Skip to main content

2013
Ford C-Max Hybrid

Starts at:
$25,200
Shop options
New 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid
See ratings
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Shop Cars.com
Browse cars & save your favorites
Dealers near you
Find & contact a dealership near you
Listings near 43272
Change location See all listings

Available trims

See the differences side-by-side to compare trims.
  • 5dr HB SE
    Starts at
    $25,200
    42 City / 37 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    60 month/60,000 miles
    Warranty
    Gas/Electric I4
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 5dr HB SEL
    Starts at
    $28,365
    20 mi.
    Range
    5
    Seat capacity
    60 month/60,000 miles
    Warranty
    Gas/Electric I4
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs

Photo & video gallery

2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid

Notable features

Five seats, no sliding doors
Available plug-in Energi version
Gas-electric four-cylinder drivetrain

The good & the bad

The good

Gas mileage potential
High-tech standard features

The bad

Pending further review

Expert 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid review

our expert's take
Our expert's take
By Kelsey Mays
Full article
our expert's take

Editor’s note: Estimated mileage ratings have been lowered to reflect a June 2014 Ford audit of this car’s stated mileage.

Few automakers have taken a direct shot at Toyota’s green icon, the Prius hybrid. Now Ford has: It’s the 2013 C-Max Hybrid, but its overall refinement has been marred by poor reliability and two downward revisions in EPA gas mileage.

Earlier plans to bring a seven-seat C-Max minivan from overseas were scrapped, and now the C-Max comes as a hybrid and a C-Max Energi plug-in hybrid, each with five seats. Ford has targeted the plus-sized Prius v as the C-Max’s primary competitor, but it’s priced closer to the Prius, so you might shop it against both — or a well-equipped Honda Insight, for that matter. Compare these models here.

C-Max trims include the SE and SEL; we tested a well-optioned SEL. We cover the C-Max Energi separately in Cars.com’s Research section.

That’s One Tall Hatch
The C-Max shares platforms with Ford’s popular Focus compact car and Escape SUV, and the styling similarities are obvious. Its profile falls somewhere between the two. It’s essentially a very tall hatchback, with a roofline 6.2 inches higher than the Focus and 2.4 inches short of the Escape. It’s a stubby profile, too, coming in substantially shorter, bumper-to-bumper, than the Prius or Prius v but wider and taller than both.

The height shows in the interior, where the driving position feels closer to an SUV than a car. The C-Max’s abundant headroom is useful; I could elevate my seat high without my head scraping the ceiling in our moonroof-free test car. Alas, the A-pillars stretch far enough ahead to sit in your field of vision, spoiling some of the otherwise commanding view.

Curiously, the second row sits a lot lower. It provides a flat cargo floor when folded down, but seated adults will find their knees pointing up in the air. Given the headroom surplus, I wish Ford had elevated the seat, even if it meant a slight ledge in the cargo floor.

There’s 52.6 cubic feet of maximum cargo volume with the seats folded. That figure splits the difference between the Prius’ 39.6 cubic feet and the Prius v’s 67.3 cubic feet. But the C-Max lacks any backseat adjustments, which the Prius v and several other hatchbacks include.

If Ford merely squeaks by in the race for versatility, it wins the cabin materials contest. From the dashboard and doors to the steering-wheel trim and headliner, the C-Max boasts handsome materials where other hybrids cheap out. The Prius and Honda Insight feel insubstantial, and even the richer Prius v has its share of cost-cutting. The C-Max is a step up.

Alas, the dashboard controls are bad news. Our test car had the latest version of the automaker’s much-maligned MyFord Touch. Thankfully, Ford didn’t include touch-sensitive dashboard keys in this car, but the system’s touch-screen still has too many pinky-size buttons for important functions, and menu changes lag for a full second. Despite efforts to call off the search, Bluetooth hunts for phones that left the car long ago. The voice-recognition software fouls up more address entries than it gets right. And the bungles go beyond MyFord Touch; even the C-Max SE, which drops MyFord Touch, adopts a confusing jumble of  stereo controls. The dual-zone climate controls on all trim levels have sunken dials that slip your grasp. It’s high time for Ford to rethink its controls, whose issues — both ergonomic and electronic — bury other strengths.

