Skip to main content

2013
Chrysler 200

Starts at:
$19,695
Shop options
New 2013 Chrysler 200
See ratings
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Shop Cars.com
Browse cars & save your favorites
Dealers near you
Find & contact a dealership near you
Listings near 67025
Change location See all listings

Notable features

Sedan or convertible
Convertible gets retuned suspension
Four-cylinder or V-6
Convertible offers powered hardtop or soft-top
Standard automatic transmission

Available trims

See the differences side-by-side to compare trims.
  • 4dr Sdn LX
    Starts at
    $19,695
    19 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas I4
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs

    Highlights

    19 City / 29 Hwy MPG
    4 Seat capacity
    Gas I4 Engine
    Front Wheel Drive Drivetrain

    Engine

    166 @ 4400 SAE Net Torque @ RPM
    173 @ 6000 SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
    2.4L/144 Displacement
    Gas I4 Engine Type

    Suspension

    w/Coil Springs Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
    w/Coil Springs Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
    Multi-Link Suspension Type - Rear
    MacPherson Strut Suspension Type - Front

    Weight & Capacity

    N/A Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
    17 gal Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
    150 lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
    1,000 lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
    100 lbs Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
    1,000 lbs Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
    3,402 lbs Base Curb Weight

    Safety

    Standard Stability Control

    Electrical

    140 Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
    525 Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)

    Brakes

    Not Available Drum - Rear (Yes or )
    10.300 x 0.400 in Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
    11.500 x 1.000 in Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
    Yes Disc - Rear (Yes or )
    Yes Disc - Front (Yes or )
    N/A Brake ABS System (Second Line)
    4-Wheel Brake ABS System
    Pwr Brake Type
  • 4dr Sdn Touring
    Starts at
    $22,565
    19 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas I4
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs

    Highlights

    19 City / 29 Hwy MPG
    4 Seat capacity
    Gas I4 Engine
    Front Wheel Drive Drivetrain

    Engine

    Gas I4 Engine Type
    2.4L/144 Displacement
    166 @ 4400 SAE Net Torque @ RPM
    173 @ 6000 SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM

    Suspension

    w/Coil Springs Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
    MacPherson Strut Suspension Type - Front
    w/Coil Springs Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
    Multi-Link Suspension Type - Rear

    Weight & Capacity

    N/A Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
    1,000 lbs Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
    17 gal Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
    1,000 lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
    150 lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
    3,403 lbs Base Curb Weight
    100 lbs Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.

    Safety

    Standard Stability Control

    Electrical

    140 Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
    525 Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)

    Brakes

    N/A Brake ABS System (Second Line)
    4-Wheel Brake ABS System
    Yes Disc - Rear (Yes or )
    Pwr Brake Type
    Not Available Drum - Rear (Yes or )
    11.500 x 1.000 in Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
    10.300 x 0.400 in Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
    Yes Disc - Front (Yes or )
  • 4dr Sdn Limited
    Starts at
    $25,255
    19 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs

    Highlights

    19 City / 29 Hwy MPG
    4 Seat capacity
    Gas V6 Engine
    Front Wheel Drive Drivetrain

    Engine

    260 @ 4400 SAE Net Torque @ RPM
    283 @ 6400 SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
    3.6L/220 Displacement
    Gas V6 Engine Type

    Suspension

    w/Coil Springs Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
    w/Coil Springs Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
    Multi-Link Suspension Type - Rear
    MacPherson Strut Suspension Type - Front

    Weight & Capacity

    N/A Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
    17 gal Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
    150 lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
    1,000 lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
    100 lbs Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
    1,000 lbs Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
    3,576 lbs Base Curb Weight

    Safety

    Standard Stability Control

    Electrical

    160 Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
    525 Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)

    Brakes

    Not Available Drum - Rear (Yes or )
    10.300 x 0.400 in Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
    11.500 x 1.000 in Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
    Yes Disc - Rear (Yes or )
    Yes Disc - Front (Yes or )
    N/A Brake ABS System (Second Line)
    4-Wheel Brake ABS System
    Pwr Brake Type
  • 2dr Conv Touring
    Starts at
    $27,525
    18 City / 27 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas I4
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs

    Highlights

    18 City / 27 Hwy MPG
    4 Seat capacity
    Gas I4 Engine
    Front Wheel Drive Drivetrain

    Engine

    166 @ 4400 SAE Net Torque @ RPM
    173 @ 6000 SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
    2.4L/144 Displacement
    Gas I4 Engine Type

