Skip to main content
3.6

2011 GMC Terrain

Starts at:
$24,500
Choose Trim
Compare trims
FWD 4dr SLE-1 AWD 4dr SLE-1 FWD 4dr SLE-2 AWD 4dr SLE-2 FWD 4dr SLT-1 AWD 4dr SLT-1 FWD 4dr SLT-2 AWD 4dr SLT-2 Shop options
New 2011 GMC Terrain
Choose trim
Compare trims
FWD 4dr SLE-1 AWD 4dr SLE-1 FWD 4dr SLE-2 AWD 4dr SLE-2 FWD 4dr SLT-1 AWD 4dr SLT-1 FWD 4dr SLT-2 AWD 4dr SLT-2 Shop options
Shop Cars.com
Browse cars & save your favorites
Dealers near you
Find & contact a dealership near you
Listings near 20149
Change location See all listings

Your message was sent. You'll receive a response shortly.

Key specifications

Highlights
Gas I4
Engine Type
22 City / 32 Hwy
MPG
182 hp
Horsepower
5
Seating Capacity
Engine
Gas I4
Engine Type
182 @ 6700
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
2.4/146.5
Displacement
172 @ 4900
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
Suspension
w/Coil Springs
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Independent Strut-type
Suspension Type - Front
w/Coil Springs
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Independent Trailing arm
Suspension Type - Rear
Weight & Capacity
1,500 lbs
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
0 lbs
Total Option Weight
150 lbs
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A
Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
Safety
Standard
Navigation System
Standard
Stability Control
Electrical
120
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
525
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
Brakes
Yes
Disc - Front (Yes or )
11.9 x 0.78 in
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
N/A
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
Power
Brake Type

Notable features

Related to Chevrolet Equinox
Four-cylinder or V-6
Available AWD
Five seats
Standard backup camera

Engine

Gas I4 Engine Type
182 @ 6700 SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
2.4/146.5 Displacement
172 @ 4900 SAE Net Torque @ RPM

Suspension

w/Coil Springs Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
Independent Strut-type Suspension Type - Front
w/Coil Springs Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
Independent Trailing arm Suspension Type - Rear

Weight & Capacity

1,500 lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
0 lbs Total Option Weight
150 lbs Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A Curb Weight
N/A Maximum Trailering Capacity
225 lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
N/A Curb Weight - Rear
18 gal Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
N/A Curb Weight - Front
N/A Maximum Payload Capacity
1,500 lbs Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
3,853 lbs Base Curb Weight

Safety

Standard Navigation System
Standard Stability Control

Electrical

120 Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
525 Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)

Brakes

Yes Disc - Front (Yes or )
11.9 x 0.78 in Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
N/A Brake ABS System (Second Line)
Power Brake Type
Yes Disc - Rear (Yes or )
12.6 x 1.18 in Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
4-Wheel Brake ABS System
Not Available Drum - Rear (Yes or )

Photo & video gallery

2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain 2011 GMC Terrain

The good & the bad

The good

Four-cylinder gas mileage
Quiet cabin
Roomy backseat
Seat-folding execution
Generous standard features

The bad

Uninspiring V-6
Mushy brakes
Slow-reacting automatic
Wide turning circle
Large blind spot

Expert 2011 GMC Terrain review

our expert's take
Our expert's take
By Kelsey Mays
Full article
our expert's take

Editor’s note: This review was written in October 2009 about the 2010 GMC Terrain. Little of substance has changed with this year’s model. To see what’s new for 2011, click here, or check out a side-by-side comparison of the two model years.

It should come as little surprise that the new GMC Terrain, a corporate twin to the redesigned Chevrolet Equinox, retains most of its sibling’s strengths and weaknesses. The wild card — or, more appropriately, the elephant in the design studio — is the Terrain’s styling. If it works for you, the Terrain is every bit as competitive as the Equinox. One caveat, however: Unless you need the towing capacity, avoid the V-6. The Terrain shows its best colors in four-cylinder form.