Drivability Shines
The transition between the C-Max’s electric motor and 2.0-liter Atkinson-cycle four-cylinder feels exceptionally smooth, though acceleration from a standing start is modest. Still, the combined 188 horsepower provides enough oomph to beat semi-trucks from the merging lane. The regenerative brakes feel linear enough, as hybrid brakes go.

Ride quality is firm but controlled, and the C-Max steers exceptionally well. The wheel has substantial, hefty confidence on the highway, with precise turn-in when you cut into corners. Toss the car around, and it displays outstanding balance — a result of Ford’s masterful small-car platform. Short of the luxury field, most hybrids drive like high-mileage commuter cars. Kudos to Ford for breaking the mold.

Mileage Mix-ups
EPA-estimated mileage for the C-Max is 42/37/40 mpg (city/highway/combined), reflecting the mileage gains from regenerative braking and low-speed EV power, both of which help the city figure. That’s short of the 42-mpg Prius v and well short of the 50-mpg Prius (both EPA combined ratings).

It wasn’t always the case, however. Originally the EPA issued a combined 47 mpg rating on the C-Max, but subsequent investigations found that mileage didn’t hold up in the real world. Ford lowered its combined mileage to 43 mpg in August 2013 after uncovering a faulty EPA rule that allowed the automaker to equate C-Max mileage with the mechanically related Fusion Hybrid (read about it here). Ford lowered mileage again — this time to 40 mpg — in June 2014 after finding to errors in fuel-economy testing (read about it here). In both cases, the automaker compensated current C-Max owners several hundred dollars.

It gets more complicated. Ford also issued drivetrain and climate-control recalibrations in July 2013 to improve real-world mileage in the 2013 C-Max (read about it here). A month later, the automaker promised aerodynamic modifications, lower-friction engine oil and more efficient transmission gearing for the 2014 C-Max to improve mileage further. But none of that seems to have had much effect: EPA combined mileage is 40 mpg for both the 2013 and 2014 models.

We reviewed the C-Max months before the calibration or hardware updates occurred, so our observed mileage reflects the 2013 car before any updates. As it stands, the latest 40 mpg EPA rating appears attainable. With temperatures in the 30s and 40s, I averaged trip-computer mileage in the low 40s over 100-plus miles of driving. Another editor reported 41.0 and 47.4 mpg over two highway commutes with temperatures in the low 30s. If you buy a C-Max and fall short of its mileage claims, shoot us an email to tell us about your experience.

Safety, Features & Pricing
The C-Max has not been crash-tested. Standard safety features include seven airbags plus the required antilock brakes and electronic stability system. Ford’s standard MyKey system allows parents to limit vehicle speed, stereo volume and other features when their teens drive. Click here for a full list of safety features, or here for our evaluation of child-safety seat accommodations.

The C-Max SE starts around $26,000, including the destination charge. Standard features include a USB/iPod-compatible stereo, Bluetooth phone and audio streaming, dual-zone automatic climate control, and a leather-wrapped steering wheel with audio and cruise controls. Add features to the SE or step up to the SEL, and you can get a power driver’s seat, heated leather upholstery, MyFord Touch, keyless access with push-button start, a power liftgate, backup camera, front and rear parking sensors with an automated parking feature, a panoramic moonroof, Sony audio and a navigation system. Load up the C-Max SEL, and the price tops out around $35,000.

C-Max in the Market
No doubt many Escape Hybrid fans were chagrined by Ford’s decision to redesign the Escape without a gas-electric version. The C-Max lacks an all-wheel-drive option, but its mileage and SUV-like qualities should provide a legitimate replacement. Reliability so far has been a black hole — much worse than average for both the C-Max and the plug-in C-Max Energi. Indeed, our test car’s check-engine light turned on thanks to a problematic fuel-filler inlet. We addressed the problem as directed in the owner’s manual, but to no avail.