    Suspension

    w/Coil Springs Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
    w/Coil Springs Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
    Multi-Link Suspension Type - Rear
    MacPherson Strut Suspension Type - Front

    Weight & Capacity

    N/A Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
    17 gal Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
    150 lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
    1,000 lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
    100 lbs Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
    1,000 lbs Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
    3,898 lbs Base Curb Weight

    Safety

    Standard Stability Control

    Electrical

    140 Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
    525 Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)

    Brakes

    Not Available Drum - Rear (Yes or )
    11.500 x 1.000 in Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
    Yes Disc - Rear (Yes or )
    Yes Disc - Front (Yes or )
    N/A Brake ABS System (Second Line)
    4-Wheel Brake ABS System
    Pwr Brake Type
    10.300 x 0.400 in Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
  • 2dr Conv Limited
    Starts at
    $32,520
    19 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs

    Highlights

    19 City / 29 Hwy MPG
    4 Seat capacity
    Gas V6 Engine
    Front Wheel Drive Drivetrain

    Engine

    260 @ 4400 SAE Net Torque @ RPM
    283 @ 6400 SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
    3.6L/220 Displacement
    Gas V6 Engine Type

    Suspension

    w/Coil Springs Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
    w/Coil Springs Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
    Multi-Link Suspension Type - Rear
    MacPherson Strut Suspension Type - Front

    Weight & Capacity

    N/A Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
    17 gal Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
    150 lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
    1,000 lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
    100 lbs Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
    1,000 lbs Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
    4,000 lbs Base Curb Weight

    Safety

    Standard Stability Control

    Entertainment

    Optional Bluetooth®

    Electrical

    160 Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
    525 Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)

    Brakes

    Not Available Drum - Rear (Yes or )
    10.300 x 0.400 in Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
    11.500 x 1.000 in Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
    Yes Disc - Rear (Yes or )
    Yes Disc - Front (Yes or )
    N/A Brake ABS System (Second Line)
    4-Wheel Brake ABS System
    Pwr Brake Type
  • 2dr Conv S
    Starts at
    $33,020
    19 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs

    Highlights

    19 City / 29 Hwy MPG
    4 Seat capacity
    Gas V6 Engine
    Front Wheel Drive Drivetrain

    Engine

    260 @ 4400 SAE Net Torque @ RPM
    283 @ 6400 SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
    3.6L/220 Displacement
    Gas V6 Engine Type

    Suspension

    w/Coil Springs Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
    w/Coil Springs Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
    Multi-Link Suspension Type - Rear
    MacPherson Strut Suspension Type - Front

    Weight & Capacity

    N/A Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
    17 gal Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx
    150 lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
    1,000 lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
    100 lbs Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt.
    1,000 lbs Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt.
    4,000 lbs Base Curb Weight

    Safety

    Standard Stability Control

    Entertainment

    Optional Bluetooth®

    Electrical

    160 Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
    525 Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)

    Brakes

    Not Available Drum - Rear (Yes or )
    10.300 x 0.400 in Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
    11.500 x 1.000 in Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness
    Yes Disc - Rear (Yes or )
    Yes Disc - Front (Yes or )
    N/A Brake ABS System (Second Line)
    4-Wheel Brake ABS System
    Pwr Brake Type

Photo & video gallery

2013 Chrysler 200 2013 Chrysler 200 2013 Chrysler 200 2013 Chrysler 200 2013 Chrysler 200 2013 Chrysler 200 2013 Chrysler 200 2013 Chrysler 200 2013 Chrysler 200 2013 Chrysler 200 2013 Chrysler 200 2013 Chrysler 200 2013 Chrysler 200 2013 Chrysler 200 2013 Chrysler 200 2013 Chrysler 200 2013 Chrysler 200 2013 Chrysler 200 2013 Chrysler 200

The good & the bad

The good

V-6 acceleration
Overall value
Cabin materials and design
Ride comfort

The bad

Brakes
Dated multimedia interface and controls
Small trunk
Undersized backseat
Four-cylinder power

Expert 2013 Chrysler 200 review

our expert's take
Our expert's take
By Jennifer Geiger
Full article
our expert's take

There’s a hole in Chrysler’s lineup that the 200 midsize sedan just doesn’t fill. It offers none of the family-friendly versatility of the accomplished Town & Country minivan and even less of the classy comfort that oozes from the roomy 300 sedan.

