in
Second Leg Room
|
29 in
Second Leg Room
|
-
Second Leg Room
|
|
|
54 in
Second Shoulder Room
|
51 in
Second Shoulder Room
|
-
Second Shoulder Room
|
|
|
5
Passenger Capacity
|
4
Passenger Capacity
|
-
Passenger Capacity
|
|
|
N/A
Cargo Box (Area) Height
|
-
Cargo Box (Area) Height
|
-
Cargo Box (Area) Height
|
|
|
N/A
Cargo Area Width @ Beltline
|
-
Cargo Area Width @ Beltline
|
-
Cargo Area Width @ Beltline
|
|
|
N/A
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 3
|
-
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 3
|
-
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 3
|
|
|
63 ft³
Cargo Volume to Seat 1
|
-
Cargo Volume to Seat 1
|
-
Cargo Volume to Seat 1
|
|
|
N/A
Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings
|
-
Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings
|
-
Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings
|
|
|
N/A
Rear Door Opening Height
|
-
Rear Door Opening Height
|
-
Rear Door Opening Height
|
|
|
N/A
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1
|
-
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1
|
-
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1
|
|
|
N/A
Rear Door Opening Width
|
-
Rear Door Opening Width
|
-
Rear Door Opening Width
|
|
|
22 ft³
Cargo Volume to Seat 2
|
-
Cargo Volume to Seat 2
|
-
Cargo Volume to Seat 2
|
|
|
Not Available ft³
Cargo Volume to Seat 3
|
-
Cargo Volume to Seat 3
|
-
Cargo Volume to Seat 3
|
|
|
N/A
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2
|
-
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2
|
-
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2
|
Weight & Capacity
|
1,000 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
Not Available lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
|
|
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
Not Available lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
|
|
15 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
18 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
-
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
|
|
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
-
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
|
|
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
Not Available lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
|
|
100 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
Not Available lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
|
|
3,222 lbs
Base Curb Weight
|
3,272 lbs
Base Curb Weight
|
-
Base Curb Weight
|
Safety
|
-
Stability Control
|
Standard
Stability Control
|
-
Stability Control
|
Electrical
|
510
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
|
525
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
|
-
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
|
|
|
120
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
|
110
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
|
-
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
|
Brakes
|
Not Available
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
|
Not Available
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
|
-
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
|
|
|
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
|
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
|
-
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
|
|
|
Pwr
Brake Type
|
Pwr
Brake Type
|
-
Brake Type
|
|
|
11 x 0.9 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
11.6 x -TBD- in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
-
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
|
|
4-wheel
Brake ABS System
|
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
|
-
Brake ABS System
|
|
|
10.62 x 0.35 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
10.3 x -TBD- in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
-
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
|
|
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
|
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
|
-
Disc - Front (Yes or )
|
|
|
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
|
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
|
-
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
|
FAQ
Which is more reliable, the 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser or the 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse?
The 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse is more reliable than the 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser according to Cars.com consumers, with a reliability rating of 4.7 for the 2012 Eclipse versus a reliability rating of 4.4 for the 2010 PT Cruiser.
Which is more fuel efficient, the 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser or the 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse?
The 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse is more fuel efficient than the 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser with 23 MPG combined versus 21 MPG combined.
Which car is cheaper, the 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser or the 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse?
The 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser is cheaper than the 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse with a $18,275 starting MSRP versus a $19,499 starting MSRP.
Compare the Chrysler PT Cruiser
Compare the Mitsubishi Eclipse
Add car