Will the C-Max ever reach Prius status? Unlikely. Toyota’s halo hybrid has so much brand equity that the automaker could probably get people to buy a Prius pickup or roadster. Ford has a long way to go before it gets there, but the C-Max is a start.

Send Kelsey an email  
Assistant Managing Editor-News
Kelsey Mays

Former Assistant Managing Editor-News Kelsey Mays likes quality, reliability, safety and practicality. But he also likes a fair price.

2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid review: Our expert's take
By Kelsey Mays

Editor’s note: Estimated mileage ratings have been lowered to reflect a June 2014 Ford audit of this car’s stated mileage.

Few automakers have taken a direct shot at Toyota’s green icon, the Prius hybrid. Now Ford has: It’s the 2013 C-Max Hybrid, but its overall refinement has been marred by poor reliability and two downward revisions in EPA gas mileage.

Earlier plans to bring a seven-seat C-Max minivan from overseas were scrapped, and now the C-Max comes as a hybrid and a C-Max Energi plug-in hybrid, each with five seats. Ford has targeted the plus-sized Prius v as the C-Max’s primary competitor, but it’s priced closer to the Prius, so you might shop it against both — or a well-equipped Honda Insight, for that matter. Compare these models here.

C-Max trims include the SE and SEL; we tested a well-optioned SEL. We cover the C-Max Energi separately in Cars.com’s Research section.

That’s One Tall Hatch
The C-Max shares platforms with Ford’s popular Focus compact car and Escape SUV, and the styling similarities are obvious. Its profile falls somewhere between the two. It’s essentially a very tall hatchback, with a roofline 6.2 inches higher than the Focus and 2.4 inches short of the Escape. It’s a stubby profile, too, coming in substantially shorter, bumper-to-bumper, than the Prius or Prius v but wider and taller than both.

The height shows in the interior, where the driving position feels closer to an SUV than a car. The C-Max’s abundant headroom is useful; I could elevate my seat high without my head scraping the ceiling in our moonroof-free test car. Alas, the A-pillars stretch far enough ahead to sit in your field of vision, spoiling some of the otherwise commanding view.

Curiously, the second row sits a lot lower. It provides a flat cargo floor when folded down, but seated adults will find their knees pointing up in the air. Given the headroom surplus, I wish Ford had elevated the seat, even if it meant a slight ledge in the cargo floor.

There’s 52.6 cubic feet of maximum cargo volume with the seats folded. That figure splits the difference between the Prius’ 39.6 cubic feet and the Prius v’s 67.3 cubic feet. But the C-Max lacks any backseat adjustments, which the Prius v and several other hatchbacks include.

If Ford merely squeaks by in the race for versatility, it wins the cabin materials contest. From the dashboard and doors to the steering-wheel trim and headliner, the C-Max boasts handsome materials where other hybrids cheap out. The Prius and Honda Insight feel insubstantial, and even the richer Prius v has its share of cost-cutting. The C-Max is a step up.

Alas, the dashboard controls are bad news. Our test car had the latest version of the automaker’s much-maligned MyFord Touch. Thankfully, Ford didn’t include touch-sensitive dashboard keys in this car, but the system’s touch-screen still has too many pinky-size buttons for important functions, and menu changes lag for a full second. Despite efforts to call off the search, Bluetooth hunts for phones that left the car long ago. The voice-recognition software fouls up more address entries than it gets right. And the bungles go beyond MyFord Touch; even the C-Max SE, which drops MyFord Touch, adopts a confusing jumble of  stereo controls. The dual-zone climate controls on all trim levels have sunken dials that slip your grasp. It’s high time for Ford to rethink its controls, whose issues — both ergonomic and electronic — bury other strengths.