In a class brimming with likable cars, the 2013 Chrysler 200’s polished looks and affordable price aren’t enough to overcome its Sebring-esque shortcomings, which place it among the losers.

Competition in this class blows the Chrysler 200 away, offering better room, fuel economy and features; strong players include the Honda Accord, Toyota Camry and Ford Fusion. Compare them here.

For 2013, sedan and convertible body styles — hardtop and soft-top — return; I reviewed the 2013 convertible, which received some suspension upgrades this year, here. The sedan carries over unchanged from 2012.

Style, But No Class
During my week in the 
Chrysler 200, it got a lot of looks and I got a lot of comments; people think it’s attractive. I doubt Accord owners hear that too often. My test car was a Touring model with the S Appearance Package — where S should stand for style. Additional chrome trim and polished aluminum, plus black 18-inch alloy wheels, add some bling; a blacked-out grille and darkened headlight and fog light bezels complete its smoky charm. Out back, LED taillights lend an elegant look that’s cheerfully incongruous with its $24,000 sticker price.

Inside, the cabin has finishes to match. No one will mistake this for a luxury car, but the interior is done well, and Chrysler’s attention to detail is evident. The tasteful analog clock, along with glossy black surfaces and chrome trim, blend well with the textured and padded plastic throughout; lightly patterned seats are visually interesting and also look and feel upscale.

The sore thumb here is the optional touch-screen multimedia system. The buttons are clear and response time is prompt, but the Uconnect unit’s 6.5-inch screen is small and dated compared with the competition, especially other Chrysler models. In the 300 and Dodge Dart, for example, the updated interface and larger 8.4-inch touch-screen are wonderful by comparison.

While the 200 looks and feels great standing still, the fondness fades after you put it in gear.

The Slow Lane
On the road, the 
Chrysler 200’s bump absorption is good, as is noise isolation. Getting to where you want to go, however, will frustrate from start to stop. Driving the 200 is a lot like running under water; your legs are pumping, but you’re not really going anywhere. The base 173-horsepower, 2.4-liter four-cylinder just isn’t enough. Around town, acceleration was adequate with one occupant, but when the car was full (as it was during most of my test), the engine felt taxed from a stop and lethargic on the highway. Keeping up in the fast lane was exhausting, requiring constant pedal prodding – especially with any extra load, like running the air conditioning. The optional engine is a 283-hp, 3.6-liter V-6, which moved the convertible with much more oomph.

The 2.4-liter never lets you forget it’s struggling, with a loud — not in a cool way — and near-constant buzzy whine. One of the main problems is that the engine and transmission need some couples counseling. The four-cylinder may be underpowered, but its complaints are valid: The six-speed is fussy and unpredictable. When it finally decides to downshift, it often clunks into gear. The shifts were so erratic that one editor thought a continuously variable automatic transmission might be to blame. An outmoded four-speed is the standard transmission, which we haven’t tested; I shudder to think about its effects on the already dismal acceleration.

With moves like a tortoise, stellar fuel economy should be a consolation prize, right? Wrong. The four-cylinder/six-speed combo is EPA rated at 20/31/23 mpg city/highway/combined, and it gets worse with the four-speed: 21/29/24 mpg. During 213 mostly highway miles, I averaged 23.0 mpg. Lousy, especially compared with the Honda Accord four-cylinder’s rating of 27/36 mpg city/highway; the Camry and Fusion also trounce it, with 25/35 mpg and 22/34 mpg, respectively.

The most troubling part isn’t the going, but the stopping. Initially, the brakes furnish smooth and strong stopping muscle, but then finish with several jarring pulses. I suppose once you realize the car will actually stop, you’ll get used to this quirk, but it does not inspire confidence.

Room & Comfort
The seats in front and back are comfortable, with ample cushioning and support. Most occupants won’t feel cramped in the front, but those looking for a roomy feel in back should shop elsewhere. By the numbers, front headroom and legroom are ample and competitive with other mid-size sedans, but the backseat is one of the smallest in the group. With just 36.2 inches of rear legroom, the 200 lags the competition by about 2 inches.

 

2013 Chrysler 200 2013 Honda Accord 2013 Toyota Camry 2013 Ford Fusion

Front headroom, inches

40.1 39.1 38.8 39.2

Front legroom, inches

42.4 42.5 41.6 44.3

Rear headroom, inches

38.4 37.5 38.1 37.8

Rear legroom, inches

36.2 38.5 38.9 38.3
Source: Manufacturers

It’s also short on cargo room. Although the trunk was able to swallow almost a week’s worth of luggage for five people (after some Tetris-like choreography), there’s just 13.6 cubic feet of space, much less than the Accord (15.8), Camry (15.4) and Fusion (16.0).