In ascending order, trim levels are the SLE1, SLE2, SLT1 and SLT2. All four come standard with the four-cylinder engine and front-wheel drive. All-wheel drive is optional on any trim, and the V-6 is optional on all but the SLE1. On each trim, you get a little added content if you choose the GMC version versus the Chevy, which accounts for the Terrain’s higher price. I drove a front-wheel-drive V-6 SLT1, though I’ve driven both engines in the mechanically identical Equinox, which you can compare to the Terrain here.

Going & Stopping
Having driven both the four-cylinder and V-6 Equinox, I can attest that the difference in power isn’t appreciable unless you’re pushing the car hard or carrying a load of people. My V-6 Terrain drove the point home: With 264 horsepower on tap — and no all-wheel drive to weigh things down — I’d expect a bit more oomph, especially given that competitors like the V-6 Toyota RAV4 feel downright fleet-footed. The Terrain does, however, weigh a few hundred pounds more, and so it lumbers along at a more leisurely pace.

That lumbering can be an issue. A six-speed automatic is standard, but it isn’t exactly the paragon of responsiveness. Kickdown takes too long at any speed, and it’s often accompanied by uncertain gear hunting. I also noticed a vexing case of accelerator lag. It has a way of creeping up on you: Acceleration from stoplights was acceptable, but when driving around 30-40 mph it occasionally took a full second for the Terrain to respond to my right foot. I’d invariably respond by stabbing the gas pedal harder, and when the cavalry finally arrived I’d get overkill.

If anything, the 182-hp four-cylinder should have enough power for most drivers. I didn’t detect any of the V-6’s accelerator lag in the four-cylinder Equinox I tested, and the pedal felt tuned for quicker response. Overly responsive accelerators are an old trick for a lot of four-cylinder cars — and a short-lived one, when you need sustained power up an on-ramp — but I never found the base Equinox gutless. The same should be true of its GMC sibling.

GMC and Chevrolet have Toyota — and everyone else, for that matter — beat in four-cylinder gas mileage. With an impressive 22/32 mpg city/highway with the four-cylinder and front-wheel drive, the Terrain beats all competitors with similar configurations. Adding all-wheel drive or the V-6 knocks mileage down quite a bit; at that point, the Terrain ranks midpack.

Gas Mileage (combined city/highway, mpg)
  All-wheel drive Front-wheel drive
2010 Toyota RAV4 21 – 24 22 – 24
2010 Honda CR-V 23 24
2010 Nissan Rogue 23 24
2010 GMC Terrain 20 – 23 20 – 26
2009 Subaru Forester* 21 – 22
2010 Ford Escape 20 – 22 21 – 24
2009 Hyundai Santa Fe 19 20
*Forester with turbo engine requires premium fuel. All others use regular.
Source: EPA data; variances are due to various transmissions and engines offered.

 

Four-wheel-disc antilock brakes are standard, but the pedal has a mushy, trucklike feel, so smooth stops can take some practice. On the upside, suspension dive while braking is fairly minimal.

When properly equipped, the four-cylinder Terrain can tow 1,500 pounds. The V-6 tows a competitive 3,500 pounds.

Noise, Ride & Handling
A defining attribute of GM’s latest crossovers is improved noise insulation. Road and wind noise are hushed, leaving the cabin exceptionally quiet — at least until you hit a bump. The suspension isn’t a particularly quiet one — it responds to potholes and expansion joints with loud, echoing noises — and, as we noted in the Equinox review, some may find the ride too firm overall.

The steering wheel turns with light effort at low speeds; it firms up progressively as you reach highway speeds, but I still found it a bit loose at 70 mph. Take an off-ramp quickly, and the Terrain has carlike resistance to body roll. Unfortunately, patches of rough pavement belie any cornering confidence: Steering response becomes sloppy, giving the Terrain a floaty sensation of being disconnected from the road. It reminds me more of traditional truck-based SUVs than car-based crossovers, to which the Terrain and its Chevy cohort belong.