Drivability Shines
The transition between the C-Max’s electric motor and 2.0-liter Atkinson-cycle four-cylinder feels exceptionally smooth, though acceleration from a standing start is modest. Still, the combined 188 horsepower provides enough oomph to beat semi-trucks from the merging lane. The regenerative brakes feel linear enough, as hybrid brakes go.

Ride quality is firm but controlled, and the C-Max steers exceptionally well. The wheel has substantial, hefty confidence on the highway, with precise turn-in when you cut into corners. Toss the car around, and it displays outstanding balance — a result of Ford’s masterful small-car platform. Short of the luxury field, most hybrids drive like high-mileage commuter cars. Kudos to Ford for breaking the mold.

Mileage Mix-ups
EPA-estimated mileage for the C-Max is 42/37/40 mpg (city/highway/combined), reflecting the mileage gains from regenerative braking and low-speed EV power, both of which help the city figure. That’s short of the 42-mpg Prius v and well short of the 50-mpg Prius (both EPA combined ratings).

It wasn’t always the case, however. Originally the EPA issued a combined 47 mpg rating on the C-Max, but subsequent investigations found that mileage didn’t hold up in the real world. Ford lowered its combined mileage to 43 mpg in August 2013 after uncovering a faulty EPA rule that allowed the automaker to equate C-Max mileage with the mechanically related Fusion Hybrid (read about it here). Ford lowered mileage again — this time to 40 mpg — in June 2014 after finding to errors in fuel-economy testing (read about it here). In both cases, the automaker compensated current C-Max owners several hundred dollars.

It gets more complicated. Ford also issued drivetrain and climate-control recalibrations in July 2013 to improve real-world mileage in the 2013 C-Max (read about it here). A month later, the automaker promised aerodynamic modifications, lower-friction engine oil and more efficient transmission gearing for the 2014 C-Max to improve mileage further. But none of that seems to have had much effect: EPA combined mileage is 40 mpg for both the 2013 and 2014 models.

We reviewed the C-Max months before the calibration or hardware updates occurred, so our observed mileage reflects the 2013 car before any updates. As it stands, the latest 40 mpg EPA rating appears attainable. With temperatures in the 30s and 40s, I averaged trip-computer mileage in the low 40s over 100-plus miles of driving. Another editor reported 41.0 and 47.4 mpg over two highway commutes with temperatures in the low 30s. If you buy a C-Max and fall short of its mileage claims, shoot us an email to tell us about your experience.

Safety, Features & Pricing
The C-Max has not been crash-tested. Standard safety features include seven airbags plus the required antilock brakes and electronic stability system. Ford’s standard MyKey system allows parents to limit vehicle speed, stereo volume and other features when their teens drive. Click here for a full list of safety features, or here for our evaluation of child-safety seat accommodations.

The C-Max SE starts around $26,000, including the destination charge. Standard features include a USB/iPod-compatible stereo, Bluetooth phone and audio streaming, dual-zone automatic climate control, and a leather-wrapped steering wheel with audio and cruise controls. Add features to the SE or step up to the SEL, and you can get a power driver’s seat, heated leather upholstery, MyFord Touch, keyless access with push-button start, a power liftgate, backup camera, front and rear parking sensors with an automated parking feature, a panoramic moonroof, Sony audio and a navigation system. Load up the C-Max SEL, and the price tops out around $35,000.

C-Max in the Market
No doubt many Escape Hybrid fans were chagrined by Ford’s decision to redesign the Escape without a gas-electric version. The C-Max lacks an all-wheel-drive option, but its mileage and SUV-like qualities should provide a legitimate replacement. Reliability so far has been a black hole — much worse than average for both the C-Max and the plug-in C-Max Energi. Indeed, our test car’s check-engine light turned on thanks to a problematic fuel-filler inlet. We addressed the problem as directed in the owner’s manual, but to no avail.

Will the C-Max ever reach Prius status? Unlikely. Toyota’s halo hybrid has so much brand equity that the automaker could probably get people to buy a Prius pickup or roadster. Ford has a long way to go before it gets there, but the C-Max is a start.