The trunk itself has a low liftover and a large mouth, great for loading bulky packages. The backseat folds easily in a 60/40 split for longer items, but the load floor isn’t very flat. One nice bonus is the trunk pass-through, handy for accessing small items from the backseat or hauling long, slender cargo.

In terms of small item storage in the cabin, the two-tier center console is wide enough to be useful, and there’s a couple of small cubbies throughout the front seat for coins and devices. One small gripe: There’s no seatback pocket behind the front passenger seat, which is where I like to stash my toddler’s books. We both missed this small convenience.

Pricing & Value
Skin-deep style aside, the 
Chrysler 200 sedan’s only other strength — and it’s a big one — is price. Base price for the base model starts at $20,690 (all prices cited include destination charges). That’s for the four-speed automatic, however; add $200 for the must-have six-speed. Four-cylinder, manual-equipped versions of the 2013 Honda Accord start at $22,470 (add $800 for a continuously variable automatic transmission), and the base Fusion is just above it at $22,695. A base Toyota Camry starts a bit higher at $23,045, but a six-speed automatic is standard.

Options are also reasonably priced. For example, navigation is available on higher 200 trim levels for $795; it starts at $1,050 on the Camry. Leather-trimmed upholstery in the 200 is $545 on midline Touring models and standard on higher trims; it’s part of a $1,599 package on most versions of the Camry.

Safety
In crash tests by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the mid-size 2013 Chrysler 200 scored Good in roof strength and front-, side- and rear-impact tests. In the agency’s tough new small overlap front crash test, the 200, along with the Ford Fusion, earned an Acceptable score — better than the 2013 Toyota Camry’s Poor score in this test. The 2013 Honda Accord earned top scores across all areas of testing.

In National Highway Traffic Safety Administration testing, the Chrysler 200 earned an overall score of four out of five stars; the Fusion, Accord and Camry all got five stars.

The Chrysler 200’s safety features list is as outdated as its multimedia system. Standard features include the required anti-lock brakes, airbags plus a driver-knee airbag, but you can’t get a backup camera (inexcusable) or a blind spot monitoring system. The Honda Accord offers a standard backup camera across the lineup, and one is optional on some four-cylinder versions of the Camry and standard on certain V-6 models; a camera is standard on top-of-the-line versions of the Ford Fusion and optional on some others.

Click here for a full list of Chrysler 200 safety features, and see why parents may have trouble installing child-safety seats in the Car Seat Check.

200 in the Market
So, if the 
Chrysler 200 is such a dud, why are there so many on the road? It’s the homecoming king of rental fleet popularity, but in terms of consumer sales, it’s definitely not a member of the in crowd.

Through July 2013, Chrysler sold just 83,137 of the sedans, which is peanuts compared with the Camry (242,406) and Accord (218,367); the Fusion also pulled in a respectable 181,668 sales so far this year.

Cost aside, there’s simply no compelling reason to choose the Chrysler 200 over just about anything else.

email  

 

News Editor
Jennifer Geiger

News Editor Jennifer Geiger joined the automotive industry in 2003, much to the delight of her Corvette-obsessed dad. Jennifer is an expert reviewer, certified car-seat technician and mom of three. She wears a lot of hats — many of them while driving a minivan.

2013 Chrysler 200 review: Our expert's take
By Jennifer Geiger

There’s a hole in Chrysler’s lineup that the 200 midsize sedan just doesn’t fill. It offers none of the family-friendly versatility of the accomplished Town & Country minivan and even less of the classy comfort that oozes from the roomy 300 sedan.

In a class brimming with likable cars, the 2013 Chrysler 200’s polished looks and affordable price aren’t enough to overcome its Sebring-esque shortcomings, which place it among the losers.

Competition in this class blows the Chrysler 200 away, offering better room, fuel economy and features; strong players include the Honda Accord, Toyota Camry and Ford Fusion. Compare them here.

For 2013, sedan and convertible body styles — hardtop and soft-top — return; I reviewed the 2013 convertible, which received some suspension upgrades this year, here. The sedan carries over unchanged from 2012.