The Elephant
GMC has long combined ruggedness and elegance to good effect — consider the Sierra pickup and Acadia crossover, for example. But the Terrain is one odd duck. GM says it shares just a few body panels with the Equinox; I wish it shared more. The Equinox has similar lines to Chevy’s larger Traverse, but the Terrain looks little like the Traverse’s GMC sibling — and arguably GM’s best-looking crossover — the Acadia. The Terrain’s styling feels ham-handed and forced. When I heard GMC would build an Equinox twin, I hoped to see a scaled-down Acadia. Color me disappointed.

Perhaps I’m being too harsh. A friend said he didn’t find the Terrain nearly as overdone as I did. Senior editor David Thomas, who lives in the Chicago suburbs, took the Terrain home over a weekend and noted that in such environs it looked much more at home. “Besides the huge gaps under the square wheel wells,” Thomas said, “I thought it was one good-looking truck when it was in my driveway. The huge grille looks much better in person, and in dark colors the Terrain can be quite striking. I can see it definitely turning on the truck crowd.”

Contrast that to multimedia editor Eric Rossi, who likened the Terrain to a modern-day Pontiac Aztek. Now that’s harsh.

The Inside
SUV fans should find plenty of familiar goodies: a high seating position, excellent forward sightlines — albeit a hefty blind spot in back — and room to stretch out. I found our tester’s leather seats reasonably comfortable, and they sit high enough off the floor to afford ample thigh support. There’s also plenty of common-sense functionality, from a speedometer marked in 10-mph increments — easier to tell your speed on the fly than the usual 20-mph markers — to a number of large storage areas and a user-friendly stereo.

Interior quality is midpack for this class. Cabin materials look good, but padded surfaces in areas you regularly touch — door panels, for instance — are in short supply, and too many buttons among the center controls have the brittle, uneven quality GM has finally banished in other models. What’s more, storage cubbies along our tester’s doors had sharp, unfinished ridges across their inside surfaces. That’s the sort of thing GM could iron out down the line, so be sure to check during your test drive.

The backseat has plenty of room. It’s adjustable forward and back, with a nifty plastic panel that keeps the cargo floor gap-free no matter where you position the seat. Like the Equinox, the Terrain posts middling cargo volume: 31.6 cubic feet behind the second row and 63.9 cubic feet with the seats folded. Here’s how those figures compare:

Cargo Volume (cu. ft.)
  Behind 2nd row Behind 1st row
2010 Toyota RAV4* 36.4 73.0
2010 Honda CR-V 35.7 72.9
2009 Hyundai Santa Fe* 34.2 78.2
2009 Subaru Forester 33.5 68.3
2010 GMC Terrain 31.6 63.9
2010 Ford Escape 31.4 67.2
2010 Nissan Rogue 28.9 57.9
*Specs for models without optional third rows.
Source: Automaker data

In real-world use, the problem with the cargo area is how narrow it is. “I tried to empty out my storage area and I could only fit one large plastic bin in the back with the rear seats up,” Thomas said. “My wife was pretty blunt in her assessment: ‘What good is an SUV if it can’t fit anything big in the back?'”

Safety & Features
With the top score, Good, in frontal, side and rear impacts by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the Terrain and Equinox have both been named IIHS Top Safety Picks. That’s commendable, though it doesn’t put the Terrain at a competitive advantage: All six major competitors are also IIHS Top Safety Picks. Standard safety features on the Terrain include six airbags, antilock brakes and an electronic stability system. Click here for a full list.

Standard features on the four-cylinder SLE1 include a six-speed automatic, a CD stereo with full USB/iPod integration, cruise control, air conditioning and a backup camera. Prices start at $24,250 — $1,810 more than the base Equinox LS, and on the higher end for this crowd — but the Terrain’s robust standard-features list beats a lot of others’, Equinox included.

Step up to higher trims, and you can get automatic climate control, a power driver’s seat, steering-wheel audio controls, a moonroof, a navigation system and heated leather seats. On any trim, all-wheel drive adds $1,750. The V-6 runs $1,500 on all but the SLE1, where it isn’t available. Otherwise, you don’t have to have one to get the other.