Send Kelsey an email  

Available cars near you

Safety review

Based on the 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid base trim
NHTSA crash test and rollover ratings, scored out of 5.
Overall rating
4/5
Combined side rating front seat
5/5
Combined side rating rear seat
5/5
Frontal barrier crash rating driver
4/5
Frontal barrier crash rating passenger
4/5
Overall frontal barrier crash rating
4/5
Overall side crash rating
5/5
Rollover rating
4/5
Side barrier rating
5/5
Side barrier rating driver
5/5
Side barrier rating passenger rear seat
5/5
Side pole rating driver front seat
5/5
14.3%
Risk of rollover
Side barrier rating driver
5/5
Side barrier rating passenger rear seat
5/5
Side pole rating driver front seat
5/5
14.3%
Risk of rollover

Factory warranties

New car program benefits

Basic
3 years / 36,000 miles
Corrosion
5 years
Powertrain
5 years / 60,000 miles
Battery
8 years / 100,000 miles
Roadside Assistance
5 years / 60,000 miles

Certified Pre-Owned program benefits

Age / mileage
Fords and many non-Ford vehicles up to 10 years old with less than 150,000 miles
Basic
90-Day / 4,000-Mile (whichever comes first) Comprehensive Limited Warranty
Dealer certification
139-point inspection

Compare similar vehicles

Select cars to compare for more detailed info.
  • 2013
    4.4
    Ford C-Max Hybrid
    Starts at
    $25,200
    42 City / 37 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    60 month/60,000 miles
    Warranty
    Gas/Electric I4
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2014
    4.7
    Ford C-Max Energi
    Starts at
    $31,635
    20 mi.
    Range
    5
    Seat capacity
    60 month/60,000 miles
    Warranty
    Gas/Electric I-4
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2011
    4.3
    Hyundai SONATA Hybrid
    Starts at
    $25,795
    34 City / 39 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    120 month/100,000 miles
    Warranty
    Gas/Electric I4
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2014
    4.3
    Ford C-Max Hybrid
    Starts at
    $24,170
    42 City / 36 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    60 month/60,000 miles
    Warranty
    Gas/Electric I-4
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2008
    4.4
    Mercury Mariner
    Starts at
    $21,540
    20 City / 26 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    -
    Warranty
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2011
    3.4
    Chevrolet Aveo
    Starts at
    $11,965
    27 City / 35 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    -
    Warranty
    Gas 4-Cylinder
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • Compare more options
    Use our comparison tool to add any vehicle of your choice and see a full list of specifications and features side-by-side.
    Try it now

Consumer reviews

4.4 / 5
Based on 134 reviews
Write a review
Comfort 4.5
Interior 4.5
Performance 4.4
Value 4.3
Exterior 4.2
Reliability 4.4

Most recent

  • 2013" c-max goes the distance

    This 2013 c-max hybrid has absolutely stood the test of time , unexpectedly driving excessive miles daily for years without having any mechanical problems, we did replace worn tires and always kept up with the recommended sevice maintenance by Ford. I am really impressed by this lil car. Now being sold to continue driving a hybrid car. I defiantly would recommend the c-max.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 4.0
    2 people out of 2 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Customer of over 25 years says bye to ford

    I waited 9 months for a control module for my car, during this time it was not operable, I was told it was on backorder. So for 9 months I was without a car or transportation. I have been a ford customer for over 25yrs but no more. Its bad when this dealership did nothing to help, not even a discounted rental to help. Ford is not the company it once was.
    • Purchased a New car
    • Used for Transporting family
    • Does not recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 3.0
    Performance 2.0
    Value 3.0
    Exterior 1.0
    Reliability 1.0
    3 people out of 7 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Lots to Like... Some Problems!