Style, But No Class
During my week in the 
Chrysler 200, it got a lot of looks and I got a lot of comments; people think it’s attractive. I doubt Accord owners hear that too often. My test car was a Touring model with the S Appearance Package — where S should stand for style. Additional chrome trim and polished aluminum, plus black 18-inch alloy wheels, add some bling; a blacked-out grille and darkened headlight and fog light bezels complete its smoky charm. Out back, LED taillights lend an elegant look that’s cheerfully incongruous with its $24,000 sticker price.

Inside, the cabin has finishes to match. No one will mistake this for a luxury car, but the interior is done well, and Chrysler’s attention to detail is evident. The tasteful analog clock, along with glossy black surfaces and chrome trim, blend well with the textured and padded plastic throughout; lightly patterned seats are visually interesting and also look and feel upscale.

The sore thumb here is the optional touch-screen multimedia system. The buttons are clear and response time is prompt, but the Uconnect unit’s 6.5-inch screen is small and dated compared with the competition, especially other Chrysler models. In the 300 and Dodge Dart, for example, the updated interface and larger 8.4-inch touch-screen are wonderful by comparison.

While the 200 looks and feels great standing still, the fondness fades after you put it in gear.

The Slow Lane
On the road, the 
Chrysler 200’s bump absorption is good, as is noise isolation. Getting to where you want to go, however, will frustrate from start to stop. Driving the 200 is a lot like running under water; your legs are pumping, but you’re not really going anywhere. The base 173-horsepower, 2.4-liter four-cylinder just isn’t enough. Around town, acceleration was adequate with one occupant, but when the car was full (as it was during most of my test), the engine felt taxed from a stop and lethargic on the highway. Keeping up in the fast lane was exhausting, requiring constant pedal prodding – especially with any extra load, like running the air conditioning. The optional engine is a 283-hp, 3.6-liter V-6, which moved the convertible with much more oomph.

The 2.4-liter never lets you forget it’s struggling, with a loud — not in a cool way — and near-constant buzzy whine. One of the main problems is that the engine and transmission need some couples counseling. The four-cylinder may be underpowered, but its complaints are valid: The six-speed is fussy and unpredictable. When it finally decides to downshift, it often clunks into gear. The shifts were so erratic that one editor thought a continuously variable automatic transmission might be to blame. An outmoded four-speed is the standard transmission, which we haven’t tested; I shudder to think about its effects on the already dismal acceleration.

With moves like a tortoise, stellar fuel economy should be a consolation prize, right? Wrong. The four-cylinder/six-speed combo is EPA rated at 20/31/23 mpg city/highway/combined, and it gets worse with the four-speed: 21/29/24 mpg. During 213 mostly highway miles, I averaged 23.0 mpg. Lousy, especially compared with the Honda Accord four-cylinder’s rating of 27/36 mpg city/highway; the Camry and Fusion also trounce it, with 25/35 mpg and 22/34 mpg, respectively.

The most troubling part isn’t the going, but the stopping. Initially, the brakes furnish smooth and strong stopping muscle, but then finish with several jarring pulses. I suppose once you realize the car will actually stop, you’ll get used to this quirk, but it does not inspire confidence.

Room & Comfort
The seats in front and back are comfortable, with ample cushioning and support. Most occupants won’t feel cramped in the front, but those looking for a roomy feel in back should shop elsewhere. By the numbers, front headroom and legroom are ample and competitive with other mid-size sedans, but the backseat is one of the smallest in the group. With just 36.2 inches of rear legroom, the 200 lags the competition by about 2 inches.

 

2013 Chrysler 200 2013 Honda Accord 2013 Toyota Camry 2013 Ford Fusion

Front headroom, inches

40.1 39.1 38.8 39.2

Front legroom, inches

42.4 42.5 41.6 44.3

Rear headroom, inches

38.4 37.5 38.1 37.8

Rear legroom, inches

36.2 38.5 38.9 38.3
Source: Manufacturers

It’s also short on cargo room. Although the trunk was able to swallow almost a week’s worth of luggage for five people (after some Tetris-like choreography), there’s just 13.6 cubic feet of space, much less than the Accord (15.8), Camry (15.4) and Fusion (16.0).

The trunk itself has a low liftover and a large mouth, great for loading bulky packages. The backseat folds easily in a 60/40 split for longer items, but the load floor isn’t very flat. One nice bonus is the trunk pass-through, handy for accessing small items from the backseat or hauling long, slender cargo.