Load up an all-wheel-drive SLT2, and the Terrain can top $36,000.

GMC Terrain in the Market
With the Equinox and Terrain, GM stands to regain some lost share in the crossover market — if for no other reason than 32 mpg in an SUV is no small feat. The Terrain is competitive otherwise, but its overwrought styling might prove the greatest hindrance to attracting new GMC shoppers. On the other hand, it may be just what truck lovers — and maybe some former Hummer owners — will gravitate toward as traditional truck-based SUVs continue to go the way of the dinosaurs.

Both of these new GM crossovers are worth a look — and, provided they turn up decent reliability scores down the road, they’re proof positive that a leaner GM can still throw some punches.

Send Kelsey an email  
Assistant Managing Editor-News
Kelsey Mays

Former Assistant Managing Editor-News Kelsey Mays likes quality, reliability, safety and practicality. But he also likes a fair price.

2011 GMC Terrain review: Our expert's take
By Kelsey Mays

Editor’s note: This review was written in October 2009 about the 2010 GMC Terrain. Little of substance has changed with this year’s model. To see what’s new for 2011, click here, or check out a side-by-side comparison of the two model years.

It should come as little surprise that the new GMC Terrain, a corporate twin to the redesigned Chevrolet Equinox, retains most of its sibling’s strengths and weaknesses. The wild card — or, more appropriately, the elephant in the design studio — is the Terrain’s styling. If it works for you, the Terrain is every bit as competitive as the Equinox. One caveat, however: Unless you need the towing capacity, avoid the V-6. The Terrain shows its best colors in four-cylinder form.

In ascending order, trim levels are the SLE1, SLE2, SLT1 and SLT2. All four come standard with the four-cylinder engine and front-wheel drive. All-wheel drive is optional on any trim, and the V-6 is optional on all but the SLE1. On each trim, you get a little added content if you choose the GMC version versus the Chevy, which accounts for the Terrain’s higher price. I drove a front-wheel-drive V-6 SLT1, though I’ve driven both engines in the mechanically identical Equinox, which you can compare to the Terrain here.

Going & Stopping
Having driven both the four-cylinder and V-6 Equinox, I can attest that the difference in power isn’t appreciable unless you’re pushing the car hard or carrying a load of people. My V-6 Terrain drove the point home: With 264 horsepower on tap — and no all-wheel drive to weigh things down — I’d expect a bit more oomph, especially given that competitors like the V-6 Toyota RAV4 feel downright fleet-footed. The Terrain does, however, weigh a few hundred pounds more, and so it lumbers along at a more leisurely pace.

That lumbering can be an issue. A six-speed automatic is standard, but it isn’t exactly the paragon of responsiveness. Kickdown takes too long at any speed, and it’s often accompanied by uncertain gear hunting. I also noticed a vexing case of accelerator lag. It has a way of creeping up on you: Acceleration from stoplights was acceptable, but when driving around 30-40 mph it occasionally took a full second for the Terrain to respond to my right foot. I’d invariably respond by stabbing the gas pedal harder, and when the cavalry finally arrived I’d get overkill.

If anything, the 182-hp four-cylinder should have enough power for most drivers. I didn’t detect any of the V-6’s accelerator lag in the four-cylinder Equinox I tested, and the pedal felt tuned for quicker response. Overly responsive accelerators are an old trick for a lot of four-cylinder cars — and a short-lived one, when you need sustained power up an on-ramp — but I never found the base Equinox gutless. The same should be true of its GMC sibling.

GMC and Chevrolet have Toyota — and everyone else, for that matter — beat in four-cylinder gas mileage. With an impressive 22/32 mpg city/highway with the four-cylinder and front-wheel drive, the Terrain beats all competitors with similar configurations. Adding all-wheel drive or the V-6 knocks mileage down quite a bit; at that point, the Terrain ranks midpack.