    PROS: Very good on the mpgs (although nowhere near the original estimates, in our experience) and has a LOT of zip! It's just an easy-to-drive, smooth, and quiet vehicle. We love the amount of interior space too, especially with the back seats down. Front seating is quite comfortable although feels like a mini-van, which surprised us at first... but you get used to it. CONS: Ford's Sync dashboard system on this model is just abysmal, and climate controls also behave un-intuitively. Car is an excellent driver most of the year but very poor on snow and ice; the smallest amount of sleet and ice can completely immobilize the vehicle on our rolling gravel driveway. Braking is very powerful and difficult to modulate—sometimes a gentle tap will throw passengers forward! Oil changes are a pain in the neck due to the large, cumbersome under-panel that has to be removed.
    • Purchased a New car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 4.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 3.0
    16 people out of 16 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • 2013 C-Max Hybrid

    Bought new. Several times for unknown reason it would not operate until jump box charger attached then everything ok for long time. 43.2 mpg day in and day out. Generally driven 20 miles to town then around town and 20 miles home. Front brake pads replaced at about 40000. Rear still original. 69000 miles on odometer but towed additional 50,000. After eight years I LOVE my little car. Other car is Ford Escape. Great car but only 24 mpg. Understand new Escape can be had as hybrid. C-max useful as small “ pickup”
    • Purchased a New car
    • Used for Transporting family
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 3.0
    Reliability 5.0
    6 people out of 6 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Daughter’s First Car!

    So far, so good! It is my daughter’s first car and she loves it! It’s perfect for her and will hopefully last her a long time.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    5 people out of 5 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • One of the best I’ve owned and I’ve owned about 40

    Very comfortable, fuel efficient, high quality and if needed fast. Good visibility. High seat height like a pickup. Great handling. And very roomy inside for a small car.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 5.0
    Reliability 5.0
    5 people out of 5 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Unreliable

    Love love this car but I would prefer a sunroof that opened to the panoramic roof. What I don’t love is the reliability. The car gas left me stranded twice and has had several 12v electric/electronic issues.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Transporting family
    • Does not recommend this car
    Comfort 4.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 3.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 2.0
    7 people out of 10 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • The most vehicle for the money

    I’m 6’5” and never thought I would be this comfortable in a “small” car but this vehicle is huge inside. We owned one for right at 100k miles and it was extremely trouble free. Basic maintenance is all it ever needed and the 40 MPG was great!
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 5.0
    3 people out of 3 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Not an Efficient Hybrid

    Have owned this vehicle now for roughly 14 months. While it is touted as a hybrid, compared to MPG of many other hybrids out there, this one is bottom of the barrel if you have any highway driving. Should have studied it's advantages a bit more before purchasing as my commute entails roughly 49 miles one way and 43 miles of that is highway driving. This car probably would be a good around town vehicle and might get better MPG if low speed limit driving was the bulk of miles traveled, but for highway driving this is not the vehicle for saving money on fuel cost. interior is comfortable, seats have heat but one noticeable weird thing is the steering wheel is off-center from the center of the drivers seat. Have used a tape measure to check and it is several inches off. This makes for a very weird driving experience and has taken some time to find a comfortable position for commuting. The entertainment system in this vehicle is the upgraded Sony but it is not very good in long term. The bluetooth connection constantly loses my phone and will not connect after a while. Have had to take system to factory defaults about every six weeks then reload my phone and re-do the connection to my phone. At one point had to remove the positive terminal on the battery and take the system to re-boot status in order for it to even function. Not a reliable system and not something that is on the positive side for this vehicle. Exterior this vehicle is very tall, almost minivan height but the seat height is roughly what a regular car would be. This gives lots of headroom but makes it feel more like a Ford Transit that a passenger vehicle. Cargo space is very nice with rear seats folded down and probably is larger than most other hybrids but if that's this vehicle's only upside I'd opt for something else. Overall, this vehicle is very heavy which is nice going through snow but it doesn't snow every day and streets are usually cleared within 24 hours. The extra weight makes it not fuel efficient so that is a pretty bad trade off. Winter the MPG is greatly affected and dips between 4-7 MPG from October through March (Chicago area). Spring and summer months the MPG stays in high 30s but again highway driving really affects that stat. If I had to purchase this vehicle again I would not unless it was the Energi model. Would make the extra investment to get the first 25 miles of driving all electric and charge overnight. Affecting the MPG positively would make this an easier pill to swallow. As mentioned below, I would not recommend this vehicle to a friend unless the bulk of their driving was under 45mph and the bulk of driving was stop and go or around town. Maybe for a delivery service around town this would be a good fit as cargo space is very spacious and mileage would be good. I could to into much greater detail but don't feel it's worth it- there's a reason that Ford decided not to continue making this vehicle- it's not that good unless you opt for the Energi version.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does not recommend this car
    Comfort 3.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 3.0
    Value 2.0
    Exterior 3.0
    Reliability 3.0
    3 people out of 3 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • A Cromulent Commuter Appliance

