Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. Mitsubishi Eclipse
Highlights
|
$18,275
Starting MSRP
|
$19,499
Starting MSRP
|
-
Starting MSRP
|
|
|
Gas I4
Engine Type
|
Gas I4
Engine Type
|
-
Engine Type
|
|
|
19 City / 24 Hwy
MPG
|
20 City / 28 Hwy
MPG
|
-
MPG
|
|
|
150 hp
Horsepower
|
162 hp
Horsepower
|
-
Horsepower
|
|
|
Front Wheel Drive
Drive Type
|
Front Wheel Drive
Drive Type
|
-
Drive Type
|
|
|
5
Seating Capacity
|
4
Seating Capacity
|
-
Seating Capacity
|
|
|
3 yr / 36,000 mi
Basic Warranty
|
5 yr / 60,000 mi
Basic Warranty
|
-
Basic Warranty
|
Engine
|
Gas I4
Engine Type
|
Gas I4
Engine Type
|
-
Engine Type
|
|
|
150 @ 5100
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
|
162 @ 6000
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
|
-
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
|
|
|
2.4L/148
Displacement
|
2.4L/145
Displacement
|
-
Displacement
|
|
|
165 @ 4000
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
|
162 @ 4000
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
|
-
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
|
|
|
4-Speed A/T
A/T Transmission Options
|
M/T
5-Speed M/T Transmission Options
|
-
Transmission Options
|
|
|
19 City / 24 Hwy
MPG
|
20 City / 28 Hwy
MPG
|
-
MPG
|
|
|
7.4 qts
Total Cooling System Capacity
|
N/A
Total Cooling System Capacity
|
-
Total Cooling System Capacity
|
Tires & Wheels
|
P205/55R16
Rear Tire Size
|
P235/45R18
Rear Tire Size
|
-
Rear Tire Size
|
|
|
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
|
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
|
-
Rear Wheel Material
|
|
|
P205/55R16
Front Tire Size
|
P235/45R18
Front Tire Size
|
-
Front Tire Size
|
|
|
16 x 6.0 in
Rear Wheel Size
|
18 x 8.0 in
Rear Wheel Size
|
-
Rear Wheel Size
|
|
|
Compact
Spare Tire Size
|
T125/70D16
Spare Tire Size
|
-
Spare Tire Size
|
|
|
N/A
Spare Wheel Size
|
16 x -TBD- in
Spare Wheel Size
|
-
Spare Wheel Size
|
|
|
16 x 6.0 in
Front Wheel Size
|
18 x 8.0 in
Front Wheel Size
|
-
Front Wheel Size
|
|
|
N/A
Spare Wheel Material
|
Steel
Spare Wheel Material
|
-
Spare Wheel Material
|
|
|
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
|
Aluminum
Front Wheel Material
|
-
Front Wheel Material
|
Suspension
|
w/Coil Springs
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
|
w/Stabilizer Bar
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
|
-
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
|
|
|
Twist beam
Suspension Type - Rear
|
Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear
|
-
Suspension Type - Rear
|
|
|
Macpherson Strut
Suspension Type - Front
|
MacPherson Strut
Suspension Type - Front
|
-
Suspension Type - Front
|
|
|
w/Coil Springs
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
|
w/Stabilizer Bar
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
|
-
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
|
Steering
|
Pwr Rack & Pinion
Steering Type
|
Pwr Rack & Pinion
Steering Type
|
-
Steering Type
|
|
|
3
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
|
3
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
|
-
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
|
|
|
40 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
|
40 ft
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
|
-
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb
|
|
|
18
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
|
17
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
|
-
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
|
|
|
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
|
N/A
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
|
-
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall
|
Measurements
|
5
Passenger Capacity
|
4
Passenger Capacity
|
-
Passenger Capacity
|
|
|
169 in
Length, Overall
|
180 in
Length, Overall
|
-
Length, Overall
|
|
|
54 in
Front Shoulder Room
|
54 in
Front Shoulder Room
|
-
Front Shoulder Room
|
|
|
67 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
|
72 in
Width, Max w/o mirrors
|
-
Width, Max w/o mirrors
|
|
|
41 in
Front Leg Room
|
43 in
Front Leg Room
|
-
Front Leg Room
|
|
|
40 in
Second Head Room
|
35 in
Second Head Room
|
-
Second Head Room
|
|
|
N/A
Trunk Volume
|
16 ft³
Trunk Volume
|
-
Trunk Volume
|
|
|
99 ft³
Passenger Volume
|
82 ft³
Passenger Volume
|
-
Passenger Volume
|
|
|
54 in
Second Shoulder Room
|
51 in
Second Shoulder Room
|
-
Second Shoulder Room
|
|
|
47 in
Second Hip Room
|
44 in
Second Hip Room
|
-
Second Hip Room
|
|
|
39 in
Front Head Room
|
39 in
Front Head Room
|
-
Front Head Room
|
|
|
103 in
Wheelbase
|
101 in
Wheelbase
|
-
Wheelbase
|
|
|
6 in
Min Ground Clearance
|
6 in
Min Ground Clearance
|
-
Min Ground Clearance
|
|
|
41 in
Second Leg Room
|
29 in
Second Leg Room
|
-
Second Leg Room
|
|
|
50 in
Front Hip Room
|
54 in
Front Hip Room
|
-
Front Hip Room
|
|
|
N/A
Liftover Height
|
N/A
Liftover Height
|
-
Liftover Height
|
|
|
58 in
Track Width, Rear
|
62 in
Track Width, Rear
|
-
Track Width, Rear
|
|
|
58 in
Track Width, Front
|
62 in
Track Width, Front
|
-
Track Width, Front
|
|
|
63 in
Height, Overall
|
53 in
Height, Overall
|
-
Height, Overall
|
|
|
N/A
Rear Door Opening Height
|
-
Rear Door Opening Height
|
-
Rear Door Opening Height
|
|
|
N/A
Rear Door Opening Width
|
-
Rear Door Opening Width
|
-
Rear Door Opening Width
|
|
|
N/A
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1
|
-
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1
|
-
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1
|
|
|
N/A
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2
|
-