Gas Mileage (combined city/highway, mpg)
  All-wheel drive Front-wheel drive
2010 Toyota RAV4 21 – 24 22 – 24
2010 Honda CR-V 23 24
2010 Nissan Rogue 23 24
2010 GMC Terrain 20 – 23 20 – 26
2009 Subaru Forester* 21 – 22
2010 Ford Escape 20 – 22 21 – 24
2009 Hyundai Santa Fe 19 20
*Forester with turbo engine requires premium fuel. All others use regular.
Source: EPA data; variances are due to various transmissions and engines offered.

 

Four-wheel-disc antilock brakes are standard, but the pedal has a mushy, trucklike feel, so smooth stops can take some practice. On the upside, suspension dive while braking is fairly minimal.

When properly equipped, the four-cylinder Terrain can tow 1,500 pounds. The V-6 tows a competitive 3,500 pounds.

Noise, Ride & Handling
A defining attribute of GM’s latest crossovers is improved noise insulation. Road and wind noise are hushed, leaving the cabin exceptionally quiet — at least until you hit a bump. The suspension isn’t a particularly quiet one — it responds to potholes and expansion joints with loud, echoing noises — and, as we noted in the Equinox review, some may find the ride too firm overall.

The steering wheel turns with light effort at low speeds; it firms up progressively as you reach highway speeds, but I still found it a bit loose at 70 mph. Take an off-ramp quickly, and the Terrain has carlike resistance to body roll. Unfortunately, patches of rough pavement belie any cornering confidence: Steering response becomes sloppy, giving the Terrain a floaty sensation of being disconnected from the road. It reminds me more of traditional truck-based SUVs than car-based crossovers, to which the Terrain and its Chevy cohort belong.

The Elephant
GMC has long combined ruggedness and elegance to good effect — consider the Sierra pickup and Acadia crossover, for example. But the Terrain is one odd duck. GM says it shares just a few body panels with the Equinox; I wish it shared more. The Equinox has similar lines to Chevy’s larger Traverse, but the Terrain looks little like the Traverse’s GMC sibling — and arguably GM’s best-looking crossover — the Acadia. The Terrain’s styling feels ham-handed and forced. When I heard GMC would build an Equinox twin, I hoped to see a scaled-down Acadia. Color me disappointed.

Perhaps I’m being too harsh. A friend said he didn’t find the Terrain nearly as overdone as I did. Senior editor David Thomas, who lives in the Chicago suburbs, took the Terrain home over a weekend and noted that in such environs it looked much more at home. “Besides the huge gaps under the square wheel wells,” Thomas said, “I thought it was one good-looking truck when it was in my driveway. The huge grille looks much better in person, and in dark colors the Terrain can be quite striking. I can see it definitely turning on the truck crowd.”

Contrast that to multimedia editor Eric Rossi, who likened the Terrain to a modern-day Pontiac Aztek. Now that’s harsh.

The Inside
SUV fans should find plenty of familiar goodies: a high seating position, excellent forward sightlines — albeit a hefty blind spot in back — and room to stretch out. I found our tester’s leather seats reasonably comfortable, and they sit high enough off the floor to afford ample thigh support. There’s also plenty of common-sense functionality, from a speedometer marked in 10-mph increments — easier to tell your speed on the fly than the usual 20-mph markers — to a number of large storage areas and a user-friendly stereo.

Interior quality is midpack for this class. Cabin materials look good, but padded surfaces in areas you regularly touch — door panels, for instance — are in short supply, and too many buttons among the center controls have the brittle, uneven quality GM has finally banished in other models. What’s more, storage cubbies along our tester’s doors had sharp, unfinished ridges across their inside surfaces. That’s the sort of thing GM could iron out down the line, so be sure to check during your test drive.