In terms of small item storage in the cabin, the two-tier center console is wide enough to be useful, and there’s a couple of small cubbies throughout the front seat for coins and devices. One small gripe: There’s no seatback pocket behind the front passenger seat, which is where I like to stash my toddler’s books. We both missed this small convenience.

Pricing & Value
Skin-deep style aside, the 
Chrysler 200 sedan’s only other strength — and it’s a big one — is price. Base price for the base model starts at $20,690 (all prices cited include destination charges). That’s for the four-speed automatic, however; add $200 for the must-have six-speed. Four-cylinder, manual-equipped versions of the 2013 Honda Accord start at $22,470 (add $800 for a continuously variable automatic transmission), and the base Fusion is just above it at $22,695. A base Toyota Camry starts a bit higher at $23,045, but a six-speed automatic is standard.

Options are also reasonably priced. For example, navigation is available on higher 200 trim levels for $795; it starts at $1,050 on the Camry. Leather-trimmed upholstery in the 200 is $545 on midline Touring models and standard on higher trims; it’s part of a $1,599 package on most versions of the Camry.

Safety
In crash tests by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the mid-size 2013 Chrysler 200 scored Good in roof strength and front-, side- and rear-impact tests. In the agency’s tough new small overlap front crash test, the 200, along with the Ford Fusion, earned an Acceptable score — better than the 2013 Toyota Camry’s Poor score in this test. The 2013 Honda Accord earned top scores across all areas of testing.

In National Highway Traffic Safety Administration testing, the Chrysler 200 earned an overall score of four out of five stars; the Fusion, Accord and Camry all got five stars.

The Chrysler 200’s safety features list is as outdated as its multimedia system. Standard features include the required anti-lock brakes, airbags plus a driver-knee airbag, but you can’t get a backup camera (inexcusable) or a blind spot monitoring system. The Honda Accord offers a standard backup camera across the lineup, and one is optional on some four-cylinder versions of the Camry and standard on certain V-6 models; a camera is standard on top-of-the-line versions of the Ford Fusion and optional on some others.

Click here for a full list of Chrysler 200 safety features, and see why parents may have trouble installing child-safety seats in the Car Seat Check.

200 in the Market
So, if the 
Chrysler 200 is such a dud, why are there so many on the road? It’s the homecoming king of rental fleet popularity, but in terms of consumer sales, it’s definitely not a member of the in crowd.

Through July 2013, Chrysler sold just 83,137 of the sedans, which is peanuts compared with the Camry (242,406) and Accord (218,367); the Fusion also pulled in a respectable 181,668 sales so far this year.

Cost aside, there’s simply no compelling reason to choose the Chrysler 200 over just about anything else.

email  

 

Available cars near you

Safety review

Based on the 2013 Chrysler 200 base trim
NHTSA crash test and rollover ratings, scored out of 5.
Overall rating
4/5
Combined side rating front seat
2/5
Combined side rating rear seat
4/5
Frontal barrier crash rating driver
4/5
Frontal barrier crash rating passenger
3/5
Overall frontal barrier crash rating
4/5
Overall side crash rating
3/5
Rollover rating
4/5
Side barrier rating
5/5
Side barrier rating driver
5/5
Side barrier rating passenger rear seat
4/5
Side pole rating driver front seat
1/5
11.1%
Risk of rollover
Side barrier rating driver
5/5
Side barrier rating passenger rear seat
4/5
Side pole rating driver front seat
1/5
11.1%
Risk of rollover

Factory warranties

New car program benefits

Basic
3 years / 36,000 miles
Corrosion
5 years / 100,000 miles
Powertrain
5 years / 100,000 miles
Roadside Assistance
5 years / 100,000 miles

Certified Pre-Owned program benefits

Age / mileage
5 model years or newer / less than 75,000 miles
Basic
3 months / 3,000 miles
Dealer certification
125-point inspection

Compare similiar vehicles

Select cars to compare for more detailed info.
  • 2013
    4.2
    Chrysler 200
    Starts at
    $19,695
    19 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas I4
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2009
    4.1
    Chrysler 300
    Starts at
    $26,665
    18 City / 26 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2008
    4.6
    Ford Taurus
    Starts at
    $23,635
    18 City / 28 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2010
    4.5
    Chrysler Sebring
    Starts at
    $20,120
    20 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2011
    4.3
    Chrysler 200
    Starts at
    $19,245
    19 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas I4
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • Compare more options
    Use our comparison tool to add any vehicle of your choice and see a full list of specifications and features side-by-side.
    Try it now

Consumer reviews

4.2 / 5
Based on 156 reviews
Write a review
Comfort 4.5
Interior 4.3
Performance 4.2
Value 4.2
Exterior 4.3
Reliability 4.2

Most recent

This is my daily drive.