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2
|
-
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2
|
|
|
N/A
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 3
|
-
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 3
|
-
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 3
|
|
|
N/A
Cargo Area Width @ Beltline
|
-
Cargo Area Width @ Beltline
|
-
Cargo Area Width @ Beltline
|
|
|
N/A
Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings
|
-
Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings
|
-
Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings
|
|
|
N/A
Cargo Box (Area) Height
|
-
Cargo Box (Area) Height
|
-
Cargo Box (Area) Height
|
|
|
63 ft³
Cargo Volume to Seat 1
|
-
Cargo Volume to Seat 1
|
-
Cargo Volume to Seat 1
|
|
|
22 ft³
Cargo Volume to Seat 2
|
-
Cargo Volume to Seat 2
|
-
Cargo Volume to Seat 2
|
|
|
Not Available ft³
Cargo Volume to Seat 3
|
-
Cargo Volume to Seat 3
|
-
Cargo Volume to Seat 3
|
Weight & Capacity
|
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
-
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
|
|
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
Not Available lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
|
|
N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
Not Available lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
-
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
|
|
15 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
18 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
-
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
|
|
|
3,222 lbs
Base Curb Weight
|
3,272 lbs
Base Curb Weight
|
-
Base Curb Weight
|
|
|
100 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
Not Available lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
|
|
|
1,000 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
Not Available lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
-
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
|
Safety
|
-
Stability Control
|
Standard
Stability Control
|
-
Stability Control
|
Electrical
|
510
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
|
525
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
|
-
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
|
|
|
120
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
|
110
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
|
-
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
|
Brakes
|
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
|
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
|
-
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
|
|
|
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
|
Yes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
|
-
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
|
|
|
Pwr
Brake Type
|
Pwr
Brake Type
|
-
Brake Type
|
|
|
4-wheel
Brake ABS System
|
4-Wheel
Brake ABS System
|
-
Brake ABS System
|
|
|
10.62 x 0.35 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
10.3 x -TBD- in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
-
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
|
|
Not Available
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
|
Not Available
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
|
-
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
|
|
|
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
|
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
|
-
Disc - Front (Yes or )
|
|
|
11 x 0.9 in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
11.6 x -TBD- in
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
-
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
|
FAQ
Which is more reliable, the 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser or the 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse?
The 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse is more reliable than the 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser according to Cars.com consumers, with a reliability rating of 4.7 for the 2012 Eclipse versus a reliability rating of 4.4 for the 2010 PT Cruiser.
Which is more fuel efficient, the 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser or the 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse?
The 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse is more fuel efficient than the 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser with 23 MPG combined versus 21 MPG combined.
Which car is cheaper, the 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser or the 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse?
The 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser is cheaper than the 2012 Mitsubishi Eclipse with a $18,275 starting MSRP versus a $19,499 starting MSRP.
Similar cars for sale
-
Chrysler Sebring for sale
14 Great Deals out of 75 listings starting at $1,594
-
Dodge Magnum for sale
6 Great Deals out of 36 listings starting at $2,995
-
Dodge Nitro for sale
11 Great Deals out of 51 listings starting at $2,000
-
Kia Rio for sale
122 Great Deals out of 542 listings starting at $2,295
-
Saturn Ion for sale
6 Great Deals out of 21 listings starting at $1,095
-
Saturn Vue for sale
15 Great Deals out of 65 listings starting at $1,532
-
Chrysler PT Cruiser for sale
13 Great Deals out of 113 listings starting at $1,000
-
Mazda RX-8 for sale
10 Great Deals out of 20 listings starting at $6,145
-
Mitsubishi Lancer for sale
23 Great Deals out of 80 listings starting at $1,200
-
Scion tC for sale
22 Great Deals out of 137 listings
Compare the Chrysler PT Cruiser
Compare the Mitsubishi Eclipse
Add car