The backseat has plenty of room. It’s adjustable forward and back, with a nifty plastic panel that keeps the cargo floor gap-free no matter where you position the seat. Like the Equinox, the Terrain posts middling cargo volume: 31.6 cubic feet behind the second row and 63.9 cubic feet with the seats folded. Here’s how those figures compare:

Cargo Volume (cu. ft.)
  Behind 2nd row Behind 1st row
2010 Toyota RAV4* 36.4 73.0
2010 Honda CR-V 35.7 72.9
2009 Hyundai Santa Fe* 34.2 78.2
2009 Subaru Forester 33.5 68.3
2010 GMC Terrain 31.6 63.9
2010 Ford Escape 31.4 67.2
2010 Nissan Rogue 28.9 57.9
*Specs for models without optional third rows.
Source: Automaker data

In real-world use, the problem with the cargo area is how narrow it is. “I tried to empty out my storage area and I could only fit one large plastic bin in the back with the rear seats up,” Thomas said. “My wife was pretty blunt in her assessment: ‘What good is an SUV if it can’t fit anything big in the back?'”

Safety & Features
With the top score, Good, in frontal, side and rear impacts by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the Terrain and Equinox have both been named IIHS Top Safety Picks. That’s commendable, though it doesn’t put the Terrain at a competitive advantage: All six major competitors are also IIHS Top Safety Picks. Standard safety features on the Terrain include six airbags, antilock brakes and an electronic stability system. Click here for a full list.

Standard features on the four-cylinder SLE1 include a six-speed automatic, a CD stereo with full USB/iPod integration, cruise control, air conditioning and a backup camera. Prices start at $24,250 — $1,810 more than the base Equinox LS, and on the higher end for this crowd — but the Terrain’s robust standard-features list beats a lot of others’, Equinox included.

Step up to higher trims, and you can get automatic climate control, a power driver’s seat, steering-wheel audio controls, a moonroof, a navigation system and heated leather seats. On any trim, all-wheel drive adds $1,750. The V-6 runs $1,500 on all but the SLE1, where it isn’t available. Otherwise, you don’t have to have one to get the other.

Load up an all-wheel-drive SLT2, and the Terrain can top $36,000.

GMC Terrain in the Market
With the Equinox and Terrain, GM stands to regain some lost share in the crossover market — if for no other reason than 32 mpg in an SUV is no small feat. The Terrain is competitive otherwise, but its overwrought styling might prove the greatest hindrance to attracting new GMC shoppers. On the other hand, it may be just what truck lovers — and maybe some former Hummer owners — will gravitate toward as traditional truck-based SUVs continue to go the way of the dinosaurs.

Both of these new GM crossovers are worth a look — and, provided they turn up decent reliability scores down the road, they’re proof positive that a leaner GM can still throw some punches.

Send Kelsey an email  

Available cars near you

Safety review

Based on the 2011 GMC Terrain base trim
NHTSA crash test and rollover ratings, scored out of 5.
Overall rating
4/5
Combined side rating front seat
4/5
Combined side rating rear seat
5/5
Frontal barrier crash rating driver
5/5
Frontal barrier crash rating passenger
4/5
Overall frontal barrier crash rating
4/5
Overall side crash rating
5/5
Rollover rating
4/5
Side barrier rating
5/5
Side barrier rating driver
4/5
Side barrier rating passenger rear seat
5/5
Side pole rating driver front seat
5/5
19.1%
Risk of rollover
Side barrier rating driver
4/5
Side barrier rating passenger rear seat
5/5
Side pole rating driver front seat
5/5
19.1%
Risk of rollover

Factory warranties

New car program benefits

Basic
3 years / 36,000 miles
Corrosion
3 years / 36,000 miles
Powertrain
5 years / 100,000 miles
Roadside Assistance
5 years / 100,000 miles

Certified Pre-Owned program benefits

Age / mileage
5 model years or newer / up to 75,000 miles
Basic
12 months / 12,000 miles bumper-to-bumper original warranty, then may continue to 6 years / 100,000 miles limited (depending on variables)
Dealer certification
172-point inspection