This is my daily drive. Bought new in 2014 and have 93,000 miles. The car itself is gorgeous and looks sporty. For the time, this was luxury. Drives smooth, looks nice, interior has nice features, but in 2024 it is definitely 'dated' to say the least. No back up cameras, no drive assist or passing vehicle warnings, and no touch screen apps like the new vehicles have. But the heated seats work well, the AC is great, and it's fast and smooth. Don't get me wrong. I love my car. I've babied my car. The review of the vehicle is positive and I'd buy it again. But here are my complaints: 1. There is a huge delay between putting your foot down and getting those RPMs up. Response time is slow. This is definitely electronically intended. 2. For some reason, the window wipers fail. Been that way since day 1. Maybe this was a fault model. But it doesn't last long. Likely just a one off. 3. The battery and the serpentine belt are hidden behind the wheel well. It means you either have the tools and time at home, or you bring it into a shop. The design is ridiculous. 4. The spacers between the back windows deteriorate. I am not sure why its made of some different material than the rest of the exterior and window, but it's definitely a design flaw. Sadly, there arent many other vehicles, at least in 2024 that come close to the quality and design of the 2013 Chrysler 200 Limited with the same or similar price tag. Instead you're looking at vehicles 2-4x the price. I've enjoyed it a lot. I've received plenty of compliments over the years. Hopefully it will last me another 10 years. At 93,000 miles and now 12 years old, I've only had to replace the front rotors, the struts, and stabilizer bar.
  • Purchased a New car
  • Used for Commuting
  • Does recommend this car
Comfort 5.0
Interior 4.0
Performance 4.0
Value 4.0
Exterior 3.0
Reliability 4.0
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Bought my 200 last year in January from a dealership .

Bought my 200 last year in January from a dealership . It has been nothing but a money pit since have been thru 5 sets of hub assemblies since getting it 3 of the sets within the last 6 months . 2 sets of tires and 3 sets of brakes. Only accident that I'm aware of with this car is the one I was in . But I'm starting to assume it's been in another one before I bought it because there's no reason I should be having these issues. Chryslers are pieces of junk and I'll never own another one after this one is paid off . Oh and the transmission has started going out at only 130k miles on it 🥲
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Used for Commuting
  • Does not recommend this car
Comfort 5.0
Interior 3.0
Performance 2.0
Value 1.0
Exterior 1.0
Reliability 1.0
1 person out of 1 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Latest news from cars.com

See all news

Chrysler dealers near you

FAQ

What trim levels are available for the 2013 Chrysler 200?

The 2013 Chrysler 200 is available in 4 trim levels:

  • LX (1 style)
  • Limited (2 styles)
  • S (1 style)
  • Touring (2 styles)

What is the MPG of the 2013 Chrysler 200?

The 2013 Chrysler 200 offers up to 19 MPG in city driving and 29 MPG on the highway. These figures are based on EPA mileage ratings and are for comparison purposes only. The actual mileage will vary depending on vehicle options, trim level, driving conditions, driving habits, vehicle maintenance, and other factors.

What are some similar vehicles and competitors of the 2013 Chrysler 200?

The 2013 Chrysler 200 compares to and/or competes against the following vehicles:

Is the 2013 Chrysler 200 reliable?

The 2013 Chrysler 200 has an average reliability rating of 4.2 out of 5 according to cars.com consumers. Find real-world reliability insights within consumer reviews from 2013 Chrysler 200 owners.

Is the 2013 Chrysler 200 a good Sedan?

Below are the cars.com consumers ratings for the 2013 Chrysler 200. 80.8% of drivers recommend this vehicle.

4.2 / 5
Based on 156 reviews
  • Comfort: 4.5
  • Interior: 4.3
  • Performance: 4.2
  • Value: 4.2
  • Exterior: 4.3
  • Reliability: 4.2

Chrysler 200 history

Your list was successfully saved.
Your comparisons
 
 
 
 
Save list Compare