    Over 5 years, we have put less than $1000 into this car (not counting tires), and the fuel economy is excellent. We like and trust it so much, we are going to give it to my elderly mother and we went and bought a 2017 C-Max Energi for ourselves.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 4.0
    Performance 4.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 4.0
    Reliability 5.0
    4 people out of 4 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • Great vehicle, 43.2 mpg! Saved me $$$$$

    This car saved me enough money in three years of gas consumption to be able to purchase a newer model Ford. This car gives a smooth ride and NEVER gave me one issue! Lots of cargo room, too.
    • Purchased a Used car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does recommend this car
    Comfort 5.0
    Interior 5.0
    Performance 5.0
    Value 5.0
    Exterior 3.0
    Reliability 5.0
    3 people out of 3 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No
  • This car is awful!

    I have 154,000 miles on my 2013 Ford C-Max. Bought mine new in January of 2013.right out of the gate the rear wiper never worked right. Wouldn’t do a full sweep on half speed. Then the transmission needed replaced in 2017 at just over 100k miles. The control arm bushings rot and need replaced during inspections, the brakes feel like they go out when braking over a bump which can be scary. Road noise is terrible and so is wind buffeting when you have just one window rolled down. Recommend this dumpster fire of a car to your worst enemy! Don’t ever get one for yourself!!
    • Purchased a New car
    • Used for Commuting
    • Does not recommend this car
    Comfort 3.0
    Interior 2.0
    Performance 2.0
    Value 1.0
    Exterior 1.0
    Reliability 1.0
    3 people out of 4 found this review helpful. Did you?
    Yes No

Latest news from cars.com

See all news

Ford dealers near you

FAQ

What trim levels are available for the 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid?

The 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid is available in 2 trim levels:

  • SE (1 style)
  • SEL (1 style)

What is the MPG of the 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid?

The 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid offers up to 42 MPG in city driving and 37 MPG on the highway. These figures are based on EPA mileage ratings and are for comparison purposes only. The actual mileage will vary depending on vehicle options, trim level, driving conditions, driving habits, vehicle maintenance, and other factors.

What are some similar vehicles and competitors of the 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid?

The 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid compares to and/or competes against the following vehicles:

Is the 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid reliable?

The 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid has an average reliability rating of 4.4 out of 5 according to cars.com consumers. Find real-world reliability insights within consumer reviews from 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid owners.

Is the 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid a good Hatchback?

Below are the cars.com consumers ratings for the 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid. 82.8% of drivers recommend this vehicle.

4.4 / 5
Based on 134 reviews
  • Comfort: 4.5
  • Interior: 4.5
  • Performance: 4.4
  • Value: 4.3
  • Exterior: 4.2
  • Reliability: 4.4

Ford C-Max Hybrid history

Your list was successfully saved.
 
 
 
 
Save list Compare
[{"cat":"hybrid_passenger","stock_type":"used","bodystyle":"Hatchback","page_type":"research/make-model-year","oem_page":false,"search_fuel_types":["Gas/Electric Hybrid"]}]