Compare similiar vehicles

Select cars to compare for more detailed info.
  • 2011
    3.6
    GMC Terrain
    Starts at
    $24,500
    22 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas I4
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2015
    4.5
    Chevrolet Equinox
    Starts at
    $22,120
    22 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas I4
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2011
    4.4
    Buick Enclave
    Starts at
    $35,865
    17 City / 24 Hwy
    MPG
    8
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2015
    4.5
    Buick Encore
    Starts at
    $24,065
    25 City / 33 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Turbocharged I4
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2009
    4.6
    GMC Envoy
    Starts at
    $30,625
    15 City / 21 Hwy
    MPG
    2
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2012
    4.1
    Dodge Journey
    Starts at
    $18,995
    19 City / 26 Hwy
    MPG
    7
    Seat capacity
    Gas/Ethanol V6
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2013
    4.3
    GMC Acadia
    Starts at
    $34,050
    17 City / 24 Hwy
    MPG
    8
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2015
    4.4
    GMC Terrain
    Starts at
    $23,975
    22 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas/Ethanol I4
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • Compare more options
    Use our comparison tool to add any vehicle of your choice and see a full list of specifications and features side-by-side.
    Try it now

Consumer reviews

3.6 / 5
Based on 126 reviews
Write a review
Comfort 4.2
Interior 4.1
Performance 3.4
Value 3.5
Exterior 4.2
Reliability 3.6

Most recent

I brought my 2011 GMC TERRAIN 2 MONTHS AGO WITH

I brought my 2011 GMC TERRAIN 2 MONTHS AGO WITH ONLY 94000 MILES ON IT THIS IS THE BEST INVESTMENT FOR A USED CAR I EVER MADE
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Used for Commuting
  • Does recommend this car
Comfort 5.0
Interior 5.0
Performance 5.0
Value 5.0
Exterior 5.0
Reliability 5.0
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

2011gmc Terrain SLT with V6, purchased new.

2011gmc Terrain SLT with V6, purchased new. A great deprndable vehicle. 13 plus years, 160k kilometers. Routine maintenance, ie oil changes, 2 sets of tires, 2 set of brakes, 1 set plugs No major issues. Love the styling but also own a gmc truck.Pulls my 2500 lb boat easily. Sad to see only 1 engine choice for 2025 Terrain. Due like 2025 styling interior and exterior.
  • Purchased a New car
  • Used for Transporting family
  • Does recommend this car
Comfort 4.0
Interior 4.0
Performance 4.0
Value 5.0
Exterior 4.0
Reliability 5.0
1 person out of 1 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Latest news from cars.com

See all news

GMC dealers near you

You might also like

FAQ

What trim levels are available for the 2011 GMC Terrain?

The 2011 GMC Terrain is available in 4 trim levels:

  • SLE-1 (2 styles)
  • SLE-2 (2 styles)
  • SLT-1 (2 styles)
  • SLT-2 (2 styles)

What is the MPG of the 2011 GMC Terrain?

The 2011 GMC Terrain offers up to 22 MPG in city driving and 32 MPG on the highway. These figures are based on EPA mileage ratings and are for comparison purposes only. The actual mileage will vary depending on vehicle options, trim level, driving conditions, driving habits, vehicle maintenance, and other factors.

What are some similar vehicles and competitors of the 2011 GMC Terrain?

The 2011 GMC Terrain compares to and/or competes against the following vehicles:

Is the 2011 GMC Terrain reliable?

The 2011 GMC Terrain has an average reliability rating of 3.6 out of 5 according to cars.com consumers. Find real-world reliability insights within consumer reviews from 2011 GMC Terrain owners.

Is the 2011 GMC Terrain a good SUV?

Below are the cars.com consumers ratings for the 2011 GMC Terrain. 65.9% of drivers recommend this vehicle.

3.6 / 5
Based on 126 reviews
  • Comfort: 4.2
  • Interior: 4.1
  • Performance: 3.4
  • Value: 3.5
  • Exterior: 4.2
  • Reliability: 3.6

GMC Terrain history

Your list was successfully saved.
Your comparisons
 
 
 
 
Save list Compare